Machine learning unveils the complex nonlinearity of concrete materials’ uniaxial compressive strength

References

• Abd Elaty MAA. 2014. Compressive strength prediction of Portland cement concrete with age using a new model. HBRC J. 10(2):145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• ACI 318R-19. 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete: (ACI 318-19) and commentary (ACI 318R-19).
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari B, Shrestha A, Bhandari A, Sah AK, Belbase A, Paudel S. 2023. Evaluation and comparison on performance evaluation of polymer brick utilizing plastic waste with local sourced burnt bricks. I-Manager’s J Struct Eng. 12(2):23.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad A, Farooq F, Niewiadomski P, Ostrowski K, Akbar A, Aslam F, Alyousef R. 2021. Prediction of compressive strength of fly ash based concrete using individual and ensemble algorithm. Materials. 14(4):794. doi: 10.3390/ma14040794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad SA, Rafiq SK, Ahmed HU, Abdulrahman AS, Ramezanianpour AM. 2023. Innovative soft computing techniques including artificial neural network and nonlinear regression models to predict the compressive strength of environmentally friendly concrete incorporating waste glass powder. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 8(4):119. doi: 10.1007/s41062-023-01089-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed HU, Mohammed AA, Mohammed A. 2022. Soft computing models to predict the compressive strength of GGBS/FA-geopolymer concrete. PLoS One. 17(5):e0265846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armaghani DJ, Asteris PG. 2021. A comparative study of ANN and ANFIS models for the prediction of cement-based mortar materials compressive strength. Neural Comput Appl. 33(9):4501–4532. doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05244-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armaghani DJ, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Karamani C, Skentou A, Zoumpoulaki I, Asteris PG. 2019. Soft computing-based techniques for concrete beams shear strength. Procedia Struct Integrity. 17:924–933. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.123.
   Google Scholar
• Asteris PG, Armaghani DJ, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Karayannis CG, Pilakoutas K. 2019. Predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Comput Concrete Int J. 24(5):469–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris PG, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Kotsonis EA, Lourenço PB. 2021. Prediction of cement-based mortars compressive strength using machine learning techniques. Neural Comput Appl. 33(19):13089–13121. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06004-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris PG, Mokos VG. 2020. Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. 32(15):11807–11826. doi: 10.1007/s00521-019-04663-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris PG, Skentou AD, Bardhan A, Samui P, Pilakoutas K. 2021. Predicting concrete compressive strength using hybrid ensembling of surrogate machine learning models. Cem Concr Res. 145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris PG, Gandomi AH, Armaghani DJ, Kokoris S, Papandreadi AT, Roumelioti A, Papanikolaou S, Tsoukalas MZ, Triantafyllidis L, Koutras EI, et al. 2024. Prognosis of COVID-19 severity using DERGA, a novel machine learning algorithm. Eur J Intern Med. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.02.037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahedh MA, Jaafar MS. 2018. Ultra high-performance concrete utilizing fly ash as cement replacement under autoclaving technique. Case Stud Constr Mater. 9:e00202. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00202.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelo L, Kline J, Walenta G, Gartner E. 2014. Cement and carbon emissions. Mater Struct. 47(6):1055–1065. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0114-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan A, Biswas R, Kardani N, Iqbal M, Samui P, Singh MP, Asteris PG. 2022. A novel integrated approach of augmented grey wolf optimizer and ANN for estimating axial load carrying-capacity of concrete-filled steel tube columns. Constr Build Mater. 337:127454. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan A, Gokceoglu C, Burman A, Samui P, Asteris PG. 2021. Efficient computational techniques for predicting the California bearing ratio of soil in soaked conditions. Eng Geol. 291:106239. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batayneh M, Marie I, Asi I. 2007. Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes. Waste Manag. 27(12):1870–1876. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhusal B, Paudel S, Tanapornraweekit G, Maskey PN, Tangtermsirikul S. 2023. Seismic performance evaluation and strengthening of RC beam-column joints adopted in Nepal. Structures. 57(4):105205. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105205.
   Google Scholar
• Bhusal B, Pradhananga A, Paudel S, Najam FA. 2024. Evaluating and strengthening low-rise reinforced concrete buildings constructed in Nepal. Structures. 63:106388. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106388.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 24(2):123–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00058655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu L, Du G, Hou Q. 2021. Prediction of the compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete based on artificial neural network. Materials. 14(14):3921. doi: 10.3390/ma14143921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p. 785–794.
   Google Scholar
• Chengsheng T, Huacheng L, Bing X. 2017. AdaBoost typical algorithm and its application research. MATEC Web Conf. 139:00222. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201713900222.
   Google Scholar
• Chithra S, Kumar SS, Chinnaraju K, Ashmita FA. 2016. A comparative study on the compressive strength prediction models for high performance concrete containing nano silica and copper slag using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Constr Build Mater. 114:528–535. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra P, Sharma RK, Kumar M. 2014. Regression models for the prediction of compressive strength of concrete with & without fly ash. Int J Latest Trends Eng Tech (IJLTET). 3(4):400–406.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysos G, Dagritzikos P, Papaefstathiou I, Dollas A. 2013. HC-CART: a parallel system implementation of data mining classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm on a multi-FPGA system. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim. 9(4):1–25. doi: 10.1145/2400682.2400706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu S-C, Tsai P-W. 2007. Computational intelligence based on the behavior of cats. Int J Innov Comput Info Control. 3(1):163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotsovos DM, Pavlović MN. 2008. Numerical investigation of concrete subjected to compressive impact loading. Part 2: parametric investigation of factors affecting behaviour at high loading rates. Comput Struct. 86(1–2):164–180. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnecki S, Shariq M, Nikoo M, Sadowski Ł. 2021. An intelligent model for the prediction of the compressive strength of cementitious composites with ground granulated blast furnace slag based on ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements. Measurement. 172:108951. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degtyarev VV, Tsavdaridis KD. 2022. Buckling and ultimate load prediction models for perforated steel beams using machine learning algorithms. J Build Eng. 51:104316. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietterich TG. 2000. Ensemble methods in machine learning. Multiple classifier systems: First International Workshop, MCS 2000 Cagliari, Italy, June 21–23, 2000 Proceedings 1, p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj RH, Mohammed AA, Omer KM, Ahmed HU. 2022. Soft computing techniques to predict the compressive strength of green self-compacting concrete incorporating recycled plastic aggregates and industrial waste ashes. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 24(7):2253–2281. doi: 10.1007/s10098-022-02318-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi AH, Babanajad SK, Alavi AH, Farnam Y. 2012. Novel approach to strength modeling of concrete under triaxial compression. J Mater Civ Eng. 24(9):1132–1143. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner E. 2004. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cem Concr Res. 34(9):1489–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilt DE, Seegrist DW. 1977. Ridge, a computer program for calculating ridge regression estimates. Upper Darby (PA): Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Ho TK. 1995. Random decision forests. Proc 3rd Int Conf Document Anal Recog. 1:278–282.
   Google Scholar
• Kajaste R, Hurme M. 2016. Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions–management options and abatement cost. J Cleaner Prod. 112:4041–4052. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashem A, Das P. 2023. Compressive strength prediction of high-strength concrete using hybrid machine learning approaches by incorporating SHAP analysis. Asian J Civ Eng. 24(8):3243–3263. doi: 10.1007/s42107-023-00707-0.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Memon SA, Farooq F, Javed MF, Aslam F, Alyousef R. 2021. Compressive strength of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete by gene expression programming and random forest. Adv Civ Eng. 2021:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2021/6618407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohavi R. 1995. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI. 14(2):1137–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Kostić S, Vasović D. 2015. Prediction model for compressive strength of basic concrete mixture using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Applic. 26(5):1005–1024. doi: 10.1007/s00521-014-1763-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Tang Z, Kang Q, Zhang X, Li Y. 2023. Machine learning-based method for predicting compressive strength of concrete. Processes. 11(2):390. doi: 10.3390/pr11020390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh W-Y. 2011. Classification and regression trees. WIREs Data Min Knowl. 1(1):14–23. doi: 10.1002/widm.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjoubi S, Meng W, Bao Y. 2022. Auto-tune learning framework for prediction of flowability, mechanical properties, and porosity of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Appl Soft Comput. 115:108182. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderpour H, Rafiean AH, Fakharian P. 2018. Compressive strength prediction of environmentally friendly concrete using artificial neural networks. J Build Eng. 16:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath P, Sarker P. 2011. Effect of fly ash on the durability properties of high strength concrete. Procedia Eng. 14:1149–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.144.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel S, Bhusal B. 2021. Investigation of modelling approaches for non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete frames. J Eng Sci Tech Rev. 14(2):61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel S. 2022. Experimental and numerical studies on composite structures under lateral cyclic loading: precast L-plate encased composite columns and wide U beam-column joints. Thailand: Thammasat University.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel S, Pudasaini A, Shrestha RK, Kharel E. 2023. Compressive strength of concrete material using machine learning techniques. Cleaner Eng Tech. 15:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100661.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel S, Tanapornraweekit G, Tangtermsirikul S. 2021a. Numerical investigation of concrete filled hollow precast composite columns subjected to lateral cyclic loading. Eng Struct. 252:113586. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel S, Tanapornraweekit G, Tangtermsirikul S. 2021b. Numerical study on seismic performance improvement of composite wide beam-column interior joints. J Build Eng. 46:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel S. 2023. Investigation of modelling approaches to study the structural performance of 3D printed plain wall under uniform axial compression. Adv Struct Eng. 26(10):1911–1928. doi: 10.1177/13694332231166566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phul AA, Memon MJ, Shah SNR, Sandhu AR. 2019. GGBS and fly ash effects on compressive strength by partial replacement of cement concrete. Civ Eng J. 5(4):913–921. doi: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091299.
   Google Scholar
• Rajakarunakaran SA, Lourdu AR, Muthusamy S, Panchal H, Jawad Alrubaie A, Musa Jaber M, Ali MH, Tlili I, Maseleno A, Majdi A, et al. 2022. Prediction of strength and analysis in self-compacting concrete using machine learning based regression techniques. Adv Eng Softw. 173:103267. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salau MA, Busari AO. 2015. Effect of different coarse aggregate sizes on the strength characteristics of laterized concrete. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 96(1):012079. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/96/1/012079.
   Google Scholar
• Shubbar AA, Jafer H, Dulaimi A, Hashim K, Atherton W, Sadique M. 2018. The development of a low carbon binder produced from the ternary blending of cement, ground granulated blast furnace slag and high calcium fly ash: an experimental and statistical approach. Constr Build Mater. 187:1051–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Ahmad A, Farooq F, Ostrowski KA, Maślak M, Czarnecki S, Aslam F. 2021. Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms. Constr Build Mater. 308:125021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanapornraweekit G, Jiramarootapong P, Paudel S, Tangtermsirikul S, Snguanyat C. 2022. Experimental and numerical investigation of 3D-printed mortar walls under uniform axial compression. Constr Build Mater. 360:129552. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topçu İB, Sarıdemir M. 2008. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Comput Mater Sci. 41(3):305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangler T, Roussel N, Bos FP, Salet TA, Flatt RJ. 2019. Digital concrete: a review. Cem Concr Res. 123:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Halloin C, Löbel W, Finklea F, Lipke E, Zweigerdt R, Cremaschi S. 2020. Data-driven model development for cardiomyocyte production experimental failure prediction. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Vol. 48. Netherland: Elsevier; p. 1639–1644. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50274-3.
   Google Scholar
• Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn I. 1984. The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J Sci and Stat Comput. 5(3):735–743. doi: 10.1137/0905052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Li W, Li J, Nguyen TN. 2018. A novel optimised self-learning method for compressive strength prediction of high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater. 184:229–247. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar