220
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

International VS National Academic Bibliographies. A Comparative Analysis of Publication and Citation Patterns in Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Hungarian Scientific Bibliography

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aguinis, H., Yu, L., & Tosun, C. (2021). How to enhance scholarly impact: Recommendations for university administrators, researchers and educators. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(8), 2485–2499. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2020-1189
  • Antonowicz, D., Kohoutek, J., Pinheiro, R., & Hladchenko, M. (2017). The roads of ‘excellence’ in Central and Eastern Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 547–567. doi:10.1177/1474904116683186
  • Berács, J., Derényi, A., Kádár-Csoboth, P., Kováts, G., Polónyi, I., & Temesi, J. (2017). Magyar Felsőoktatás 2016. Stratégiai helyzetértékelés. [Hungarian Higher Education 2016. Strategic assessment]. Project report no. 4. Budapest: NFKK.
  • Boyadijeva, P. (2017). Invisible higher education: Higher education institutions from Central and Eastern Europe in global rankings. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 529–546.
  • Demeter, M. (2017). The core-periphery problem in communication research: A network analysis of leading publication. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(4), 402–420. doi:10.1007/s12109-017-9535-2
  • Demeter, M. (2018a). Changing center and stagnant periphery in communication and media studies. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2893–2921.
  • Demeter, M. (2018b). The Global South’s participation in the International Community of Communication Scholars. From an Eastern European point of view. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(2), 238–255. doi:10.1007/s12109-018-9585-0
  • Demeter, M. (2019a). The winner takes it all: International inequality in communication and media studies today. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 37–59. doi:10.1177/1077699018792270
  • Demeter, M. (2019b). The world-systemic dynamics of knowledge production: The distribution of transnational academic capital in the social sciences. Journal of World-Systems Research, 25(1), 111–144. doi:10.5195/jwsr.2019.887
  • Demeter, M. (2019c). Open access movements: Emancipation or hypocrisy? KOME, 7(1), 126–127. doi:10.17646/KOME.75698.97
  • Demeter, M. (2020). Academic knowledge production and the Global South. Questioning inequality and under-representation. London: Palgrave.
  • Demeter, M., & Istratii, R. (2020). Scrutinising what open access journals mean for global inequalities. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(4), 505–522. doi:10.1007/s12109-020-09771-9
  • Dobbins, M. (2011). Higher education policies in central and eastern Europe convergence towards a common model? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dobbins, M. (2015). Exploring the governance of Polish public higher education: Balancing restored historical legacies with Europeanization and market pressures. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 18–33. doi:10.1080/21568235.2014.969289
  • Dobbins, M., & Kwiek, M. (2017). Europeanisation and globalisation in higher education in Central and Eastern Europe: 25 years of changes revisited (1990–2015). European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 519–528. doi:10.1177/1474904117728132
  • DORA. (2012). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. DORA, The American Society for Cell Biology. Retrieved from https://sfdora.org/read/
  • Fernández-Quijada, D., & Masip-Masip, P. (2013). Tres décadas de investigación española en comunicación: hacia la mayoría de edad. [Three decades of Spanish communication research: Towards legal age]. Comunicar, 41, 15–24.
  • Froumin, I., & Smolentseva, A. (2014). Issues of transformation in post-socialist higher education systems. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 205–208. doi:10.1080/21568235.2014.916533
  • Gadd, E. (2020). University rankings need a rethink. Nature, 587(7835), 523–523. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03312-2
  • Gadd, E. (2021). Love DORA, hate rankings? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/05/10/love-dora-hate-rankings/
  • Győrffy, B., Herman, P., & Szabó, I. (2020). Research funding: Past performance is a stronger predictor of future scientific output than reviewer scores. Journal of Informetrics, 14(3), 101050. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101050
  • Havas, Á., & Fáber, Á. (2020). The rise of heteronomous academia on the EU’s borderlands. LeftEast, August 19, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/heteronomous-academia-eu-borderlands/#_edn14
  • Ianoş, I., & Petrişor, A.-I. (2020). An overview of the dynamics of relative research performance in Central-Eastern Europe using a ranking-based analysis derived from SCImago data. Publications, 8(3), 36. doi:10.3390/publications8030036
  • Karady, V., & Nagy, P. T. (2018). A case of state controlled westernization. Foreign impacts in the Hungarian social sciences (1945–2015). In J. Heilbron, G. Sorá, & T. Boncourt (Eds.), The social and human sciences in global power relations (pp. 297–332). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kohoutek, J. (Ed.) (2009). Quality assurance in higher education: A contentious yet intriguing policy issue. Prague: CEPES.
  • Kwiek, M. (2012). Universities and knowledge production in Central Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 111–126. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.111
  • Kwiek, M. (2014). Structural changes in the Polish higher education system (1990–2010): A synthetic view. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 266–280. doi:10.1080/21568235.2014.905965
  • Kwiek, M. (2017). A generational divide in the academic profession: A mixed quantitative and qualitative approach to the Polish case. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 645–669. doi:10.1080/21568235.2014.905965
  • MTA. (2019). Az Aranycsapathoz hasonlóan kell felépíteni a magyar tudományt, azaz miért lenne értelmetlen szétszedni az MTA kutatóhálózatát [Hungarian science has to be built up like the Golden Team, or, Why it makes sense to disband the Hungarian Academy of Science’s research network]. MTA kommunikáció, 2019. Február 14. https://mta.hu/mta_hirei/az-aranycsapathoz-hasonloan-kell-felepiteni-a-magyar-tudomanyt-109347
  • Oancea, A. (2019). Research governance and the future(s) of research assessment. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 27. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0213-6
  • Popovic, S., Pekovic, S., & Matic, R. M. (2019). Research quality evaluation in social sciences: The case of criteria on the conditions and requirements for academic promotion in Serbia, Slovenia and Montenegro. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8(2), 55–62. doi:10.26773/mjssm.190908
  • Prion, S., & Haerling, K. A. (2014). Making sense of methods and measurement: Spearman-Rho ranked-ordered correlation coefficient. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(10), 535–536. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.07.005
  • Sasvári, P., Bakacsi, G., & Urbanovics, A. (2021). Egyetemi előmenetel és publikációs teljesítmény kapcsolata. [The connection between university promotions and publication output]. Magyar Tudomány, 182(6), 806–822.
  • Sasvári, P., & Urbanovics, A. (2019). Merre tovább egyetemi tanárok, avagy az új publikációs minimum aspektusai a társadalomtudományban [Where to next, university professors, or, aspects of new minimum publication requirements in social sciences]. In J. T. Karlovitz (Ed.) Újítások és újdonságok (pp. 5–30). Grosspetersdorf: Sozial und Wirtschafts Forschungsgruppe.
  • Sasvári, P., & Urbanovics, A. (2021). Előmeneteli minimumkövetelmények a társadalomtudományban. [Minimum requirements for promotion in social science]. Tudományos és Műszaki Tájékoztatás, 68(1), 12–24.
  • Tóth, J., & Demeter, M. (2021). Prestige and independence-controlled publication performance of researchers at 14 Hungarian research institutions between 2014 and 2018 – A data paper. KOME, 9(1), 41–63. doi:10.17646/KOME.75672.61
  • Walsh, J. P. (2011). 2010 Presidential address: Embracing the sacred in our secular scholarly world. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 215–234.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1974a). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415. doi:10.1017/S0010417500007520
  • Wallerstein, I. (1974b). The modern world system. Vol. 1, Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy: Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1983). Labour in the world social structure. London: Sage.
  • Wallerstein, I. (1991). Geopolitics and geoculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Warczok, T., & Zarycki, T. (2018). Polish political sciences in a global context. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 397–404). doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.872
  • Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40. doi:10.1080/17405900903453922
  • Xu, X. (2020). China ‘goes out’ in a centre–periphery world: Incentivizing international publications in the humanities and social sciences. Higher Education, 80(1), 157–172. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00470-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.