Current issues in doctoral supervision practice in the UK

References

• Adrian-Taylor, S. S., K. A. Noels, and K. Tischler. 2007. “Conflict Between International Graduate Students and Faculty Supervisors: Towards Effective Conflict Prevention and Management Strategies.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11 (1): 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306286313.
   Google Scholar
• Afzal, M. 2021. “Recommended Practices for Doctoral Students in Navigating and Engaging in Online Courses During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Personal Narrative from a Doctoral Candidate.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 49 (5): 679–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, A. 2007. “Supervisory Power and Postgraduate Supervision.” The International Journal of Management Education 6 (2): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.3794/ijme.62.179.
   Google Scholar
• Aspland, T., H. Edwards, J. O’Leary, and Y. Ryan. 1999. “Tracking New Directions in the Evaluation of Postgraduate Supervision.” Innovative Higher Education 24 (2): 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000008150.75564.b3.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, R. A., and G. V. Schultz. 2019. “Most Important is That They Figure Out How to Solve the problem’: How Do Advisors Conceptualize and Develop Research Autonomy in Chemistry Doctoral Students?.” Higher Education 79 (6): 981–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00451-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgeson, E., M. Sotak, J. Kraft, G. Bagunu, C. Biorserud, and S. Lange. 2021. “Challenges in PhD Education Due to COVID-19 - Disrupted Supervision or Business as Usual: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Swedish Biomedical Sciences Graduate Students.” BMC Medical Education 21 (294): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02727-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1977. The Process of Education. 2nd ed. Cambridge MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, H. T. M. 2014. “Student–Supervisor Expectations in the Doctoral Supervision Process for Business and Management Students.” Business and Management Education in HE 1 (1): 12–27. https://doi.org/10.11120/bmhe.2014.00006.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff University. 2019. Research Integrity and Governance Code of Practice. Cardiff University. https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/937021/Research-Integrity-and-Governance-Code-of-Practice-v3-PDF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C., C. M. Palmer, S. Edgar, and E. Hansen. 2016. “Learning to Teach Graduate Students: A Self-Study by Students and a Faculty Member.” Update: Applications of Research in Music Education 34 (2): 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314553130.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., R. Dean, and P. Wladkowski. 2011. “The Power Dynamics of Supervision: Ethical Dilemmas.” Smith College Studies in Social Work 81 (1): 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2011.543041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd edn ed. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. 2012. “A Reflexive Lens: Exploring Dilemmas of Qualitative Methodology Through the Concept of Reflexivity.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8 (1): 60–85. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.04.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., P. Atkinson, and O. Parry. 1997. Supervising the Ph.D: A Guide to Success. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. 2008. “Facilitator, Director or Critical Friend?: Contradiction and Congruence in Doctoral Supervision Styles.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (4): 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802193905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloriet, C., S. Sambrook, and J. Stewart. 2012. “Power and Emotion in Doctoral Supervision: Implications for HRD.” European Journal of Training & Development 36 (7): 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255566.
   Google Scholar
• ESRC. 2021. Review of the PhD in the Social Sciences. Leicester: CFE Research, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2018. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. 2009. Survey Research Methods. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. 2009. “Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines.” The Review of Higher Education 32 (3): 383–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. 2010. “Contrasting the Socialization Experiences of Doctoral Students in High-And Low-Completing Departments: A Qualitative Analysis of Disciplinary Contexts at One Institution.” The Journal of Higher Education 81 (1): 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. 2005. “An Investigation Onto PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a Dynamic Conceptual Model and Its Managerial Implications.” Journal of Higher Education and Policy Management 27 (3): 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283585.
   Google Scholar
• Gittell, J. 2016. Transforming Relationships for High Performance. The Power of Relational Coordination. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C.M., and Walker, G.E. 2006. Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing the Stewards of the Discipline - Carnegie essays on the doctorate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, L., D. Jindal-Snape, J. Morrison, J. Muldoon, G. Needham, S. Siebert, and C. Rees. 2017. “Multiple and Multidimensional Transitions from Trainee to Trained Doctor: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study in the UK.” British Medical Journal 7 (11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., and I. Green. 2013. “‘They’re the Bosses’: Feedback in Team Supervision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 39 (3): 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, G. 2001. “Negotiating the “Rackety Bridge” — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924360120043882.
   Google Scholar
• Haksever, A. M., and E. Manisali. 2000. “Assessing Supervision Requirements of PhD Students: The Case of Construction Management and Engineering in the UK.” European Journal of Engineering Education 25 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/030437900308616.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. and K. Wall 2019. Research Methods for Understanding Professional Learning. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C. 2011. “Becoming a Supervisor: The Impact of Doctoral Supervision on supervisors’ Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (5): 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and P. Bansel. 2012. “The Learning Alliance: Ethics in Doctoral Supervision.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (4): 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.706219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and J. Malfroy. 2010. “Retheorizing Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1997. “A Complex Craft: United Kingdom PhD Supervision in the Social Sciences.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 2 (1): 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596749700200004.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., X. Zhao, and K. van Veen. 2020. “Unravelling the Implicit Challenges in Fostering Independence: Supervision of Chinese Doctoral Students at Dutch Universities.” Instructional Science 48 (2): 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iphofen, R. 2001. “Subject to Contract.” The Times Higher, November 9, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jindal-Snape, D. 2023. Multiple and Multi-Dimensional Educational and Life Transitions: Conceptualization, Theorization and XII Pillars of Transition. In International Encyclopaedia of Education, edited by R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, and K. Erkican. 4th edn 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14060-6.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, B. T., R. M. Olsen, N. C. Øverby, R. Garred, and E. Enoksen. 2019. “Team Supervision of Doctoral Students: A Qualitative Inquiry.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 14:69–84. https://doi.org/10.28945/4177.
   Google Scholar
• Kiger, M., and L. Varpio. 2020. “Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data. AMEE Guide No. 131.” Medical Teacher 42 (8): 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., R. Pollard, M. Johnson, and N. Ağaçlı-Doğan. 2021. “Online Research Group Supervision: Structure, Support and Community.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 58 (6): 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1991430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2007. “Developing Effective Supervisors: Concepts of Research Supervision.” South African Journal of Higher Education 21 (4): 680–693. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v21i4.25690.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. 2016. “Developing Skills and Disposition for Lifelong Learning: Acculturative Issues Surrounding Supervising International Doctoral Students in New Zealand Universities.” Journal of International Students 6 (3): 740–761. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v6i3.354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and C. Amudsen. 2012. “Challenging the Taken-For-Granted: How Research Analysis Might Inform Pedagogical Practices and Institutional Policies Relating to Doctoral Education.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (6): 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.537747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. 2020. “Remote Supervision in Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The “New normal”?” Education for Primary Care 31 (6): 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2020.1802353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, N., J. Bain, and L. Conrad. 2007. “Orientations to Research Higher Degree Supervision.” Higher Education 53:209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R. 2002. How to Write a Thesis. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L., J. Norris, D. White, and N. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Method 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-López, P., and J. Sunderland. 2017. “Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41 (6): 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer, R., C. Jones, A. Thomas, and P. Watkins. 2021. All Change! Best Practice for Educational Transitions. St. Albans: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parker-Jenkins, M. 2018. “Mind the Gap: Developing the Roles, Expectations and Boundaries in the Doctoral Supervisor–Supervisee Relationship.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1153622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and A. Brew. 2002. “Research Training and Supervision Development.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (2): 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220119986c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, M. 2020. “Postgraduate Research Experience Survey 2020.” Advance HE. www.advance-he.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. 2014. Higher Education Review. QAA. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. and T. Fletcher 2020. “Learning to Work Together: Conceptualizing Doctoral Supervision as a Critical Friendship.” Sport, Education & Society 25 (1): 98–110. doi:10.1080/13573322.2018.1554561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. J. 2016. “Team Modes and Power: Supervision of Doctoral Students.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (2): 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. 2005. “Postgraduate supervision.” In Teaching International Students: Improving Learning for All, edited by J. Carroll and J. Ryan, 101–106. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sadlak, J. 2004. Studies on Higher Education: Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.
   Google Scholar
• Sanjari, M., F. Bahramnezhad, F. Khoshnava, M. Shoghi, and M. Cheraghi. 2014. “Ethical Challenges of Researchers in Qualitative Studies: The Necessity to Develop a Specific Guideline.” Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 7 (14).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott, C. E., and D. M. Miller. 2017. “Stories of Transformative Mentorship: Graduate Student Glue.” International Journal of Mentoring & Coaching in Education 6 (2): 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-09-2016-0065.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2019. Interpreting Qualitative Data. 6th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, C. R. 2012. “Are You My Mentor? Identifying Mentors and Their Roles in LIS Doctoral Education.” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 53 (1): 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2023. The Good Supervisory Practice Framework. UK Council for Graduate Education. https://supervision.ukcge.ac.uk/good-supervisory-practice-framework/.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. R., S. Kirkman, R. Watson, and S. Stewart. 2005. “Improving Research Supervision in Nursing.” Nurse Education Today 25 (4): 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Council for Graduate Education. 2021a. “Towards Describing the Global Doctoral Landscape.” Accessed February 10, 2022. https://ukcge.ac.uk/assets/resources/Towards-Describing-the-Global-Doctoral-Landscape-Taylor-UK-Council-for-Graduate-Education.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UK Council for Graduate Education. 2021b. “UK Research Supervision Survey 2021 Report.” Accessed October 8, 2021. https://ukcge.ac.uk/resources/resource-library/uk-research-supervision-survey-2021-report.
   Google Scholar
• UK Council for Graduate Education. 2022. “Supporting Excellent Supervisory Practice Across UKRI Doctoral Training Investments.” UK Council for Graduate Education. Accessed March 10, 2023. https://ukcge.ac.uk/assets/resources/UKRI-Research-Supervision-Report-UKCGE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. H. 2009. “From Professional to PhD Student: Challenges of Status Transition.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (6): 687–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903315357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, C., N. Meier, and K. Ingerslev. 2016. “Borrowing Brainpower – Sharing Insecurities. Lessons Learned from a Doctoral Peer Writing Group.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (6): 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J., and J. Ilieva. 2022. “Global demand for UK postgraduate research degrees.” Universities UK International https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/field/downloads/2022-06/Global%20demand%20for%20UK%20postgraduate%20research%20degrees_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. 2012. The Good Supervisor. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., M. McGinn, S. Bengtsen, I. Lokhtina, F. He, S. Cornér, S. Leshem, K. Inouye, and E. Löfström. 2021. “Remote doctoral supervision experiences: Challenges and affordances.” Innovations in Educational and Teaching International 58 (6): 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1991427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar