The Influences of Political Strategies and Communication Styles on Political Candidates’ Online and Offline Visibility

References

• Aldrich, J. H., and J. D. Griffin. 2003. “The Presidency and the Campaign: Creating Voter Priorities in the 2000 Election.” In The Presidency and the Political System, edited by Michael Nelson, 7th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Baik, Jason M., Thet H. Nyein, and Sepideh Modrek. 2022. “Social Media Activism and Convergence in Tweet Topics after the Initial #MeToo Movement for Two Distinct Groups of Twitter Users.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37 (15–16): NP13603–NP13622.https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001481
   Google Scholar
• Bene, M. 2023. “Who Reaps the Benefits? A Crosscountry Investigation of the Absolute and Relative Normalization and Equalization Theses in the 2019 European Parliament Elections.” New Media & Society 25 (7): 1708–1727. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211019688
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, L. 2020. “The 2019 Swiss Federal Elections: The Rise of the Green Tide.” West European Politics 43 (6): 1339–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1710687
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., and K. E. Dalrymple. 2016. “Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter.” Journal of Political Marketing 15 (4): 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959686
   Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, T., M. Brunner, and T. Däubler. 2012. “Personal Voteseeking in Flexible List Systems: how Electoral Incentives Shape Belgian MPs’ Bill Initiation Behaviour.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (5): 607–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02047.x
   Google Scholar
• Bright, J., S. Hale, B. Ganesh, A. Bulovsky, H. Margetts, and P. Howard. 2020. “Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence from Candidate Use of Twitter during the 2015 and 2017 U.K. Elections.” Communication Research 47 (7): 988–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219872394
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A., R. A. Feenstra, and S. Tormey. 2016. “Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign: The Case of Podemos and the Two-Way Street Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., and S. Proksch. 2022. “Politicians Unleashed? Political Communication on Twitter and in Parliament in Western Europe.” Political Science Research and Methods 10 (4): 776–792. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.36
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, A. 2017. “Intra-Party Politics in 140 Characters.” Party Politics 23 (1): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816654325
   Google Scholar
• Cha, M., H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummad. 2010. “Measuring User Influence on Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy.” Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Washington, DC, 23–26. http://www.icwsm.org/2010/papers.shtml. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14033
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damore, D. F. 2004. “The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700304
   Google Scholar
• Diez-Gracia, A., P. Sánchez-García, and J. Martín-Román. 2023. Polarisation and emotional discourse in the political agenda on Twitter: disintermediation and engagement in electoral campaigns. Icono 14 21 (1). https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1922
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Eberl, J.-M., P. Tolochko, P. Jost, T. Heidenreich, and H. G. Boomgaarden. 2020. “What’s in a Post? How Sentiment and Issue Salience Affect Users’ Emotional Reactions on Facebook.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 17 (1): 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1710318
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., and E. Skogerbø. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L., C. Gahn, A. Bodlos, and M. Haselmayer. 2022. “Does Social Media Enhance Party Responsiveness? How User Engagement Shapes Parties’ Issue Attention on Facebook.” Party Politics 28 (3): 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820985334
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., F. Esser, S. Blassnig, and S. Engesser. 2019. “Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 24 (2): 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, X., and M. Bene. 2021. “Images, Politicians, and Social Media: Patterns and Effects of Politicians’ Image-Based Political Communication Strategies on Social Media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 26 (1): 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220959553
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., and F. Gilardi. 2023. Level playing field or politics as usual? Equalization–normalization in directdemocratic online campaigns. Media and Communication 11 (1): 43–55. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6004
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and R. K. Nielsen. 2018. “Are People Incidentally Exposed to News on Social Media? A Comparative Analysis.” New Media & Society 20 (7): 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
   Google Scholar
• Giger, N., S. Bailer, A. Sutter, and T. Turner-Zwinkels. 2021. “Policy or Person? What Voters Want from Their Representatives on Twitter.” Electoral Studies 74:102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102401
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., T. Gessler, M. Kubli, and S. Müller. 2021. Issue ownership and agenda setting in the 2019 Swiss national elections. Swiss Political Science Review 28 (2): 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12496
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., M. Broersma, K. Hazelhoff, and G. Van‘t Haar. 2013. “Between Broadcasting Political Messages and Interacting with Voters.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., D. Jackson, and M. Broersma. 2017. “Exposing Themselves? The Personalization of Tweeting Behavior during the 2012 Dutch General Election Campaign.” 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, 25–29 May 2017, San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, R., J. Sevenans, and A. P. Van. 2017. “Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 22 (3): 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969
   Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., D. Schmuck, and J. Matthes. 2019. “What Drives Interaction in Political Actors’ Facebook Posts? Profile and Content Predictors of User Engagement and Political Actors’ Reactions.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (10): 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, C. P., and A. Suphan. 2017. “Stuck with ‘Electronic Brochures’? How Boundary Management Strategies Shape Politicians’ Social Media Use.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (4): 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200646
   Google Scholar
• Holtz‐Bacha, C. 2014. “Political Advertising in International Comparison.” In The Handbook of International Advertising Research, edited by H. Cheng, 554–574. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N. 2006. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and N. Spierings. 2019. “A Populist Paradise? Examining Populists’ Twitter Adoption and Use.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (12): 1681–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. J. 2017. “Social Media and Political Campaigning: Changing Terms of Engagement?” The International Journal of Press/Politics 22 (1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216673196
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B. 2016. “The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties Facebook Strategy versus Practice.” Social Media + Society 2 (2): 205630511664461. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R. 2013. “Obama’s Online Success and European Party Organizations: Adoption and Adaptation of US Online Practices in the Norwegian Labor Party.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (2): 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.749822
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R., and B. Enjolras. 2016. “Styles of Social Media Campaigning and Influence in a Hybrid Political Communication System: Linking Candidate Survey Data with Twitter Data.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T. R. 2020. “To Whom Do Politicians Talk and Listen? Mapping Swiss Politicians’ Public Sphere on Twitter.” Computational Communication Research 2 (2): 175–202. https://computationalcommunication.org/ccr/article/view/38. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2020.2.003.KELL
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T. R., and K. Kleinen-von Königslöw. 2018a. “Followers, Spread the Message! Predicting the Success of Swiss Politicians on Facebook and Twitter.” Social Media + Society 4 (1): 205630511876573. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511876573
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T. R., and K. Kleinen-von Königslöw. 2018b. “Pseudo-Discursive, Mobilizing, Emotional, and Entertaining: identifying Four Successful Communication Styles of Political Actors on Social Media during the 2015 Swiss National Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 15 (4): 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1510355
   Google Scholar
• Kite, J., B. C. Foley, A. C. Grunseit, and B. Freeman. 2016. “Please like Me: Facebook and Public Health Communication.” PloS One 11 (9): e0162765.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162765
   Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B., A. O. Larsson, and G. Enli. 2017. “The Social Media Logic of Political Interaction: Exploring Citizens’ and Politicians’ Relationship on Facebook and Twitter.” First Monday 22 (2): 6348. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i2.6348
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., and J. Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media & Society 17 (8): 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
   Google Scholar
• Kligler-Vilenchik, N., and I. Literat. 2018. “Distributed Creativity as Political Expression: Youth Responses to the 2016 US Presidential Election in Online Affinity Networks.” Journal of Communication 68 (1): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx005
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., and U. Russmann. 2017. “Beer is More Efficient than Social Media”—Political Parties and Strategic Communication in Austrian and Swiss National Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14 (4): 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919
   Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, K., D. Lilleker, A. Smith, and D. Weissmann. 2016. “The Normalization of Online Campaigning in the Web 2.0 Era.” European Journal of Communication 31 (3): 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116647236
   Google Scholar
• Kovic, M., A. Rauchfleisch, J. Metag, C. Caspar, and J. Szenogrady. 2017. “Brute Force Effects of Mass Media Presence and Social Media Activity on Electoral Outcome.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14 (4): 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1374228
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. 2005. Direct-Democratic Choice. The Swiss Experience. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., K. Gattermann, and R. Vliegenthart. 2018. “Understanding the Dynamics of Politicians’ Visibility in Traditional and Social Media.” The Information Society 34 (4): 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S. Y. B., M. F. M. Cheung, and W. H. Lo. 2021. “What Matters Most in the Responses to Political Campaign Posts on Social Media: The Candidate, Message Frame, or Message Format?” Computers in Human Behavior 121:106800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106800
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., and S. Y. Shin. 2014. “When the Medium is the Message: How Transportability Moderates the Effects of Politicians’ Twitter Communication.” Communication Research 41 (8): 1088–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466407
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., J. Tenscher, and V. Štětka. 2015. “Towards Hypermedia Campaigning? Perceptions of New Media’s Importance for Campaigning by Party Strategists in Comparative Perspective.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (7): 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C. 2019. “Social Media as Public Opinion: How Journalists Use Social Media to Represent Public Opinion.” Journalism 20 (8): 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C. 2020. “Taking the Temperature of the Room: How Political Campaigns Use Social Media to Understand and Represent Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (S1): 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa012
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., P. Van Aelst, and S. Praet. 2021. “Party Ownership or Individual Specialization? A Comparison of Politicians’ Individual Issue Attention across Three Different Agendas.” Party Politics 27 (4): 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
   Google Scholar
• Praet, S., P. Van Aelst, W. Daelemans, S. Walgrave, T. Kreutz, J. Peeters, and D. Martens. 2021. “Comparing Automated Content Analysis Methods to Distinguish Issue Communication by Political Parties on Twitter.” Computational Communication Research 3 (2): 1–27. https://computationalcommunication.org/ccr/article/view/45. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2021.2.004.PRAE
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, G., and T. Sheafer. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949-2003.” Political Communication 24 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, C., B. J. Bes, and M. Schoonvelde. 2020. “Undermining, Defusing or Defending European Integration? Assessing Public Communication of European Executives in Times of eu Politicisation.” European Journal of Political Research 59 (2): 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12350
   Google Scholar
• Reveilhac, M., and L. Eisner. 2022. “Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter.” Statistics, Politics and Policy 13 (3): 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2022-0003
   Google Scholar
• Reveilhac, M., and D. Morselli. 2023. “The Impact of Social Media Use for Elected Parliamentarians: Evidence from Politicians’ Use of Twitter during the Last Two Swiss Legislatures.” Swiss Political Science Review 29 (1): 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12543
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, L. 2022. “Socially Mediated Issue Ownership.” Communications 47 (2): 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2020-0020
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, Valentin, and Christian Stecker. 2018. “The Temporal Dimension of Issue Competition.” Party Politics 24 (6): 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817693474
   Google Scholar
• Selb, P., and G. Lutz. 2015. “Lone Fighters: Intraparty Competition, Interparty Competition, and Candidates’ Vote Seeking Efforts in Open-Ballot PR Elections.” Electoral Studies 39:329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Sevenans, J., Q. Albaugh, and T. Shahaf. 2014. “The Automated Coding of Policy Agendas: A Dictionary Based Approach (v. 2.0.).” CAP Conference 2014, Konstanz, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sides, J. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 407–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000226
   Google Scholar
• Spierings, N., and K. Jacobs. 2014. “Getting Personal? The Impact of Social Media on Preferential Voting.” Political Behavior 36 (1): 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9228-2
   Google Scholar
• Spierings, N., and K. Jacobs. 2019. “Political Parties and Social Media Campaigning: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Parties’ Professional Facebook and Twitter Use in the 2010 and 2012 Dutch Elections.” Acta Politica 54 (1): 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0079-z
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., and L. Dang-Xuan. 2013. Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of management information systems 29 (4): 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
   Google Scholar
• Stier, S., A. Bleier, H. Lietz, and M. Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35 (1): 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
   Google Scholar
• Teresi, H., and M. R. Michelson. 2015. “Wired to Mobilize: The Effect of Social Networking Messages on Voter Turnout.” The Social Science Journal 52 (2): 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Thesen, G., C. Green-Pedersen, and P. B. Mortensen. 2017. “Priming, Issue Ownership, and Party Support: The Electoral Gains of an Issue-Friendly Media Agenda.” Political Communication 34 (2): 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233920
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, A., and A. Feddersen. 2019. “The (In)Stability of Voters’ Perceptions of Competence and Associative Issue Ownership: The Role of Media Campaign Coverage.” Political Communication 36 (3): 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1542416
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, A. 2009. Politicians in the media: Determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in Swiss newspapers. International Journal of Press/Politics 14 (1): 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016120832326
   Google Scholar
• Tromble, R. 2018. “Thanks for (Actually) Responding! How Citizen Demand Shapes Politicians’ Interactive Practices on Twitter.” New Media & Society 20 (2): 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., T. Sheafer, and J. Stanyer. 2012. “The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism 13 (2): 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp, K. 2017. “The Influence of Issue Ownership Perceptions on Behavior of Journalists.” PhD thesis, University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dalen, A., Z. Fazekas, R. Klemmensen, and K. M. Hansen. 2015. “Policy Considerations on Facebook: Agendas, Coherence, and Communication Patterns in the 2011 Danish Parliamentary Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12 (3): 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1061398
   Google Scholar
• van der Loo, M., J. van der Laan, R. C. Team, N. Logan, and C. Muir. 2021. Package ‘stringdist’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stringdist/stringdist.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. 2016. Switzerland on the Road from a Consociational to a Centrifugal Democracy?. Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1): 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12203
   Google Scholar
• Vissers, S., and D. Stolle. 2014. “Spill-over Effects between Facebook and on/Offline Political Participation? Evidence from a Two-Wave Panel Study.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11 (3): 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.888383
   Google Scholar
• Vos, D. 2016. “How Ordinary MPs Can Make It into the News: A Factorial Survey Experiment with Political Journalists to Explain the Newsworthiness of MPs.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (6): 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1185128
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., J. Lefevere, and A. Tresch. 2012. “The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4): 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Google Scholar
• Wijffels, J., M. Straka, and J. Straková. 2019. Package ‘udpipe’. R package. https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2019-10-09/web/packages/udpipe/udpipe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., D. B. Margolin, J. R. Fownes, D. L. Eiseman, A. M. Chatrchyan, and S. B. Allred. 2021. “Tweeting about Climate: Which Politicians Speak up and What Do They Speak up about?” Social Media + Society 7 (3): 205630512110338. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033815
   Google Scholar