Innovation systems for controlled-environment food production in urban contexts: a dynamic case study analysis of combined plant, fish and insect production in Berlin

References

• Athey, G., Glossop, C., Harrison, B., Nathan, M., & Webber, C. (2007). Innovation and the city. How innovation has developed in five city-regions. NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
   Google Scholar
• Bannor, R. K., Sharma, M., & Oppong-Kyeremeh, H. (2021). Extent of urban agriculture and food security: Evidence from Ghana and India. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2020-0519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur, N., & Blasius, J. (2014). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Ein Überblick. In N. Baur, & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 41–62). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin.de. (2019). Berlin im Überblick. Zahlen und Fakten. Retrieved July 7, 2021, from https://www.berlin.de/berlin-im-ueberblick/zahlen-und-fakten/
   Google Scholar
• Berlin Food Policy Council. (n.d.). The Berlin Food Policy Council. Retrieved July 7, 2021, from https://ernaehrungsrat-berlin.de/the-berlin-food-policy-council/
   Google Scholar
• Bizer, K., & Führ, M. (2014). Praktisches Vorgehen in der interdisziplinären Institutionenanalyse. Ein Kompaktleitfaden. sofia-Diskussionsbeiträge. https://www.sofia-darmstadt.de/fileadmin/Dokumente/Sonstige/Delta-Analyse/Kompakte_Stufenheuristik_2022-01-12_mf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BMBF. (2022). Agricultural systems of the future. Retrieved March 10, 20221, from https://www.agrarsysteme-der-zukunft.de/en/home
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2015). Forschungsmethoden und -evaluation. Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (4th ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, G. M. (2020). Know your indoor farmer: Square roots, techno-local food, and transparency as publicity. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(11), 1588–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220945349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammies, C., Mytton, D., & Crichton, R. (2021). Exploring economic and legal barriers to commercial aquaponics in the EU through the lens of the UK and policy proposals to address them. Aquaculture International, 29(3), 1245–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00690-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., & Harris, D. (1993). Flexibility in long-term contractual relationships: The role of co-operation. Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chave, M., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., & Noël, Y. (2012). Towards agricultural innovation systems: Designing an operational interface. Outlook on Agriculture, 41(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2012.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., & Díaz López, F. J. (2009). Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities. Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University. Paper no. 2009/12.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. M., Vaskou, P., & Kountouris, Y. (2019). Insect food products in the western world: Assessing the potential of a new ‘green’ market. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 112(6), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saz015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COST Action. (2013). COST-Aktion zur urbanen Landwirtschaft “Urban Agriculture Europe”. Erklärung von Barcelona zur urbanen Landwirtschaft und der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from http://www.urban-agriculture-europe.org/files/130624_barcelona_declaration_on_urban_agriculture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• CUBES Circle. (n.d.). CUBES Circle - Future Food Production. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from https://www.cubescircle.de/
   Google Scholar
• Curry, N., Reed, M., Maye, D., & Kirwan, J. (2014). Urban agriculture and the policies of the European union: The need for renewal. Spanish Journal of Rural Development, 5(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.5261/2014.ESP1.08
   Google Scholar
• Dagevos, H. (2021). A literature review of consumer research on edible insects: Recent evidence and new vistas from 2019 studies. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 7(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despommier, D. (2010). Vertical farm: Feeding the world in the 21st century. Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Despommier, D. (2013). Farming up the city: The rise of urban vertical farms. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(7), 388–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despommier, D., & Ellingsen, E. (2008). The vertical farm: The sky-scraper as vehicle for a sustainable urban agriculture. CTBUH 8th World Congress.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, J. R., van der Zee, E., Beunen, R., Kat, R., & Feindt, P. H. (2019). Trusting the people and the system. The influence of institutional design on interpersonal and institutional trust in collective action for agri-environmental management. Sustainability, 11(24), Article 7022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247022
   Google Scholar
• De Wilt, J., & Dobbelaar, T. (2005). Agroparks: The concept, the response, the practice. Innovation Network.
   Google Scholar
• Dielemann, H. (2019). Innovation system approach for urban agriculture: Case study of Mexico city. In M. Farooq, & M. Pisante (Eds.), Innovations in sustainable agriculture (pp. 79–104). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Di Fiore, G., Specht, K., & Zanasi, C. (2021). Assessing motivations and perceptions of stakeholders in urban agriculture: A review and analytical framework. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(2), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1904247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, L. (2017). Urban farms: bringing innovations in agriculture and food security to the city. Policy Brief, Berkeley Food Institute.
   Google Scholar
• DüngG. (2009). Düngegesetz vom 9. Januar 2009 (BGBl. I S. 54, 136), das zuletzt durch Artikel 96 des Gesetzes vom 10. August 2021 (BGBl. I S. 3436) geändert worden ist. Retrieved November 1, 2022, from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/d_ngg/BJNR005400009.html
   Google Scholar
• Duzí, B., Frantál, B., & Simon Rojo, M. (2017). The geography of urban agriculture: New trends and challenges. Moravian Geographical Reports, 25(3), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2017-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches – their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 1–35). Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In D. C. Mowery, & J. Fagerberg (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 41–63). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eidt, C. M., Pant, L. P., & Hickey, G. M. (2020). Platform, participation, and power: How dominant and minority stakeholders shape agricultural innovation. Sustainability, 12(461), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.3390/su12020461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eigenbrod, C., & Gruda, N. (2015). Urban vegetable for food security in cities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(2), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0273-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elorinne, A.-L., Niva, M., Vartiainen, O., & Väisänen, P. (2019). Insect consumption attitudes among vegans, non-vegan vegetarians, and omnivores. Nutrients, 11(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. (1989). Sustainable Development and Natural Resources Management. Twenty-Fifth Conference, Paper C 89/2, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2019). FAO framework for the urban food agenda. Leveraging sub-national and local government action to ensure sustainable food systems and improved nutrition. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA3143EN/
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/23599563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruscella, L., Kotzen, B., & Milliken, S. (2021). Organic aquaponics in the European Union: Towards sustainable farming practices in the framework of the new EU regulation. Reviews in Aquaculture, 13(3), 1661–1682. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. T. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2008). Experteninterview und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrument rekonstruierender Untersuchungen (3rd ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C., Currey, C. J., Dickson, R. W., Kim, H.-J., Hernández, R., Sabeh, N. C., Raudales, R. E., Brumfield, R. G., Laury-Shaw, A., Wilke, A. K., Lopez, R. G., & Burnett, S. E. (2019). Controlled environment food production for urban agriculture. HortScience, 54(9), 1448–1458. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14073-19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grebitus, C., Chenarides, L., Muenich, R., & Mahalow, A. (2020). Consumers’ perception of urban farming—An exploratory study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, Article 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00079
   Google Scholar
• Grebitus, C., Printezis, I., & Printezis, A. (2017). Relationship between consumer behavior and success of urban agriculture. Ecological Economics, 136, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossetti, M. (1999). The genesis of two urban innovation systems in France: Grenoble and Toulouse. Regional Innovation Systems, Sep 1999, San Sebastian, Spain. halshs-00477337.
   Google Scholar
• Hackfort, S. (2021). Patterns of inequalities in digital agriculture: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(22), 12345.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. (2005). Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: An innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it. Journal of International Development, 17(5), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1227
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A., & Clark, N. (2010). What do complex adaptive systems look like and what are the implications for innovation policy? Journal of International Development, 22(3), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A., Sulaiman, R., Clark, N., & Yoganand, B. (2003). From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: An innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2017). Insects as food: Perception and acceptance. Findings from current research. Ernährungs Umschau, 64, 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Mason-D’Croz, D., Palmer, J., Benton, T. G., Bodirsky, B. L., Bogard, J. R., Hall, A., Lee, B., Nyborg, K., Pradhan, P., Bonnett, G. D., Bryan, B. A., Campbell, B. M., Christensen, S., Clark, M., Cook, M. T., de Boer, I. J. M., Downs, C., … West, P. C. (2020). Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system. Nature Food, 1(5), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0074-1
   Google Scholar
• Hoevenaars, K., Junge, R., Bardocz, T., & Leskovec, M. (2018). EU policies: New opportunities for aquaponics. Ecocycles, 4(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v4i1.87
   Google Scholar
• Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, S. O. (2006). Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(5), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.190
   Google Scholar
• House, J. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and commercial implications. Appetite, 107, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannuzzi, E., Sisto, R., & Nigro, C. (2019). The willingness to consume insect-based food: An empirical research on Italian consumers. Agricultural Economics, 65, 454–462. https://doi.org/10.17221/87/2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. (2018). Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2011). Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Joly, A., Junge, R., & Bardocz, R. (2015). Aquaponics business in Europe: Some legal obstacles and solutions. Ecocycles, 1(2), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v1i2.30
   Google Scholar
• Jürkenbeck, K., Heumann, A., & Spiller, A. (2019). Sustainability matters: Consumer acceptance of different vertical farming systems. Sustainability, 11, Article 4052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, S.-M., Pettersen, I. N., & Boks, C. (2019). Consumer acceptance of edible insects and design interventions as adoption strategy. International Journal of Food Design, 4(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.39_1
   Google Scholar
• Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems, 118, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kledal, P. R., König, B., & Maulic, D. (2019). Aquaponics: The ugly duckling in organic regulation. In S. Goddek, A. Joyce, B. Kotzen, & G. M. Burnell (Eds.), Aquaponics food production systems (pp. 487–500). SpringerOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., & Kilelu, C. W. (2012). Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: Towards innovation system facilitation. IDS Bulletin, 43(5), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 457–484). Springer Science + Business.
   Google Scholar
• Kloas, W., Rennert, B., van Ballegooy, C., & Drews, M. (2008). Aquaponic system for vegetable and fish production. US Patent and Trademark Office Publications no. US20110131880 A1. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from www.google.com/patents/US20110131880
   Google Scholar
• Knickel, K., Ashkenazy, A., Calvão, T., Parrot, C., & Parrot, N. (2017). Agricultural modernization and sustainable agriculture: Contradictions and complementarities. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1373464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, L., & Riggs, W. (2010). Nourishing urbanism: A case for a new urban paradigm. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(1-2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, B., Janker, J., Reinhardt, T., Villarroel, M., & Junge, R. (2018). Analysis of aquaponics as an emerging technological innovation system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornher, L., Schellhorn, M., & Vetter, S. (2019). Disgusting or innovative – consumer willingness to pay for insect based burger patties in Germany. Sustainability, 11(7), Article 1878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozai, T., Fang, W., Chun, C., Yang, Q., Tong, Y., Cheng, R., Kubota, C., & Lu, C. (2016). PFAL business and R&D in the world: Current status and perspectives. In T. Kozai, G. Niu, & M. Takagaki (Eds.), Plant factory: An indoor vertical farming system for efficient quality food production (pp. 1448–1458). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., Hénault-Ethier, L., Marimuthu, S. B., Talibov, S., Allen, R. N., Nemane, V., Vandenberg, G. W., & Józefiak, D. (2018). The impact of the insect regulatory system on the insect marketing system. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 4(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2017.0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., Marimuthu, S. B., & Meijer, N. (2021). Regulations on insects as food and feed: A global comparison. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 7(5), 849–856. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & Jiang, M. (2018). Research on the elements and structure of urban innovation system. International Conference on Frontier Computing. FC 2018: Frontier Computing (pp. 1194–1199).
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, S., Sogari, G., Menozzi, D., Nuvoloni, R., Torracca, B., Moruzzo, R., & Paci, G. (2019). Factors predicting the intention of eating an insect-based product. Foods, 8(7), Article 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markatou, M., & Alexandrou, E. (2015). Urban system of innovation: Main agents and main factors of success. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.355
   Google Scholar
• Massot, A. (2020). The common agricultural policy (CAP) and the treaty. Fact Sheets on the European Union. Retrieved May 12, 2020, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_3.2.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McEldowney, J. (2017). Urbane Landwirtschaft in Europa. Modelle, Herausforderungen und Strategien. EPRS. Wissenschaftlicher Dienst des Europäischen Parlaments. Retrieved August 13, 2020, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/614641/EPRS_IDA(2017)614641_DE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (1997). Das Expertlnneninterview – Wissenssoziologische Voraussetzungen und methodische Durchführung. In B. Friebertshäuser, & A. Prengel (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 481–491). Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen, M. P. M., Feindt, P. H., Slijper, T., Spiegel, A., Finger, R., de Mey, Y., Paas, W., Termeer, K. J. A. M., Poortvliet, P. M., Peneva, M., Urquhart, J., Vigani, M., Black, J. E., Nicholas-Davies, P., Maye, D., Appel, F., Heinrich, F., Balmann, A., Bijttebier, J., … Reidsma, P. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 on farming systems in Europe through the lens of resilience thinking. Agricultural Systems, 191, Article 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milicic, V., Thorarinsdottir, R., Santos, M., & Hancic, M. (2017). Commercial aquaponics approaching the European market: To consumers’ perceptions of aquaponics products in Europe. Water, 9(80), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020080
   Google Scholar
• Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June 12–15). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Paper presented at the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.
   Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Guevara, N., Fanter, M., Conconi, A. M., & Floto-Stammen, S. (2021). Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food. Food Science & Nutrition, 9(1), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nellemann, C. (2009). The environmental food crisis: The environment’s role in averting future food crises. UNEP. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://www.grida.no/publications/154
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Das Jahrhundert der Metropolen. Eine Analyse der Ursachen und Konsequenzen von Urbanisierung. Zusammenfassung. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Metropolitan-Century-Policy-Highlights-German.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ojo, A., Dzhusupova, Z., & Curry, E. (2016). Exploring the nature of the smart cities research landscape. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 23–47). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Onwezen, M. C., Van den Puttelaar, V. J., Verain, M. C. D., & Veldkamp, T. (2019). Consumer acceptance of insects as food and feed: The relevance of affective factors. Food Quality and Preference, 77, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oroian, C. F., Safirescu, C. O., Harun, R., Chiciudean, G. O., Arion, F. H., Muresan, I. C., & Bordeanu, B. M. (2015). Consumers’ attitudes towards organic products and sustainable development: A case study of Romania. Sustainability, 9(9), Article 1559. http://doi.org/10.3390/su9091559.
   Google Scholar
• Orsi, L., Voege, L. L., & Stranieri, S. (2019). Eating edible insects as sustainable food? Exploring the determinants of consumer acceptance in Germany. Food Research International, 125, Article 108573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini, F., Kahane, R., Nono-Womdim, R., & Gianquinto, G. (2013). Urban agriculture in the developing world: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33(4), 695–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0143-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, A., Sillva, E., & Colquhoun, J. (2015). Innovation in urban agricultural practices: Responding to diverse production environments. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigford, A.-A. E., Hickey, G. M., & Klerkx, L. (2018). Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agricultural Systems, 164, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, P. M., Van der Pas, L., Mulder, B. C., & Fogliano, V. (2019). Healthy, but disgusting: An investigation into consumers’ willingness to try insect meat. Journal of Economic Entomology, 112(3), 1005–1010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, G., & de Zeeuw, H. (2007, December). Enhancing technical, organisational and institutional innovation in urban agriculture. Urban Agriculture Magazine 19, The RUAF Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., Sutherland, W. J., Ashby, J., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D., Bell, M., Bentley, J., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., Campbell, H., Chen, K., Crowley, E., Crute, I., Dobbelaere, D., Edwards-Jones, G., Funes-Monzote, F., Charles, H., Godfray, J., … Pilgrim, S. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prové, C., Dessein, J., & de Krom, M. (2016). Taking context into account in urban agriculture governance: Case studies of Warsaw (Poland) and Ghent (Belgium). Land Use Policy, 56, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra, Z. D. W., & van der Knaap, W. G. M. (2018). Urban innovation system and the role of an open web based platform: The case of Amsterdam smart city. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.5614/jrcp.2018.29.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 49–63). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2015). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, T., Hoevenaars, K., & Joyce, A. (2019). Regulatory frameworks for aquaponics in the European Union. In S. Goddek, A. Joyce, B. Kotzen, & G. M. Burnell (Eds.), Aquaponics food production systems. Combined aquaculture and hydroponic production technologies for the future (pp. 501–522). Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (1983). The diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorabaugh, P. A. (2015). Intro to hydroponics and CEA. University of Arizona Controlled Environment Agriculture Center. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://ceac.arizona.edu/resources/intro-hydroponics-cea
   Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, G., Mazzochi, C., & Corsi, S. (2016). Urban gardeners’ motivations in a metropolitan city: The case of Milan. Sustainability, 8, Article 1099. http://doi.org/10.3390/su8111099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumpold, B. A., & Langen, N. (2019). Potential of enhancing consumer acceptance of edible insects via information. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 5(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2018.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyang, S., Jean-Baptiste, S., Julienne Kuiseu, T., Coulibaly, N., & Konaté, L. (2016). A paradigm shift in African agricultural research for development: The role of innovation platforms. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 14(2), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2015.1070065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2013). The global city. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, J. P., Sushil, & Prem, V. (1990). Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables-a MICMAC analysis for energy conservation. Systems Research, 7(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850070404
   Google Scholar
• Schmutz, U., Kneafsey, M., Sarrouy, K., Doernberg, A., & Zasada, I. (2018). Sustainability impact assessments of different urban short food supply chains: Examples from London, UK. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(6), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Wohnen. (n.d.). Bevölkerungsprognose für Berlin und die Bezirke 2018–2030. Ergebnisse der Bevölkerungsprognose. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/bevoelkerungsprognose/de/ergebnisse/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• SenJustVA. (n.d.). Die Stadt isst fair! Die Berliner Ernährungsstrategie. Senatsverwaltung für Justiz, Verbraucherschutz und Antidiskriminierung. Retrieved May 10, 2021, from https://www.berlin.de/ernaehrungsstrategie/strategie/
   Google Scholar
• Sidali, K. L., Pizzo, S., Garrido-Pérez, E. I., & Schamel, G. (2018). Between food delicacies and food taboos: A structural equation model to assess Western students’ acceptance of Amazonian insect food. Food Research International, 115, 83–89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogari, G., Lui, A., & Li, J. (2019). Understanding edible insects as food in Western and Eastern societies. In D. Bogueva, D. Marinova, T. Raphaely, & K. Schmidinger (Eds.), Environment, health, and business opportunities in the new meat alternatives market (pp. 166–181). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Lee, D., & Bouquillon, E. A. (2005). Context and mentoring: Examining formal and informal relationships in high tech firms and K-12 schools. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190501200208
   Google Scholar
• Specht, K., Siebert, R., & Thomaier, S. (2015). Perception and acceptance of agricultural production in and on urban buildings (ZFarming): A qualitative study from Berlin, Germany. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(4), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9658-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, K., Weith, T., Swoboda, K., & Siebert, R. (2016). Socially acceptable urban agriculture businesses. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(17), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0355-0
   Google Scholar
• Specht, K., Zoll, F., Schümann, H., Bela, J., Kachel, J., & Robischon, M. (2019). How will we eat and produce in the cities of the future? From edible insects to vertical farming—A study on the perception and acceptability of new approaches. Sustainability, 11(4315), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164315
   Google Scholar
• Stamer, A. (2015). Insect proteins – a new source for animal feed. EMBO Reports, 16(6), 676–680. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201540528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2021). Einwohnerzahl der größten Städte in Deutschland am 31. Dezember 2019. Retrieved July 14, 2021, from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1353/umfrage/einwohnerzahlen-der-grossstaedte-deutschlands/
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M., Feindt, P. H., Karpouzoglou, T., Poppe, K. J., Hofstede, G. J., Kramer, K., Ge, L., Mathijs, E., & Meuwissen, M. P. M. (2019). Institutions and the resilience of biobased production systems: The historical case of livestock intensification in the Netherlands. Ecology and Society, 24(4), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11206-240415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. A., Klerkx, L., Rijswijk, K., Williams, T., & Barnard, T. (2016). Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand agricultural innovation system: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. Journal of Life Sciences, 76, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrichs, C., Schmidt, U., Geilfus, C.-M., Feindt, P., Grimm, B., Onasch, L., Kloas, W., Kühne, S., Streif, S., Herrmann, C., Mempel, H., Katz, H., & Simon, D. (2017). CUBES circle. Future Food Production.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2016). Urbanization and development: emerging futures. World cities report 2016. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/WCR-2016-WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2019). World population prospects 2019: Highlights. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Gaast, K., van Leeuwen, E., & Wertheim-Heck, S. (2022). Food systems in transition: Conceptualizing sustainable food entrepreneurship. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(5), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1969163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weele, C., Feindt, P., van der Goot, A. J., van Mierlo, B., & van Boekel, M. (2019). Meat alternatives: An integrative comparison. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 88, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Winden, W., Braun, E., Orgaar, A., & Witte, J.-J. (2014). Urban innovation systems. What makes them thick? Regional Studies Association. The global forum for city and regional research, development and policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W. (2015). Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in aWestern society. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2014). Institutionen und Public Policies. In K. Schubert, & N. C. Bandelow (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse (pp. 311–340). De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2011). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Sustainable Agriculture, 29(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004
   Google Scholar
• Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., Jonell, M., Clark, M., Gordon, L. J., Fanzo, J., Hawkes, C., Zurayk, R., Rivera, J. A., De Vries, W., Sibanda, L. M., … Murray, C. L. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2020). Population estimates and projections. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/population-estimates-and-projections
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, K., & Hamm, U. (2010). Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21(5), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZINEG. (2014). ZukunfInitiative NiedrigEnergieGewächhaus. Ein Verbundvorhaben gefördert vom Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit sowie der Landwirtschaftlichen Rentenbank unter Federführung des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz mit Unterstützung der Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from http://zineg.net/
   Google Scholar