Two-stage stochastic optimization of virtual power plant with wind power and uncertain demand

References

• Bakhtvar, M., A. Al Hinai, M. S. El Moursi, and M. H. Albadi. 2021. A vision of flexible dispatchable hybrid solar-wind-energy storage power plant. IET Renewable Power Generation 15 (13):2983–96. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitar, E. Y., R. Rajagopal, P. P. Khargonekar, K. Poolla, and P. Varaiya. 2012. Bringing wind energy to market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 27 (3):1225–35. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2183395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneville Power Administration. 2022. “VER* generation & total load in the BPA balancing authority. Accessed April 21 2022. http://transmission.bpa.gov/business/operations/Wind/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Braun, M. 2009. Provision of ancillary services by distributed generators: Technological and economic perspective, Vol. 10. Kassel: Kassel University Press GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Camal, S., F. Teng, A. Michiorri, G. Kariniotakis, and L. Badesa. 2019. Scenario generation of aggregated wind, photovoltaics and small hydro production for power systems applications. Applied Energy 242:1396–406. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., P. Luo, P. Liu, X. Li, B. Ming, K. Huang, W. Xu, and Y. Gong. 2022. Stochastic short-term scheduling of a wind-solar-hydro complementary system considering both the day-ahead market bidding and bilateral contracts decomposition. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 138:107904. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlke, S. 2018. Effects of wholesale electricity markets on wind generation in the midwestern United States. Energy Policy 122:358–68. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C. J., J. W. Bialek, and B. F. Hobbs. 2011. Opportunity cost bidding by wind generators in forward markets: Analytical results. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 26 (3):1600–08. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2100412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De, G., Z. Tan, M. Li, L. Huang, and X. Song. 2018. Two-stage stochastic optimization for the strategic bidding of a generation company considering wind power uncertainty. Energies 11 (12):3527. doi:10.3390/en11123527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, J., and P. Pinson. 2016. Very-short-term probabilistic wind power forecasts by sparse vector autoregression. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 7 (2):763–70. doi:10.1109/TSG.2015.2424078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, E., N. Zhang, C. Kang, B. Kroposki, H. Huang, M. Miao, and Q. Xia. 2016. Managing wind power uncertainty through strategic reserve purchasing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 32 (4):2547–59. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2617466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endemao-Ventura, L., J. Serrano Gonzlez, J. Manuel Roldn Fernndez, M. Burgos Payn, and J. Manuel Riquelme Santos. 2021. Optimal energy bidding for renewable plants: A practical application to an actual wind farm in Spain. Renewable Energy 175:1111–26. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., and J. H. Lee. 2021. Two-stage stochastic programming formulation for optimal design and operation of multi-microgrid system using data-based modeling of renewable energy sources. Applied Energy 291:116830. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia, F.-J., M. D. Cuadrado, and C. Corchero. 2018. On optimal participation in the electricity markets of wind power plants with battery energy storage systems. Computers & Operations Research 96:316–29. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2018.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooshmand, R.-A., S. Mostafa Nosratabadi, and E. Gholipour. 2018. Event-based scheduling of industrial technical virtual power plant considering wind and market prices stochastic behaviors–A case study in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 172:1748–64. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordehi, A. R. 2022a. Risk-aware two-stage stochastic programming for electricity procurement of a large consumer with storage system and demand response. Journal of Energy Storage 51:104478. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.104478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordehi, A. R. 2022b. Two-stage stochastic programming for risk-aware scheduling of energy hubs participating in day-ahead and real-time electricity markets. Sustainable Cities and Society 81:103823. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.103823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordehi, A. R., V. Sohrabi Tabar, and M. Ahmadi Jirdehi. 2022. A two-stage stochastic model for security-constrained market clearing with wind power plants, storage systems and elastic demands. Journal of Energy Storage 51:104550. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.104550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordehi, A. R., V. Sohrabi Tabar, S. A. Mansouri, M. Nasir, S. M. Hakimi, and S. Pirouzi. 2022. A risk-averse two-stage stochastic model for planning retailers including self-generation and storage system. Journal of Energy Storage 51:104380. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.104380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordehi, A. R., V. Sohrabi Tabar, S. A. Mansouri, F. Sheidaei, A. Ahmarinejad, and S. Pirouzi. 2022. Two-stage stochastic programming for scheduling microgrids with high wind penetration including fast demand response providers and fast-start generators. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 31:100694. doi:10.1016/j.segan.2022.100694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., H. Shin, and R. Baldick. 2018. Bivariate probabilistic wind power and real-time price forecasting and their applications to wind power bidding strategy development. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33 (6):6087–97. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2830785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., and Z. Hu. 2020. Data-driven regulation reserve capacity determination based on Bayes theorem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (2):1646–49. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2965763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., J. Qiu, and J. Zhao. 2022. A data-driven scheduling model of virtual power plant using Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 137:107801. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., and J. Xu. 2021. Equilibrium strategy based policy shifts towards the integration of wind power in spot electricity markets: A perspective from China. Energy Policy 157:112482. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Wei, F. Zhu, J. Du, Z. Zhao, and M. Ouyang. 2023. The path enabling storage of renewable energy toward carbon neutralization in China. ETransportation 16:100226. doi:10.1016/j.etran.2023.100226.
   Google Scholar
• Mansouri, S. A., E. Nematbakhsh, A. Rezaee Jordehi, M. Tostado-Véliz, F. Jurado, and Z. Leonowicz. 2022. A risk-based bi-level bidding system to manage day-ahead electricity market and scheduling of interconnected microgrids in the presence of smart homes. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), 1–6. Prague: IEEE. doi:10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope54979.2022.9854685.
   Google Scholar
• Pandi, H., J. M. Morales, A. J. Conejo, and I. Kuzle. 2013. Offering model for a virtual power plant based on stochastic programming. Applied Energy 105:282–92. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, K., and Y. Guan. 2022. Integrated stochastic optimal self-scheduling for two-settlement electricity markets. INFORMS Journal on Computing 34 (3):1819–40. doi:10.1287/ijoc.2021.1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrot, A., and P. Pinson. 2021. Adaptive generalized logit-normal distributions for wind power short-term forecasting. 2021 IEEE Madrid PowerTech, 1–6. Madrid: IEEE. doi:10.1109/PowerTech46648.2021.9494900.
   Google Scholar
• Pinson, P. 2012. Very-short-term probabilistic forecasting of wind power with generalized logit–normal distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 61 (4):555–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.01026.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinson, P., C. Chevallier, and G. N. Kariniotakis. 2007. Trading wind generation from short-term probabilistic forecasts of wind power. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 22 (3):1148–56. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2007.901117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudjianto, D., C. Ramsay, and G. Strbac. 2007. Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources. IET Renewable Power Generation 1 (1):10–16. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg:20060023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouzbahani, H. M., H. Karimipour, and L. Lei. 2021. A review on virtual power plant for energy management. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 47:101370. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruixiaoxiao, Z., G. Q. Shen, M. Ni, and J. K. Wong. 2019. An overview on the status quo of onshore and offshore wind power development and wind power enterprise localization in China. International Journal of Green Energy 16 (15):1646–64. doi:10.1080/15435075.2019.1681429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seok, H., C. Ok, and C. Chen. 2022. Wind power bidding strategy by harmonizing neural network and genetic algorithm. International Journal of Green Energy 19 (15):1649–57. doi:10.1080/15435075.2021.2021415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabanzadeh, M., M.-K. Sheikh-El-Eslami, and M.-R. Haghifam. 2015. The design of a risk-hedging tool for virtual power plants via robust optimization approach. Applied Energy 155:766–77. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern California Edison. 2022. “Regulatory information–SCE load profiles”, Accessed April 21 2022. https://www.sce.com/wps/portal/home/regulatory/load-profiles
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, A., E. Bitar, P. Khargonekar, and K. Poolla. 2012. Market induced curtailment of wind power. 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting San Diego, 1–8. doi:10.1109/PESGM.2012.6345171.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H., W. Yan, Z. Ren, Q. Wang, and M. A. Mohamed. 2022. A robust dispatch model for integrated electricity and heat networks considering price-based integrated demand response. Energy 239:121875. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., X. Ge, P. Yang, K. Li, Z. Mi, P. Siano, and N. Dui. 2020. Day-ahead optimal bidding and scheduling strategies for DER aggregator considering responsive uncertainty under real-time pricing. Energy 213:118765. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., W. B. Hobbs, A. Tuohy, M. Bello, and D. J. Ault. 2021. Evaluating potential benefits of flexible solar power generation in the southern company system. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 12 (1):152–60. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3126118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Z., Y. Xu, W. Gu, and W. Wu. 2019. A multi-time-scale economic scheduling strategy for virtual power plant based on deferrable loads aggregation and disaggregation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 11 (3):1332–46. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2019.2924936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., F. Fang, Y. Liu, and J. Liu. 2019. Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures. Applied Energy 239:454–70. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., J. Le, F. Zheng, Y. Zhang, and K. Liu. 2019. Two-stage distributionally robust coordinated scheduling for gas-electricity integrated energy system considering wind power uncertainty and reserve capacity configuration. Renewable Energy 135:122–35. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., Y. Shen, and M. Li. 2016. Control and bidding strategy for virtual power plants with renewable generation and inelastic demand in electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 7 (2):562–75. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2015.2504561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., C. Wan, and Y. Song. 2021. Operating reserve quantification using prediction intervals of wind power: An integrated probabilistic forecasting and decision methodology. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 36 (4):3701–14. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3053847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, T., H.-T. Zhang, Y. Li, L. Liu, and R. Lu. 2020. Bayesian learning-based multi-objective distribution power network reconfiguration. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 12 (2):1174–84. doi:10.1109/TSG.2020.3027290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar