Extending cognition: a vegetal rejoinder to extensionless thought and to extended cognition

References

• Clark A, Chalmers D. The extended mind. Analysis. 1998;58(1):7–7. doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newen A, de Bruin L, Gallagher S. (eds). The oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bayne T, Brainard D, Byrne RW, Chittka L, Clayton N, Heyes C, Mather J, Ölveczky B, Shadlen M, Suddendorf T. et al. What is cognition? Curr Biolol. 2019;29(13):R608–15. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon P, Keijzer F, Arendt D, Levin M. Reframing cognition: getting down to biological basics. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2021;376(1820):20190750. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shettleworth SJ. Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Gomila T. Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach. San Diego, USA: Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana HR, Varela FJ. Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson M. Embedded and situated cognition. In: Shapiro L. editor. The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Oxon: Routledge; 2014. p. 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng K. Cognition beyond representation: varieties of situated cognition in animals. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2018;13:1–20. doi:10.3819/CCBR.2018.130001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E. The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes R. Principles of philosophy. New York: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Parise AG, Gagliano M, Souza G. Extended cognition in plants: is it possible? Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15(2):1710661. doi:10.1080/15592324.2019.1710661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson CI, Chicas-Mosier AM. Learning in plants: lessons from Mimosa pudica. Front Psychol. 2016;7:417. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Individuality, self and sociality of vascular plants. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2019;376(1821):20190760. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Gagliano M, Souza GM, Trewavas A. Plants are intelligent, here’s how. Ann Bot. 2020;125(1):11–28. doi:10.1093/aob/mcz155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliano M. In a green frame of mind: perspectives on the behavioural ecology and cognitive nature of plants. AoB Plants. 2015;7:lu075. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plu075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Aspects of plant intelligence. Ann Bot. 2003;92(1):1–20. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oborny B. The plant body as a network of semi-autonomous agents: a review. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2019;374(1774):20180371. doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey E, Marder M. Plants in place: a phenomenology of the vegetal. New York: Columbia University Press; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Self-organization and behaviour in root systems. In: Trewavas A. editors. Plant behaviour & intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 122–36.
   Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Plant intelligence. Naturwissenschaften. 2005;92(9):401–413. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0014-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray TS. Foraging behaviour in tropical herbaceous climbers (Araceae). J Ecol. 1992;80(2):189–203. doi:10.2307/2261006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell E, Chaves-Campos J. Memory and habituation to harmful and non-harmful stimuli in a field population of the sensitive plant, Mimosa pudica. J Trop Ecol. 2022;38(2):89–98. doi:10.1017/S0266467421000559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amador-Vargas S, Dominguez M, León G, Maldonado B, Murillo J, Vides GL. Leaf-folding response of a sensitive plant shows context-dependent behavioral plasticity. Plant Ecolog. 2014;215:1445–1454. doi: 10.1007/s11258-014-0401-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin CR, Darwin F. The power of movement in plants. London, UK: John Murray; 1880.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin CR. The movements and habits of climbing plants. London, UK: John Murray; 1875.
   Google Scholar
• Gianoli E. The behavioural ecology of climbing plants. AoB Plants. 2015;7:lv013. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plv013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonato B, Simonetti V, Bulgheroni M, Wang Q, Guerra S, Quaggiotti S, Ruperti B, Castiello U. Evidence of motor intentions in plants: a kinematical study. J Comp Psychol. 2023;137(4):228–37. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/com0000351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra S, Peressotti A, Peressotti F, Bulgheroni M, Baccinelli W, D’Amico E, Gómez A, Massaccesi S, Ceccarini F, Castiello U. Flexible control of movement in plants. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16570. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53118-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raja V, Silva PL, Holghoomi R, Calvo P. The dynamics of plant nutation. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19465. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76588-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra S, Spoto A, Panzeri A, Wang Q, Bonato B, Simonetti V, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U. Ascent and attachment in pea plants: a matter of iteration. Under Rev. 2024. doi:10.2120/3/rs.3.rs-3923677/v1.
   Google Scholar
• Parise AG, Marder M. Extended plant cognition: a critical consideration of the concept. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2023. doi:10.1007/s40626-023-00281-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karst J, Jones MD, Hoeksema JD. Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023;7(4):501–11. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide OM, Rivero R, Sønsteby A. Temperature control of shoot growth and floral initiation in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). CABI Agric Biosci. 2020;1(1):8. doi:10.1186/s43170-020-00007-6.
   Google Scholar
• Karban R. Plant behaviour and communication. Ecol Lett. 2008;11(7):727–39. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01183.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zanten M, Pons TL, Janssen JAM, Voesenek LACJ, Peeters AJM. On the relevance and control of leaf angle. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2010;29(5):300–16. doi:10.1080/07352689.2010.502086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel HM, Cocroft RB. Plants respond to leaf vibrations caused by insect herbivore chewing. Oecologia. 2014;175(4):1257–66. doi:10.1007/s00442-014-2995-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil M, Silva Bueno JC. Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(13):5467–72. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610266104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ, de Jonge R, Berendsen RL. The soil-borne legacy. Cell. 2018;172(6):1178–80. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Zhao J, Wen T, Zhao M, Li R, Goossens P, Huang Q, Bai Y, Vivanco JM, Kowalchuk GA. et al. Root exudates drive the soil-borne legacy of aboveground pathogen infection. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0537-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marder M. Plant-thinking: a philosophy of vegetal life. New York: Columbia University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl E. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Guerra S, Bonato B, Simonetti V, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U. Decision-making underlying support-searching in pea plants. Plants. 2023;12(8):1597. doi:10.3390/plants12081597.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver LM, Amasino RM. Senescence is induced in individually darkened Arabidopsis leaves, but inhibited in whole darkened plants. Plant Physiol. 2001;127(3):876–86. doi:10.1104/pp.010312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksson J. Differential shading of branches or whole trees: survival, growth, and reproduction. Oecologia. 2001;126(4):482–6. doi:10.1007/s004420000547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura K. Irradiance heterogeneity within crown affects photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen distribution of leaves in Cedrela sinensis. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2010;33(5):750–58. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02100.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong T, Li J, Zhang Y, Korpelainen H, Niinemets Ü, Li C. Partial shading of lateral branches affects growth, and foliage nitrogen- and water-use efficiencies in the conifer cunninghamia lanceolata growing in a warm monsoon climate. Tree Physiol. 2015;35(6):632–643. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shani U, Waisel Y, Eshel A, Xue S, Ziv G. Responses to salinity of grapevine plants with split root systems. New Phytol. 1993;124(4):695–701. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03860.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemesh H, Arbiv A, Gersani M, Ovadia O, Novoplansky A, Bruun HH. The effects of nutrient dynamics on root patch choice. PLOS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falik O, Reides P, Gersani M, Novoplansky A. Root navigation by self inhibition. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2005;28(4):562–569. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbach C, Markus K, Zhang Y, Schlicht M, Baluška F. Photophobic behavior of maize roots. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(7):874–878. doi:10.4161/psb.21012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvan-Ampudia CS, Testerink C. Salt stress signals shape the plant root. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(3):296–302. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastien R, Bohr T, Moulia B, Douady S. Unifying model of shoot gravitropism reveals proprioception as a central feature of posture control in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;110(2):755–760. doi:10.1073/pnas.1214301109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy AS. Plant physiology and development. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliano M, Vyazovskiy VV, Borbély AA, Grimonprez M, Depczynski M. Learning by association in plants. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):38427. doi:10.1038/srep38427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ge L, Chen R. Negative gravitropic response of roots directs auxin flow to control root gravitropism. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2019;42(8):2372–83. doi:10.1111/pce.13559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushwah S, Jones AM, Laxmi A. Cytokinin interplay with ethylene, auxin, and glucose signaling controls Arabidopsis seedling root directional growth. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(4):1851–66. doi:10.1104/pp.111.175794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel K. Lack of evidence for associative learning in pea plants. eLife. 2020;9:e57614. doi:10.7554/eLife.57614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagaki T, Yamada H, Tóth Á. Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism. Nature. 2000;407(6803):470. doi:10.1038/35035159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karban R. Plant sensing and communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar