Outlanders: Loneliness experience of gifted girls

References

• Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 500–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, S. K., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Social self-concept, social attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth, and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayar, S. (2018). Zorbaliga maruz kalan ozel yetenekli ogrencilerin zorbalik algilari [Bullying perceptions of gifted students who are exposed to bullying] (Publication No. 525491) [Master’s thesis, Anadolu University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookby, S. A. (2004). Academic self-efficacy and social self-concept of mathematically gifted high school students in a summer residential program (Publication No. 3133644) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. MedSurg Nursing, 25(6), 435–437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating (4th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Cassady, J. C., Dixon, F. A., & Adams, C. M. (2008). The psychology of gifted adolescents as measured by the MMPI-A. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 326–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Stewart, R. A., & Coleman, L. J. (2003). Phenomenology and its implications for gifted studies research: Investigating the lebenswelt of academically gifted students attending an elementary magnet school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. R., Vaughn, C. T., Mammadov, S., Cross, T. L., Kim, M., O’Reilly, C., … Hymer, B. (2019). A cross-cultural study of the social experience of giftedness. Roeper Review, 41(4), 224–242.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, L. G., & Rinn, A. N. (2007). The role of gender and previous participation in a summer program on gifted adolescents’ self-concepts over time. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(3), 326–352.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S., & Piechowski, M. M. (2009). Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duy, B., & Yildiz, M. A. (2014). Farkli zorbalik statusune sahip erinlerde okula baglanma ve yalnizlik [School attachment and loneliness in early adolescents with different bully status]. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 39(174), 173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enersen, D. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Dai, D. Y. (1997). Gifted students’ attitudes and perceptions of the gifted label, special programs, and peer relations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, J. P. (1982). A general systems approach to loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 166–182). New York: Wiley-Inter Science.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (2001). Gifted children grow up. London: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• French, L. R., Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33(3), 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, S., & Sosland, B. E. (2009). Banishing bullying behavior transforming the culture of pain, rage, and revenge. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. (1985). The eight great gripes of gifted kids: Responding to special needs. Roeper Review, 8(1), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godor, B. P., & Szymanski, A. (2017). Sense of belonging or feeling marginalized? Using PISA 2012 to assess the state of academically gifted students within the EU. High Ability Studies, 28(2), 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, K. H. (2020). The weight of expectations: A thematic narrative of gifted adolescent girls’ reflections of being gifted. Roeper Review, 42(1), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A. (2005). Education and counseling of the gifted and talented in Germany. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 27(2), 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt, L. (2010). A case study of the suicide of a gifted female adolescent: Implications for prediction and prevention. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 514–535.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Hughes, C. E. (2015). The educational experience for student with gifts and talents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(4), 187–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jumper, R. L. (2009). Gifted children’s communication about bullying: Understanding the experience (Publication No. 3400752) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1962). Psychological types. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. F., & Berndt, D. J. (1985). Predictors of loneliness in the gifted adolescent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(2), 74–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C. Y. (2015). Mathematically gifted adolescent females’ mixed sentiment toward gender stereotypes. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, A. (2005). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the children’s loneliness scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 5(19), 220–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. (1997). Smart girls: A new psychology of girls, women, and giftedness. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerry, T. (1992). Judging and handling ability in classrooms: Do circumstances alter cases? In L. Jones (Ed.), Curriculum for able children (pp. 7–26). London: Middlesex University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel, M. A., Chapa, B., Patterson, G., & Walling, D. D. (1992). Experience of giftedness ‘eight great gripes’ six years later. Roeper Review, 15(1), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, B., & Pursell, G. (2009). Conflict in peer relationships. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 267–286). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. T. (2012). Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. K., & Low, A. (2009). Supporting emotional needs of gifted. In B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness creativity and talent (pp. 857–859). CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Litster, K., & Roberts, J. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 111–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manaster, G. J., & Powell, P. M. (1983). A framework for understanding gifted adolescents’ psychological maladjustment. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 6(2), 70–73.
   Google Scholar
• Masden, C. A., Leung, O. N., Shore, B. M., Schneider, B. H., & Udvari, S. J. (2015). Social-perspective coordination and gifted adolescents’ friendship quality. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 3–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhirter, E. H., Larson, L. M., & Daniels, J. A. (1996). Predictors of educational aspirations among adolescent gifted students of color. Journal of Career Development, 23(2), 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (Ed.). (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook (3th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2015). Challenging gender stereotypes: Resistance and exclusion. Child Development, 86(3), 681–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opengin, E., & Sak, U. (2012). Effects of gifted label on gifted students’ perceptions. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 2(1), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3th ed.). CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peairs, K. F. (2011). The social world of gifted adolescents: Sociometric status, friendship and social network centrality (Publication No. 3469001) [Doctoral dissertation, Duke University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1–18). New York: Wiley-Inter Science.
   Google Scholar
• Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31–56). Washington: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2012). The asset-burden paradox of giftedness: A 15-year phenomenological, longitudinal case study. Roeper Review, 34(4), 244–260.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S. (2015). School counselors and gifted kids: Respecting both cognitive and affective. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Duncan, N., & Canady, K. (2009). A longitudinal study of negative life events, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006). Bullying among the gifted: The subjective experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 252–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I., & Stocking, V. B. (2000). Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools, 16(1–2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Piechowski, M. M. (1999). Overexcitabilities. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 325–334). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., Goetz, T., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Female ‘big fish’ swimming against the tide: The ‘big-fish-little-pond effect’ and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M. (2001). External barriers experienced by gifted and talented girls and women. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 26–65.
   Google Scholar
• Rokach, A. (1990). Surviving and coping with loneliness. The Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 39–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokach, A. (2011). From loneliness to belonging: A review. Psychology Journal, 8(2), 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, W. A., & Johnson, T. B. (1980). From loneliness to anomia. In J. Hartog, R. J. Audy, & Y. A. Cohen (Eds.), The anatomy of loneliness (pp. 34–64). New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2004). A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(2), 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2010). Ustun zekalilar ozellikleri tanilanmalari egitimleri [The gifted: Characteristics, identification, and education] (2. baski). Ankara: Vize Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2011). Ustün Yetenekliler Egitim Programlari Modeli (ÜYEP) ve sosyal gecerliği [An overview and social validity of the education programs for talented students model (EPTS)]. Egitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2016). EPTS curriculum model in the education of gifted students. Anales de Psicología, 32(3), 683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sak, U., & Ayas, B. (2020). EPTS curriculum model: Optimum curriculum differentiator for the education of gifted students. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 154–169.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striley, K. M. (2016). Ostracism’s potential to awaken us to possibility and mystery. In E. Gilchrist-Petty & S. Long (Eds.), Contexts of the dark side of communication (pp. 3–27). Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E., & Magilvy, J. K. (2011). Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 16(2), 151–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyanik, S. (2007). Ustun yetenekli cocuklarda mukemmeliyetcilik, yalnizlik ve kendine saygi düzeyinin sinav kaygisi üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of perfectionism, loneliness, and self-esteem level over the test anxiety on gifted children] (Publication No. 274365)) [Master’s thesis, Uludag University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
   Google Scholar
• Vanderbrook, C. M. (2006). Intellectually gifted females and their perspectives of lived experience in the AP and IB programs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(3), 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Vialle, W., Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong youth study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 569–586.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R. (1995). Working with emotions in the change process: Using drawings for team diagnosis and development. Organizations & People, 2(1), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., & Bukowski, W. M. (2009). The role of friendship in child and adolescent psychosocial development. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 568–585). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, L. A., & Girard, F. M. (2004). Establishing integrity and avoiding methodological misunderstanding. Qualitative Health Research, 14(6), 875–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J. T., Gore, J. L., & Amend, E. R. (2007). A parent’s guide to gifted children. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1996). Drawing ourselves into teaching: Studying the images that shape and distort teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., & Gerber, J. (2005). Ostracism: The making of the ignored and exclude mind. Interaction Studies, 6(3), 359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. N., & Morrow, S. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 576–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. C., & Kalyan-Masih, V. (1990). Loneliness, coping strategies and cognitive styles of the gifted rural adolescent. Adolescence, 25(100), 977–988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo, J. E., & Moon, S. M. (2006). Counseling needs of gifted students: An analysis of intake forms at a university-based counseling center. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. E. (1982). Loneliness, depression and cognitive therapy: Theory and application. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 379–406). New York: Wiley-Inter Science.
   Google Scholar