Improving agricultural sustainability through farm mergers: an energy efficiency perspective

References

• Abu Hatab, A., Cavinato, M. E. R., Lindemer, A., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2019). Urban sprawl, food security and agricultural systems in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature. Cities, 94, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (2018). Can group farms outperform individual family farms? Empirical insights from India. World Development, 108, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (2020). A tale of two experiments: Institutional innovations in women’s group farming in India. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 41(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2020.1779673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B., Dobay, K. M., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2021). Revisiting group farming in a post-socialist economy: The case of Romania. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B., & Dorin, B. (2019). Group farming in France: Why do some regions have more cooperative ventures than others? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(3), 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18802311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Q., Yaseen, M. R., & Khan, M. T. I. (2019). Energy budgeting and greenhouse gas emission in cucumber under tunnel farming in Punjab, Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae, 250, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mezeini, N. K., Oukil, A., & Al-Ismaili, A. M. (2020). Investigating the efficiency of greenhouse production in Oman: A two-stage approach based on data envelopment analysis and double bootstrapping. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, Article 119160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, G. R., & Ibn Boamah, M. (2020). A new inverse DEA cost efficiency model for estimating potential merger gains: A case of Canadian banks. Annals of Operations Research, 295(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03667-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, G. R., & Oukil, A. (2019a). Flexible target setting in mergers using inverse data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Operational Research, 35(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijor.2019.101196
   Google Scholar
• Amin, G. R., & Oukil, A. (2019b). Gangless cross-evaluation in DEA: An application to stock selection. RAIRO – Operations Research, 53(2), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2018060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran, M. F., Eren, O., Gökdoğan, O., & Oğuz, H. I. (2020). Determination of energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in organic almond production in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 62(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-020-00507-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başer, U., & Bozoğlu, M. (2023). The impact of farm size on sustainability of beef cattle farms: A case study of the Samsun province, Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21(1), Article 2253647. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2253647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunia, S., Karmakar, S., Bhattacharjee, S., Roy, K., Kanthal, S., Pramanick, M., & Mandal, B. (2021). Optimization of energy consumption using data envelopment analysis (DEA) in rice-wheat-green gram cropping system under conservation tillage practices. Energy, 236, Article 121499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibi, Z., Khan, D., & Haq, I. U. (2021). Technical and environmental efficiency of agriculture sector in South Asia: A stochastic frontier analysis approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(6), 9260–9279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojacá, C. R., Casilimas, H. A., Gil, R., & Schrevens, E. (2012). Extending the input–output energy balance methodology in agriculture through cluster analysis. Energy, 47(1), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candemir, A., Duvaleix, S., & Latruffe, L. (2021). Agricultural cooperatives and farm sustainability – a literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1118–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopin, P., Mubaya, C. P., Descheemaeker, K., Öborn, I., & Bergkvist, G. (2021). Avenues for improving farming sustainability assessment with upgraded tools, sustainability framing and indicators. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00674-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cush, P., & Macken-Walsh, A. (2016). Farming ‘through the ages’: Joint farming ventures in Ireland. Rural Society, 25(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2016.1225833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakpo, K. H., Jeanneaux, P., & Latruffe, L. (2016). Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Olde, E. M., Moller, H., Marchand, F., McDowell, R. W., MacLeod C, J., Sautier, M., Halloy, S., Barber, A., Benge, J., Bockstaller, C., Bokkers, E. A. M., de Boer, I. J. M., Legun, K. A., Le Quellec, I., Merfield, C., Oudshoorn, F. W., Reid, J., Schader, C., Szymanski, E., & Manhire, J. (2017). When experts disagree: The need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(4), 1327–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9803-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, R., & Salehi, M. (2015). Investigation of CO2 emission reduction and improving energy use efficiency of button mushroom production using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhag, M., & Boteva, S. (2019). Conceptual assessment of energy input-output analysis and data envelopment analysis of greenhouse crops in Crete Island, Greece. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(35), 35377–35386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05544-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhami, B., Akram, A., & Khanali, M. (2016). Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Information Processing in Agriculture, 3(3), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2016.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., & Amin, G. R. (2023). Advances in inverse data envelopment analysis: Empowering performance assessment. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 34(3), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpad004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahani, S. M. J., & Rafati, M. (2022). The share of farm-scale on optimizing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in irrigated wheat farms in eastern Iran. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, Article 102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. (2014). The state of food and agriculture report, innovation in family farming. United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). ISBN 978-92-5-108536-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gattoufi, S., Amin, G. R., & Emrouznejad, A. (2014). A new inverse DEA method for merging banks. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 25(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dps027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gésan-Guiziou, G., Alaphilippe, A., Aubin, J., Bockstaller, C., Boutrou, R., Buche, P., & van der Werf, H. M. (2020). Diversity and potentiality of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for agri-food research. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00650-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Torres, T., Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L., Pelechano-Barahona, E., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2020). A systematic review of research on sustainability in mergers and acquisitions. Sustainability, 12(2), 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorjian, S., Ebadi, H., Trommsdorff, M., Sharon, H., Demant, M., & Schindele, S. (2021). The advent of modern solar-powered electric agricultural machinery: A solution for sustainable farm operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, Article 126030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeub, B. E., Chappell, M. J., Wittman, H., Ledermann, S., Kerr, R. B., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2016). The state of family farms in the world. World Development, 87, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grashuis, J., & Su, Y. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on farmer cooperatives: Performance, ownership and governance, finance, and member attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 90(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedani, S. R., Shabani, Z., & Rafiee, S. (2011). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy, 36(5), 2367–2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hercher-Pasteur, J., Loiseau, E., Sinfort, C., & Hélias, A. (2020). Energetic assessment of the agricultural production system. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00627-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, B. V., Kingsbury, A., & Ho, N. S. (2022). Production efficiency and effect of sustainable land management practices on the yield of oranges in northwest Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(7), 1237–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2088003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström, K., Hessle, A., Andersson, H., & Kumm, K. I. (2018). Merging small scattered pastures into large pasture-forest mosaics can improve profitability in Swedish suckler-based beef production. Land, 7(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Khanali, M., Ghahderijani, M., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Application of data envelopment analysis approach for optimization of energy use and reduction of greenhouse gas emission in peanut production of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hýblová, E. (2014). Analysis of mergers in Czech agriculture companies. Agricultural Economics, 60(10), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.17221/15/2014-agricecon
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibidunni, A. S., Ufua, D. E., Okorie, U. E., & Kehinde, B. E. (2020). Labour productivity in agricultural sector of sub-Sahara Africa (2010–2017) a data envelopment and panel regression approach. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 11(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-02-2019-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilahi, S., Wu, Y., Raza, M. A. A., Wei, W., Imran, M., & Bayasgalankhuu, L. (2019). Optimization approach for improving energy efficiency and evaluation of greenhouse gas emission of wheat crop using data envelopment analysis. Sustainability, 11(12), 3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J., & Kirwan, J. (2011). Matching new entrants and retiring farmers through farm joint ventures: Insights from the fresh start initiative in Cornwall, UK. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy, 181, 1298–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, D., Nouman, M., Popp, J., Khan, M. A., Ur Rehman, F., & Oláh, J. (2021). Link between technically derived energy efficiency and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN region. Energies, 14(13), 3923. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, D., Nouman, M., & Ullah, A. (2023). Assessing the impact of technological innovation on technically derived energy efficiency: A multivariate co-integration analysis of the agricultural sector in South Asia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(4), 3723–3745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02194-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, D., & Ullah, A. (2020). Comparative analysis of the technical and environmental efficiency of the agricultural sector: The case of Southeast Asia countries. Custos E Agronegocio Line, 16, 2–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., & Mousazadeh, H. (2013). Reduction of CO2 emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach. Energy, 55, 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshroo, A., Mulwa, R., Emrouznejad, A., & Arabi, B. (2013). A non-parametric data envelopment analysis approach for improving energy efficiency of grape production. Energy, 63, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiakos, L. S., Kleftodimos, G., Vlontzos, G., & Pardalos, P. M. (2023). A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability. Operational Research, 23(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00741-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampridi, M. G., Sørensen, C. G., & Bochtis, D. (2019). Agricultural sustainability: A review of concepts and methods. Sustainability, 11(18), 5120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langarita, R., Chóliz, J. S., Sarasa, C., Duarte, R., & Jiménez, S. (2017). Electricity costs in irrigated agriculture: A case study for an irrigation scheme in Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latruffe, L., Diazabakana, A., Bockstaller, C., Desjeux, Y., Finn, J., Kelly, E., Ryan, M., & Uthes, S. (2016). Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: A review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(3), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, T. L., Lee, P. P., Peng, K. C., & Chung, R. H. (2019). Evaluation of total factor productivity and environmental efficiency of agriculture in nine East Asian countries. Agricultural Economics, 65(6), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/50/2018-AGRICECON
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., Jing, X., Wang, Y., Shi, Y., & Ruan, J. (2019). Evaluating production process efficiency of provincial greenhouse vegetables in China using data envelopment analysis: A green and sustainable perspective. Processes, 7(11), 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7110780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Wang, Y. M., & Shi, H. L. (2020). Mergers and acquisitions matching for performance improvement: A DEA-based approach. Economic Research – Ekonomska istraživanja, 33(1), 3545–3561. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1775673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Cutforth, H., Chai, Q., & Gan, Y. (2016). Farming tactics to reduce the carbon footprint of crop cultivation in semiarid areas. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0404-8
   Google Scholar
• Llones, C. A., Mankeb, P., Wongtragoon, U., & Suwanmaneepong, S. (2022). Production efficiency and the role of collective actions among irrigated rice farms in Northern Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(6), 1047–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2047464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2021). A DEA approach for merging dairy farms. Agricultural Economics – Zemedelska Ekonomika, 67(6), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.17221/418/2020-agricecon
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani Najafabadi, M., & Taki, M. (2020). Robust data envelopment analysis with Monte Carlo simulation model for optimization the energy consumption in agriculture. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1777221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddas, Z., Oukil, A., & Vaez-Ghasemi, M. (2022). Global multi-period performance evaluation: A new model and a new productivity index. RAIRO Operations Research, 56(3), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, A., & Omid, M. (2010). Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Keyhani, A., Dalgaard, T., Knudsen, M. T., & Hermansen, J. E. (2015). Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of environmental impacts in rice paddy production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohseni, P., Borghei, A. M., & Khanali, M. (2018). Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwambo, F. M., Fürst, C., Martius, C., Jimenez-Martinez, M., Nyarko, B. K., & Borgemeister, C. (2021). Combined application of the EM-DEA and EX-ACT approaches for integrated assessment of resource use efficiency, sustainability and carbon footprint of smallholder maize production practices in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, Article 126132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2017). Energy consumption enhancement and environmental life cycle assessment in paddy production using optimization techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacer, T., Hamidat, A., & Nadjemi, O. (2016). A comprehensive method to assess the feasibility of renewable energy on Algerian dairy farms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3631–3642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafabadi, M. M., Sabouni, M., Azadi, H., & Taki, M. (2022). Rice production energy efficiency evaluation in north of Iran; application of robust data envelopment analysis. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 6, Article 100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100356
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, H. S., Parihar, C. M., Aravindakshan, S., Silva, J. V., Krupnik, T. J., McDonald, A. J., & Sapkota, T. B. (2023). Pathways and determinants of sustainable energy use for rice farms in India. Energy, 272, Article 126986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, A., & Bencheikh, A. (2020). Energy requirement optimization of greenhouse vegetable production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) method in Algeria. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 23(2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2020-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, A., & Bencheikh, A. (2021). Applying of DEA approach to optimize the energy required and GHG emission for greenhouse vegetable production in Algeria. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 23(3), 156–164.
   Google Scholar
• Oral, M., Amin, G. R., & Oukil, A. (2015). Cross-efficiency in DEA: A maximum resonated appreciative model. Measurement, 63, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral, M., Oukil, A., Malouin, J.-L., & Kettani, O. (2014). The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: A case of faculty academic performance evaluation. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 48(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2008). Exploiting sparsity in vehicle routing algorithms [Doctoral diss., Lancaster University], https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/45150.
   Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2018). Ranking via composite weighting schemes under a DEA cross-evaluation framework. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 117, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2019). Embedding OWA under preference ranking for DEA cross-efficiency aggregation: Issues and procedures. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(5), 947–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2020). Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking. Omega, 94, Article 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2022). Selecting material handling equipment through a market weight scheme based DEA cross-efficiency approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.2116122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2023a). A two-level induced OWA procedure for ranking DMUs under a DEA cross-efficiency framework. In Intelligent and Transformative Production in Pandemic Times: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Production Research (pp. 495–521). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18641-7_47
   Google Scholar
• Oukil, A. (2023b). Investigating prospective gains from mergers in the agricultural sector through inverse DEA. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 34(3), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpac004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., & Al-Zidi, A. (2018). Benchmarking the hotel industry in Oman through a three-stage DEA-based procedure. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences [JASS], 9(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.24200/jass.vol9iss2pp5-23
   Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., & Amin, G. R. (2015). Maximum appreciative cross-efficiency in DEA: A new ranking method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 81, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., & Amin, G. R. (2023). An induced OWA aggregation operator with dual preference setting for DEA cross-efficiency ranking. Soft Computing, 27(24), 18419–18440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09235-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., Channouf, N., & Al-Zaidi, A. (2016). Performance evaluation of the hotel industry in an emerging tourism destination: The case of Oman. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 29, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., & El-Bouri, A. (2021). Ranking dispatching rules in multi-objective dynamic flow shop scheduling: A multi-faceted perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 59(2), 388–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1696487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., & Govindaluri, S. M. (2017). A systematic approach for ranking football players within an integrated DEA-OWA framework. Managerial and Decision Economics, 38(8), 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., & Govindaluri, S. M. (2020). A hybrid multi-attribute decision-making procedure for ranking project proposals: A historical data perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., Kennedy, R. E., Al-Hajri, A., & Soltani, A. A. (2024). Unveiling the potential of hotel mergers: A hybrid DEA approach for optimizing sector-wide performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 116, Article 103620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., Nourani, A., Soltani, A. A., & Benchikh, A. (2022). Using inverse data envelopment analysis to investigate potential impact of mergers on energy use optimization – application in agricultural production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381(1), Article 135199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135199
   Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., Soltani, A. A., Al-Mezeini, N., Al-Ismaili, A., & Nourani, A. (2023). Mergers as an alternative for energy use optimization: Evidence from the cucumber greenhouse production using the inverse DEA approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04144-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., Soltani, A. A., Boutaghane, H., Abdalla, O., Bermad, A., Hasbaia, M., & Boulassel, M. R. (2021). A Surrogate Water Quality Index to assess groundwater using a unified DEA-OWA framework. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(40), 56658–56685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13758-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oukil, A., Soltani, A. A., Zeroual, S., Boutaghane, H., Abdalla, O., Bermad, A., Hasbaia, M., & Boulassel, M. R. (2022). A DEA cross-efficiency inclusive methodology for assessing water quality: A Composite Water Quality Index. Journal of Hydrology, 612, Part A, Article 128123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan, B., Ceylan, R. F., & Kizilay, H. (2011). Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production. Renewable Energy, 36(5), 1639–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramesh, V., Arunachalam, V., Nikkhah, A., Das, B., & Ghnimi, S. (2018). Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of arecanut production through coupled data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payandeh, Z., Jahanbakhshi, A., Mesri-Gundoshmian, T., & Clark, S. (2021). Improving energy efficiency of barley production using joint data envelopment analysis (DEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA): Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and optimization approach. Sustainability, 13(11), 6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendharkar, P. C. (2002). A potential use of data envelopment analysis for the inverse classification problem. Omega, 30(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00030-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L. V., & Smith, C. (2014). Drivers of agricultural sustainability in developing countries: A review. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9494-5
   Google Scholar
• Piñeiro, V., Arias, J., Dürr, J., Elverdin, P., Ibáñez, A. M., Kinengyere, A., Opazo, C. M., Owoo, N., Page, J. R., Prager, S. D., & Torero, M. (2020). A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nature Sustainability, 3(10), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., Zylowski, T., Rozakis, S., & Kozyra, J. (2020). Efficiency under different methods for incorporating undesirable outputs in an LCA+ DEA framework: A case study of winter wheat production in Poland. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, Article 110138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahbari, H., Mahmoudi, A., & Ajabshirchi, Y. (2013). Improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse tomato production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique. International Journal of Agriculture, 3(3), 559.
   Google Scholar
• Raheli, H., Rezaei, R. M., Jadidi, M. R., & Mobtaker, H. G. (2017). A two-stage DEA model to evaluate sustainability and energy efficiency of tomato production. Information Processing in Agriculture, 4(4), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2017.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed, N., Khan, D., & Magda, R. (2022). The influence of institutional quality on environmental efficiency of energy consumption in BRICS countries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, Article 943771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.943771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, C., Liu, S., Van Grinsven, H., Reis, S., Jin, S., Liu, H., & Gu, B. (2019). The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeidi, E., Dehkordi, A. L., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2022). Potential for optimization of energy consumption and costs in saffron production in central Iran through data envelopment analysis and multi-objective genetic algorithm. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 41(5), e13857. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeidi, R. G., Oukil, A., Amin, G. R., & Raissi, S. (2015). Prioritization of textile fabric defects using ordered weighted averaging operator. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(5), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6227-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, A., Wang, H., Rahman, A., Qian, L., & Memon, W. H. (2022). Evaluating the roles of the farmer's cooperative for fostering environmentally friendly production technologies – a case of kiwi-fruit farmers in Meixian, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 301, Article 113858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefeedpari, P., Shokoohi, Z., & Pishgar-Komleh, S. H. (2020). Dynamic energy efficiency assessment of dairy farming system in Iran: Application of window data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, Article 124178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G., Singh, P., & Sodhi, G. P. S. (2019). Applying DEA optimization approach for energy auditing in wheat cultivation under rice-wheat and cotton-wheat cropping systems in north-western India. Energy, 181, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G., Singh, P., Sodhi, G. P. S., & Tiwari, D. (2021). Energy auditing and data envelopment analysis (DEA) based optimization for increased energy use efficiency in wheat cultivation (Triticum aestium L.) in north-western India. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, Article 101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. (2002). On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India [Master of Science, International Institute of Management, University of Flensburg].
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Singh, G., & Sodhi, G. P. S. (2022). Data envelopment analysis based optimization for improving net ecosystem carbon and energy budget in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivation: Methods and a case study of north-western India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(2), 2079–2119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01521-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soheilifard, F., Taki, M., & van Zelm, R. (2021). Impact of energy flow optimization on the mitigation of environmental consequences and costs in greenhouse cucumber production. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 8421–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11219-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani, A. A., Oukil, A., Boutaghane, H., Bermad, A., & Boulassel, M. R. (2021). A new methodology for assessing water quality, based on data envelopment analysis: Application to Algerian dams. Ecological Indicators, 121, Article 106952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sow, O., Oukil, A., Ndiaye, B. M., & Marcos, A. (2016). Efficiency analysis of public transportation subunits using DEA and bootstrap approaches–Dakar Dem Dikk case study. Journal of Mathematics Research, 8(6), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v8n6p114
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, F., Agarwal, B., Leder, S., Saikia, P., Raut, M., Kumar, A., & Ray, D. (2021). Experiments in farmers’ collectives in Eastern India and Nepal: Process, benefits, and challenges. Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(1), 90–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, V. H., Can, N. D., Takahashi, Y., Kopp, S. W., & Yabe, M. (2019). Technical and environmental efficiency of eco-friendly rice production in the upstream region of the Vietnamese Mekong delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 2401–2424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0140-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2022). Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet. Retrieved October 6, 2023, from https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/population
   Google Scholar
• Vu, T. H., Peng, K. C., & Chung, R. H. (2019). Evaluation of environmental efficiency of edible canna production in Vietnam. Agriculture, 9(11), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9110242
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., & Parkan, C. (2005). A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights. Information Sciences, 175(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Chen, Q., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Evolutionary overview of land consolidation based on bibliometric analysis in web of science from 2000 to 2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. (1995). An approach to ordinal decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 12(3), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-613X(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Ding, W., Luo, J., Geng, R., & Cai, Z. (2012). Long-term application of organic manure and mineral fertilizers on aggregation and aggregate-associated carbon in a sandy loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 124, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahm, F., Ugaglia, A. A., Barbier, J. M., Boureau, H., Del’homme, B., Gafsi, M., Gasselin, P., Girard, S., Guichard, L., Loyce, C., Manneville, V., Menet, A., & Redlingshöfer, B. (2019). Évaluer la durabilité des exploitations agricoles. La méthode IDEA v4, un cadre conceptuel combinant dimensions et propriétés de la durabilité. Cahiers Agricultures, 28(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2019004
   Google Scholar
• Zaier, R., Zekri, S., Jayasuriya, H., Teirab, A., Hamza, N., & Al-Busaidi, H. (2015). Design and implementation of smart irrigation system for groundwater use at farm scale. In 7th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, S., Zhu, F., Chen, F., Yu, M., Zhang, S., & Yang, Y. (2018). Assessing the impacts of land consolidation on agricultural technical efficiency of producers: A survey from Jiangsu province, China. Sustainability, 10(7), 2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2018). Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar