Spatial representation and reasoning in an architecture for embodied agents

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Asgharbeygi, N., Nejati, N., Langley, P., & Arai, S. (2005). Guiding inference through relational reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (pp. 20–37). Bonn, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, G., Kresse, I., & Beetz, M. (2013). Constraint-based movement representation grounded in geometric features. Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (pp. 547–554). Atlanta, GA: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. (1996). A brief history of automatic control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 16(3), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.506394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binford, T. O. (1971). Visual perception by computer. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems and Control. Miami, FL: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, M., Hawes, N., Kelleher, J., & Wyatt, J. (2007). Mediating between qualitative and quantitative representations for task-orientated human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2072–2077). Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRA.1986.1087032
   Google Scholar
• Choi, D., & Langley, P. (2018). Evolution of the Icarus cognitive architecture. Cognitive Systems Research, 48, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clocksin, W. F., & Mellish, C. S. (1981). Programming in Prolog. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J., & Gotts, M. M. (1997). Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus. GeoInformatica, 1(3), 275–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009712514511
   Google Scholar
• Deeken, H., Wiemann, T., & Hertzberg, J. (2018). Grounding semantic maps in spatial databases. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 105, 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. M., Laird, J. E., Nielsen, P. E., Coulter, K., Kenny, P., & Koss, F. (1999). Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Magazine, 20(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v20i1.1438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996). Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(4), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.508439
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, O. (1985). Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Proceedings of the 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (pp. 500–550).St Louis, MO: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B. (2004). An intellectual history of the spatial semantic hierarchy. In M. E. Jeffries & W. K. Yeap (Eds.), Robotics and cognitive approaches to spatial mapping (pp. 243–264). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B. J., & Byun, Y.-T. (1991). A robot exploration and mapping strategy based on a semantic hierarchy of spatial representations. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 8(1–2), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8890(91)90014-C
   Google Scholar
• Laird, J. E. (2012). The Soar cognitive architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P. (2017). Progress and challenges in research on cognitive architectures. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 4870–4876). San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., Barley, M., Meadows, B., Choi, D., & Katz, E. P. (2016). Goals, utilities, and mental simulation in continuous planning. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Cognitive Systems. Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., Choi, D., Barley, M., Meadows, B., & Katz, E. P. (2017). Generating, executing, and monitoring plans with goal-based utilities in continuous domains. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Cognitive Systems. Troy, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., & Katz, E. P. (2022). Motion planning and continuous control in a unified cognitive architecture. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems. Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., Laird, J. E., & Rogers, S. (2009). Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., & Meadows, B. (2019). Heuristic construction of explanations through associative abduction. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 8, 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• LaValle, S. M., & Kuffner, J. J. (2001). Randomized kinodynamic planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(5), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02783640122067453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravec, H., & Elfes, A. (1985). High resolution maps from wide angle sonar. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (pp. 116–121).St Louis, MO: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neches, R., Langley, P., & Klahr, D. (1987). Learning, development, and production systems. In D. Klahr, P. Langley, & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models of learning and development (pp. 1–53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Piegl, L. (1991). On NURBS: A survey. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 11(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.67702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultheiss, H., & Barkowsky, T. (2011). Casimir: An architecture for mental spatial knowledge processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(4), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01151.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanojevic, M., Vranes, S., & Velasevic, D. (1994). Using truth maintenance systems: A tutorial. IEEE Expert, 9(6), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/64.363270
   Google Scholar
• Trafton, J. G., Hiatt, L. M., Harrison, A. M., Tamborello, F., Khemlani, S. S., & Schultz, A. C. (2013). ACT-R/E: An embodied cognitive architecture for human robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.2.1.Trafton
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, T., Sammut, C., Hengst, B., & Bratko, I. (2016). A planning and learning hierarchy using qualitative reasoning for the on-line acquisition of robotic behaviors. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 4, 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Yamauchi, B., Schultz, A., & Adams, W. (1998). Mobile robot exploration and map-building with continuous localization. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp.3715–3720). Leuven, Belgium: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeap, W. K. (2011). How Albot0 finds its way home: A novel approach to cognitive mapping using robots. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(4), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01157.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar