Reconstructing a teachers' discourse to build inclusive interactions using positive discourse analysis and a formative intervention program

References

• Afacan, K., A. Bal, A. J. Artiles, H. I. Cakir, D. Ko, D. Mawene, and H. Kim. 2021. “Inclusive Knowledge Production at an Elementary School through Family-School-University Partnerships: A Formative Intervention Study.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 31: 100569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M. 2020. “Promoting Inclusion and Equity in Education: Lessons from International Experiences.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 6 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., and S. Miles. 2009. “Developing Inclusive Education Systems: How Can We Move Policies Forward.” In La educación inclusiva: de la exclusión a la plena participación de todo el alumnado. (pp. 167-170). Barcelona, ES: HORSORI, edited by C. Giné, D. Durán, T. Font, and E. Miquel, 167–170. Barcelona, ES: HORSORI.
   Google Scholar
• Ajodhia-Andrews, A. 2013. “Official Discourses, Teachers’ Practices and Inclusion for Minoritized Students: A Review of Works by Critical Theorists.” Critical Intersections in Education: An OISE/UT Students’ Journal 1 (1): 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Azeem, M., and N. A. Salfi. 2012. “Usage of NVivo Software for Qualitative Data Analysis.” Academic Research International 2 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, L. 1990. “Teacher Development through Reflective Teaching.” In Second Language Teacher Education, edited by J. C. Richards and D. Nunan, 202–214. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, R. 2016. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Teacher-Student Relationships in a Third-Grade Literacy Lesson: Dynamics of Microaggression.” Cogent Education 3 (1): 1244028. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1244028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buli-Holmberg, J., H. M. Høybråten Sigstad, I. Morken, and E. Hjörne. 2023. “From the Idea of Inclusion into Practice in the Nordic Countries: A Qualitative Literature Review.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 38 (1): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2031095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman, E. 1996. “Continuities and Discontinuities in Interpretive and Textual Approaches in Developmental Psychology.” Human Development 39 (6): 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzelli, C. A. 1996. “The Moral Implications of Teacher-Child Discourse in Early Childhood Classrooms.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 11 (4): 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90020-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calle-Díaz, L. 2019. “Possibilities of Building Peace through Classroom Discourse: A Positive Discourse Analysis.” Linguistics and Education 54: 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. L. 2014. “An Examination of Teacher-Student Interactions in Inclusive Classrooms: Teacher Interviews and Classroom Observations.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 14 (4): 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12021.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, A., and J. McNicholl. 2007. “Investigating the Relationship between Subject Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Practice through the Analysis of Classroom Discourse.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (13): 1629–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601180817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., and H. Hasan. 2006. “Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in Information Systems.” Austaralasian Journal of Information Systems 13: 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1999. “Innovative Learning in Work Teams: Analyzing Cycles of Knowledge Creation in Practice25.” In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R.-L. Punamäki, 377–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.0.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. 2000. “Activity Theory as a Framework for Analyzing and Redesigning Work.” Ergonomics 43 (7): 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Educación and Work 14 (1): 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2011. “From Design Experiments to Formative Interventions.” Theory & Psychology 21 (5): 598–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2010. “Studies of Expansive Learning: Foundations, Findings and Future Challenges.” Educational Research Review 5 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2011. “Discursive Manifestations of Contradictions in Organizational Change Efforts: A Methodological Framework.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 24 (3): 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., A. Sannino, and J. Virkkunen. 2014. “On the Methodological Demands of Formative Interventions.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 21 (2): 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.891868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and I. Lunt. 2002. “Inclusive Education: Are There Limits?” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250110098980.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florio-Ruane, S. 2000. “Culture in Literacy Education: Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird.” In Vol. 49 of National Reading Conference Yearbook, 12–30. Chicago: National Reading Conference, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• García Montes, P. A., J. S. Martínez, and A. Romero. 2022. “Contradictions in Learning to Teach Digital Literacy Practices in an EFL Public Setting: An Activity Theory Analysis.” Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura 27 (1): 105–124. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a06.
   Google Scholar
• Gérin-Lajoie, D. 2008. “Student Diversity and Schooling in Metropolitan Toronto: A Comparative Analysis of the Discourses of Anglophone and Francophone School Personnel.” In Educators’ Discourses on Student Diversity in Canada: Context, Policy, and Practice, 109–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., and M. Boyle. 2008. “Teachers’ Discourse during Cooperative Learning and Their Perceptions of This Pedagogical Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (5): 1333–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, S., and W. Scott. 2000. “Exploring the Purposes of Qualitative Data Coding in Educational Enquiry: Insights from Recent Research.” Educational Studies 26 (3): 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690050137141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, H. 1998. “Activity Theory: A Basis for the Contextual Study of Information Systems in Organizations.” In Information Systems and Activity Theory: Tools in Context, edited by H. Hasan, E. Gould, and P. N. Hyland, 19–38. Wollongong: University of Wollongong Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim, N. H., and M. L. Jones. 2007. Activity Theory: A Framework for Qualitative Analysis. 4th International Qualitative Research Convention (QRC), 3–5 September, PJ Hilton, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 2000. “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2015. “Inclusion, Integration, or What? A Comparative Study of the School Principals’ Perceptions of Inclusive and Special Education in Finland and in Alberta, Canada.” Disability & Society 30 (1): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.982788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeder, D. 2015. “Implications of Using Humor in the Classroom.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180: 828–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.218.
   Google Scholar
• Juzwik, M. M. 2006. “Performing Curriculum: Building Ethos through Narratives in Pedagogical Discourse.” Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 108 (4): 489–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2015. “A Formative Intervention on Mobile Learning Community.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191: 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.655.
   Google Scholar
• Leont’ev, A. N. 1981. Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, G. 2007. “Educational Psychology and the Effectiveness of Inclusive Education/Mainstreaming.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X156881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. H., N. Kolodziej, and K. Brashears. 2016. “Classroom Discourse: An Essential Component in Building a Classroom Community.” School Community Journal 26 (2): 291–304.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2004. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 49: 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• McAvinia, C. 2016. Online Learning and its Users: Lessons for Higher Education. Kidlington, UK: Chandos Publishing/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, J., and M. Devlin. 2014. “‘Uni Has a Different Language … to the Real World’: Demystifying Academic Culture and Discourse for Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (5): 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morf, M. E., and W. G. Weber. 2000. “I/O Psychology and the Bridging of A. N. Leont’ev’s Activity Theory..” Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne 41: 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordahl, T., B. Persson, C. B. Dyssegaard, B. W. Hennestad, M. V. Wang, J. Martinsen, E. K. Vold, P. Paulsrud, and T. Johnsen. 2018. Inkluderende fellesskap for barn og unge. Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, V., B. Jena, and S. Karla. 2013. “Qualitative Research.” Perspectives in Clinical Research 4 (3): 192. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.115389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. 2020. “The Complementarity of Formative Intervention Research, Action Research and Action Learning.” Educational Research 62 (3): 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1793684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. 2016. “Discussing Inclusive Education: An Inquiry into Different Interpretations and a Search for Ethical Aspects of Inclusion Using the Capabilities Approach.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 31 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1087123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M., and K. Tobin. 2001. “Actions and Discourses for Transformative Understanding in a Middle School Science Class.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (3): 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750066529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., and M. M. Wetzel. 2013. “Studying Agency in Literacy Teacher Education: A Layered Approach to Positive Discourse Analysis.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 10 (1): 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2013.753845.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and Y.-J. Lee. 2007. ““Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Review of Educational Research 77 (2): 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagre, A., J. D. H. Rivera, P. G. Montes, T. B. Posada, L. P. Machado, and L. E. G. Humanez. 2021. “Contradictions and Critical Praxis in Foreign Language Teachers’ Implementation of Reading to Learn.” Teaching and Teacher Education 108: 103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. 2011. “Activity Theory as an Activist and Interventionist Theory.” Theory & Psychology 21 (5): 571–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311417485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., and Y. Engestrom. 2018. “Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Founding Insights and New Challenges.” Cultural-Historical Psychology 14 (3): 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140304.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Y. Engeström, and M. Lemos. 2016. “Formative Interventions for Expansive Learning and Transformative Agency.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (4): 599–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, C. F., and B. Louise. 2003. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. Vol. 21. NYU press.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 2018. Inclusive Education Isn't Dead, Itjust Smells Funny. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Su, T. 2016. “Positive Discourse Analysis of Xi Jinping’s Speech at the National University of Singapore under Appraisal Theory.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 7 (4): 796–801. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.22.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2006. “Languaging, Agency and Collaboration in Advanced Second Language Proficiency.” In Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, edited by H. Byrnes, 95–108. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, R. 2001. “The Idea of Units of Analysis: Vygotsky’s Contribution.” In The Theory and Practice of Cultural-Historical Psychology, 93–106. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1999. “Tool and Sign in the Development of the Child.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 6: Scientific Legacy, edited by R. W. Rieber, 3–68. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. H., P. Sztajn, C. Edgington, J. Webb, and M. Myers. 2017. “Changes in Teachers’ Discourse about Students in a Professional Development on Learning Trajectories.” American Educational Research Journal 54 (3): 568–604. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217693801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H. 2021. “Epistemic Agency, a Double-Stimulation, and Video-Based Learning: A Formative Intervention Study in Language Teacher Education.” System 96: 102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar