59
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Prediction of rear-seat belt use: Application of extended theory of planned behavior

&
Pages 698-704 | Received 08 Nov 2023, Accepted 07 Apr 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

References

  • Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Beck LF, Kresnow MJ, Bergen G. 2019. Belief about seat belt use and seat belt wearing behavior among front and rear seat passengers in the United States. J Safety Res. 68:81–88. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.007.
  • Bendak S, Alnaqbi SS. 2017. Rear seat belt use in developing countries: a case study from the United Arab Emirates. Int J Transport and Vehicle Engin. 11:2768–2772.
  • Bhat G, Beck L, Bergen G, Kresnow MJ. 2015. Predictors of rear seat belt use among U.S. adults, 2012. J Safety Res. 53:103–106. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.011.
  • Bird EL, Panter J, Baker G, Jones T, Ogilvie D. 2018. Predicting walking and cycling behaviour change using an extended theory of planned behaviour. J Transport & Health. 10:11–27. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.014.
  • Bose D, Arregui-Dalmases C, Sanchez-Molina D, Velazquez-Ameijide J, Crandall J. 2013. Increased risk of driver fatality due to unrestrained rear-seat passengers in severe frontal crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 53:100–104. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.031.
  • Chin WW. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Res. 295:295–336.
  • Colgan F, Gospel A, Petrie J, Adams J, Heywood P, White M. 2004. Does rear seat belt use vary according to socioeconomic status? J Epidemiol Community Health. 58(11):929–930. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.016972.
  • Demir B, Özkan T, Demir S. 2019. Pedestrian violations: reasoned or social reactive? comparing theory of planned behavior and prototype willingness model. Transportation Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 60:560–572. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.012.
  • Eren H, Gauld C. 2021. Smartphone use among young drivers: applying an extended theory of planned behaviour to predict young drivers’ intention and engagement in concealed responding. Accid Anal Prev. 164:106474. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106474.
  • Findley DJ, Sanchez M, Nye T. 2018. Estimating the effect of standard enforcement of a rear seat belt law for rear seat fatality prevention. Transportation Res Record. 2672(33):67–77. doi:10.1177/0361198118790131.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
  • Hagger M. 2010. Current issues and new directions inpsychology and health: physical activity research showcasing theory into practice. Psychol Health. 25(1):1–5. doi:10.1080/08870440903268637.
  • Hair JF, Black W, Babin B. 2009. Multivariate data analysis. London (UK): Pearson Education.
  • Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2011. Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet. J Marketing Theory and Practice. 19(2):139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
  • Hardeman W, Johnston M, Johnston D, Bonetti D, Wareham N, Kinmonth AL. 2002. Application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Psychol Health. 17(2):123–158. doi:10.1080/08870440290013644a.
  • Høye A. 2016. How would increasing seat belt use affect the number of killed or seriously injured light vehicle occupants? Accid Anal Prev. 88:175–186. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.022.
  • Hulland J. 1999. Use of Partial Least Squares (Pls) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strat Mgmt J. 20(2):195–204. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7.
  • Jermakian JS. 2017. Research on rear-seat safety and primary-enforcement safety belt use laws. Arlington, VA: The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
  • Jermakian JS, Weast RA. 2018. Passenger use of and attitudes toward rear seat belts. J Safety Res. 64:113–119. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.006.
  • Jiang K, Ling F, Feng Z, Wang K, Guo L. 2017. Psychological predictors of mobile phone use while crossing the street among college students: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(2):118–123. doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1236195.
  • Jiang K, Yang Z, Feng Z, Yu Z, Huang Z. 2020. Psychological predictors of seat belt usage among university student passengers and an examination of the differences between the front and rear seats. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(2):139–144. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1732361.
  • Kidd DG, O'Malley S. 2023. Drivers’ attitudes toward front or rear child passenger belt use and seat belt reminders at these seating ­positions. Traffic Inj Prev. 24(sup1):S80–S87. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.810333.
  • Lajunen T, Summala H. 2003. Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 6(2):97–107. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1.
  • Li Q, Peng J, Chen T, Yu Y, Hyder AA. 2018. Seatbelt wearing rate in a Chinese city: results from multi-round cross-sectional studies. Accid Anal Prev. 121(1016/j.aap.2018.09.027):279–284. 10 doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.027.
  • Li X, Useche SA, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Haworth N. 2022. Comparing the cycling behaviours of Australian, Chinese and Colombian cyclists using a behavioural questionnaire paradigm. Accid Anal Prev. 164:106471. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106471.
  • McIlroy RC, Kokwaro GO, Wu J, Jikyong U, Nam VH, Hoque MS, Preston JM, Plant KL, Stanton NA. 2020. How do fatalistic beliefs affect the attitudes and pedestrian behaviours of road users in different countries? A cross-cultural study. Accid Anal Prev. 139:105491. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105491.
  • Nambulee W, Jomnonkwao S, Siridhara S, Ratanavaraha V. 2018. Modelling of seat belt use intention for intercity buses based on health belief model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Sci. 15(2):944–962. doi:10.1080/23249935.2018.1551946.
  • Nemire K. 2017. Seat belt use by adult rear seat passengers in private passenger, taxi, and rideshare vehicles. Proc Human Factors and Ergon Soc Annual Meeting. 61(1):1644–1648. doi:10.1177/1541931213601896.
  • Nemire K. 2019. Warning signs to fasten seat belts result in higher rates of rear seat belt use in rideshare vehicles. Proc Human Factors and Ergon Soc Annual Meeting. 63(1):2046–2050. doi:10.1177/1071181319631515.
  • Nukenine SKL, Daniel J. 2011. Impact of belt use by rear-seat occupants on injury severity of belted drivers in New Jersey. Transport Res Record. 2265(1):91–99. doi:10.3141/2265-10.
  • Obeid S, Gitelman V, Baron-Epel O. 2014. The relationship between social capital and traffic law violations: Israeli Arabs as a case study. Accid Anal Prev. 71:273–285. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.027.
  • Ogawa S, Hayashi K, Nakao H, Shinozaki H. 2021. Factors that associate Japanese University students’ use of rear seat belts on general roads and expressways. J Community Health. 46(3):603–608. doi:10.1007/s10900-020-00912-x.
  • Ogawa S, Shinozaki H, Hayashi K, Itoh M, Soda M, Kameda T, Ozawa K, Yokota H, Kamioka K, Minegishi T. 2018. Prevalence of rear seat belt use among pregnant women in a suburban area of Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 44(1):117–123. doi:10.1111/jog.13468.
  • Okyere P, Agyei-Baffour P, Harris MJ, Mock C, Donkor P, Yankson IK, Owusu-Dabo E. 2021. Predictors of seat-belt use among bus passengers in Ghana: an application of the theory of planned behaviour and health belief model. J Community Health. 46(5):992–999. doi:10.1007/s10900-021-00980-7.
  • Palat B, Paran F, Delhomme P. 2017. Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predicting violations at automated railroad crossings. Accid Anal Prev. 98:174–184. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.005.
  • Parenteau CS, Viano DC. 2018. Driver and front passenger injury in frontal crashes: update on the effect of unbelted rear occupants. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(1):28–34. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1344355.
  • Qiao X, Ji L, Jin Y, Si H, Bian Y, Wang W, Wang C. 2021. Development and validation of an instrument to measure beliefs in physical activity among (pre)frail older adults: an integration of the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior. Patient Educ Couns. 104(10):2544–2551. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.009.
  • Rahman IA, Memon AH, Abd Karim AT. 2013. Examining factors affecting budget overrun of construction projects undertaken through management procurement method using Pls-Sem approach. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 107:120–128. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.407.
  • Şimşekoğlu Ö, Lajunen T. 2008. Social psychology of seat belt use: a comparison of theory of planned behavior and health belief model. Transport Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 11(3):181–191. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2007.10.001.
  • Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araújo-Soares V. 2014. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 8(1):1–7. doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.869710.
  • Sutanto E, Zia N, Taber N, Rinawan FR, Amelia I, Jiwattanakulpaisarn P, Bachani AM. 2021. Rear-seat seatbelt use in urban Southeast Asia: results from Bandung and Bangkok. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 29(2):247–255. doi:10.1080/17457300.2021.1998135.
  • Taylor NL, Daily M. 2019. Self-reported factors that influence rear seat belt use among adults. J Safety Res. 70:25–31. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.005.
  • Wang J, Wang X. 2019. Structural equation modeling: applications using Mplus. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wang X, Yuen KF, Shi W, Ma F. 2020. The determinants of passengers’ safety behaviour on public transport. J Transport & Health. 18:100905. 101016/j.jth.2020.100905 doi:10.1016/j.jth.2020.100905.
  • World Health Organization. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018: summary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  • Zhou H, Romero SB, Qin X. 2016. An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict pedestrians’ violating crossing behavior using structural equation modeling. Accid Anal Prev. 95(Pt B):417–424. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.009.
  • Zhu M, Cummings P, Chu H, Cook LJ. 2007. Association of rear seat safety belt use with death in a traffic crash: a matched cohort study. Inj Prev. 13(3):183–185. doi:10.1136/ip.2006.012153.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.