The effect of phoneme-based auditory training on speech intelligibility in hearing-aid users

References

• Ahissar, M., M. Nahum, I. Nelken, and S. Hochstein. 2009. “Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364 (1515):285–299. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, F. L. 2021. “Subcortical electrophysiological measures of running speech.”. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, F. L., E. N. MacDonald, and J. Hjortkjaer. 2021. “Neural Measures of Pitch Processing in EEG Responses to Running Speech.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 15:738408. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.738408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, H. L, and A. L. Benton. 1957. “Revised Administration and Scoring of the Digit Span Test.” Journal of Consulting Psychology 21 (2):139–143. doi:10.1037/h0047235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 2010. “Adapting to Changed Hearing: The Potential Role of Formal Training.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (9):601–611. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.9.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T, and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6):2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, N., L. Leach, and K. J. Murphy. 2018. “A Re-Examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 33 (2):379–388. doi:10.1002/gps.4756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling, C., C. Ludvigsen, and P. E. Lyregaard. 1989. “DANTALE: A New Danish Speech Material.” Scandinavian Audiology 18 (3):169–175. doi:10.3109/01050398909070742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. A., H. Henshaw, D. P. A. Clark, and D. R. Moore. 2014. “Benefits of Phoneme Discrimination Training in a Randomized Controlled Trial of 50- to 74-Year-Olds with Mild Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 35 (4):e110–e121. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw, H, and M. Ferguson. 2014. Assessing the Benefits of Auditory Training to Real-World Listening: Identifying Appropriate and Sensitive Outcomes. In Proceedings of ISAAR 2013: Auditory Plasticity - Listening with the Brain. 4th Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, edited by T. Dau, S. Santurette, J. C. Dalsgaard, L. Tranebjaerg, T. Andersen, and T. Poulsen, 45–52. Nyborg, Denmark: The Danavox Jubilee Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw, H, and M. A. Ferguson. 2013. “Efficacy of Individual Computer-Based Auditory Training for People with Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” PLOS One 8 (5):e62836. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E., K. G. Skinner, D. L. Kinney, S. E. Rogers, A. K. Main, and T. M. Quigley. 2019. “Clinical Effectiveness of an At-Home Auditory Training Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Ear and Hearing 40 (5):1043–1060. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Christensen. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82 (13):1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. 2016. “Least-Squares Means: The R Package Lsmeans.” Journal of Statistical Software 69 (1):1–33. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, J. G. Barry, and S. Amitay. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group “White Paper.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7):433–445. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., B. R. Glasberg, and M. A. Stone. 1999. “Use of a Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting: III. A General Method for Deriving Initial Fittings for Hearing Aids with Multi-channel Compression.” British Journal of Audiology 33 (4):241–258. doi:10.3109/03005369909090105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., N. A. Phillips, V. Bédirian, S. Charbonneau, V. Whitehead, I. Collin, J. L. Cummings, and H. Chertkow. 2005. “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53 (4):695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B., and T. Dau. 2009. “Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (10):729–741. doi:10.1080/14992020903019312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B., and T. Dau. 2011. “The Danish hearing in noise test.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (3):202–208. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.524254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B., and T. Dau. 2019. “A Danish Nonsense Word Corpus for Phoneme Recognition Measurements.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 105 (1):183–194. doi:10.3813/aaa.919299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, W., and S. Gatehouse. 2004. “Interaural Asymmetry of Hearing Loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) Disabilities, and Handicap.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2):100–114. doi:10.1080/14992020400050015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, G. H., S. L. Smith, T. H. Chisolm, M. T. Frederick, R. A. McArdle, and R. H. Wilson. 2016. “A Randomized Control Trial: Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training.” Ear and Hearing 37 (4):381–396. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidiger, C., J. B. Allen, and T. Dau. 2017. “Assessing the Efficacy of Hearing-Aid Amplification Using a Phoneme Test.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (3):1739–1748. Doi : doi:10.1121/1.4976066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, K. F., D. G. Altman, and D. Moher. 2010. “CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials.” Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics 1 (2):100–107. doi:10.4103/0976-500X.72352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumann, A., L. Garea Garcia, and U. Hoppe. 2017. “Trainierbarkeit der Diskrimination von Phonemen im Störgeräusch bei normalhörenden Erwachsenen.” Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie 96 (2):98–103. doi:10.1055/s-0042-113134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumann, A., M. Serman, O. Gefeller, and U. Hoppe. 2015. “Computer-Based Auditory Phoneme Discrimination Training Improves Speech Recognition in Noise in Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (3):190–198. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.969409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serman, M. 2012. “SchooLo: New Speech Training Method Based on Changes in Speech Cues.” 15th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Audiology, Erlangen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Stecker, G. C., G. A. Bowman, E. W. Yund, T. J. Herron, C. M. Roup, and D. L. Woods. 2006. “Perceptual Training Improves Syllable Identification in New and Experienced Hearing Aid Users.” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 43 (4):537–552. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2005.11.0171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stropahl, M., J. Besser, and S. Launer. 2020. “Auditory Training Supports Auditory Rehabilitation.” Ear and Hearing 41 (4):697–704. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetow, R, and J. H. Sabes. 2006. “The Need for and Development of an Adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE TM) Program.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (8):538–558. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.8.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnet, L., K. Knoblauch, F. Meunier, and M. Hoen. 2013. “Using Auditory Classification Images for the Identification of Fine Acoustic Cues Used in Speech Perception.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:865. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnet, L., C. Langlet, C. Lorenzi, D. S. Lazard, and C. Micheyl. 2019. “High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.” Trends in Hearing 23:2331216519886707–2331216519886718. doi:10.1177/2331216519886707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 2008. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, D., R. K. Hietkamp, and T. Lunner. 2017. “Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.” Ear and Hearing 38 (6):690–700. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, J. P., K. E. Hancock, J. M. Shannon, and D. B. Polley. 2017. “Audiomotor Perceptual Training Enhances Speech Intelligibility in Background Noise.” Current Biology 27 (21):3237–3247.e6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. L., T. Arbogast, Z. Doss, M. Younus, T. J. Herron, and E. W. Yund. 2015. “Aided and Unaided Speech Perception by Older Hearing Impaired Listeners.” PLOS One 10 (3):e0114922. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. L., Z. Doss, T. J. Herron, T. Arbogast, M. Younus, M. Ettlinger, and E. W. Yund. 2015. “Speech Perception in Older Hearing Impaired Listeners: Benefits of Perceptual Training.” PLOS One 10 (3):e0113965. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. L., E. W. Yund, T. J. Herron, and M. A. Cruadhlaoich. 2010. “Consonant Identification in Consonant-Vowel-Consonant Syllables in Speech-Spectrum Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (3):1609–1623. doi:10.1121/1.3293005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar