Publication Cover
Philosophical Explorations
An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action
Latest Articles
78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Wide computationalism revisited: distributed mechanisms, parsimony and testability

Received 24 Oct 2023, Accepted 01 Mar 2024, Published online: 24 Mar 2024

References

  • Baumgartner, Michael, and Lorenzo Casini. 2017. “An Abductive Theory of Constitution.” Philosophy of Science 84 (2): 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/690716.
  • Baumgartner, Michael, and Wendy Wilsktzy. 2017. “Is it Possible to Experimentally Determine the Extension of Cognition?” Philosophical Psychology 30 (8): 1104–1125.
  • Chalmers, David. 1994. “On Implementing a Computation.” Minds and Machines 4 (4): 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974166.
  • Chalmers, David. 2011. “A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition.” Journal of Cognitive Science 12 (1): 323–357.
  • Chrisley, Ron. 1995. “Why Everything Doesn’t Realize Every Computation.” Minds and Machines 4: 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974167.
  • Craver, Carl. 2006. “When Mechanistic Models Explain.” Synthese 153 (3): 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x.
  • Craver, Carl. 2007. Explaining the Brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Craver, Carl. 2013. “Functions and Mechanisms: A Perspectivalist View.” In Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, edited by Philippe Huneman, 133–158. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Craver, Carl F., Stuart Glennan, and Povich. Michael. 2021. “Constitutive Relevance & Mutual Manipulability Revisited.” Synthese 199 (3–4): 8807–8828.
  • Dewhurst, Joe. 2018. “Individuation Without Representation.” British Journal of Philosophy of Science 69: 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw018
  • Fresco, Nis. 2014. Physical Computation and Cognitive Science. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Harbecke, Jens. 2014. “The Role of Supervenience and Constitution in Neuroscientific Research.” Synthese 191 (5): 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0308-y.
  • Harbecke, Jens, and Oron. Shagrir. 2019. “The Role of the Environment in Computational Explanation.” European Journal of Philosophy of Science 9: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0263-7.
  • Kaplan, David. 2011. “Explanation and Description in Computational Neuroscience.” Synthese 183: 339–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9970-0
  • Kaplan, David. 2012. “How to Demarcate the Boundaries of Cognition.” Biology and Philosophy 27: 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9308-4
  • Kastner, Lena. 2017. Philosophy of Cognitive Neuroscience: Causal Explanations, Mechanisms and Experimental Manipulations. Boston: De Gruyter.
  • Kersten, Luke. 2017. “A Mechanistic Account of Wide Computationalism.” The Review of Psychology and Philosophy 8 (3): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-016-0322-3
  • Kersten, Luke. 2020. “How to be Concrete: Mechanistic Computation and the Abstraction Problem.” Philosophical Explorations 23 (3): 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2020.1799664.
  • Kersten, Luke. 2024. “An Idealised Account of Mechanistic Computation.” Synthese 203 (99): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04526-x.
  • Kirchhoff, Michael, and Julian Kiverstein. 2019. Extended Consciousness and Predictive Processing: A Third Wave View. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Krickel, Beate. 2018. “Saving the Mutual Manipulability Account of Constitutive Relevance.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 68: 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.003.
  • Leuridan, Bert, and Thomas Lodewyck. 2021. “Diachronic Causal Constitutive Relations.” Synthese 198: 9035–9065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02616-0.
  • Losonsky, Michael. 1995. “Embedded Systems vs Individualism.” Minds and Machines 5: 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974750.
  • Milkowski, Marcin. 2013. Explaining the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Milkowski, Marcin. 2015. “Computational Mechanism and Models of Cognition.” Philosophia Scientiae 18 (3): 1–14.
  • Milkowski, Marcin. 2018. “Morphological Computation: Nothing but Physical Computation.” Entropy 20 (12): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20120942.
  • Miłkowski, Marcin, Clowes Robert, Rucińska Zuzanna, Alexandra Przegalińska, Tadeusz Zawidzki, Joel Krueger, Adam Gies, et al. 2018. “From Wide Cognition to Mechanisms: A Silent Revolution.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393.
  • Nowakowski, Przemyslaw R. 2017. “Bodily Processing: The Role of Morphological Computation.” Entropy 19 (7): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19070295.
  • Piccinini, Gualtiero. 2007. “Computing Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 74 (4): 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1086/522851.
  • Piccinini, Gualtiero. 2015. Physical Computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Piccinini, Gualtiero. 2018. “Computational Mechanisms.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, edited by S. Glennan, and P. Illari, 435–446. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Piccinini, Gualtiero. 2020. Neurocognitive Mechanisms: Explaining Biological Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866282.001.0001.
  • Piccinini, Gualtiero, and Andrea Scarantino. 2011. “Information Processing, Computation, and Cognition.” Journal of Biological Physics 37 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-010-9195-3.
  • Rupert, Robert. 2004. “Challenges to the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 389–428. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2004101826.
  • Rutkowska, Julie. C. 1993. The Computational Infant. Brighton: Harvester.
  • Scheutz, Matthias. 1999. “When Physical Systems Realize Functions … .” Minds and Machines 9 (2): 161–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008364332419.
  • Shagrir, Oron. 2020. “In Defense of the Semantic View of Computation.” Synthese 197: 4083–4108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01921-z.
  • Smart, Paul. 2018. “Human-extended Machine Cognition.” Cognitive System Research 49: 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.11.001.
  • Smart, Paul. 2022. “Toward a Mechanistic Account of Extended Cognition.” Philosophical Psychology 35 (8): 1107–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.2023123.
  • Thagard, Paul. 2007. “Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge.” Philosophy of Science 74: 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/520941.
  • Webb, Barbara. 2008. “Using Robots to Understand Animal Behavior.” In Advances in the Study of Behavior, edited by H. J. Brockmann, Timothy J. Roper, Marc Naguib, Katherine E. Wynne-Edwards, Chris Barnard, and John C. Mitani, vol. 38, 1–58. London: Elsevier.
  • Webb, Barbara, and Reid Harrison. 2000. “Integrating Sensorimotor Systems in a Robot Model of Cricket Behaviour, Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems III.” Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 4196: 113–124.
  • Wells, Andrew J. 1998. “Turing Analysis of Computation and Theories of Cognitive Architecture.” Cognition 22 (3): 269–294.
  • Wilson, Robert A. 1994. “Wide Computationalism.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 103 (4): 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/103.411.351.
  • Wilson, Robert A. 1995. Cartesian Psychology and Physical Minds: Individualism and the Sciences of the Minds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, Robert A. 2004. Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, Robert. 2010. “Extended Vision.” In Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems, edited by Nivedita Gangopadhyay, Michael Madary, and Finn Spicer, 277–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ylikoski, Petri, and Jaakko Kuorikoski. 2010. “Dissecting Explanatory Power.” Philosophical Studies 148 (2): 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9324-z.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.