Empathy, extremism, and epistemic autonomy

Works Cited

• Baele, S., L. Brace, and D. Ging. 2023. “A Diachronic Cross-Platforms Analysis of Violent Extremist Language in the Incel Online Ecosystem.” Terrorism and Political Violence 36 (3): 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2022.2161373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaly, H.. 2022. “Intellectual Autonomy and Intellectual Interdependence.” In In Epistemic Autonomy, edited by J. Matheson and K. Lougheed, 153–172. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003003465-12
   Google Scholar
• Betus, A., M. Jablonski, and A. Lemieux. 2017. "Terrorism and Intergroup Communication.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved 20 Apr. 2024, from https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-409.
   Google Scholar
• Bogetić, K., V. Koller, F. Heritage, and M. McGlashan. 2023. “Landwhales, Femoids and Sub-Humans: Dehumanising Metaphors in Incel Discourse.” Metaphor and the Social World 13 (2): 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23005.bog
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., and A. Liebler. 1993. “Convergence of Stranger Ratings of Personality and Intelligence with Self-Ratings, Partner Ratings, and Measured Intelligence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (3): 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton, A., and S. Dalmazzone. 2002. “Information Control, Loss of Autonomy, and the Emergence of Political Extremism.” In Political Extremism and Rationality, edited by A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, and R. Wintrobe, 44–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., and K. Dutton. 1995. “Truth and Consequences: The Costs and Benefits of Accurate Self-Knowledge.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (12): 1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952112006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2021. Extremism: A Philosophical Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. 2022. “The Monstrous-Feminine in the Incel Imagination: Investigating the Representation of Women as “Femoids” on /r/Braincels.” Feminist Media Studies 22 (2): 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1804976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. 2010. “Violent Radicalization in Europe: What We Know and What We Do Not Know.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33 (9): 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2006. “Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy.” In The Epistemology of Testimony, edited by J. Lackey, and E. Sosa, 225–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, G. 2018. “Evidentialism and Moral Encroachment.” In Believing in Accordance with the Evidence, edited by K. McCain, 169–195. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ging, D. 2017. “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 22 (4): 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glace, A. M., T. Dover, and J. G. Zatkin. 2021. “Taking the Black Pill: An Empirical Analysis of the “Incel”.” Psychology of Men & Masculinities 22 (2): 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. 2013. “Epistemic Dependence in Testimonial Belief, in the Classroom and Beyond.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (2): 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1999. “Democratic Disagreement.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by S. Macedo, 243–280. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C. 2013. “Counter-Terrorism and the Counterfactual: Producing the ‘Radicalisation’ Discourse and the UK PREVENT Strategy.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (3): 394–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00489.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, T. 1980. “Humanity as an End in Itself.” Ethics 91 (1): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/292205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B., J. Ware, and E. Shapiro. 2020. “Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 43 (7): 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janik, R. 2018. “‘I Laugh at the Death of Normies’: How Incels are Celebrating the Toronto Mass Killing.” Southern Poverty Law Center. Online resource. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/04/24/i-laugh-death-normies-how-incels-are-celebrating-toronto-mass-killing.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. 2008. The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, E., and K. Sylvan. 2019. “Prime Time (for the Basing Relation).” In Well-Founded Belief, edited by J. A. Carter, and P. Bondy, 141–173. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, T. 2021. “Birds Aren’t Real, or are They? Inside a Gen Z Conspiracy Theory.” The New York Times, Online Edition, December 9.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., and W. C. Partin. 2022. “Constructing Alternative Facts: Populist Expertise and the QAnon Conspiracy.” New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221090201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, M. 2019. “Can Beliefs Be Based on Practical Reasons?” In Well-Founded Belief: New Essays on the Epistemic Basing Relation, edited by J. A. Carter, and P. Bondy, 215–234. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, S. 2018. “IX—Moral Encroachment.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2): 177–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy007
   Google Scholar
• Neta, R. 2019. “The Basing Relation.” The Philosophical Review 128 (2): 179–217. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-7374945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T. 2020. “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.” Episteme 17 (2): 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32
   Google Scholar
• Nuraniyah, N. 2018. “Not Just Brainwashed: Understanding the Radicalization of Indonesian Female Supporters of the Islamic State.” Terrorism and Political Violence 30 (6): 890–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1481269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K., and S. Stevens. 2015. “Echo Chambers and Online Radicalism: Assessing the Internet's Complicity in Violent Extremism.” Policy & Internet 7 (4): 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. 2016. “Seeing it for Oneself: Perceptual Knowledge, Understanding, and Intellectual Autonomy.” Episteme 13 (1): 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.59
   Google Scholar
• Reisner, A. 2012. “Is There Reason to be Theoretically Rational?” In Reasons for Belief, edited by A. Reisner, and A. Steglich-Petersen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, S., and P. A. Fearon. 2021. “Increasing Cognitive Complexity and Meta-Awareness among at-Risk Youth in Bosnia-Herzegovina in Order to Reduce Risk of Extremism and Interethnic Tension.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 27 (2): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M. 2008. “Having Reasons.” Philosophical Studies 139 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9102-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, D. 2015. Responsibility from the Margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible.” The Journal of Ethics 11 (4): 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-7989-5
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C., and A. Vermeule. 2008. Conspiracy Theories. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 387.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvan, K. 2016. “Epistemic Reasons I: Normativity.” Philosophy Compass 11 (7): 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanesini, A. 2022. “Intellectual Autonomy and its Vices.” In Epistemic Autonomy, edited by J. Matheson and K. Lougheed, 231–249. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Valkenburgh, S. P. 2021. “Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 24 (1): 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18816118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. 1996. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Gary. 1996. “Two Faces of Responsibility.” Philosophical Topics 24 (2): 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Wispé, L. 1987. “History of the Concept of Empathy.” In Empathy and its Development, edited by N. Eisenberg, and J. Strayer, 17–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. 2007. “Ethical and Epistemic Egoism and the Ideal of Autonomy.” Episteme 4 (3): 252–263. https://doi.org/10.3366/E174236000700007X
   Google Scholar