Unconditionally Stable Central Difference Dissipative Algorithm for Multi-Directional Real-Time Hybrid Simulations of Large Nonlinear Structural Systems

References

• Al-Subaihawi, S. 2023. “Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of Complex Structural Systems Subjected to Multi-natural Hazards.” PhD diss., Bethlehem, PA: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Subaihawi, S., C. Kolay, T. Marullo, J. Ricles, and S. Quiel. 2020. “Assessment of Wind-Induced Vibration Mitigation in a Tall Building with Damped Outriggers Using Real-Time Hybrid Simulations.” Engineering Structure 205:110044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Subaihawi, S., J. Ricles, and S. Quiel. 2022. “Online Explicit Model Updating of Nonlinear Viscous Dampers for Real Time Hybrid Simulation.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., Z. Bai, C. Bischof, L. Blackford, J. Demmel, J. Dongarra, J. Croz, et al. 1999. LAPACK Users’ Guide. 3rd ed. Software, Environments, Tools Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719604.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, C., R. Grimes, and J. Lewis. 1998. “Accurate Symmetric Indefinite Linear Equation Solvers.” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 20 (2): 513–561. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479896296921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, Y., K. Kazemibidokhti, and J. Ricles. 2013. “Adaptive Time Series Compensator for Delay Compensation of Servohydraulic Actuator Systems for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (11): 1697–1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. 2002. “Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm with Unconditional Stability.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128 (9): 935–947. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:9(935).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. 2014. “A Family of Noniterative Integration Methods with Desired Numerical Dissipation.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 100 (1): 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. Ricles. 2008a. “Development of Direct Integration Algorithms for Structural Dynamics Using Discrete Control Theory.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 134 (8): 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:8(676).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. Ricles. 2008b. “Stability Analysis of Direct Integration Algorithms Applied to Nonlinear Structural Dynamics.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 134 (9): 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:9(703).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. Ricles. 2010. “Stability Analysis of Direct Integration Algorithms Applied to MDOF Nonlinear Structural Dynamics.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 136 (4): 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. Ricles. 2012. “Analysis of Implicit HHT-α Integration Algorithm for Real-Time Pseudodynamic Testing.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (5): 1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. 2012. Dynamics of Structures. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J., and G. Hulbert. 1993. “A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics with Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-Alpha Method.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 60 (2): 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2900803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, I. 2004. “MA57—A Code for the Solution of Sparse Symmetric Definite and Indefinite Systems.” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 30 (2): 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/992200.992202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, G., J. D. Powell, and A. Emami. 2009. Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., and J. Liu. 1981. Computer Solution of Large Sparse Positive Definite Systems. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., C. Moler, and R. Schreiber. 1992. “Sparse Matrices in MATLAB: Design and Implementation.” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 13 (1): 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1137/0613024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudreau, G., and R. Taylor. 1973. “Evaluation of Numerical Integration Methods in Elastodynamics.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2 (1): 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(73)90023-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber, H. 1976. Analysis and Design of Numerical Integration Methods in Structural Dynamics. Rep. No. EERC 67-29. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Resistant Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber, H., and T. Hughes. 1978. “Collocation, Dissipation and [Overshoot] for Time Integration Schemes in Structural Dynamics.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 6 (1): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilber, H., T. Hughes, and R. Taylor. 1977. “Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 5 (3): 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, R.-Y., P. Benson Shing, E. Stauffer, and B. Thoen. 2007. “Performance of a Real-Time Pseudodynamic Test System Considering Nonlinear Structural Response.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (12): 1785–1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolay, C., T. Marullo, and J. Ricles. 2018. HybridFEM-MH: A Program for Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of Civil Infrastructure Systems Subject to Multi-Hazards. ATLSS Report No. 18-06. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
   Google Scholar
• Kolay, C., and J. Ricles. 2014. “Development of a Family of Unconditionally Stable Explicit Direct Integration Algorithms with Controllable Numerical Energy Dissipation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43 (9): 1361–1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolay, C., and J. Ricles. 2019. “Improved Explicit Integration Algorithms for Structural Dynamic Analysis with Unconditional Stability and Controllable Numerical Dissipation.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23 (5): 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1326423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolay, C., J. Ricles, T. Marullo, A. Mahvashmohammadi, and R. Sause. 2015. “Implementation and Application of the Unconditionally Stable Explicit Parametrically Dissipative KR-α Method for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (5): 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X., and K. Mosalam. 2016. “Lyapunov Stability and Accuracy of Direct Integration Algorithms Applied to Nonlinear Dynamic Problems.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 142 (5): 04016022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehle, J., Y. Bozorgnia, N. Jayaram, P. Jones, M. Rahnama, N. Shome, et al. 2011. Case Studies of the Seismic Performance of Tall Buildings Designed by Alternative Means. Berkeley PEER: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California. Report 2011/5.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark, N. 1959. “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics.” American Society of Civil Engineers 85 (3): 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098.
   Google Scholar
• Noh, G., and K. Bathe. 2013. “An Explicit Time Integration Scheme for the Analysis of Wave Propagations.” Computers & Structures 129:178–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEER Ground Motion Database. July 19, 2019. “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.” University of California at Berkeley. https://peer.berkeley.edu/peer-strong-ground-motion-databases.
   Google Scholar
• Ricles, J., C. Kolay, and T. Marullo. 2020. HyCoM-3D: A Program for Multi-Hazard Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of 3-D Civil Infrastructural Systems (HyCom-3D) User’s Manual. ATLSS Report No. 20-02. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., and M. Willford. 2007. “The Damped Outrigger Concept for Tall Buildings.” The Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings 16 (4): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokyo Polytechnic University. January 19, 2019. “Aerodynamic Database of High-Rise Buildings.” http://www.wind.arch.t-kougei.ac.jp/info_center/windpressure/highrise/Homepage/homepageHDF.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B., H. Bao, J. Ou, and S. Tian. 2005. “Stability and Accuracy Analysis of the Central Difference Method for Real-Time Substructure Testing.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34 (7): 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., Q. Wang, P. Benson Shing, and J. Ou. 2007. “Equivalent Force Control Method for Generalized Real-Time Substructure Testing with Implicit Integration.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36 (9): 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., and K. Tamma. 2004. “Design, Analysis, and Synthesis of Generalized Single Step Single Solve and Optimal Algorithms for Structural Dynamics.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 59 (5): 597–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar