Organizational Routines and Theorizing in Large-Scale School Improvement—Exploring a Swedish Design

References

• Adolfsson, C.-H. (2018). Upgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge boundaries in teaching under the Swedish subject-based curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 29(3), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1442231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2020). Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1745621
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). Nordic schools in a time of change. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic educational model: “A school for all” encounters neo-liberal policy. Policy implications of research in education (pp. 1–14). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brix, J. (2019). Ambidexterity and organizational learning: Revisiting and reconnecting the literatures. The Learning Organization, 26(4), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2019-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Mehta, J. D. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644–690. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217700078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176529
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119207245
   Google Scholar
• Ertås, T. I., & Irgens, E. J. (2021). Developing organizational knowledge in schools: The role of theory and theorizing in collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Change, 24(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09433-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010068703786
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). Whole school reform: Problems and promises. University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2009). Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9108-z
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Corvin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Dinham, S. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111174785
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Hargreaves, A. (2012). Performance beyond expectations. NCSL.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2010). The challenge of large-scale literacy improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.486589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets—and then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000032328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordholm, D., & Adolfsson, C.-H. (2024). Big ideas, soft governance: Managing large-scale school improvement at the national agency level in Sweden. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(1), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2023-0219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Talis 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, I., & Ogawa, R. T. (2000). Site‐based decision‐making leadership in American public schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010378377
   Google Scholar
• Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership (vol. 1): Policy and practice. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264044715-en
   Google Scholar
• Ronnberg, L. (2011). Exploring the intersection of marketization and central state control through Swedish national school inspection. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 689–707.
   Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K., Thomas, E., Gordon, M. F., & Febey, K. S. (2008). State leadership for school improvement: An analysis of three states. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 562–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08323858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., Parise, L., & Sherer, J. (2011). Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms: Policy, school administration, and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 586–619. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210385102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective: An exploration of some study operations and measures. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/656300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlstrom, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalized conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2021). Statsbidrag för en likvärdig skola 2021. [ State grants for an equivalent school in 2021]. https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statsbidrag/statsbidrag-for-likvardig-skola-2021
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2019). Redovisning av uppdrag om Samverkan för bästa skola (Report on assignments on collaboration for the best school possible. Report 7.2.1-2015:778).
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/258556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar