Reflecting in/on social professions: the critical potential of rhetorical reflexivity

References

• Angel, A., & Bates, B. (2014). Terministic screens of corruption: A cluster analysis of Colombian radio conversations. Kenneth Burke Journal, 10(1). https://kbjournal.org/angel_bates_terministic_screens_of_corruption
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2003). Review of ‘Kenneth Burke’s ‘attitude’ at the crossroads of rhetorical and cultural studies’ by S. Mahan-Hays & R. C. Aden. Kenneth Burke Journal. https://www.kbjournal.org/node/48
   Google Scholar
• Berg, H., & Slaattelid, R. (2017). Facts and values in psychotherapy: A critique of the empirical reduction of psychotherapy within evidence‐based practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(5), 1075–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904114565162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, L. (2010). A critical review of the scientist-practitioner model for counselling psychology. Counselling Psychology Review, 25(4), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2010.25.4.19
   Google Scholar
• Blakesley, D. (2002). The elements of dramatism. Longman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bolam, B., & Chamberlain, K. (2003). Professionalization and reflexivity in critical health psychology practice. Journal of Health Psychology, 8(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053030080026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902945215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullough, R. V. (2014). Toward reconstructing the narrative of Teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113519131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1955). Linguistic approaches to problems of education. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Modern philosophies and education. The fifty-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of education, part 1 (pp. 259–303). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarà, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114552028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. (2014). Disability rhetoric. Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Nicoll, K., Solomon, N., & Usher, R. (2004). Rhetoric and educational discourse: Persuasive texts?. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, J. (2004). Becoming symbol-wise: Kenneth Burke’s pedagogy of critical reflection. College Composition and Communication, 56, 272–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/4140650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2002). Critical social work. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., White, S., & Gardner, F. (2006). Critical reflection: A review of contemporary literature and understandings. In S. White, J. Fook, & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 1–18). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forney, E. (2012). Marbles: Mania, Depression, Michelangelo, and Me: A Graphic Memoir. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. (2018). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice (5th ed.). Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galea, S. (2012). Reflecting reflective practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00652.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, C. (2018). Rhetorical feminism and this thing called hope. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., Plath, D., & Webb, S. (2009). Evidence-based social work. A critical stance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, A. (2019). In theory and practice: Constructing an embodied feminist rhetorical pedagogy. In J. Enoch & J. Jack (Eds.), Retellings: Opportunities for feminist research in rhetoric and composition studies (pp. 34–53). Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsen, K., & Knutsen, I. (2020). Performative historical competence: Use-of-history as symbolic action. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(5), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1636138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuypers, J. (Ed.). (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, R. (2008). Episode III: Enjoy Poverty [motion picture]. Inti Films: The Image and Sound Factory.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, C. (2008). Teaching critical practice: Resisting structural domination through critical reflection. Social Work Education, 27(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470701379925
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., & Lorenz, W. (2010). Beyond the pro and contra of evidence-based practice: Reflections on a recurring dilemma at the core of social work. Social Work & Society, 8, 46–59. Retrieved from. https://www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/22/62
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & O’Byrne, P. (2006). Constructive social work: Towards a new practice. Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pycroft, A. (2019). From a trained incapacity to professional resistance in criminal justice. In A. Pycroft & D. Gough (Eds.), Multi-agency working in criminal justice: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 25–40). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, K. (2005). Rhetorical listening: Identification, gender, whiteness. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. (2018). A short history of Mental Health Rhetoric Research (MHRR). Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 1(1), 1–18. muse.jhu.edu/article/710560. https://doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2018.1003
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, K. (2011). Academic discourse and narratives of literacy as’ equipment for living’. CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, K., & Soetaert, R. (2012). Revisiting the rhetorical curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(6), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.730280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. UK Arena.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (2004). The rhetorical legacy of Kenneth Burke. In W. Jost & W. Olmsted (Eds.), A companion to rhetoric and rhetorical criticism (pp. 152–167). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G., & Cowden, S. (2009). The social worker as intellectual. European Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902840689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & White, S. (2001). Knowledge, truth and reflexivity: The problem of judgement in social work. Journal of Social Work, 1(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100104
   Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, L., Roets, G., Buysse, A., Rutten, K., Roose, R., Åberg, I., Blomberg, H., Butler, P., Čajko Eibicht, M., Caklová, K., Campbell, J., Donnelly, S., Gallagher, B., Havrdova, Z., Kroll, C., Lindroos, S., Machado, I., Margarido, H., & Zeman, J. (2023). ‘Enjoy poverty’: Introducing a rhetorical approach to critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education. European Journal of Social Work, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, L., & Rutten, K. (2023). Kenneth Burke’s multiperspectivism in higher education: Educating students in the social and behavioural sciences to become symbol-wise practitioners. In A. George & E. Weiser (Eds.), The classroom with Kenneth Burke (pp. 228–241). Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, L., Rutten, K., Hensing, G., Spyridoula, N., Schønning, V., Axelsson, M., Bockting, C., Buysse, A., De Neve, I., Desmet, M., Dewaele, A., Giovazolias, T., Hannon, D., Kafetsios, K., Meganck, R., Øverland, S., Triliva, S., & Vandamme, J. (2020). A critical perspective on mental health news in six European countries: How are “mental health/illness” and “mental health literacy” rhetorically constructed? Qualitative Health Research, 30(9), 1362–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320912409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, L., Rutten, K., Roets, G., & Buysse, A. (2023). Critical cultural disability studies and mental health: A rhetorical perspective. Disability & Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1918539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, L., Rutten, K., Vandermeersche, G., & Verdoodt, I. (2018). Exploring educational taboos through school movies. A rhetorical analysis of student-teachers’ reflections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wais, E. (2005). ‘Trained incapacity’: Thorstein Veblen and Kenneth Burke. Kenneth Burke Journal, 2, 18. https://www.kbjournal.org/wais
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2009). Risk, governmentality and insurance: The actuarial recasting of social work. In H. Otto, A. Polutta, & H. Zeigher (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: Modernising the knowledge base of social work? (pp. 211–226). Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. (2008, June). Kenneth Burke on motion and action: The problem of dualism. Paper presented at Kenneth Burke: Transcendence by Perspective 7th Triennial Conference for the Kenneth Burke Society. terpconnect.umd.edu/~jklumpp/kbworkshop08/readings/weiss.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. (2006). Unsettling reflections: The reflexive practitioner as ‘trickster’ in interprofessional work. In S. White, J. Fook, & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 21–39). McGraw-Hill Education Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Stancombe, J. (2003). Clinical judgement in the health and welfare professions. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Lewiecki-Wilson, C. (Eds.). (2001). Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring autism: On rhetoric and neurological queerness. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeldow, P. (2009). In defense of clinical judgment, credentialed clinicians, and reflective practice. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar