A Computationally Efficient Algorithm for Constructing Effective Vector-Valued Seismic Intensity Measures for Engineering Structures

References

• Agarap, A. F. 2018. “Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (Relu).” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08375.
   Google Scholar
• Ancheta, T. D., R. B. Darragh, J. P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, W. J. Silva, B. S.-J. Chiou, K. E. Wooddell, et al. 2014. “NGA-West2 Database.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS197M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council, & Structural Engineers Association of California. 1978. Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings: A Cooperative Effort with the Design Professions, Building Code Interests, and the Research Community ( No. 6). Redwood City, CA: Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Aptikaev, F. F. 1982. “Seismicity: On the Correlation of MM Intensity with Parameters of Ground Shaking.” In European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens, Greece, 95–101. Vol. 7. Greece: Technical Chamber of Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Araya, R., and R. Saragoni. 1980. “Capacidad de los movimientos sísmicos de producir daño estructural.”
   Google Scholar
• Architectural Institute of Japan. 2013. “Recommendation for the Design of Seismically Isolated Buildings.” (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A. 1970. Measure of Earthquake Intensity. Santiago de Chile: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge University of Chile.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Rep. No. FEMA-356. Washington, DC: Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., and C. Allin Cornell. 2005. “A Vector‐Valued Ground Motion Intensity Measure Consisting of Spectral Acceleration and Epsilon.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (10): 1193–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balke, W. T., and U. Güntzer. 2004. “Multi-Objective Query Processing for Database Systems.” In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 936–947. Vol. 30. Toronto, Canada: VLDB Endowment.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. R. 1988. A Criterion for Determining Exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake. EPRI Report NP-5930. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bojórquez, E., R. Chávez, A. Reyes-Salazar, S. E. Ruiz, and J. Bojórquez. 2017. “A New Ground Motion Intensity Measure IB.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 99:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojórquez, E., and I. Iervolino. 2011. “Spectral Shape Proxies and Nonlinear Structural Response.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31 (7): 996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojórquez, E., I. Iervolino, A. Reyes-Salazar, and S. E. Ruiz. 2012. “Comparing Vector-Valued Intensity Measures for Fragility Analysis of Steel Frames in the Case of Narrow-Band Ground Motions.” Engineering Structures 45:472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., A. S. Elnashai, and A. G. Weir. 2000. “Compatible Acceleration and Displacement Spectra for Seismic Design Codes.” In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 8. Auckland: IAEE. Paper No. 207.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. 2011. “Empirical Equations for the Prediction of Displacement Spectrum Intensity and Its Correlation with Other Intensity Measures.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31 (8): 1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratti, N. 2012. “A Comparison of the Performances of Various Ground–Motion Intensity Measures.” In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 24–28. Lisbon, Portugal: IAEE.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 1994. Eurocode8, Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structure. Brussels: ENV1998-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. Y., and L. P. Ye. 2008. “Earthquake Input Energy Sprctrum for Inelastic SDOF Systems.” Engineering Mechanics 25 (2): 28–039. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., N. Xiang, Z. Guan, and J. Li. 2022. “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Tall Pier Bridges Under Mainshock-Aftershock-Like Earthquake Sequences Using Vector-Valued Intensity Measure.” Engineering Structures 253:113732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. 2007. Earthquake Dynamics of Base-Isolated Buildings. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. 3rd ed. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P., and K. Jacobs. 2004. “The Importance of the Loss Function in Option Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics 72 (2): 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, P. P., G. G. Deierlein, S. S. Mehanny, and C. A. Cornell. 2000. “Development of a Two-Parameter Seismic Intensity Measure and Probabilistic Assessment Procedure.” The Second US-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures 20.
   Google Scholar
• Cosenza, E., C. Greco, and G. Manfredi. 1998. “An Equivalent Steel Index in the Assesement of the Ductility Performances of the Reinforcement.” CEB Comité Euro international du Béton Bulletin N°242:157–170.
   Google Scholar
• De Biasio, M., S. Grange, F. Dufour, F. Allain, and I. Petre-Lazar. 2014. “A Simple and Efficient Intensity Measure to Account for Nonlinear Structural Behavior.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (4): 1403–1426. https://doi.org/10.1193/010614EQS006M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakal, R. P., A. Pourali, A. S. Tasligedik, T. Yeow, A. Baird, G. MacRae, and S. Pampanin, A. Palermo. 2016. “Seismic Performance of Non-Structural Components and Contents in Buildings: An Overview of NZ Research.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 15 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0301-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., J. Chen, and J. Shen. 2020. “Conditional Generative Adversarial Network Model for Simulating Intensity Measures of Aftershocks.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 139:106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, J. Y., and D. C. Feng. 2023. Feature Selection of Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Data‐Driven Surrogate Modeling of Structures. UK: Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, H., and F. Jalayer. 2021. “Selection of Seismic Intensity Measures for Prescribed Limit States using Alternative Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Methods.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 50 (5): 1235–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, H., F. Jalayer, A. Lucchini, F. Mollaioli, and G. Manfredi. 2015. “Preliminary Ranking of Alternative Scalar and Vector Intensity Measures of Ground Shaking.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (10): 2805–2840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9755-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., T. Vidic, and M. Fischinger. 1990. “A Measure of Earthquake Motion Capacity to Damage Medium-Period Structures.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 9 (5): 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(05)80002-8.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1994. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings. Vols. 1 and 2. Washington, DC: FEMA 274.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. 2012. Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology-Earthquake Model Technical Manual (HAZUSMH 2.1). Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Filiatrault, A., and T. Sullivan. 2014. “Performance-Based Seismic Design of Nonstructural Building Components: The Next Frontier of Earthquake Engineering.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 13 (S1): 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0238-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, P., D. M. Seyedi, and J. Douglas. 2013. “Vector-valued fragility functions for seismic risk evaluation.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11 (2): 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9402-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorian, C. E., and M. Grigorian. 2016. “Performance Control and Efficient Design of Rocking-Wall Moment Frames.” Journal of Structural Engineering 142 (2): 04015139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorian, M., A. S. Moghadam, and H. Mohammadi. 2017. “Advances in Rocking Core-Moment Frame Analysis.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12): 5551–5577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0177-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadiani, N., M. Davoodi, and M. K. Jafari. 2013. “Correlation between Settlement of Embankment Dams and Ground Motion Intensity Indices of Pulse-Like Records.”
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C. B., and J. W. Baker. 2006. “Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Collapse Capacity Prediction: Choice of Optimal Spectral Period and Effect of Spectral Shape.” In 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 18–22. San Francisco, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
   Google Scholar
• Housner, G. W. 1970. “Strong Ground Motion.” In Earthquake Engineering, 91. Chapter 4.
   Google Scholar
• Housner, G. W. 1975. “Measures of Severity of Earthquake Ground Shaking.” In Proceedings of US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 25–33. Ann Arbor, MI: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
   Google Scholar
• Housner, G. W., and P. C. Jennings. 1964. “Generation of Artificial Earthquakes.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 90 (1): 113–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000448.
   Google Scholar
• Jasmi, R. P., B. Perumal, and M. P. Rajasekaran. 2014. “Comparison of Medical Image Compression using DWT Algorithm and Neural Network Techniques.” Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 8 (19): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kapposl, A. J. 1990. “Sensitivity of Calculated Irjelastic Seismic Response to Input Motion Characteristics.”
   Google Scholar
• Keskar, N. S., and R. Socher. 2017. “Improving Generalization Performance by Switching from Adam to Sgd.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07628.
   Google Scholar
• Kiani, J., C. Camp, and S. Pezeshk. 2018. “Role of Conditioning Intensity Measure in the Influence of Ground Motion Duration on the Structural Response.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 104:408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi, M., T. Nakamura, and I. D. Aiken. 2010. “Three‐Dimensional Analysis for Square Seismic Isolation Bearings under Large Shear Deformations and High Axial Loads.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 39 (13): 1513–1531. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohrangi, M., P. Bazzurro, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2016. “Vector and Scalar IMs in Structural Response Estimation, Part I: Hazard Analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1507–1524. https://doi.org/10.1193/053115EQS080M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., N. Naumoski, M. Saatcioglu, and S. Foo. 2011. “Improved Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis. Part 1: Development of Improved Intensity Measures.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 38 (1): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., X. Liu, and D. Lu. 2018. “Analysis of Correlation Between Principal Components of Multivariate Earthquake Intensity Measures and Structural Damage.” Engineering Mechanics 35 (8): 122–129,137. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T. T., X. H. Yu, and D. G. Lu. 2020. “An Approach to Develop Compound Intensity Measures for Prediction of Damage Potential of Earthquake Records using Canonical Correlation Analysis.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (11): 1747–1770. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1481157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchini, A., Y. Cheng, F. Mollaioli, and L. Liberatore. 2013. “Predicting Floor Response Spectra for Rc Frame Structures.” In 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Kos Island, Greece: National Technical University of Athens. Paper No. 1334.
   Google Scholar
• Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. “Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 357–392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., X. Z. Lu, and L. P. Ye. 2012. “Discussion on the Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Super High-Rise Buildings.” China Civil Engineering Journal 45 (S1): 292–296. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. R. 2004. Fragility-Based Seismic Decision Making for Highway Overpass Bridges. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Marafi, N. A., J. W. Berman, and M. O. Eberhard. 2016. “Ductility‐Dependent Intensity Measure That Accounts for Ground‐Motion Spectral Shape and Duration.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45 (4): 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsagar, V. A., and R. S. Jangid. 2004. “Influence of Isolator Characteristics on the Response of Base-Isolated Structures.” Engineering Structures 26 (12): 1735–1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, K. 1992. “On the Intensity Measure of Strong Motions Related to Structural Failures.” In Proceedings 10WCEE, 375–380. Vol. 1. Rotterdam: IAEE.
   Google Scholar
• MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2010. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB 50011-2010). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Nau, J. M., and W. J. Hall. 1984. “Scaling Methods for Earthquake Response Spectra.” Journal of Structural Engineering 110 (7): 1533–1548. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:7(1533).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. D., M. Shin, and J. M. LaFave. 2023. “Optimal Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Steel Moment Frames.” Journal of Building Engineering 65:105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttli, O. W. 1979. State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States. Report 16, the Relation of Sustained Maximum Ground Acceleration and Velocity to Earthquake Intensity and Magnitude.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E., B. G. Nielson, and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Selection of Optimal Intensity Measures in Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Highway Bridge Portfolios.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (5): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, P., S. Wu, H. Wang, and X. Nie. 2018. “Seismic Performance Evaluation of an Infilled Rocking Wall Frame Structure Through Quasi-Static Cyclic Testing.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 17 (2): 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0447-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J., A. H. Ang, and Y. K. Wen. 1985. “Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings.” Journal of Structural Engineering 111 (4): 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(740).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, R. 2007. “On Ground Motion Intensity Indices.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (1): 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2424748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, R., and J. E. Garcia. 2001. “Hysteretic Energy Spectrum and Damage Control.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 30 (12): 1791–1816. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong, X. L., J. H. Yang, L. Jun, Y. X. Zhang, S. S. Zheng, and L. Dong. 2023. “Optimal Ground Motion Intensity Measure for Seismic Assessment of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures.” Case Studies in Construction Materials 18:e01678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01678.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, A., and S. K. Mishra. 2021. “Synthesis of a Vector-Valued Intensity Measure for Improved Prediction of Seismic Demands in Inter-Story-Isolated (ISI) Buildings Subjected to Near Fault Ground Motions.” Engineering Structures 248:113241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma, S. K., and K. S. Yang. 1987. “An Evaluation of Strong Motion Records and a New Parameter A95.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 15 (1): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., P. Pan, L. Ye, Y. Xu, and C. Wang. 2013. “Skyline‐Based Ground Motion Selection Method for Nonlinear Time History Analysis of Building Structures.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (9): 1361–1373. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, N. 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sucuoglu, H., and A. Nurtug. 1995. “Prediction of Seismic Energy Dissipation in SDOF Systems.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 24 (2): 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240904.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, B., M. Deng, S. Zhang, C. Wang, W. Cui, Q. Li, and H. Yan. 2023. “Optimal Selection of Scalar and Vector-Valued Intensity Measures for Improved Fragility Analysis in Cross-Fault Hydraulic Tunnels.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 132:104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavi, S., and M. M. Miranda. 2003. Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements, PEER Report 2003/05. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, T., M. A. Sozen, and N. N. Nielsen. 1970. “Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes.” Journal of the Structural Division 96 (12): 2557–2573. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002765.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcan, J., and Q. Cheng. 2012. “Support Vector Regression for Estimating Earthquake Response Spectra.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (4): 1205–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9350-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. “A Study on the Duration of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65 (3): 581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. “Developing Efficient Scalar and Vector Intensity Measures for IDA Capacity Estimation by Incorporating Elastic Spectral Shape Information.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (13): 1573–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Thun, J. L., L. H. Rochim, G. A. Scitt, and J. A. Wilson. 1988. “Earthquake Ground Motions for Design and Analysis of Dams.” Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II-Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation, 463–481. New York: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P., and S. Peng. 2019. “On a New Method of Estimating Shear Wave Velocity from Conventional Well Logs.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 180:105–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., X. Lu, Y. Tian, and Y. Huang. 2022. “Real-Time Seismic Damage Prediction and Comparison of Various Ground Motion Intensity Measures Based on Machine Learning.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 26 (8): 4259–4279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1826371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, M. Y., D. G. Lu, X. H. Yu, and M. M. Jia. 2023. “Selection of Optimal Seismic Intensity Measures Using Fuzzy-Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 164:107615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahyaabadi, A., and M. Tehranizadeh. 2011. “New Scalar Intensity Measure for Near-Fault Ground Motions Based on the Optimal Combination of Spectral Responses.” Scientia Iranica 18 (6): 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakhchalian, M., A. Nicknam, and G. G. Amiri. 2015. “Optimal Vector-Valued Intensity Measure for Seismic Collapse Assessment of Structures.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 14 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0005-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakut, A., and H. Yılmaz. 2008. “Correlation of Deformation Demands with Ground Motion Intensity.” Journal of Structural Engineering 134 (12): 1818–1828. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:12(1818).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Y., Y. Xia, J. Yang, and L. Sun. 2022. “Optimal Selection of Scalar and Vector-Valued Seismic Intensity Measures Based on Gaussian Process Regression.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 152:106961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, L. P., Q. L. Ma, and Z. W. Miao. 2009. “Study on Earthquake Intensities for Seismic Analysis of Structures.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 29 (4): 9–22. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, C. H., and L. L. Xie. 2007. “A New Approach of Selecting Real Input Ground Motions for Seismic Design: The Most Unfavourable Real Seismic Design Ground Motions.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (8): 1009–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Z. He, and Y. Yang. 2018. “A Spectral-Velocity-Based Combination-Type Earthquake Intensity Measure for Super High-Rise Buildings.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (2): 643–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0224-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, J., J. S. Jeon, Y. H. Shao, and L. Chen. 2019. “Optimal Intensity Measures in Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Cable-Stayed Bridges Subjected to Pulse-Like Ground Motions.” Journal of Bridge Engineering 24 (2): 04018118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., and M. Li. 2015. “An Area-Based Intensity Measure for Incremental Dynamic Analysis.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 14 (2): 451–457. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar