Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty

References

• Al Marzouqi, A. H. H., Alameddine, M., Sharif, A., & Alsheikh-Ali, A. A. (2019). Research productivity in the United Arab Emirates: A 20-year bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 5(12), e02819. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlRyalat, S. A., Farah, R. I., Shehadeh, B., Abukeshek, A., Aldabbas, L., Al-fawair, A., & Ababneh, O. (2019). Biomedical researchers and students knowledge about predatory journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(5), 102056. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sheryani, R., & Pasha, K. B. (2020). A surge in open access publications in the United Arab Emirates: A bibliometric analysis. In UAE Information Literacy Network Virtual Symposium, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=presentations.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J. (2010). “Predatory” open-access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10–17. Retrieved from https://charleston.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/charleston/chadv/2010/00000011/00000004/art00005#.
   Google Scholar
• Blankstein, M., & Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2019). Ithaka S + R US faculty survey 2018. Ithaka S + R. doi:10.18665/sr.311199
   Google Scholar
• Boufarss, M. (2020). Charting the open access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1707–1725. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03349-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boufarss, M., & Laakso, M. (2020). Open Sesame? Open access priorities, incentives, and policies among higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1553–1577. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03529-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobey, K. D., Grudniewicz, A., Lalu, M. M., Rice, D. B., Raffoul, H., & Moher, D. (2019). Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: A survey. BMJ Open, 9(3), e026516. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516[PMC][30904874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Darby, R., Goerner, B., Hyppoelae, J., Igo-Kemenes, P., Kahn, D., … Van der Stelt, W. (2011). Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists think about open access publishing. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5260.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Frass, W., Cross, J., & Gardner, V. (2013). Open access survey: Exploring the views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge authors. Retrieved from https://files.taylorandfrancis.com/open-access-survey-march2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, A. M. (2015). From concerned to cautiously optimistic: Assessing faculty perceptions and knowledge of open access in a campus-wide study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), 1-40. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., & King, C. J. (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Berkeley: UC Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, R., Burns, D., & Thoms, B. (2019). Altruism or self-interest? Exploring the motivations of open access authors. College & Research Libraries, 80(4), 485–507. doi:10.5860/crl.80.4.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., & Wulfson, K. (2013). US faculty survey 2012. Ithaka S + R. doi:10.18665/sr.22502
   Google Scholar
• Kaba, A., & Said, R. (2015). Open access awareness, use, and perception: A case study of AAU faculty members. New Library World, 116(1–2), 94–103. doi:10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0053
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One. 6(6), e20961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughtin-Dunker, K. (2014). Assessing the scholarly communication attitudes and practices of faculty: Lessons from a “failed” survey. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 2(3), 1-13. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1164
   Google Scholar
• Mavodza, J. (2013). A review of the open access concept in the UAE. New Library World, 114(5–6), 259–266. doi:10.1108/03074801311326885
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., Gibson, I., Yates, E., & Stephenson, C. (2017). An exploration of faculty experiences with open access journal publishing at two Canadian comprehensive universities. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 11(2), 1-26. doi:10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3703
   Google Scholar
• Mertkan, S., Onurkan Aliusta, G., & Suphi, N. (2021). Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 30(4), 470–483. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvab032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischo, W. H., & Schlembach, M. C. (2011). Open access issues and engineering faculty attitudes and practices. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5–6), 432–454. doi:10.1080/01930826.2011.589349
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, B., Luca Edward, J., Tiffen, B., England, A., Booth, M., & Boateng, H. (2018). Scholarly communication practices in humanities and social sciences: A study of researchers’ attitudes and awareness of open access. Open Information Science, 2(1), 168–180. doi:10.1515/opis-2018-0013
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2005). Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(3), 179–181. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, C. (2020, June 19). QS top 50 under 50 2021. Top Universities. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings-articles/top-50-under-50-next-50-under-50/qs-top-50-under-50-2021.
   Google Scholar
• OAPEN-UK. (2012). OAPEN-UK HSS researcher survey results. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/OAPENUK/oapenuk-hss-researcher-survey-results.
   Google Scholar
• Open Access. (2021). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open_access&oldid=1006749664.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Qin, J. (2007). Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 38(2), 55–84. doi:10.3138/C972-1321-8720-314M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richtig, G., Berger, M., Lange-Asschenfeldt, B., Aberer, W., & Richtig, E. (2018). Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 32(9), 1441–1449. doi:10.1111/jdv.15039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 604–610. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrig, A. D., Soper, D., Cox, B. E., & Colvin, G. P. (2018). Changing the default to support open access to education research. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 465–473. doi:10.3102/0013189X18782974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroter, S., Tite, L., & Smith, R. (2005). Perceptions of open access publishing: Interviews with journal authors. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 330(7494), 756. doi:10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, A. (2019). Faculty awareness, use and attitudes towards scholarly open access: A Pakistani perspective. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 612–628. doi:10.1177/0961000617742455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suber, P. (2006). Open access overview. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20070519103647/http:/www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/overview.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Think. Check. Submit. (2015, September 10). Think. Check. Submit. Introduced at ALPSP 2015 • Think. Check. Submit. Think. Check. Submit. Retrieved from https://thinkchecksubmit.org/2015/09/10/hello-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Times Higher Education. (2021, January 20). American University of Sharjah. Times Higher Education (THE). Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/american-university-sharjah.
   Google Scholar
• Togia, A., & Korobili, S. (2014). Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature. Information Services & Use, 34(3–4), 221–231. doi:10.3233/ISU-140742
   Google Scholar
• Warlick, S. E., & Vaughan, K. (2007). Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 4, 1–1. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-4-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• What authors want from open access publishing: Wiley author survey [Presentation]. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/WileyScienceNewsroom/wiley-14895586.
   Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M. (2016). Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals. Plos One, 11(1), e0147913. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Predatory Practices in Academia. (2022, March 2). [Text]. American University of Sharjah. Retrieved from https://www.aus.edu/media/events/wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-predatory-practices-in-academia.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, J. (2010). A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(3), 615–624. doi:10.1002/asi.21283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. doi:10.1002/asi.23265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Y., & Li, Y. (2015). University faculty awareness and attitudes towards open access publishing and the institutional repository: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), 1-29. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar