A case for ideological coherence in regulating online speech: going back to basics to manage the (not so) difficult interplay between free speech and economic freedoms

References

• “Section 230 as First Amendment Rule.” 2018. Harvard Law Review 131: 2027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alegre, Susie. 2023. Freedom to Think: Protecting a Fundamental Human Right in the Digital Age. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Arun, Chinmayi. 2021. “Making Choices: Social Media Platforms and Freedom of Expression Norms.” In Regardless of Frontiers. Global Freedom of Expression in a Troubled World, edited by Lee C. Bollinger and Agnès Callamard, 275–287. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, Jack M. 1990. “Some Realism About Pluralism: Legal Realist Approaches to the First Amendment.” Duke Law Journal. 1990 (3): 375–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372553.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, Jack M. 2004. “Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society.” NYU Law Review 79 (1): 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, Jack M. 2021. “How to Regulate (and Not Regulate) Social Media.” Journal of Free Speech Law 1 (1): 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Barata, Joan. 2023. “Freedom of Expression and Privacy on Social Media: The Blurred Line Between the Private and the Public Sphere.” https://www.medialaws.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Freedom-of-Expression-and-Privacy-on-Social-Media96.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barata, Joan, and Jordi Calvet-Bademunt. 2023. “The European Commission’s Approach to DSA Systemic Risk is Concerning for Freedom of Expression.” Tech Policy Press. October 30, 2023. https://techpolicy.press/the-european-commissions-approach-to-dsa-systemic-risk-is-concerning-for-freedom-of-expression/.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Paul M. 2020. Regulating Social Media: The Fight Over Section 230 — and Beyond. New York: NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Bassini, Marco. 2019. Internet e libertà di espressione. Prospettive costituzionali e sovranazionali. Aprilia: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• Bazelon, Emily. 2020. “The First Amendment in the age of disinformation.” The New York Times Magazine, October 13, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/magazine/free-speech.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bedi, Sonu. 2019. “Online Dating Sites as Public Accommodations: Facilitating Racial Discrimination.” In Free Speech in the Digital Age, edited by Susan J. Brison and Katharine Gelber, 189–206. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research 49 (2): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, Paul S. 2000. “Cyberspace and the State Action Debate: The Cultural Value of Applying Constitutional Norms to “Private” Regulation.” University of Colorado Law Review 71: 1263–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Walter E. (1976) 2018. Defending the Undefendable. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Walter E. 1992. “Discrimination: An interdisciplinary analysis.” Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, Walter E. 1998. “Compromising the Uncompromisable: Discrimination.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 57 (2): 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1998.tb03275.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, Walter E. 2010. The Case for Discrimination. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Walter E., and Javier Portillo. 2012. “Anti-Discrimination Laws: Undermining Our Rights.” Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2): 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1120-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger, Lee C. 1986. The Tolerant Society: Freedom of Speech and Extremist Speech in America. New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bollinger, Lee C., and Geoffrey R. Stone. 2022. Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of our Democracy. New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Borgogno, Oscar, and Giuseppe Colangelo. 2022. “Platform and Device Neutrality Regime: The New Competition Rulebook for App Stores?” The Antitrust Bulletin 67 (3): 451–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X221103122.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, Valerie C. 2019. Free Speech and the Regulation of Social Media Content. CRS Report R45650. Washington, D.C.: CRS.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, Valerie C. 2022. Free Speech Challenges to Florida and Texas Social Media Laws. CRS Report LSB10748. Washington, D.C.: CRS.
   Google Scholar
• Brison, S. J., and K. Gelber. 2019. Free Speech in the Digital Age. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Britton-Purdy, Jedediah. 2018. “The Bosses’ Constitution: How and Why the First Amendment Became a Weapon for the Right.” The Nation, September 12, 2018. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/the-bosses-constitution/.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, Jon. 2022. “Texas Looks to a Clarence Thomas Opinion to Defend Its Social Media Law.” ArsTechnica, May 19, 2022. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/05/texas-looks-to-a-clarence-thomas-opinion-to-defend-its-social-media-law/.
   Google Scholar
• Brussels Report. 2022. “The EU’s Digital Services Act is Undermining Free Speech.” April 25, 2022. https://www.brusselsreport.eu/2022/04/25/the-eus-digital-services-act-is-undermining-free-speech/.
   Google Scholar
• Buiten, Miriam C. 2021. “The Digital Services Act. From Intermediary Liability to Platform Regulation.” Jipitec 12 (5): 361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, Dylan. 2021. “Zuckerberg Calls for Changes to Tech’s Section 230 protections.” NBC News, March 24, 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/zuckerberg-calls-changes-techs-section-230-protections-rcna486.
   Google Scholar
• Celeste, Edoardo. 2022. Digital Constitutionalism. The Role of Internet Bills of Rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Celeste, E., A. Heldt, and C. Iglesias Keller. 2022. Constitutionalising Social Media. New York: Hart/Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Chandran, Rina. 2022. “Twitter Battles India for Control of Social Media Content.” Thomson Reuters Foundation News, July 6, 2022. https://news.trust.org/item/20220706152542-4jkzy.
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021. “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media.” PNAS 118 (9): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Coad, Lily A. 2021. “Compelling Code: A First Amendment Argument Against Requiring Political Neutrality in Online Content Moderation.” Cornell Law Review. 106: 457–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, Gregory. 2020. “Monopolising Free Speech.” Fordham Law Review 88 (4): 1315–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Cunha, Christian. 2021. ““A State in the Disguise of a Merchant”: Tech Leviathans and the Rule of Law.” European Law Journal. 27 (1-3): 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Caria, Riccardo. 2019. “Old is Sometimes Better: The Case for Using Existing Law to Face the Challenges of the Digital Age.” Cambridge Law Review 4 (2): 68–82.
   Google Scholar
• de Caria, Riccardo. 2021. “‘Offers They Can’t Refuse’: Assessing the Impact on Business and Society At-Large of the Recent Fortune of Anti-Discrimination Laws and Policies.” The Italian Law Journal 7 (2): 671–711.
   Google Scholar
• de Caria, Riccardo. 2022. “The European Common Constitutional Traditions on Freedom of Expression. A Comparative Assessment.” Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico 72 (2): 391–430.
   Google Scholar
• De Gregorio, Giovanni. 2019. “From Constitutional Freedoms to the Power of Platforms: Protecting Fundamental Rights Online in the Algorithmic Society.” European Journal of Legal Studies 11 (2): 65–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gregorio, Giovanni. 2022. Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Đorđević, Nikola. 2021. “Poland and Hungary are Gunning for the Social Media Giants.” Emerging Europe, March 4, 2021. https://emerging-europe.com/news/poland-and-hungary-are-gunning-for-the-social-media-giants/.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, David G. 2005. “Private Property and Tax Policy in a Libertarian World: A Critical Review.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 18 (1): 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Richard A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Richard A. 1992. Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2023. “Fighting Disinformation and Dissemination of Illegal Content in the Context of the Digital Services Act and in Times of Conflict - Speech by Commissioner Breton.” October 18, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_23_5126.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. n.d. “The EU Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech Online. The Robust Response Provided by the European Union.” Accessed December 24, 2013. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/the-case-of-the-brazil-fake-news-inquiry/.
   Google Scholar
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2022. “Bias in Algorithms - Artificial Intelligence and Discrimination.” https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2022-bias-in-algorithms_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, Daniel A. 1991. “Free Speech without Romance: Public Choice and the First Amendment.” Harvard Law Review 105 (2): 554–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton, Marie-Claude. 2014. Maîtres De Leurs Ouvrages: L’édition À Compte D’auteur À Paris Au Xviiie Siècle. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• First Amendment Watch at New York University. n.d. “Hulk Hogan v. Gawker: Invasion of Privacy & Free Speech in a Digital World.” Accessed December 24, 2023. https://firstamendmentwatch.org/deep-dive/hulk-hogan-v-gawker-invasion-of-privacy-free-speech-in-a-digital-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Foer, Franklin. 2017. “Facebook’s War on Free Will.” The Guardian, September 19, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/19/facebooks-war-on-free-will.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, John G., and Leslie P. Francis. 2021. “Freedom of Thought in the United States: The First Amendment, Marketplaces of Ideas, and the Internet.” European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance 8 (2-3): 192–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10019.
   Google Scholar
• French, David. 2022. “Free Speech for Me But Not for Thee. The American Right has Lost the Plot on Free Speech.” The Atlantic, April 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/republican-dont-say-gay-bill-florida/629516/.
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann, Brett M. 2008. “Speech, Spillovers, and the First Amendment.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 2008 (1): 301–333.
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann, Brett M., and Susan Benesch. 2023. “Friction-In-Design Regulation as 21st Century Time, Place, and Manner Restriction.” Yale Journal of Law & Technology. 25: 376–447.
   Google Scholar
• Frosio, Giancarlo, and Christophe Geiger. 2023. “Taking Fundamental Rights Seriously in the Digital Services Act’s Platform Liability Regime”. European Law Journal 29: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fruge Corry, Katherine. 2021. “Section 230: Should the Interactive Computer Service Provider Shield Be Repealed?” Louisiana Law Review 81 (3): 1038–1076.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudo, Marco. 2021. “Riflessioni sul ripristino del dibattito pubblico. Fare i conti con le “esternalità costituzionali.”” Medialaws. Rivista di diritto dei media 3/2021: 108–123.
   Google Scholar
• Global Freedom of Expression at Columbia University. n.d. “The Case of the Brazil Fake News Inquiry.” Accessed December 24, 2023. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/the-case-of-the-brazil-fake-news-inquiry/.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, Bruce. 2022. “Zuckerberg Says Facebook Censored The Post’s Hunter Biden Stories because FBI Warned of Russian Misinfo ‘Dump.’” New York Post, August 26, 2022. https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/zuckerberg-blames-fbi-for-censoring-the-posts-hunter-biden-scoop/.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Eric. 2019. “Why Section 230 Is Better Than the First Amendment”. Notre Dame Law Review 95(1) 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, Jack L. 1998. “The Internet and the Abiding Significance of Territorial Sovereignty.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 5 (2): 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R., R. Binns, and C. Katzenbach. 2020. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graef, Inge. 2019. “Rethinking the Essential Facilities Doctrine for the EU Digital Economy.” Revue juridique Thémis de l’Université de Montréal 53 (1): 33–72.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Hillary. 2010. “Antitrust Censorship of Economic Protest.” Duke Law Journal 59 (6): 1037–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Hillary, and Dennis A. Yao. 2019. “Antitrust as Speech Control.” William & Mary Law Review 60: 1215–1267.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Jonathan. 2022a. “Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid.” The Atlantic, April 11, 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/05/social-media-democracy-trust-babel/629369/.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Jonathan. 2022b. “Yes, Social Media Really Is Undermining Democracy.” The Atlantic, July 28, 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/social-media-harm-facebook-meta-response/670975/.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, Karen. 2021. “AI Still Sucks at Moderating Hate Speech.” MIT Technology Review, June 4, 2021. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/04/1025742/ai-hate-speech-moderation/.
   Google Scholar
• Hemingway, Mollie. 2021. Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Husovec, M. 2019. “Why Is There No Due Process Online?” Balkinization, June 7, 2019. https://balkin.blogspot.com/2019/06/why-there-is-no-due-process-online.html.
   Google Scholar
• Illing, Sean. 2021. “The First Amendment has a Facebook problem.” Vox, May 5, 2021. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/22356339/free-speech-facebook-twitter-big-tech-first-amendment.
   Google Scholar
• Jaggi, Stephan. n.d. “State Action Doctrine.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann, and Rüdiger Wolfrum (last updated October 2017). Accessed December 24, 2023. https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e473.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Kate. 2019. Online Disinformation and Political Discourse. Applying a Human Rights Framework. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Daphne. 2019. Who Do You Sue? State and Platform Hybrid Power over Online Speech. Hoover Working Group on National Security, Technology, and Law, Aegis Series Paper No. 1902. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kiš, Danilo. 1986. “Censorship/Self Censorship.” Index on Censorship 86 (1): 43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, William. 2022. “A Libertarian Defense of Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.” Journal of Business Ethics 185 (1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05200-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippenstein, Ken, and Lee Fang. 2022. “Truth Cops. Leaked Documents Outline DHS’s Plans to Police Disinformation.” The Intercept, October 31, 2022. https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformation-dhs/.
   Google Scholar
• Klonick, Kate. 2018. “The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech.” Harvard Law Review 131: 1598–1670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltay, András. 2021. New Media and Freedom of Expression: Rethinking the Constitutional Foundations of the Public Sphere. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kosseff, Jeff. 2019. The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakier, Genevieve. 2021. “The Non-First Amendment Law of Freedom of Speech.” Harvard Law Review. 134: 2299–2381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lao, Marina. 2013. “Search, Essential Facilities, and the Antitrust Duty to Deal.” Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. 11 (5): 275–319.
   Google Scholar
• Lehdonvirta, Vili. 2022. Cloud Empires: How Digital Platforms Are Overtaking the State and How We Can Regain Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, Emil. 2015. “Libertarianism and Georgism on Private Property.” https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:900066/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lottieri, Carlo. 2016. Every New Right is a Freedom Lost: A Classical Liberal Defense Against the Triumph of False Rights. Dallas: Monolateral.
   Google Scholar
• Lottieri, Carlo. 2022. “Introduzione: Gli oligarchi, i renitenti e gli altri.” In Leviatano sanitario e crisi del diritto. Cultura, società e istituzioni al tempo del Covid-19, edited by Carlo Lottieri, 5–28. Macerata: Giometti&Antonello.
   Google Scholar
• Lynskey, Orla. 2017. Regulating ‘Platform Power’. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 1/2017. London: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, Kim. 2021. “Twitter Censored Tweets Critical of India’s Handling of the Pandemic at Its Government’s Request.” The Verge, April 24, 2021. https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/24/22400976/twitter-removed-tweets-critical-india-censor-coronavirus.
   Google Scholar
• Mai-DucFollow, Christine, and Meghan Bobrowsky. 2022. “Social-Media Firms Would Have to Consider Children’s Health Under Bill Passed by California Legislature.” The Wall Street Journal, August 30, 2022. https://www.wsj.com/articles/social-media-firms-would-have-to-consider-childrens-health-under-bill-passed-by-california-legislature-11661901669?st=cgh2d865qbr4ldi.
   Google Scholar
• Mazgal, Anna. 2021. “Back to the Future? The Digital Services Act and Regulating Online Platforms Built on Community-Led Moderation.” In Building a European Digital Public Space: Strategies for taking back control from Big Tech platforms, edited by Alexander Baratsits. Berlin: iRights media.
   Google Scholar
• Mchangama, Jacob. 2022. Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mchangama, Jacob, and Natalie Alkiviadou. 2021. “Hate Speech and the European Court of Human Rights: Whatever Happened to the Right to Offend, Shock or Disturb?” Human Rights Law Review 21 (4): 1008–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngab015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. (1870) 1909.. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: Longmans, Green, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Morais Carvalho, J., F. Arga e Lima, and M. Farinha. 2021. “Introduction to the Digital Services Act, Content Moderation and Consumer Protection.” Revista de Direito e Tecnologia 3 (1): 71–104.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Julian, ed. 2000. Markets and the Internet. Volume 20 (1) of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nahmias, Yifat, and Maayan Perel. 2021. “The Oversight of Content Moderation by AI: Impact Assessments and Their Limitations.” Harvard Journal on Legislation 58 (1): 145–194.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Steven. 2021. “White House ‘Flagging’ Posts for Facebook to Censor Over COVID ‘misinformation.’” The New York Post, July 15, 2021. https://nypost.com/2021/07/15/white-house-flagging-posts-for-facebook-to-censor-due-to-covid-19-misinformation/.
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. 2022. “America Has a Free Speech Problem.” March 18, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/18/opinion/cancel-culture-free-speech-poll.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan Brown, Elizabeth. 2019. “Section 230 Is the Internet’s First Amendment. Now Both Republicans and Democrats Want To Take It Away.” Reason, July 29, 2019. https://reason.com/2019/07/29/section-230-is-the-internets-first-amendment-now-both-republicans-and-democrats-want-to-take-it-away/.
   Google Scholar
• Notes from Poland. 2021. Law to Protect Poles from Social Media ‘Censorship’ Added to Government Agenda. October 5, 2021. https://notesfrompoland.com/2021/10/05/law-to-protect-poles-from-social-media-censorship-added-to-government-agenda/.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. (1974) 1999. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford-Cambridge: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Patty, Michael. 2019. “Social Media and Censorship: Rethinking State Action Once Again.” Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice 40 (1): 99–136.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Jonathan. 2018. ““The “Sovereigns of Cyberspace” and State Action: The First Amendment’s Application (or Lack Thereof) to Third-Party Platforms.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 32 (2): 989–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, Nicolas. 2020. Big Tech and the Digital Economy. The Moligopoly Scenario. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Politico. 2022. “Is the Media Doomed?” January 21, 2022. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/01/21/media-journalism-future-527294.
   Google Scholar
• Pollicino, Oreste. 2018. “La prospettiva costituzionale sulla libertà di espressione nell’era di Internet.” Medialaws. Rivista di diritto dei media 1/2018: 48–82.
   Google Scholar
• Pollicino, Oreste. 2021. “Digital Private Powers Exercising Public Functions: The Constitutional Paradox in the Digital Age and Its Possible Solutions.” https://echr.coe.int/Documents/Intervention_20210415_Pollicino_Rule_of_Law_ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pollicino, Oreste. 2022. “The Road Towards a Strengthened Code Against Disinformation: About Metaphors in Free Speech and the Need to Handle Them Carefully.” European Law Institute Newsletter, (3) May-June 2022. https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Newsletter/2022/Newsletter_May-Jun_2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pollicino, O. 2023. Freedom of Speech and the Regulation of Fake News. Cambridge: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Pollicino, Oreste, Marco Bassini, and Giovanni De Gregorio. 2021. Fundamentals of Internet Law. Milan: Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Pollicino, O., and G. Romeo. 2016. The Internet and Constitutional Law: The protection of fundamental rights and constitutional adjudication in Europe. London-New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Richard A. 1986. “Free Speech in an Economic Perspective.” Suffolk University Law Review 20 (1): 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Jason. 2021. “Twitter Loses Appeal Court Bid to Toss Wealthy B.C. Businessman’s Defamation Suit.” CBC, December 10, 2021. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/twitter-giustra-defamation-lawsuit-1.6281590.
   Google Scholar
• Psychogiopoulou, E., and S. de la Sierra. 2022. Digital Media Governance and Supranational Courts. Selected Issues and Insights from the European Judiciary. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Quarta, Alessandra. 2021. “Beyond Assimilation: Are Terms of Use Really Contracts?” In European Economic Constitution, edited by Martin Schimdt-Kessel, Camilla Crea, Pasquale Femia, and Christina Möllnitz, 115–138. Jena: JWV.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, Jonathan. 1993. Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rochefort, Alex. 2020. “Regulating Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Policy Analysis.” Communication Law and Policy 25 (2): 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbard, Murray N. 1982. 1998. The Ethics of Liberty. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudofsky, Daniel. 2017. “Modern State Action Doctrine in the Age of Big Data.” NYU Annual Survey of American Law 71: 741–800.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D., and L. McCollum. 2022. “Big Tech and Free Speech: How Both the Left and the Right Are Wrong.” Fee.org. April 5, 2022. https://fee.org/articles/big-tech-and-free-speech-how-both-the-left-and-the-right-are-wrong/.
   Google Scholar
• Savin, Andrej. 2021. The EU Digital Services Act: Towards a More Responsible Internet. CBS LAW Research Paper No. 21-04. Copenhagen: CBS Law.
   Google Scholar
• Schuldt, L. 2019. “Truth vs. Free Speech. How Southeast Asia’s War on Fake News Unfolds.” Verfassungsblog, December 7, 2019. https://verfassungsblog.de/truth-vs-free-speech/.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, Len. 2022. “Yes, Let’s Be ‘Tough on Russia’ – But Not by Overriding the Rule of Law.” IEA, March 10, 2022. https://iea.org.uk/yes-lets-be-tough-on-russia-but-not-by-overriding-the-rule-of-law/.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, Edward. 2021. “The Most Dangerous Censorship.” https://edwardsnowden.substack.com/p/on-censorship-pt-1.
   Google Scholar
• Soukup, Stephen R. 2021. The Dictatorship of Woke Capital: How Political Correctness Captured Big Business. New York: Encounter Books.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. n.d. “Number of Internet and Social Media Users Worldwide as of October 2023”. Accessed December 24, 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State. 2019. Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms: Final Report. Chicago: Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
   Google Scholar
• Stinnett, Casey. 2018. “Facebook’s Program Thinks Declaration of Independence Is Hate Speech.” The Vindicator, July 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stossel, John. 2021. “Here’s Where the ‘Facts’ About Me Lie — Facebook Bizarrely Claims Its ‘Fact-Checks’ are ‘Opinion.’” New York Post, December 13, 2021. https://nypost.com/2021/12/13/facebook-bizarrely-claims-its-misquote-is-opinion/.
   Google Scholar
• Stucke, Maurice E. and Ariel Ezrachi. 2020. Competition Overdose: How Free Market Mythology Transformed Us from Citizen Kings to Market Servants. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. #republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2021. Liars: Falsehoods and Free Speech in an Age of Deception. Oxford, MA: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Thobani, Shaira. 2021. “L’esclusione da Facebook tra lesione della libertà di espressione e d’accesso al mercato.” Persona e Mercato 2021/2: 426–439.
   Google Scholar
• Tushnet, Mark. 2003. “The Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (1): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.1.79.
   Google Scholar
• University of Oxford, Faculty of Law. n.d. “Freedom of Expression on Social Media.” Accessed December 24, 2023. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/freedom-expression-social-media.
   Google Scholar
• Volokh, Eugene. 2021. “Treating Social Media Platforms Like Common Carriers?” Journal of Free Speech Law 1 (1): 377–462.
   Google Scholar
• Volokh, Eugene, and Donald M. Falk. 2012. “First Amendment Protection for Search Engine Search Results.” 20 April 2012. http://www.volokh.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/SearchEngineFirstAmendment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Abingdon: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, Ludwig. (1951). 1962.. Socialism. An Economic and Sociological Analysis. Translated by J. Kahane. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, Ludwig. 1979. 2006. Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow. 3rd ed. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vranaki, Asma. 2022. Regulating Social Network Sites. Data Protection, Copyright and Power. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post. 2022. “The Disinformation Governance Board’s Collapse Shows the Problem.” May 23, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/23/disinformation-governance-boards-collapse-showcases-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Zachary B. 2022. “American Free Speech Enters Uncharted Territory.” CNN Politics, What matters, May 14, 2022. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/14/politics/free-speech-twitter-censorship-what-matters/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yale Law School. 2022. “Can We Fix What’s Wrong with Social Media?” https://law.yale.edu/yls-today/news/can-we-fix-whats-wrong-social-media.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Christopher S. 2021. “The First Amendment, Common Carriers, and Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, and Privacy.” Journal of Free Speech Law 1 (1): 463–508.
   Google Scholar
• Zalnieriute, Monika. 2019. “From Human Rights Aspirations to Enforceable Obligations by Non-State Actors in the Digital Age: The Case of Internet Governance and ICANN.” Yale Journal of Law & Technology 21: 278–336.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Jonathan. 2021. Free Speech: And Why You Should Give a Damn. Buffalo, NY: City of Light Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Jonathan. 2022. “Why We Must Allow Hate Speech.” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, August 17, 2022. https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/Op-Ed/2022/08/17/rushdie-matar-fatwa-censorship-speech-codes/stories/202208170022.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar