A comparative study of teachers’ beliefs about gifted students’ leadership talent

References

• Adams-Green, S. D. (2016). Teacher perceptions of leadership potential of gifted and talented students (Publication No. 10158882) [Doctoral dissertation, Morgan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021, December 16). National, state and territory population. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release
   Google Scholar
• Baik, K., Seo, J., Koo, J., & Kim, J. (2010). In search of Korean leadership styles. Korean Journal of Management, 18(4), 33–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. H. (2002). Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede’s ecological analysis—A 20-year odyssey: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., Akerblom, S., Audia, G., Bakacsi, G., Bendova, H., & Wunderer, R. (2000). Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, L. L., & Wang, C. X. (2019). Collectivism and individualism: The differentiation of leadership. TechTrends, 63(3), 353–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casimir, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). A cross cultural comparison of the importance of leadership traits for effective low-level and high-level leaders: Australia and China. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7(1), 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Channing, J. (2020). How can leadership be taught? Implications for leadership educators. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 15(1), 134–148.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, M. G., & Klein, K. J. (2001). Predicting followers’ preferences for charismatic leadership: The influence of follower values and personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 153–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einola, K., & Alvesson, M. (2021). When ‘good’ leadership backfires: Dynamics of the leader/follower relation. Organization Studies, 42(6), 845–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., & Barreto, M. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2022). Riding on the waves of transformation in the Asia-Pacific: Chinese migration to Australia since the late 1980s. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(4), 933–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. J., & Cai, D. A. (2004). Cultural structuring of the social context in negotiation. In M. J. Gelfand & J. M. Brett (Eds.), The handbook of negotiation and culture (pp. 238–257). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, A. H., & Pogrebna, G. (2015). Expert leaders in a fast-moving environment. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan, I. (2019, December). Develop educational leadership by applying values and ethics to strengthen student character. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2019), Kota Batu, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 23–29. doi:10.2991/icet-19.2019.6
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, A. S., McCauley, K. D., Randolph-Seng, B., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 595–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context . Online readings in psychology and culture, Unit 2. Retrieved 1 September 2021. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Iordanoglou, D. (2018). Future trends in leadership development practices and the crucial leadership skills. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 15(2), 118–129.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. S., & Turner, B. A. (2008). The feasibility of single-item measures for organizational justice. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 12(4), 237–257.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y. (2014). Predictors of attitudes to gifted programs/provisions: Evidence from preservice educators. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y., & Worrell, F. C. (2017). School psychological practice with gifted students. In M. Thielking & M. D. Terjesen (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology: Integrating international research, practice, and policy (pp. 575–593). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_29
   Google Scholar
• Kashima, Y., Bain, P. G., & Perfors, A. (2019). The psychology of cultural dynamics: What is it, what do we know, and what is yet to be known? Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 499–529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiersch, C., & Peters, J. (2017). Leadership from the inside Out: Student leadership development within authentic leadership and servant leadership frameworks. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(1), 148–168.
   Google Scholar
• Kono, T., Ehrhart, K. H., Ehrhart, M. G., & Schultze, T. (2012). Implicit leadership theories in Japan and the U.S. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 367–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziol, N. A., & Bilder, C. R. (2014). MRCV: A package for analyzing categorical variables with multiple response options. The R Journal, 6(1), 144–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lassig, C. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 24(2), 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y. (2015). Civic education as a means of talent dissemination for gifted students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., & Boo, E. (2019). Leadership development of gifted adolescents from a Korean multicultural lens. In S. R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1-20). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_61-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Matthews, M., Boo, E., & Kim, Y.-K. (2021). Gifted students’ perceptions about leadership and leadership development. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 219-259. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2020.1818554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (2002). A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(1), 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Luburic, I., & Jolly, J. L. (2019). An examination of the empirical literature: Gifted education in the Australian context. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(1), 64–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, P. P., & Rollock, D. (2018). Greater than the sum of its parts: Development of a measure of collectivism among Asians. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(2), 242-259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly, N. B. (2020). Cultural influences on leadership: Western-dominated leadership and non-Western conceptualizations of leadership. Sociology and Anthropology, 8(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Macias, C., Gold, P. B., Öngür, D., Cohen, B. M., & Panch, T. (2015). Are single-item global ratings useful for assessing health status? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 22(4), 251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Report to the subcommittee on education, committee on labor and public welfare, US senate). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. S., Resick, C. J., Keating, M. A., & Dickson, M. W. (2009). Ethical leadership across cultures: A comparative analysis of German and US perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 127–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S. (2015). Creativity and leadership’s role in gifted identification and programming in the USA: A pilot study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. S., & Rinn, A. N. (2021). Developing leadership talent in adolescents and emerging adults: A systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(3), 287–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2018). A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 463–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, C., & Jung, J. Y. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes towards gifted programs and provisions: An Australian study of primary and secondary school teachers. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 28(1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., Higgs, C., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). DeSeCo. Executive summary (pp. 1–20). Paris, France: Author. Retrieved 15 June 2021 https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., Worrell, F. C., Wardman, J., Tan, L. S., & Lee, S.-Y. (2021). Sociocultural perspectives on the talent development megamodel. In S. R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 101–127). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. O., & Peterson, C. M. (2012). What managerial leadership behaviors do student managerial leaders need? An empirical study of student organizational members. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 102–119.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, A. (2011). Leadership: A critical text, by Simon Western. Administration in Social Work, 35(1), 107–109.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single‐item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo, J. M., & Choe, I. S. (2009). Implicit knowledge on children’s leadership and creative leaders’ styles by teachers and children. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 30(6), 443–458.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Accessed 20 July 2021. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, S., Xie, Y., Zhu, Y., & Warner, M. (2018). New generation employees’ preferences towards leadership style in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(4), 437–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, D. L., Dinh, J., Lacerenza, C. N., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2019). The state of higher education leadership development program evaluation: A meta-analysis, critical review, and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. A. (2018). Using multi‐item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 739–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, P., Ruiz, C., & Martínez, R. (2011). Improving the “leader–follower” relationship: Top manager or supervisor? The ethical leadership trickle-down effect on follower job response. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 587–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechtman, Z., & Silektor, A. (2012). Social competencies and difficulties of gifted children compared to nongifted peers. Roeper Review, 34(1), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., Moore, M., Mann, R. L., & Wilson, H. E. (2010). Factors that influence in-service and preservice teachers’ nominations of students for gifted and talented programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 337–360.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C., Shang, J., Naumann, S. E., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2014). How team identification and expertise identification affect R&D employees‘ creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 276–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevor-Roberts, E., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Kennedy, J. C. (2003). The egalitarian leader: A comparison of leadership in Australia and New Zealand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(4), 517–540.
   Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancey, G. B., & Watanabe, N. (2009). Differences in perceptions of leadership between U.S. and Japanese workers. The Social Science Journal, 46(2), 268–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Jiang, G., Hattori, M., & Trichtinger, L. (2019). EFAutilities: Utility functions for exploratory factor analysis. R package version 2.0.0. Accessed 20 July 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=EFAutilities
   Google Scholar