228
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Who would never grant them equal rights? A comparative analysis of welfare chauvinism in Central and Eastern Europe

Hvem vil aldri gi dem like rettigheter? En komparativ analyse av velferdssjåvinisme i Sentral- og Øst-Europa

&

References

  • Abou-Chadi, T., & Krause, W. (2020). The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 829–847. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000029
  • Andersen, J. G., & Bjørklund, T. (1990). Structural changes and new cleavages: The progress parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica, 33(3), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939003300303
  • Arzheimer, K. (2018). Explaining electoral support for the radical right (J. Rydgren, Ed.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274559.013.8
  • Aspelund, A., Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2013). Political conservatism and left-right orientation in 28 Eastern and Western European countries: Conservatism and left-right. Political Psychology, 34(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12000
  • Auers, D. (2018). Populism and political party institutionalisation in the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0231-1
  • Baldi, G., & Goodman, S. W. (2015). Migrants into members: Social rights, civic requirements, and citizenship in Western Europe. West European Politics, 38(6), 1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1041237
  • Bartoszewicz, M. G., & Eibl, O. (2022). A rather wild imagination: Who is and who is not a migrant in the Czech media and society? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 230. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01240-2
  • Bell, D. A., Strabac, Z., & Valenta, M. (2022). The importance of skin colour in central Eastern Europe. A comparative analysis of racist attitudes in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 11(1), 5–22.
  • Bell, D. A., Valenta, M., & Strabac, Z. (2021). A comparative analysis of changes in anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim attitudes in Europe. Comparative Migration Studies, 9, 1–24.
  • Bell, D. A., Valenta, M., & Strabac, Z. (2023a). Perceptions and realities: Explaining welfare chauvinism in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 33(3), 301–316.
  • Bell, D. A., Valenta, M., & Strabac, Z. (2023b). Nordic welfare chauvinism: A comparative study of welfare chauvinism in Sweden, Norway and Finland. International Social Work, 66(6), 1786–1802.
  • Bello, V. (2017). International migration and international security: Why prejudice is a global security threat. Routledge.
  • Bessudnov, A. (2016). Ethnic hierarchy and public attitudes towards immigrants in Russia. European Sociological Review, 32(5), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw002
  • Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388607
  • Careja, R., & Harris, E. (2022). Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research: Findings and challenges. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287211068796
  • CBOS. (2023). How should Poland support refugees from Ukraine. Retrieved August 23, 2023, from https://www.cbos.pl/EN/publications/news/2022/25/newsletter.php
  • Cinpoeş, R., & Norocel, O. C. (2020). Nostalgic nationalism, welfare chauvinism, and migration anxieties in Central and Eastern Europe. In O. C. Norocel, A. Hellström, & M. B. Jørgensen (Eds.), Nostalgia and hope: Intersections between politics of culture, welfare, and migration in Europe (pp. 51–65). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41694-2_4
  • Deacon, B. (2000). Eastern European welfare states: The impact of the politics of globalization. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/a012487
  • De Haas, H., Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2022). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (6th ed., reprinted by Bloomsbury Academic). Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Dražanová, L. (2022). Sometimes it is the little things: A meta-analysis of individual and contextual determinants of attitudes toward immigration (2009–2019). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 87, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.01.008
  • Dražanová, L., & Geddes, A. (2023). Attitudes towards Ukrainian refugees and governmental responses in 8 European countries. In S. Carrera & M. Ineli-Ciger (Eds.), Eu responses to the large-scale refugee displacement from Ukraine: An analysis on the temporary protection directive and Its implications for the future EU asylum policy. European University Institute (EUI).
  • Eger, M. A., & Breznau, N. (2017). Immigration and the welfare state: A cross-regional analysis of European welfare attitudes. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58(5), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715217690796
  • Eger, M. A., & Valdez, S. (2015). Neo-nationalism in Western Europe. European Sociological Review, 31(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu087
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
  • Eugster, B. (2018). Immigrants and poverty, and conditionality of immigrants’ social rights. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(5), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717753580
  • Fenger, H. J. M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–30.
  • Field, R. S., Chung, D., & Fleay, C. (2021). Working with restrictions: A scoping review of social work and human service practice with people seeking asylum in the Global North. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa006
  • Ford, R. (2016). Who should we help? An experimental test of discrimination in the British welfare state. Political Studies, 64(3), 630–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12194
  • Goerres, A., Spies, D. C., & Kumlin, S. (2018). The electoral supporter base of the alternative for Germany. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12306
  • Gorodzeisky, A. (2013). Does the type of rights matter? Comparison of attitudes toward the allocation of political versus social rights to labour migrants in Israel. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 630–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs013
  • Gorodzeisky, A. (2021). Public opinion toward asylum seekers in post-communist Europe: A comparative perspective. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1987267
  • Gorodzeisky, A., Glikman, A., & Maskileyson, D. (2015). The nature of anti-immigrant sentiment in post-socialist Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2014.918452
  • Gorodzeisky, A., & Leykin, I. (2020). When borders migrate: Reconstructing the category of ‘international migrant’. Sociology, 54(1), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519860403
  • Gorodzeisky, A., & Leykin, I. (2022). On the West–East methodological bias in measuring international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(13), 3160–3183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1873116
  • Gorodzeisky, A., & Semyonov, M. (2009). Terms of exclusion: Public views towards admission and allocation of rights to immigrants in European countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802245851
  • Gorodzeisky, A., & Semyonov, M. (2009). Terms of exclusion: Public views towards admission and allocation of rights to immigrants in European countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(3), 401–423.
  • Grdešić, M. (2019). Neoliberalism and welfare chauvinism in Germany. German Politics and Society, 37(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2019.370201
  • Grdešić, M. (2020). The Strange case of welfare chauvinism in Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 53(3), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2020.53.3.107
  • Greve, B. (2020). Myths, narratives and welfare states: The impact of stories on welfare state development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Heizmann, B., Jedinger, A., & Perry, A. (2018). Welfare chauvinism, economic insecurity and the asylum seeker “crisis”. Societies, 8(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030083
  • Hjorth, F. (2016). Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics, 17(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515607371
  • Hutter, S., & Kriesi, H. (2022). Politicising immigration in times of crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853902
  • Jylhä, K. M., Rydgren, J., & Strimling, P. (2019). Radical right-wing voters from right and left: Comparing Sweden Democrat voters who previously voted for the Conservative Party or the Social Democratic Party. Scandinavian Political Studies, 42(3-4), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12147
  • Keskinen, S., Norocel, O. C., & Jørgensen, M. B. (2016). The politics and policies of welfare chauvinism under the economic crisis. Critical Social Policy, 36(3), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315624168
  • Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. J. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. The University Press of Michigan.
  • Koning, E. A. (2022). Welfare chauvinist or neoliberal opposition to immigrant welfare? The importance of measurement in the study of welfare chauvinism. In M. M. L. Crepaz (Ed.), Handbook on migration and welfare (pp. 156–174). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Kros, M., & Coenders, M. (2019). Explaining differences in welfare chauvinism between and within individuals over time: The role of subjective and objective economic risk, economic egalitarianism, and ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 35(6), 860–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz034
  • Lancaster, C. M. (2022). Immigration and the sociocultural divide in central and Eastern Europe: Stasis or evolution? European Journal of Political Research, 61(2), 544–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12474
  • Leruth, B., & Taylor-Gooby, P. (2021). The United Kingdom before and after Brexit. In B. Greve (Ed.), Handbook on austerity, populism and the welfare state (pp. 170–185). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Leykin, I., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2023). Is anti-immigrant sentiment owned by the political right? Sociology, 58. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231161206
  • Lugosi, N. V. (2018). Radical right framing of social policy in Hungary: Between nationalism and populism. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34(3), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2018.1483256
  • Magni, G. (2021). Economic inequality, immigrants and selective solidarity: From perceived lack of opportunity to in-group favoritism. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1357–1380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000046
  • Mazurkiewicz, A. (Ed.). (2019). East central European migrations during the cold War: A handbook. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110610635
  • Minderhoud, P. E. (1999). Asylum seekers and access to social security: Recent developments in The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium. In A. Bloch & C. Levy (Eds.), Refugees, citizenship and social policy in Europe (pp. 132–148). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371248_7
  • Moise, A. D. (2020). Researching the welfare impact of populist radical right parties comment on “A scoping review of populist radical right parties’ influence on welfare policy and its implications for population health in Europe”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.125
  • Moise, A. D., Dennison, J., & Kriesi, H. (2023). European attitudes to refugees after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. West European Politics, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2229688
  • Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European sociological review, 26(1), 67–82.
  • Ramet, S., & Valenta, P. (2016). Ethnic Minorities and Politics in Post-Socialist Southeastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rinaldi, C., & Bekker, M. P. M. (2020). A scoping review of populist radical right parties’ influence on welfare policy and its implications for population health in Europe. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.48
  • Robinson, K. (2014). Voices from the front line: Social work with refugees and asylum seekers in Australia and the UK. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1602–1620. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct040
  • Rydgren, J. (2008). Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 47(6), 737–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00784.x
  • Savage, L. (2023). Preferences for redistribution, welfare chauvinism, and radical right party support in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 37(2), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221079797
  • Saxonberg, S., & Sirovátka, T. (2018). Central and Eastern Europe. In B. Greve (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the welfare state (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Schumacher, G., & Van Kersbergen, K. (2016). Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics, 22(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549345
  • Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. R. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination: Vol. 2 (pp. 255–278). Psychology Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 33–37). Psychology Press.
  • United Nations. (2020). International Migrant Stock. Downloaded from https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock.
  • Vala, J., & Pereira, C. R. (2018). Racisms and normative pressures: A new outbreak of biological racism? In M. C. Lobo, F. C. da Silva, & J. P. Zúquete (Eds.), Changing societies: Legacies and challenges. Citizenship in crisis. (Vol. 2, pp. 217–248). ICS.
  • Valenta, M., & Berg, B. (2010). User involvement and empowerment among asylum seekers in Norwegian reception centres. European Journal of Social Work, 13(4), 483–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691451003603406
  • Valenta, M., & Strabac, Z. (2011). State-assisted integration, but not for all: Norwegian welfare services and labour migration from the new EU member states. International Social Work, 54(5), 663–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872810392811
  • Valenta, M., & Thorshaug, K. (2013). Restrictions on Right to Work for Asylum Seekers: The Case of the Scandinavian Countries, Great Britain and the Netherlands. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 20(3), 459–482.
  • Whitefield, S. (2002). Political cleavages and post-communist Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112601.144242
  • Włoch, R. (2009). Islam in Poland: between ethnicity and universal umma. International Journal of Sociology, 39(3), 58–67.
  • Wojcik, A. D., Cislak, A., & Schmidt, P. (2021). ‘The left is right’: Left and right political orientation across Eastern and Western Europe. The Social Science Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1986320
  • Zogata-Kusz, A., Öbrink Hobzová, M., & Cekiera, R. (2023). Deserving of assistance: The social construction of Ukrainian refugees. Ethnopolitics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2023.2286779
  • Župarić-Iljić, D. & Valenta, M. (2019). “Refugee Crisis” in the Southeastern European Countries: The rise and fall of the Balkan Corridor. In C. Menjívar, M. Ruiz & I. Ness (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of migration crises, Oxford handbooks (pp. 366–388). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190856908.013.29