Toward conservation of visual resources at the regional scale

References

• Alivand M, Hochmair HH. 2013. Extracting scenic routes from VGI data sources. Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information, Orlando, Florida, USA. p. 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Altschul JH. 2016. The society for American archaeology’s task forces on landscape policy issues. Adv Archaeol Pract. 102–105. doi:10.7183/2326-3768.4.2.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L. 1998. Exploratory spatial data analysis in a geocomputational environment. In: Longley PA, Brooks SM, McDonnell R, Macmillian W, editors. Geocomputation: a primer. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons. p. 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin L. 2005. Exploring spatial data with GeoDa: a workbook. Santa Barbara. UC Santa Barbara (CA): Center for Spatially Integrated Social.
   Google Scholar
• Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative. 2018 Apr 21. Integrating cultural resource preservation at a landscape level. [accessed 2018 June 12]. http://applcc.org/research/applcc-funded-projects/integrating-cultural-resource-preservation-at-a-landscape-level.
   Google Scholar
• Arriaza M, Cañas-Ortega JF, Cañas-Madueño JA, Ruiz-Aviles P. 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan. 69:115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astopol D, Palmer J, Pasqualetti M, Smardon R, Sullivan R. 2017. The renewable energy landscape. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin RF, Trombulak SC, Leonard PB, Noss RF, Hilty JA, Possingham HP, Scarlett L, Anderson MG. 2018. The future of landscape conservation. BioScience. 68(2):60–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balomenou N, Garrod B. 2016. A review of participant-generated image methods in the social sciences. J Mix Methods Res. 10(4):335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer HL. 2014. Introducing the geospatial modelling environment. Introducing the geospatial modelling environment. [accessed 2018 June 29]. http://www.spatialecology.com/gme/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop ID, Hulse DW. 1994. Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landsc Urban Plan. 30:59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M 2018. The present and future possibilities of landscape scale conservation: AppLCC ethnographic study. Blacksburg (VA): Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (AppLCC). p. 20. Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cherem GJ, Driver BL. 1983. Visitor employed photography: a technique to measure common perceptions of natural environments. J Leis Res. 65–83. doi:10.1080/00222216.1983.11969541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel TC. 2000. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan. 54:267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelle WH, Barker P, Cushman D, Heilen M, Herhahn C, Rieth C. 2016. Incorporating archaeological resources in landscape-level planning and management. Adv Archaeol Pract. 4(2):118–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkel A. 2015. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endless Mountains Heritage Region. 2009. Endless mountains heritage region.[accessed 2014 May 16]. http://www.endlessmountainsheritage.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg L. 2015. Utilizing crowdsourced georeferenced photography for identification and prioritization of areas for scenic conservation. In: Buhmann E, Ervin SM, & Pietsch M, editor. Peer reviewed proceedings digital landscape architecture 2015, Anhalt University of applied sciences. Offenbach/Berlin (Germany): Wichmann Verlag. pp. 268– 275.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmair HH. 2010. Spatial association of geotagged photos with scenic locations. In: Car A, Griesebner G, Strobl J, editors. Proceedings of the geoinformatics forum Salzburg. Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg (Germany): Wichmann; p. 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. 1985. The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landsc Plan. 12(2):161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann KR. 2004. Culture, creativity and spatial planning. Town Plan Rev. 75(4):383–404.
   Google Scholar
• Landscape Institute and Institute of environmental Management and Assessment. 2002. Guidelines for landscape and visual assessment. London (England): Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenzi A, Peeples MA, Doelle WH. 2013. Cultural resources priority area planning in sub-mogollon Arizona. Adv Archaeol Pract. 61–76. doi:10.7183/2326-3768.1.2.61.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen A, Arts GA. 2010. Culture in urban or regional planning: a review and research agenda. J Plan Educ Res. 29(3):379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurczyk T, Murtha TM, Goldberg L, Orland B 2018. Integrating visual and cultural resource evaluation and impact assessment for landscape conservation design and planning. Proceedings: Visual Resource Stewardship Conference: Landscape and Seascape Management in a Time of Change. Argonne National Laboratory; Lemont, IL: United States Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Murtha TM, Mazurczyk T, Goldberg L, Holzer J. 2018. Cultural resource preservation planning at a landscape scale: collaborative with national parks service and the appalachian landscape conservation cooperative. Presentation. Shepardtown (WV): The Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• National Parks Conservation Association. 2011. The state of America’s National Parks. Washington, DC (USA): Department of Agriculture, Technical Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Orland B. 1988. Aesthetic preference for rural landscapes: some resident and visitor differences. In: Nasar JL, editor. Environmental aesthetics; theory, research, and applications. Cambridgeshire (England): Cambridge University Press. p. 364–378.
   Google Scholar
• ScenicOrNot. 2018. ScenicOrNot. [accessed 2018 June 29]. http://scenicornot.datasciencelab.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Scheetz BE, Linzell DG, Murtha TM, Donnell ET, Jovanis PP, Pietrucha MT. 2013. The impact of marcellus gas development on the rural transportation infrastructure. Monograph, The Thomas D. Larson Pennsylvania Transportation Institute. University Park (PA): The Penn State Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research. p. 79.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer EL Jr., Brush RO. 1977. How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes. Landsc Plan. 4:237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroeder HW, Daniel TC. 1981. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. For Sci. 27:71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman R, Beckley T, Wallace S, Ambard M. 2004. A picture and 1000 words: using resident-employed photography to understand attachment to high amenity places. J Leis Res. 36:580–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinitz C. 1990. Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: the loop road in Acadia National Park, U.S.A. Landsc Urban Plan. 19:213–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto K. 2011. Analysis of scenic perception and its spatial tendency: using digital cameras, GPS loggers, and GIS. International Conference: Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences, Tokyo, Japan 2011. p. 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sui D. 2011. Legal and ethical issues of using GIS in society. In: Nyerges TL, Couclelis H, McMaster R, editors. The Sage handbook of GIS and society. London (England): Sage. p. 504–528.
   Google Scholar
• Trombulak SC. 2010. Assessing irreplaceability for systematic conservation planning. In: Trombulak SC, Baldwin RF, editors. Landscape-scale conservation planning. Warner (NH): Springer. p. 303–324.
   Google Scholar
• Trombulak SC, Anderson MG, Baldwin RF, Beazley K, Ray JC, Reining C. 2008. The Northern appalachian/acadian ecoregion: priority locations for conservation action. Warner (NH): Two Countries, One Forest. Special Report No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Burris MA. 1997. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav. 24(3):369–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zube EH. 1984. Themes in landscape assessment theory. Landsc J. 3(2):104–110.
   Google Scholar