Should all Stakeholders be Treated Fairly? Identifying Stakeholders that Legitimately Matter

References

• Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447–456. doi:10.1002/smj.v30:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lokkesmoe, K. L. (2002). What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American men project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administrative Review, 62(5), 568–584. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Centre for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, Toronto: University of Toronto. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77044-2
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(95–120), 95–120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 1–9. doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0196
   Google Scholar
• Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identify: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 77–87. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1191-4
   Google Scholar
• De Vita, G., Tekaya, A., & Wang, C. L. (2011). The many faces of asset specificity: A critical review of key theoretical perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4), 329–348. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2011.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., & Fiss, P. C. (2013). Editor’s comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325–331. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H. (1996). Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organization Science, 7(6), 649–666. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.6.649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, H., & Phillips, R. A. (2009). Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: Corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(3), 403–432. doi:10.5840/beq200919323
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Y. (2012). Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 83–96. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1381-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influencer strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 314–327. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 149–164. doi:10.2307/2095567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. doi:10.2307/2667032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R., & Butler, J. E. (1992). Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Management, 18(4), 733–740. doi:10.1177/014920639201800408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23463924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1–2), 91–99. doi:10.1023/A:1016336118528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, D. (2004). The imperfect nature of corporate responsibilities to stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 201–217. doi:10.5840/beq200414212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, S. S., Wong, Y. Y., & Liu, W. (2009). Asset specificity roles in inter-firm corporation: Reducing opportunistic behavior or increasing cooperative behavior?. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1214–1219. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2011). Stakeholder theories: Issues to resolve. Management Decision, 49(2), 226–252. doi:10.1108/00251741111109133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. (2005). A names and faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 57–69. doi:10.1177/1056492604270799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 437–459. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2741-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Angle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren, H. J., III., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 851–877. doi:10.1111/joms.2015.52.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 252–275. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, D., & James, H. (2016). No man lives on an Island: Habitual agency and complexity in entrepreneurial decision making. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 3(3), 244–259. doi:10.1504/IJCLM.2016.080312
   Google Scholar
• Noland, J., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2010.12.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(1), 25–41. doi:10.5840/beq20031312
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not? Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502. doi:10.5840/beq200313434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana, A. (2012). Three elements of stakeholder legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 257–265. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0966-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024–1039. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contributions? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar