Characteristics of the quick repeat-recall test (Q-RRT)

References

• ANSI S3.5. 1997. American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Akeroyd, M. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-Impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (suppl 2): S53–S71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802301142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., and G. Hitch. 1974. “Working Memory.” In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, edited by G. H. Bower, Vol. 8, 47–89. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bönitz, H., T. Lunner, M. Finke, L. Fiedler, B. Lyxell, S. Riis, E. Ng, A. Valdes, A. Büchner, and D. Wendt. 2021. “How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in noise? A pupillometry study.” Ear and Hearing 42 (4):846–859. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, N., L. Leach, and K. Murphy. 2018. “A Re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Cut-Off Scores.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 33 (2):379–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D., and S. Sparrow. 1981. “Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.” American Journal of Mental Deficiency 86: 127–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson, A., N. Marrone, B. Wong, and F. Musiek. 2021. “Predicting Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Adults: A systematic Review of Speech-in-Noise Tests and Other Behavioral Measures.” Ear and Hearing 42 (6):1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, J., C. Belletier, S. Rhodes, A. Jaroslawska, P. Barrouillet, V. Camos, N. Cowan, M. Naveh-Benjamin, and R. Logie. 2019. “Dual-Task Costs in Working Memory: An Adversarial Collaboration.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. 45 (9):1529–1551. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000668
   Google Scholar
• Gamer, M., J. Lemon, I. Fellows, and P. Singh. 2022. “Package irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.” 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. Zekveld, J. Festen, J. Rönnberg, and S. Kramer. 2012. “Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking is Related to Linguistic Abilities.” International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012: 865731. Epub 2012 Oct 3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/865731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuk, F., E. Seper, C. Lau, and P. Korhonen. 2017. “Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefits.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 28 (08):698–707. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuk, F., C. Slugocki, P. Korhonen, E. Seper, and O. Hau. 2019. “Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable-Speed Compressor Over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 30 (7):590–606. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, F., C. Slugocki, and P. Korhonen. 2020a. “An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Algorithm Under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 31 (4):262–270. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.19009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, F., C. Slugocki, and P. Korhonen. 2020b. “Using the Repeat-Recall Test to Study Factors Affecting Context Use.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 31 (10):771–780. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, F., C. Slugocki, N. Ruperto, and P. Korhonen. 2020. “Performance of Normal Hearing Listeners on RRT with Different Noise Configurations.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1807626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner, T. 2003. “Cognitive Function in Relation to Hearing Aid Use.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (Suppl 1):S49–S58. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, A., F. Tucker, and T. Letowski. 1991. “Toleration of Background Noises: Relationship With Patterns of Hearing Aid Use by Elderly Persons.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 34 (3):679–685. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3403.679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., and E. Picou. 2018. “A Potential Bias in Subjective Ratings of Mental Effort.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61 (9):2405–2421. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., N. A. Phillips, V. Bedirian, S. Charbonneau, V. Whitehead, I. Collin, J. L. Cummings, and H. Chertkow. 2005. “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53 (4):695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, M. Pedersen, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Effects of Noise and Working Memory Capacity on Memory Processing of Speech for Hearing-Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7):433–441. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.776181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. Soli, and J. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2):1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L, Lemke U, Lunner T, Matthen M, Mackersie C, Naylor G, Phillips N, Richter M, Rudner M, Sommers MS, Tremblay K, Wingfield A. 2016. Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing. 37 (Suppl 1):5S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seper, E., F. Kuk, P. Korhonen, and C. Slugocki. 2019. “Tracking of noise tolerance to predict hearing aid satisfaction in loud noisy environments.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 30 (4):302–314. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.17101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slugocki, C., F. Kuk, and P. Korhonen. 2018. “Development and Clinical Applications of the ORCA Repeat and Recall Test (RRT).” Hear Review 25 (12):22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Slugocki, C., F. Kuk, and P. Korhonen. 2023. “Alpha-Band Dynamics as a Neural Proxy for Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Wearers Performing the Repeat-Recall Test (RRT).” (under review)
   Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., F. Wolters, and M. Rung. 2015. “Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (2):183–196. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., K. Pichora-Fuller, and G. Alexander. 2016. “Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.” Ear and Hearing 37 (6):e360–e376. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Noort, M., P. Bosch, M. Haverkort, and K. Hugdahl. 2008. “A Standard Computerized Version of the Reading Span Test in Different Languages.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 24 (1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., E. Stangl, O. Chipara, S. Hasan, A. Welhaven, and J. Oleson. 2018. “Characteristics of Real-World Signal-to-Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 39 (2):293–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar