The Saudi gifted educational and learning environment: Parents and student perspectives

References

• Aichouni, M., Alghamdi, A. S., Touahmia, M., & Aït-Messaoudène, N. (2015, 12–14 October). Does our educational system enhance creativity and innovation among gifted students? [Paper presentation] ADVED15 International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Aichouni, M., Touahmia, M., Al-Ghamdi, A., Ait-Messaoudene, N., Al-Hamali, R. M., Al-Ghonamy, A., & Al-Badawi, E. (2015). Creativity and innovation among gifted Saudi students - an empirical study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1371–1379.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Dhaimat, Y., Alzahrani, -A.-A., & Shahin, A. (2019). The effectiveness of future problem-solving program (FPSP) in developing creative thinking skills among gifted students: experimental study. International Journal of Learning and Development, 9(9), 154–171.
   Google Scholar
• Al–Zoubi, S. M., & Rahman, M. S. B. A. (2015). Talented Students' Satisfaction with the Performance of the Gifted Centers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Alamer, S. M. (2010). Views of giftedness: The Perceptions of teachers and parents regarding the traits of gifted children in Saudi Arabia (PhD Thesis). Australia: Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Alamer, S. M. (2014). Challenges facing gifted students in Saudi Arabia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(24), 107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Alamer, S. M. (2015). Cultural perspectives of associating music with the giftedness in Saudi Arabia. Canadian Social Science, 11(2), 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Alamer, S. M., & Phillipson, S. N. (2020). Current status and future prospects of Saudi gifted education: A macro-systemic perspective. High Ability Studies, 1–24. doi:10.1080/13598139.2020.1840966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamiri, F. Y. (2020). Gifted education in Saudi Arabian educational context: A systematic review. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 9(4), 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Hassan, N. A. S. (2016). The effectiveness of the Mawhiba program for the development of critical thinking skills among gifted female students at the secondary levels. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 14(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Aljughaiman, A. M., Ayoub, A. E. A. , & . (2017). Giftedness in Arabic environments: concepts, implicit theories, and the contributed factors in the enrichment programs. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1364900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljughaiman, A. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). Growing up under pressure: The cultural and religious context of the Saudi system of gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(3), 307–322.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, A. A. A., & Ibrahim, U. M. A. (2013). Teachers’ assumptions underlying identification of gifted and talented students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 1(1), 55–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, A. (2011). Creativity and innovation in Saudi Arabia: An overview. Innovation, 13(3), 376–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, F., & Delen, E. (2014). A computer-based peer nomination form to identify gifted and talented students. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 23(2), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kubinger, K. D. (2005). Psychological test calibration using the Rasch model—Some critical suggestions on traditional approaches. International Journal of Testing, 5(4), 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, K., Phillipson, S. N., & Costello, S. (2020). Educational resources and gender norms: An examination of the actiotope model of giftedness and social gender norms on achievement. High Ability Studies. doi:10.1080/13598139.2020.1768056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardize mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. In R. M. Smith & E. V. J. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications (pp.258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W. & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of Effect Sizes. Retrieved from: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Dettelbach (Germany): Psychometrica. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3478.4245
   Google Scholar
• Paz-Baruch, N. (2019). Educational and learning capital as predictors of general intelligence and scholastic achievements. High Ability Studies. doi:10.1080/13598139.2019.1586656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S. N. (2008). The optimal achievement model and underachievement in Hong Kong: An application of the Rasch model. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(2), 147–172.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S. N., Phillipson, S., & Francis, M. A. (2017). Validation of the family educational and learning capitals questionnaire in Australia. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 350–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S., Phillipson, S. N., & Kewalramani, S. (2018). Cultural variability in the educational and learning capitals of Australian families and its relationship with children’s numeracy outcomes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(4), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S. N., Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2013). Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the actiotope model of giftedness. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S. N., & Ziegler, A. (2020). Towards exceptionality: The current status and future prospects of Australian gifted education. In S. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1–40). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Reprint ed.). Chicago, Ill: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, C. S. Y., Phillipson, S. N., & Phillipson, S. (2022). Culture, executive thinking style, and knowledge fixation in the development of creativity in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2057688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vladut, A., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2016). Two studies of the empirical basis of two learning resource-oriented motivational strategies for gifted educators. High Ability Studies, 27, 39-60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. (2005). The Actiotope model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 411–436). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Baker, J. (2013). Talent development as adaptation: The role of educational and learning capital. In S. N. Phillipson, H. Stoeger, & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the actiotope model of giftedness (pp. 18–39). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., Balestrini, D. P., & Stoeger, H. (2018). An international view of gifted education: Incorporating the macro-systemic perspective. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2 ed., pp. 15–28). Cham, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 23(1), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2017). Systemic gifted education: A theoretical introduction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(183–193). doi:10.1177/0016986217705713
   PubMedGoogle Scholar