Discourse Effect on Children’s Interpretation of Pre-Subject Exclusive Zhiyou ‘Only’

References

• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, D. I., & Clark, B. Z. (2008). Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsma, W. (1999). Children’s interpretation of Dutch sentences with the focus particle alleen. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, University of Potsdam, September. 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. L. (2008). Deconstructing the shì … de construction. The Linguistic Review, 25(3–4), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S., Drozd, K., Matsuoka, K., Philip, W., & Roeper, T. (1992). Only in child language. Paper presented at the 17th Boston University Conference on Language Development.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., Ni, W. J., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing, and modularity. In C. Cliton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspective on sentence processing (pp. 443–467). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A Guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, K., & van Loosbroek, E. (1998). Dutch children’s interpretations of focus particle constructions. Paper presented at the 23rd Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Endo, M. (2004). Developmental issues on the interpretation of focus particles by Japanese children. BUCLD 28: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.141–152). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackl, M., Sugawara, A., & Wexler, K. (2015). Question-answer (In)congruence in the acquisition of only. BUCLD 39: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 204–217). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 5(1), 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar [PhD dissertation]. M.I.T.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., & Li, R. (2012). Focus association in child mandarin. Poster presented in Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America (pp. 11–13). University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, M. (2007). On the meaning of only. Journal of Semantics, 25(1), 45–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge, B., Theakston, A. L., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2015). Given–new/new–given? Children’s sensitivity to the ordering of information in complex sentences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (1991). A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 127–158. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v1i0.2492
   Google Scholar
• Krifka, M.(1992). A framework for focus-sensitive quantification. In C. Baker & D. Dowty (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. H.-T. (1995). Focus adverbs in child cantonese. In J. Camocho & L. Choueiri (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 85–101). GSIL, Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. H. T. (2000, November). Restrictive focus in Cantonese: how acquisition meets semantics. In LSHK Workshop on Cantonese Particles (Vol. 18).
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka Least-Squares means. R package version 1.4.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., & Hu, J. (2013). Focus sensitivity in child mandarin. Paper presented in the Symposium on Quantification in Chinese: Linguistic Theory and Language Acquisition, Beijing, China, November. 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, A., Schulz, P., & Höhle, B. (2011). How the understanding of focus particles develops: Evidence from child German. Proceedings of the 4th conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2010) (pp. 163–171). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Notley, A., Zhou, P., Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (2009). Children’s interpretation of focus expressions in English and Chinese. Language Acquisition, 16(4), 240–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220903266669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Rowland, C., & Filik, R. (2003). Children’s comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition, 89, 263–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00126-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., White, D., Filik, R., & Jaz, K. (2006). Children’s interpretation of ambiguous focus in sentences with ‘only’. Language Acquisition, 13(3), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1303_4
   Google Scholar
• Philip, W., & Lynch, E. (2000). Felicity, relevance, and acquisition of the grammar of ‘every’ and ‘only’. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 583–596). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, T. (2004). The processing cost of reference set computation: Acquisition of stress shift and focus. Language Acquisition, 12(2), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1202_1
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (1996/2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 1–69. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6
   Google Scholar
• Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus [ Unpublished PhD dissertation]. University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617
   Google Scholar
• Rooth, M. (1996). Focus. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 271–297). Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sano, T. (2011). Abstract CP/IP configuration in child Japanese. BUCLD 36: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 525–535). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). Afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.27-2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
   Google Scholar
• Sugawara, A. (2016). The Role of Question-Answer Congruence (QAD) in Child Language and Adult Sentence Processing [ Doctoral dissertation]. MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, T.-C. (1979). Studies in Chinese syntax. Student Book.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X. (2002). Restrictive focus in child mandarin. Contemporary Linguistics, 4(3), 225–237. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2010). Focus identification in child mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 965–1005. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar