Decision Making in Killer Robots Is Not Bias Free

References

• Ansell, D. 2014. “Research and Development of Autonomous ‘Decision Making’ Systems.” In Expert Meeting on Autonomous Weapon Systems: Technical, Military, Legal and Humanitarian Aspects, 39–41. Report from Geneva meeting, March 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. 2010. “The Case for Ethical Autonomy in Unmanned Systems.” Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4): 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2010.536402.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. 2015. “The Case for Banning Killer Robots: Counterpoint.” Communications of the ACM 58 (12): 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkin, R., P. Ulam, and B. Duncan. 2009. An Ethical Governor for Constraining Lethal Action in an Autonomous System. Technical Report GIT-GVU-09-02. Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology. https://sites.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/GIT-GVU-09-02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Asaro, P. 2012. “On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-making.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaro, P. 2019. “Algorithms of Violence: Critical Social Perspectives on Autonomous Weapons.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 86 (2): 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0026.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Computing Machinery’s US Technology Policy Committee. 2020. ACM US Technology Policy Committee Urges Suspension of Private and Governmental Use of Facial Recognition Technologies, June 30. Accessed September 15, 2023. https://www.acm.org/media-center/2020/june/ustpc-issues-statement-on-facial-recognition-technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., and A. D. Selbst. 2016. “Big Data Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104 (3): 671–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., and T. Gebru. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research) 81: 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Cowgill, B., F. Dell’Acqua, S. Deng, D. Hsu, N. Verma, and A. Chaintreau. 2020. “Biased Programmers? Or Biased Data? A Field Experiment in Operationalizing AI Ethics.” Columbia Business School Research Paper. Accessed September 16, 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3615404.
   Google Scholar
• Danks, D., and A. J. London. 2017. “Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems.” In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4691–4697.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, N. 2018. “A Legal Perspective: Autonomous Weapon Systems under International Humanitarian Law.” United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) Occasional Papers 30.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. 2012. “Understanding Bias in Computational News Media.” NiemenLab, December 10. Accessed September 15, 2023. https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/12/nick-diakopoulos-understanding-bias-in-computational-news-media/.
   Google Scholar
• Docerty, B. 2012. Losing Humanity: The Case against Killer Robots. New York: Human Rights Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. N., R. W. Leet, L. M. Kipling, M. K. Rhee, S. L. Jackson, P. Wilson, L. S. Phillips, and L. R. Staimez. 2019. “Racial Differences in Performance of HbA1c for the Classification of Diabetes and Prediabetes among US Adults of Non-Hispanic Black and White Race.” Diabetic Medicine: A Journal of the British Diabetic Association 36 (10): 1234–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. 2015. “Killer Robots: Why the U.S. Should Lead the Ban.” Global policy 6 (1): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goose, S., and M. Wareham. 2016. “The Growing International Movement against Killer Robots.” Harvard International Review 37 (4): 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, A. 2018. “Autonomous Weapon Systems in International Humanitarian Law.” Journal of Joint Air Power Competence Centre 27: 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, T. 2013. “On the Moral Responsibilities of Military Robots.” Ethics and Information Technology 15: 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9301-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, T., V. Dignum, and S. Bensch. 2020. “Bias in Machine Learning -– What Is It Good For?” Accessed September 15, 2023. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2659/hellstrom.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Henckaerts, J. M., and L. Doswald-Beck. 2005. Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross). 1977. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I). Geneva: ICRC.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, A. F. 2019. “The SKYNET Programme and the Principle of Distinction: Why We Should Not Let Artificial Intelligence Lead the Way.” 142nd Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law on the 70th Anniversary of the Geneva Conventions. San Remo, September 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kania, E. 2018. “China’s Strategic Ambiguity and Shifting Approach to Lethal Autonomous Weapons.” Lawfare, April 17. Accessed September 16, 2023. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/chinas-strategic-ambiguity-and-shifting-approach-lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A. 2009. Killer Robots: Legality and Ethicality of Autonomous Weapons. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leveringhaus, A. 2018. “What’s So Bad about Killer Robots?” Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2): 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddox, J. K. E., M. Reidhead, J. Hu, A. J. H. Kind, A. M. Zaslavsky, E. M. Nagasako, and D. R. Nerenz. 2019. “Adjusting for Social Risk Factors Impacts Performance and Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.” Health Services Research 54 (2): 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, N., F. Morstatter, N. Saxena, K. Lerman, and A. Galstyan. 2021. “A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning.” ACM Computing Surveys 54 (6): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard, D. B. 2003. “Reexamining Criminal Behavior: The Importance of Omitted Variable Bias.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2003.85.1.205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olteanu, A., C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and E. Kiciman. 2019. “Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls and Ethical Boundaries.” Frontiers in Big Data, July 19. Accessed October 1, 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389fdata.2019.00013/full.
   Google Scholar
• Ramchand, R., R. L. Pacula, and M. Y. Iguchi. 2006. “Racial Differences in Marijuana-users’ Risk of Arrest in the United States.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 84 (3): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichberg, G. M., N. Ahmad, I. Carrozza, K. Fisher, and H. Syse. 2021. Algor-ethics in the Emerging Battlespace. Internal report for the Norwegian Ministry of Defense. Oslo: Peace Research Institute (PRIO).
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P. 2015a. “The Opportunity and Challenge of Autonomous Systems.” In Autonomous Systems Issues for Defence Policymakers, edited by A. P. Williams, and P. Scharre, 3–26. Norfolk: Allied Commander Transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P. 2015b. “Presentation at the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.” Meeting of Experts on LAWS. Geneva, April 13.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P. 2016. Autonomous Weapons and Operational Risk. Ethical Autonomy Project. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P. 2018. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P., and M. Horowitz. 2015. “An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems.” CNAS Working Papers. Accessed October 1, 2023. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/an-introduction-to-autonomy-in-weapon-systems.
   Google Scholar
• Scopelliti, I., C. K. Morewedge, E. McCormick, H. L. Min, S. Lebrecht, and K. S. Kassam. 2015. “Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences.” Management Science 61 (10): 2468–2486. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, E. N. 2012. “The Evitability of Autonomous Robot Warfare.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R., and A. Chander. 2021. “Biases in AI Systems.” Communications of the ACM 64 (8): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3464903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, H., and J. V. Guttag. 2019. “A Framework for Understanding Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning.” arXiv paper 1901.10002. Accessed September 15, 2023. https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1901.10002/.
   Google Scholar
• The International Court of Justice. 1996. “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.” Advisory Opinion. International Court of Justice Reports. Accessed October 1, 2023. https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. 2018. Algorithmic Bias and the Weaponization of Increasingly Autonomous Technologies. Geneva: The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. A. 2015. “Defining Autonomy in Systems: Challenges and Solutions.” In Autonomous Systems Issues for Defence Policymakers, edited by A. P. Williams, and P. Scharre, 27–62. Norfolk: Allied Commander Transformation.
   Google Scholar