Bridging State and Society: College Students’ Collaborative Participation in Rural Construction in China

References

• Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2018). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216672500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bing, W., & Dan, W. (2006). Imperial power, gentry power and clan power: Western and Chinese cultural traditions in a comparative perspective. Frontiers of History in China, 1(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11462-006-0016-y
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S. (2011). Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic – Communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521038308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, R., & Gaffikin, F. (2007). Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Planning Theory, 6(3), 282–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207082036
   Google Scholar
• Calderon, C., & Westin, M. (2021). Understanding context and its influence on collaborative planning processes: A contribution to communicative planning theory. International Planning Studies, 26(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1674639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2000). Theory and practice should mix. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(1), 125–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350050135239
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012). Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11436347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture vol. I. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (1992). Creativity in design: The role of domain knowledge in designing [Doctoral thesis]. Lemma BV.
   Google Scholar
• Fei, H.-T., & Malinowski, B. (2013). Peasant life in China. Read Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action, volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711000892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B, 23(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. Town Planning Review, 69(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K-c. (1960). Rural China: Imperial control in the nineteenth century (in Chinese). Jiuzhou Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. Y. J., & Hasmath, R. (2017). A maturing civil society in China? The role of knowledge and professionalization in the development of NGOs. China Information, 31(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X16676995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Roo, G. D., & Lu, B. (2013). “Communicative turn” in Chinese spatial planning? Exploring possibilities in Chinese contexts. Cities, 35, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P. C. (1993). Public sphere/civil society in China?: The third realm between state and society. Modern China, 19(2), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/009770049301900207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Hui, E. C.-M., Zhou, J., Lang, W., Chen, T., & Li, X. (2020). Rural revitalization in China: Land-use optimization through the practice of place-making. Land Use Policy, 97, 104788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. (2018). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (1999a). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (1999b). Consensus building as role-playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., Booher, D. (2003). The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Annual conference of the association of collegiate schools of planning. 2003-04-01.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864302
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2015). A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses. Planning Theory, 14(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213519356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krag, M. M. S. (2017). Encountering rural transformation: A catalyst for exchanging narratives of place? Architecture and Culture, 5(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2017.1283135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. P. (1996). Assets-based community development. National Civic Review, 85(4), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100850405
   Google Scholar
• Lang, W., Chen, T., & Li, X. (2016). A new style of urbanization in China: Transformation of urban rural communities. Habitat International, 55, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zhang, F., Hui, E. C-m., & Lang, W. (2020). Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities, 102, 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. (2022). Rethinking collaborative planning in China: Does the communicative or agonistic planning theory matter? Planning Theory, 22(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221122283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H., & Liu, Y. (2016). Rural restructuring in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. (2001). Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangan, H., Ng, M. K., Porter, L., & Chase, J. (2016). Insurgencies and revolutions: Reflections on john friedmann’s contributions to planning theory and practice. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rozelle, S., & Hell, N. (2020). Invisible China. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2017). Communicative planning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saija, L., De Leo, D., Forester, J., Pappalardo, G., Rocha, I., Sletto, B., Corburn, J., Mwau, B., & Magnaghi, A. (2017). Learning from practice: Environmental and community mapping as participatory action research in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1262982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, W. (2005). Stories in a park: Giving voice to the voiceless in Eagleby, Australia. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000334994
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, B. K. (2022). Co-creation of knowledge in the urban planning context: The case of participatory planning for transitional social housing in Hong Kong. Cities, 122, 103518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft and gesellschaft (pp. 27–58). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VanderVen, E. (2005). Village-state cooperation: Modern community schools and their funding, Haicheng County, Fengtian, 1905–1931. Modern China, 31(2), 204–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700404273985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2014). Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.866266
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 2). The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westin, M. (2022). The framing of power in communicative planning theory: Analysing the work of john forester, patsy healey and judith innes. Planning Theory, 21(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952211043219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L. (2001). Introduction to sciences of human settlements. China Architecture & Building Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Yujie, C., & Kang, C. (2021). The third sector in collaborative planning: Case study of tongdejie community in guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 109, 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar