Experimental study and multi-objective optimisation of CNC turning parameters of AL6061 materials

References

• Agrawal, R., N. Kumar, K. Parvez, A. Srivastava, and M. S. Alam. 2022. “Optimization of Cutting Force via Variable Feed Rate in Dry Turning Lathe of AISI 304.” In Materials Today: Proceedings 64 (3): 1182–1187.
   Google Scholar
• Asiltürk, İ., and H. Akkuş. 2011. “Determining the Effect of Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness in Hard Turning Using the Taguchi Method.” Measurement 44 (9): 1697–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachchhav, B. D., Sachin Salunkhe, and Vishal Naranje. 2021. “Drilling of High Volume Fraction Al2O3 Metal Matrix Composites.” Materials Performance and Characterization 10 (1): 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camposeco-Negrete, C., J. Calderón-Nájera, and J. Miranda-Valenzuela. 2013. “Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Turning of AISI 1018 Steel With Constant Material Removal Rate Using Robust Design for Minimizing Cutting Power.” In Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA, V02BT02A023. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2013-6252.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, W.-L., M.-J. Xie, L.-W. Wu, Y.-S. Guo, and H.-T. Yau. 2020. “The Optimization of Lathe Cutting Parameters Using a Hybrid Taguchi-Genetic Algorithm.” IEEE Access 8:169576–169584. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022648.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, R. and A. Majumder. 2010. “Optimization of Turning Process Parameters Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm.” In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Barcelona, Spain, 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2010.5586296.
   Google Scholar
• Dave, H., L. Patel, and H. Raval. 2012. “Effect of Machining Conditions on MRR and Surface Roughness During CNC Turning of Different Materials Using TiN Coated Cutting Tools–A Taguchi Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 3 (5): 925–930. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• Kathmore, Pramod, Bhanudas Bachchhav, Somnath Nandi, Sachin Salunkhe, Palanisamy Chandrakumar, Emad Abouel Nasr, and Ali Kamrani. 2023. “Prediction of Thrust Force and Torque for High-Speed Drilling of AL6061 with TMPTO-Based Bio-Lubricants Using Machine Learning.” Lubricants 11 (9): 356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoch, S., S. S. Chauhan, and V. Kumar. 2021. “A Review on Genetic Algorithm: Past, Present, and Future.” Multimedia Tools & Applications 80 (5): 8091–8126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., A. Kamal, and K. Kumar. 2014. “Optimization of Material Removal Rate During Turning of SAE 1020 Material in CNC Lathe Using Taguchi Technique.” Procedia Engineering 97:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.221.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbant, M., H. Gökkaya, and G. Sur. 2007. “Application of Taguchi Method in the Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Surface Roughness in Turning.” Materials & Design 28 (4): 1379–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V., F. Altarazi, T. Tran, and J. Hu. 2022. “Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Cutting Process of Stainless Steel 304: A Comparative Analysis and Estimation with Taguchi Method and Response Surface Methodology.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6677586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V., T. Huynh, T. Nguyen, and T. Tran. 2020. “Single and Multi-Objective Optimization of Processing Parameters for Fused Deposition Modeling in 3D Printing Technology.” International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 17 (1): 7542–7551. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.17.1.2020.03.0558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankaj, A. V., F. Nazir, W. Zhang, and M. Guo. 2022. “Development of a CAE Modeling Technique for Heavy Duty Cargo Weight Using a DFSS Methodology.” SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility 5 (2022–01–0774): 558–566. https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-0774.
   Google Scholar
• Romanova, V., R. Balokhonov, and S. Schmauder. 2013. “Numerical Study of Mesoscale Surface Roughening in Aluminum Polycrystals Under Tension.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 564:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., and C. Larson. 2016. “Statistical Approaches in Surface Finishing. Part 1. Introductory Review and Parametric Hypothesis Testing.” Transactions of the IMF 94 (6): 288–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surya, M. S. 2022. “Optimization of Turning Parameters While Turning Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy for Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate Using Response Surface Methodology.” In Materials Today: Proceedings 62 (6): 3479–3484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.300.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, C.-J., Y.-H. Lin, Y.-K. Yang, and M.-C. Jeng. 2009. “Optimization of Turning Operations with Multiple Performance Characteristics Using the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (6): 2753–2759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, V., J. Kumar, and A. Singh. 2020. “Optimization of Material Removal Rate and Surface Roughness in Turning of 316 Steel by Using Full Factorial Method.” Materials Today: Proceedings 25 (4): 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.029.
   Google Scholar
• Vinoth, V. 2021. “Optimization of Process Parameters in Turning of Aluminum Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology.” Materials Today: Proceedings 46 (19): 9462–9468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.236.
   Google Scholar