498
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Stakeholder engagement: the role of facilitators and gender in ‘opening up’ conversations and enabling participation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 7-39 | Received 21 Jun 2022, Accepted 18 Dec 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2024

References

  • Ashworth, P., A. Littleboy, P. Graham, and S. Niemeyer. 2010. “Turning the Heat On: Public Engagement in Australia's Energy Future.” In Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation, edited by P. Devine-Wright, 131–147. Earthscan.
  • Ashworth, Peta, Svetla Petrova, Kathy Witt, Belinda Wade, Bishal Bharadwaj, Elliot Clarke, Katie Meissner, and Amrita Kambo. 2021a. Citizens’ Panels on the Role of Future Fuels in a Low-Carbon Future Energy Mix in Australia. https://www.futurefuelscrc.com/wp-content/uploads/FFCRC-2.1-07-Citizens-panels_Interim-report_final-web-1.pdf.
  • Ashworth, Peta, Svetla Petrova, Kathy Witt, Belinda Wade, Bishal Bharadwaj, Elliot Clarke, Katie Meissner, and Amrita Kambo. 2021b. Technical Appendices: Citizens’ Panels on the Role of Future Fuels in a Low-Carbon Future Energy Mix in Australia. https://www.futurefuelscrc.com/wp-content/uploads/FFCRC-RP2.1-07-Citizens-panels_Technical-appendices-web.pdf.
  • Australian Bureau of Satistics. 2016. “Greater Melbourne: 2016 Census All Persons QuickStats.” https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2016/2GMEL.
  • Australian Government. 2021. “Australian Values.” https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about-us/our-portfolios/social-cohesion/australian-values.
  • Hurst B., and Ihlen Ø. 2018. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Engagement.” In The Handbook of Communication Engagement. Online edition, edited by K. A. Johnston and M. Taylor, 133–147. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119167600.ch10.
  • Bächtiger, André, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren. 2018. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren, 1–32. Oxford University Press.
  • Bakenne, Adetokunboh, William Nuttall, and Nikolaos Kazantzis. 2016. “Sankey-Diagram-based Insights into the Hydrogen Economy of Today.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41 (19): 7744–7753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.216.
  • Batel, Susana, and Patrick Devine-Wright. 2015. “Towards a Better Understanding of People’s Responses to Renewable Energy Technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory.” Public Understanding of Science 24 (3): 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513514165.
  • Batel, Susana, Patrick Devine-Wright, and Torvald Tangeland. 2013. “Social Acceptance of Low Carbon Energy and Associated Infrastructures: A Critical Discussion.” Energy Policy 58: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018.
  • Braun, Robert, Vincent Blok, Anne Loeber, and Ulrike Wunderle. 2020. “COVID-19 and the Onlineification of Research: Kick-Starting a Dialogue on Responsible Online Research and Innovation (RoRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1789387.
  • Brueckner, Martin, and Marian Eabrasu. 2018. “Pinning Down the Social License to Operate (SLO): The Problem of Normative Complexity.” Resources Policy 59: 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.07.004.
  • Bush, Sarah Sunn, and Amanda Clayton. 2023. “Facing Change: Gender and Climate Change Attitudes Worldwide.” American Political Science Review 117 (2): 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000752.
  • Carcasson, Martin. 2016. “Tackling Wicked Problems Through Deliberative Engagement.” National Civic Review 105 (1): 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.21258.
  • Cheng, B., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2014. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance.” Strategic Management Journal 35 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131.
  • Cislaghi, B., and L. Heise. 2020. “Gender Norms and Social Norms: Differences, Similarities and Why They Matter in Prevention Science.” Sociology of Health & Illness 42 (2): 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13008.
  • Crane, Andrew, Abagail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon, and Donald S. Siegel. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Online edition). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.001.0001.
  • de Bakker, Frank G. A., and Frank den Hond. 2008. “Introducing the Politics of Stakeholder Influence: A Review Essay.” Business & Society 47 (1): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650307306637.
  • De Vries, Raymond, Aimee Stanczyk, Ian F Wall, Rebecca Uhlmann, Laura J Damschroder, and Scott Y Kim. 2010. “Assessing the Quality of Democratic Deliberation: A Case Study of Public Deliberation on the Ethics of Surrogate Consent for Research.” Social Science & Medicine 70 (12): 1896–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.031.
  • Diehl, Sandra, Matthias Karmasin, Barbara Mueller, Ralf Terlutter, and Franzisca Weder. 2017. Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication (Online edition). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1.
  • Dryzek, John S. 2002. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dutta, Mohan. 2020. Communication, Culture and Social Change (Online edition). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26470-3.
  • Edinger-Schons, L. M., L. Lengler-Graiff, S. Scheidler, G. Mende, and J. Wieseke. 2020. “Listen to the Voice of the Customer-First Steps Towards Stakeholder Democracy.” Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (3): 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12252.
  • Flynn, Robert, Miriam Ricci, and Paul Bellaby. 2013. “Deliberation Over New Hydrogen Energy Technologies: Evidence from Two Citizens’ Panels in the UK.” Journal of Risk Research 16 (3-4): 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.743160.
  • Fujimoto, Yuka, Fara Azmat, and Nava Subramaniam. 2019. “Creating Community-Inclusive Organizations: Managerial Accountability Framework.” Business & Society 58 (4): 712–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316680060.
  • Gallois, Cindy, Peta Ashworth, Joan Leach, and Kieren Moffat. 2017. “The Language of Science and Social Licence to Operate.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16663254.
  • Gastil, John. 2018. “The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (1): 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113639.
  • Goodman, Jennifer, and Jukka Mäkinen. 2022. “Democracy in Political Corporate Social Responsibility: A Dynamic, Multilevel Account.” Business & Society 62 (2): 250–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211068421.
  • Gunningham, N., R. A. Kagan, and D. Thornton. 2004. “Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses go Beyond Compliance.” Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation 29 (2): 307–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb00338.x.
  • Hurst, Bree, and Kim A Johnston. 2021. “The Social Imperative in Public Relations: Utilities of Social Impact, Social License and Engagement.” Public Relations Review 47 (2): 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102039.
  • Idowu, Samuel O, Nicholas Capaldi, Liangrong Zu, and Ananda Das Gupta. 2013. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Vol. 21. Berlin: Springer.
  • Kambo, Amrita, Katherine Witt, Belinda Wade, Bishal Bharadwaj, and Peta Ashworth. 2022. Report on Engagement and Workshops with Policy Makers. https://www.futurefuelscrc.com/wp-content/uploads/FFCRC-2.1-07-Citizens-panels_Interim-report_final-web-1.pdf.
  • Karpowitz, C. F., and T. Mendelberg. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Karpowitz, Christopher F, Tali Mendelberg, and Lee Shaker. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000329.
  • Kelan, E. K. 2007. ““TOOLS AND TOYS: Communicating Gendered Positions Towards Technology.” Information, Communication & Society 10 (3): 358–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701409960.
  • Krueger, Richard A., and Mary Anne Casey. 2015. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lee, Caroline W., and Zachary Romano. 2013. “Democracy’s New Discipline: Public Deliberation as Organizational Strategy.” Organization Studies 34 (5-6): 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613479233.
  • Lesser, Pamela. 2021. “The Road to Societal Trust: Implementation of Towards Sustainable Mining in Finland and Spain.” Mineral Economics 34 (2): 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-021-00260-9.
  • Levy, H. I., and S. Sakaiya. 2020. “Effect of Deliberation Style on the Gender Gap in Deliberative Participation.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109920000055.
  • MacArthur, Julie. 2016. “Challenging Public Engagement: Participation, Deliberation and Power in Renewable Energy Policy.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 6 (3): 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0328-7.
  • Mansbridge, Jane. 2015. “A Minimalist Definition of Deliberation.” In Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies, edited by Patrick Heller, and Vijayendra Rao, 27–50. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0501-1_ch2.
  • Martinez-Palacios, J., and I. Ahedo. 2020. “How Can Critical Deliberative Theory Help to Solve the Methodological Challenges of Evaluating from a Gender + Perspective?.” Evaluation 26 (4): 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020912779.
  • Moffat, K., and A. R. Zhang. 2014. “The Paths to Social Licence to Operate: An Integrative Model Explaining Community Acceptance of Mining.” Resources Policy 39: 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. The Return of the Political (Vol. 8). London: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. “Feminism, Citizenship, and Radical Democratic Politics.” In Feminists Theorize the Political, edited by Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, 369–384. New York: Routledge.
  • Myers, C Daniel. 2017. “Interests, Information, and Minority Influence in Deliberation.” The Journal of Politics 79 (3): 804–822. https://doi.org/10.1086/690304.
  • OECD. 2020. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • O’Riordan, Linda, and Jenny Fairbrass. 2014. “Managing CSR Stakeholder Engagement: A New Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 125 (1): 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1913-x.
  • Otto, Jade. 2021. “Examining the Impact of Digital Media on PR Practitioners’ Capacity to Network and Build Stakeholder Relationships During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Cape Peninsula University of Technology.
  • Pearse, Rebecca. 2017. “Gender and Climate Change.” WIREs Climate Change 8 (2), https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.451.
  • Pieczka, Magda. 2018. “On Bauman: Power, Ethics and Social Hermeneutics.” In Public Relations and Social Theory, edited by Øyvind Ihlen and Magnus Fredriksson, 61–79. New York: Routledge.
  • Polletta, Francesca, and Pang Ching Bobby Chen. 2013. “Gender and Public Talk: Accounting for Women's Variable Participation in the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory 31 (4): 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113515172.
  • Polman, P., and A. Winston. 2021. Net Positive: How Courageous Companies Thrive by Giving More Than They Take. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Quick, Kathryn S., and Martha S. Feldman. 2011. “Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (3): 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11410979.
  • Rasche, Andreas, Mette Morsing, and Jeremy Moon. 2017. Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scherer, Andreas Georg, Guido Palazzo, and Dirk Matten. 2014. “The Business Firm as a Political Actor: A New Theory of the Firm for a Globalized World.” Business & Society 53 (2): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313511778.
  • Schkade, David, Cass R. Sunstein, and Reid Hastie. 2010. “When Deliberation Produces Extremism.” Critical Review 22 (2-3): 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2010.508634.
  • Steenbergen, Marco R., André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli, and Jürg Steiner. 2003. “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 1 (1): 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002.
  • Theunissen, Petra, and Wan Norbani Wan Noordin. 2012. “Revisiting the Concept “Dialogue” in Public Relations.” Public Relations Review 38 (1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.006.
  • Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555.
  • Thomson, I., and R. G. Boutilier. 2011. “The Social Licence to Operate.” In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, edited by P. Darling, 673–690. Denver, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, & Exploration.
  • Trittin-Ulbrich, Hannah, Andreas Georg Scherer, Iain Munro, and Glen Whelan. 2021. “Exploring the Dark and Unexpected Sides of Digitalization: Toward a Critical Agenda.” Organization 28 (1): 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420968184.
  • Tyler, Stephen. 2009. Creating Adaptive Policies: A Guide for Policy-Making in an Uncertain World. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd.
  • von Prümmer, Christine. 2023. “ODDE and Gender.” In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education, edited by Olaf Zawacki-Richter, and Insung Jung, 949–968. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  • Voyer, M., and J. van Leeuwen. 2018. “Social License to Operate and the Blue Economy.” Report to the World Ocean council, Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources a d Security, Wollongong, Australia.
  • Wade, Belinda, and Tomas Piccinini. 2020. “Teaching Scenario Planning in Sustainability Courses: The Creative Play Method.” Journal of Management Education 44 (6): 699–725.
  • Weder, Franzisca. 2021. “(P) Rebels Needed! Transformative Potential of Problematization for Social Change.” In Public Relations for Social Responsibility, edited by Donnalyn Pompper, 191–206. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Weder, Franzisca. 2022. “Strategic Problematization of Sustainability Reframing Dissent in Strategic Communication for Transformation.” Public Relations Inquiry 11 (3): 337–360. http://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X211026857.
  • Weder, Franzisca, Larissa Krainer, and Matthias Karmasin. 2021. The Sustainability Communication Reader: A Reflective Compendium. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Wiesbaden
  • Weder, F., M. B. Marte, and B. Erikson. 2023. CSR Communication and Cultures of Sustainability. Brisbane: The University of Queensland.