Controlling aeroplane crashing through aviation infrastructure using multi-agent technology

References

• Low JMW, Yang KK. An exploratory study on the effects of human, technical and operating factors on aviation safety. J Transp Saf Secur. 2019;11(6):595–628. doi: 10.1080/19439962.2018.1458051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safety Report 2022 Edition. 2022. Online]. Available from: www.icao.int
   Google Scholar
• Accident involving M/S Air India Express B737-800 aircraft Vt on 07 August aircraft accident investigation bureau ministry of civil aviation Government of India, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ud-Din S, Yoon Y. Analysis of loss of control parameters for aircraft maneuvering in general aviation. J Adv Transp. 2018;2018:1–19. doi: 10.1155/2018/7865362.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Efthymiou M. An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017. J Safety Res. 2019;69:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazargan M, Guzhva VS. Impact of gender, age and experience of pilots on general aviation accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(3):962–970. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2021 Safety report flight safety foundation. [Online]Available from: https://aviation-safety.net/database/
   Google Scholar
• Wilke S, Majumdar A, Ochieng WY. Airport surface operations: a holistic framework for operations modeling and risk management. Saf Sci. 2014;63:18–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorri A, Kanhere SS, Jurdak R. Multi-Agent systems: a survey. IEEE Access. 2018;6:28573–28593. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2831228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Sharma SK. Analyzing the role of multiagent technology in preventing airplane crash using AHP and DEMATEL approach. Int J Crashworthiness. 2022;27(6):1753–1769. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2021.2008739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman SK, Debacker M. Survivability of occupants in commercial passenger aircraft accidents. Saf Sci. 2018;104:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdobyslaw Goraj. (2004). AN OVERVIEW OF THE DEICING AND ANTIICING TECHNOLOGIES WITH PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE. Warsaw University of Technology, 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeeka C, Kapila RM, Rathnayaka T, et al. Multi-agent based intelligent weather forecasting system novel forecasting mechanism on time series view project remote sensing and GIS view project. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335632052
   Google Scholar
• M. R. Ioan and S. P. Liliana, “Using Mobile Agents and Intelligent Data Analysis Techniques for Climate Environment Modeling and Weather Analysis and Prediction,” 2008 10th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, Timisoara, Romania, 2008, pp. 316–319, doi: 10.1109/SYNASC.2008.51.
   Google Scholar
• Sandy Dance and Rodney Potts. (2002). Microburst Detection Using Agent Networks. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 19, 646–653.
   Google Scholar
• Koglbauer I. Simulator training improves the estimation of collision parameters and the performance of student pilots. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;209:261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.231.
   Google Scholar
• Tegos S, Demetriadis S, Tsiatsos T. A configurable conversational agent to trigger students’ productive dialogue: a pilot study in the CALL domain. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2014;24(1):62–91. doi: 10.1007/s40593-013-0007-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodetsky V, Karsaev O, Samoylov V, et al. Multi-agent technology for air traffic control and incident management in airport airspace Performance Simulation Initiative (PSI) view project personal assistance recommendation system view project multi-agent technology for air traffic control and incident management in airport airspace. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228922255
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Furuta K, Kanno T, et al. Multi -Agent simulation of ground aircraft operations at a large airport. SIMUTools 2010 - 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques; ICST; 2010, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.4108/ICST.SIMUTOOLS2010.8724.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F. Aircraft taxiing route planning based on multi-agent system. Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, IMCEC 2016; Piscataway (NJ): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2017. p. 1421–1425. doi: 10.1109/IMCEC.2016.7867448.
   Google Scholar
• Stroeve SH, Blom HAP, Bakker GJ. Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modelling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2013;109:133–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller A, Crespo Marquez A, Iung B. On the concept of e-maintenance: review and current research. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2008;93(8):1165–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Vishwakarma S, Jha N. Prognosis agent technology: influence on manufacturing organizations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;92(1–4):435–446. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0025-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiping H, Weiguo X, Huiming D, et al. An agent based fault diagnosis support system and its application. Piscataway (NJ): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2007. p. 388–392. doi: 10.1109/soli.2006.329003.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhang C, Gao L, et al. An agent-based approach for integrated process planning and scheduling. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37(2):1256–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Portillo I, Atkins EM. Adaptive trajectory planning for flight management systems. 2001. Available from: www.aaai.org
   Google Scholar
• Hovell K, Ulrich S, Bronz M. Learned multiagent real-time guidance with applications to quadrotor runway inspection. Field Robot. 2022;2(1):1105–1133. doi: 10.55417/fr.2022036.
   Google Scholar
• Ibri S, Nourelfath M, Drias H. A multi-agent approach for integrated emergency vehicle dispatching and covering problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2012;25(3):554–565 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2011.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Pan W, Liu K. Multi-Agent aviation search task allocation method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing; 2019. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/646/1/012058.
   Google Scholar
• Hawe GI, Coates G, Wilson DT, et al. Agent-based simulation of emergency response to plan the allocation of resources for a hypothetical two-site major incident. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2015;46:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, Richard E., and Lotfi Asker Zadeh. “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment.” Management science 17.4 (1970): B-141.
   Google Scholar
• Nădăban S, Dzitac S, Dzitac I. Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016;91:823–831. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty RW. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math Modell. 1987;9(3–5):161–176. doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil AN. Fuzzy AHP methodology and its sole applications. 2018. Available from: www.ijmrr.com
   Google Scholar
• Buckley JJ, Feuring T, Hayashi Y. Theory and methodology fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsw
   Google Scholar
• Syazwan M, Soberi F, Ahmad R. Application of fuzzy AHP for setup reduction in manufacturing industry Template for Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) view project integrating Single Minute Exchange of Dies (SMED) with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) view project. 2016. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318110021
   Google Scholar
• Sathyan R, Parthiban P, Dhanalakshmi R, et al. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for modelling and prioritising the enablers of responsiveness in automotive supply chain using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Comput. 2023;27(1):257–277. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07591-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang B, Chang CW, Wu CH. Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(3):1850–1858. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu A, Kaplanoğlu V, Durmuşoğlu ZDU, et al. Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40(3):899–907. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 51. A duzzy TOPSIS based model for safety risk.
   Google Scholar
• Singh V, Kumar V, Singh VB. A hybrid novel fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS technique for selecting parameter-influencing testing in software development. Decision Anal J. 2023;6:100159. doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100159.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldızbaşı A, Ünlü V. Performance evaluation of SMEs towards industry 4.0 using fuzzy group decision making methods. SN Appl Sci. 2, 355 pp (1–13) (2020). doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-2085-9.
   Google Scholar
• Singh A, Misra SC, Kumar V, et al. Identification and ordering of safety performance indicators using fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study in indian construction company. IJQRM. 2022;39(1):77–114. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2020-0051.
   Google Scholar
• Odeyinka OF, Okandeji AA, Sogbesan AA. A fuzzy TOPSIS model for selecting raw material suppliers in a manufacturing company. Nig J Tech. 2022;41(4):797–804. doi: 10.4314/njt.v41i4.17.
   Google Scholar