Library space design to promote student engagement: A comparison of graduate and undergraduate students

References

• Agosto, D. E., Bell, J. P., Bernier, A., & Kuhlmann, M. (2015). “This is our library and it’s a pretty cool place”: A user-centered study of public library YA spaces. Public Library Quarterly, 34(1), 23–43. doi:10.1080/01616846.2015.1000777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, C. (2019). Multiple testing and protection against Type I (false positive) error using the Bonferroni and Hochberg Corrections. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 41(1), 99–100. doi:10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_499_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews, C., Wright, S. E., & Raskin, H. (2016). Library learning spaces: Investigating libraries and investing in student feedback. Journal of Library Administration, 56(6), 647–672. doi:10.1080/01930826.2015.1105556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, A. D. (2017). Space use in the commons: Evaluating a flexible library environment. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(2), 68–89. doi:10.18438/B8M659
   Google Scholar
• Asher, A., Couture, J., Amaral, J., Smale, M., Lowe, S., Lanclos, D., B. … Fister (2016). A day in the life: Practical strategies for understanding student space-use practices. In S. Baughman, S. Hiller, K. Monroe, & A. Pappalardo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment (pp. 428–438). Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries Retrieved from http://old.libraryassessment.org/bmdoc/70-asher-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1970a, Summer). The methodology of research on college impact, part one. Sociology of Education, 43(3), 223–254. doi:10.2307/2112065
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1970b). The methodology of research on college impact, part two. Sociology of Education, 43(4), 437–450. doi:10.2307/2111842
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving academic excellence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993a). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993b). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2015). A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education. Facilities, 33(1/2), 2–19. doi:10.1108/F-02-2013-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Careaga, G. (2017). Library space redesign: Stimulus and response—University of California, Santa Cruz. In S. E. Montgomery (Ed.), Assessing library space for learning (pp. 183–196). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., Algina, J., & Oltman, D. O. (1996). Univariate and multivariate omnibus hypothesis tests selected to control type I error rates when population variances are not necessarily equal. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 137–179. doi:10.3102/00346543066002137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cronk, B. (2014). How to use SPSS ®: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation (8th ed.). Pyrczak Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, H. V., & Tabur, S. (2012). Learning space attributes: Reflections on academic library design and its use. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2). Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/392.
   Google Scholar
• DeClercq, C. P., & Cranz, G. (2014). Moving beyond seating-centered learning environments: Opportunities and challenges identified in a POE of a campus library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 574–584. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, F., Craig, D., & Gillen, N. (2011). Purpose, process, place: Design as a research tool. Facilities, 29(3/4), 97–113. doi:10.1108/02632771111109243
   Google Scholar
• Fallin, L. (2016). Beyond books: The concept of the academic library as learning space. New Library World, 117(5/6), 308–320. doi:10.1108/NLW-10-2015-0079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Å., & Wahlgern, I. (2016). From data to development—Using qualitative data to create ideas and solutions. In S. Baughman, S. Hiller, K. Monroe, & A. Pappalardo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.libraryassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/bm∼doc/72-wahlgren-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., & Foster, N. F. (2007). Library design and ethnography. In N. F. Foster & S. Gibbons (Eds.), Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester (pp. 20–29). Association of College and Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., & Kapa, D. (2015). Silent and independent: Student use of academic library study space. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 10(1), 1–38. doi:10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3338
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Beyond sameness with engagement outcomes for all: An introduction. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.) Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, R., & Spencer, G. (2014). The changing landscape of library and information services: What presidents, provosts, and finance officers need to know. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved from https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub162.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Warwick & York, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/1525822X05282260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, K., Besara, R., Scheel, A., Colvin, G., Brady, E., & Burel, M. (2015). Graduate conversations: Assessing the space needs of graduate students. College & Research Libraries, 76(6), 756–770. doi:10.5860/crl.76.6.756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, K. M., Schoonover, D., & Spitler, J. (2016). GoPro as an ethnographic tool: A wayfinding study in an academic library. Journal of Access Services, 13(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15367967.2016.1154465
   Google Scholar
• Kott, F. C., & Jones, J. L. (2015). The impact of library resource utilization on undergraduate students’ academic performance: A propensity score matching design. College & Research Libraries, 76(5), 566–586. doi:10.5860/crl.76.5.566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2015). The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College & Research Libraries, 76(3), 359–385. doi:10.5860/crl.76.3.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari, S. S. (2008). Multicollinearity estimation and elimination. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 3(1), 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Dazkir, S. S. (2015). User experience and wayfinding in an academic library. The International Journal of Visual Design, 9(4), 13–25. doi:10.18848/2325-1581/CGP/v09i04/38761
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T., & Loh, W. (1966). A comparison of tests of equality of variance. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 22(3), 287–301. doi:10.1016/0167-9473(95)00054-2
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B. P., Murray-Rust, C., Parker, S. E., Turner, D., Walker, D. P., Wilkinson, F. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2007). May) Attitudes of presidents and provosts on the university library. College & Research Libraries, 68(3), 213–228. doi:10.5860/crl.68.3.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, J., & Kinsley, K. (2017). Embracing the generalized propensity score method: Measuring the effect of library usage on first-time-in-college student academic success. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4), 129–157. doi:10.18438/B8BH35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, I., & Calzonetti, J. A. (2017). Are they different? An investigation of space and learning in a STEM branch library. In S. E. Montgomery (Ed.), Assessing library space for learning (pp. 143–166). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K., & Fisher, E. S. (2017). Designing to meet our institutional mission: A case study from Grand Valley State University Libraries. In S. E. Montgomery (Ed.), Assessing library space for learning (pp. 73–81). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Minson, V., Spears, L. I., Del Monte, A., Portillo, M., Meneely, J., Gonzalez, S., & Bossart, J. (2022). Library Impact Research Report: Facilitating innovative research, creative thinking, and problem solving. Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from https://www.arl.org/library-spaces/
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. E. (2014). Library space assessment: User learning behaviors in the library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), 70–75. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. The European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A., Ireland, A., & Hackathorn, J. (2016). The value of academic libraries: Library services as a predictor of student retention. College & Research Libraries, 77(5), 631–642. doi:10.5860/crl.77.5.631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, S. M. (2016). Space preference at James White Library: What students really want. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(4), 355–367. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. J., & Terenzini, P. J. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ranstam, J. (2016). May) Multiple P-values and Bonferroni correction. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 24(5), 763–764. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonover, D., & Kinsley, K. (2014). Stories from the stacks: Students lost in the labyrinth. Journal of Access Services, 11(3), 175–188. doi:10.1080/15367967.2014.914426
   Google Scholar
• Schutt, R. K. (2009). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research (6th ed.). Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2013). Library use and undergraduate student outcomes: New evidence for students’ retention and academic success. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2), 147–164. doi:10.1353/pla.2013.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2014). Stacks, serials, search engines, and students’ success: First-year undergraduate students’ library use, academic achievement, and retention. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2017a). Beyond books: The extended academic benefits of library use for first-year college students. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 8–22. doi:10.5860/crl.78.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2017b). The impact of academic library resources on undergraduates’ degree completion. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 812–823. doi:10.5860/crl.78.6.812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staines, G. M. (2012). Universal design: A practical guide to creating and recreating interiors of academic libraries for teaching, learning and research. Chandos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stemmer, J. K., & Mahan, D. M. (2016). Investigating the relationship of library usage to student outcomes. College & Research Libraries, 77(3), 359–375. doi:10.5860/crl.77.3.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternheim, J. (2016). I have to change to stay the same. New Library World, 117(1/2), 22–34. doi:10.1108/NLW-09-2015-0061
   Google Scholar
• Strange, C. C., & Banning, J. H. (2015). Designing for learning: Creating campus environments for student success (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). HarperCollins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1975). Dropouts from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. doi:10.2307/1170024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 51–89). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, R. L., & Doane, D. P. (2005). Using the studentized range to assess kurtosis. Journal of Applied Statistics, 32(3), 271–280. doi:10.1080/02664760500054632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (2015). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D., & Gioia, D. (2015). Mixed methods research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–611. doi:10.1353/csd.2013.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaugg, H., Child, C., Bennett, D., Brown, J., Alcaraz, M., Allred, A., … Lee, S., T. (2016). Comparing library wayfinding among novices and experts. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 17(1), 70–82. doi:10.1108/PMM-12-2015-0041
   Google Scholar