References
- Abma, T. A., and R. E. Stake. 2001. “‘Stake’s Responsive Evaluation: Core Ideas and Evolution’. Article.” New Directions for Evaluation 2001 (92): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.31.
- Andersson, P., and S. Köpsén. 2019. “VET Teachers Between School and Working Life: Boundary Processes Enabling Continuing Professional Development.” Journal of Education & Work 32 (6–7): 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1673888.
- Cheng, T.-L. 2018. “How Does Supervision Develop Students’ Professional Identity When Entering the Childcare Workforce? Applying a Responsive Evaluation Approach to Guide RUFDATA for the Fieldwork Placement Evaluation of a Tertiary Early-Childhood Education Programme in Hong Kong.” Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice 6 (2): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.337.
- Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Enquiry & Research Design, Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
- Crotty, M. J. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: SAGE Publications.
- Farrell, A. M. 1992. “What Teachers Can Learn from Industry Internships.” Educational Leadership 49 (6): 38–39.
- Grix, J. 2019. The Foundations of Research. 3rd ed. UK: Red Globe Press.
- Hu, D., B. M. Zwickl, and C. Carusone. 2020. “Impact of Industry Experience on Faculty Teaching Practices in STEM.” Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2019, Provo, UT, July 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.hu.
- The Malta Chamber. 2018. “GO4Industry Teacher Internship Programme Launched.”
- Ministry For Education and Employment. 2014. “Framework for the Education Strategy for Malta 2014-2024: The Current Context, Our Beliefs and Values.”
- Mulnix, A. B., and D. Allen. 2016. “STEM Faculty as Learners in Pedagogical Reform and the Role of Research Articles as Professional Development Opportunities.” CBE Life Sciences Education 15 (4): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0251.
- Perry, C., and I. Ball. 1998. “What Do Teachers Really Know About Work? Professional Development Through Education-Industry Links.” Teacher Development 2 (1): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664539800200038.
- Saunders, M. 2000. “Beginning an Evaluation with RUFDATA: Theorizing a Practical Approach to Evaluation Planning.” Evaluation 6 (1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890022209082.
- Saunders, M. 2006. “The “Presence” of Evaluation Theory and Practice in Educational and Social Development: Toward an Inclusive Approach.” London Review of Education 4 (2): 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460600855526.
- Sherman, P. D. 2016. “Using RUFDATA to Guide a Logic Model for a Quality Assurance Process in an Undergraduate University Program.” Evaluation and Program Planning 55 (April): 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.12.009.
- Stake, R. 2004. “Responsive Evaluation.” In Standards-Based & Responsive Evaluation, 86–107. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985932.n4.
- Stufflebeam, D. L., and C. L. S. Coryn. 2014. “Approach 2018: Responsive or Stakeholder-Centered Evaluation.” In Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications, 2nd ed., 192–196. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
- Stufflebeam, D. L., and A. J. Shinkfleld. 1988. Systematic Evaluation: A Self·lnstructional Guide to Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-88415-356-6.50011-8.
- University of Arizona. 2021. “Teachers in Industry – Partnering with Business to Prepare the Future Workforce.” https://teachersinindustry.arizona.edu/.