The affordances of a mobile video-tagging tool for evaluating presentation skills in a second language

References

• Batlle, J., & Seedhouse, P. (2021). Integrating the Video Enhanced Observation (VEO) app in peer observation feedback interaction. In P. Seedhouse (Ed.), Video enhanced observation for language teaching: Reflection and professional development (pp. 117–134). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Belhiah, H. (2009). Tutoring as an embodied activity: How speech, gaze and body orientation are coordinated to conduct ESL tutorial business. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). What is the problem with feedback? In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bozbıyık, M., Sert, O., & Dilek Bacanak, K. (2021). VEO-integrated IMDAT in pre-service language teacher education: A focus on change in teacher questioning practices. In P. Seedhouse (Ed.), Video enhanced observation for language teaching: Reflection and professional development (pp. 97–116). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M., Bower, M., Moloney, R., & Sweller, N. (2014). The effect over time of a video-based reflection system on preservice teachers’ oral presentations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.3
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, S., Baran, E., & Sert, O. (2018). The affordances of mobile-app supported teacher observations for peer feedback. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2018040104
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self-and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gynne, A., Larsson, M., & Sert, O. (2022). Digitaliserad reflektion kring lärares agerande i klassrumsinteraktion. In I. A. Nordin & M. Uljens (Eds.), Didaktikens språk – om skolundervisningens mål, innehåll och form (s (pp. 171–180). Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K., & Looney, S. D. (Eds.). (2019). The embodied work of teaching. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, E., Jiang, L., & Yang, M. (2021). The affordances of a technology-aided formative assessment platform for the assessment and teaching of English as a foreign language: An ecological perspective. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(6), 3391–3412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10047-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s Companion. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Körkkö, M. (2021). Towards meaningful reflection and a holistic approach: Creating a reflection framework in teacher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1676306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Lakkala, S. (2020). Educating reflective practitioners through video-elicited reflection. In N. E. Fenton & W. Ross (Eds.), Critical reflection on research in teaching and learning (pp. 34–51). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S., & Yeh, M. (2019). Instructed L2 interactional competence in the first year. In M. L. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 228–259). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, P., Joseph, S. R., & Boulay, R. (2010). Applying constant comparative and discourse analyses to virtual worlds research. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v3i1.815
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). How hand gestures contribute to action ascription. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(4), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657275
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2023). Technology-enhanced reflection and teacher development: A student teacher’s journey. RELC Journal, 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231161153 54 2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. R., & Markee, N. (2018). Multimodality in second language talk: The impact of video analysis on SLA research. In Co-Operative Engagements in Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin (pp. 247–260).
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2017). Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, S. (2016). Gestures in motion in TED talks: Towards multimodal literacy. In V. Bonsignori & B. C. Camiciottoli (Eds.), Multimodality across communicative settings, discourse domains and genres (pp. 146–165). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, S. (2020). Exploring meaning-making practices via co-speech gestures in TED talks. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39(3–4), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2020.1826223
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. (2019). Science students’ responses to an oral communication skills development initiative: Attitude and motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(1), 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. (2009). Oral presentations for English proficiency purposes. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 8(2), 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Haines, J. (2021). From teaching to learning: The development of the VEO app. Video Enhanced Observation for Language Teaching Reflection and Professional Development, 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Morell, T., & Pastor Cesteros, S. (2018). Multimodal communication in academic oral presentations by L2 Spanish students. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 5(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2018.1538334
   Google Scholar
• Morreale, S., Hackman, M., Ellis, K., King, K., Meade, P.A., & Pinello-Tegtmeier, L. (1993, November). Assessing communication competency in the interpersonal communication course: A laboratory-supported approach. Paper presented at the seventy-ninth annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. (2019). Digital divide. In R. Hobbs, & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 1–8). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
   Google Scholar
• Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (2021). Video enhanced observation for language teaching – reflection and professional development. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. (2019). Classroom interaction and language teacher education. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language Teacher education (pp. 216–238). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. (2021). Transforming CA findings into future L2 teaching practices: Challenges and prospects for teacher education. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 259–279). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. (2023). “It helped me grow and develop”: Video enhanced reflection and feedback in a Swedish teacher education context. TESOL Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O., Gynne, A., & Larsson, M. (forthcoming). Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: A discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O., and Jonsson, C. (forthcoming). Digital data-led reflections on language classroom interaction: A collaborative action research. In A. Burns & K. Dikilitaş (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language teacher action research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tasdemir, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2021). Improving discipline and classroom management using VEO in a Turkish university context. In P. Seedhouse (Ed.), Video enhanced observation for language teaching: Reflection and professional development (pp. 135–152). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (2014). Meaning between, in and around words, gestures and postures–multimodal meaning-making in children’s classroom discourse. Language and Education, 28(5), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.885038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VEO website. (2021). https://veo.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Viera, C., & Williams, S. A. (2020). Corpus analysis of engagement discourse strategies in academic presentations. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.01.07
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. (2021). SETTVEO: Evidence-based reflective practice and professional development. In P. Seedhouse (Ed.), Video enhanced observation for language teaching: Reflection and professional development (pp. 167–180). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Yu, S., & Teo, T. (2018). Experienced EFL teachers’ beliefs about feedback on student oral presentations. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0053-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagi, M., & Baker, A. A. (2016). Challenges experienced by Japanese students with oral communication skills in Australian universities. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar