Unearthing the latent assumptions inscribed into language tools: the cross-cultural benefits of applying a reflexive lens in co-design

References

• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 205. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aluvilu, H. N., H. Winschiers-Theophilus, S. Krishnamurthy, H.-N.-N. Muyingi, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, A. Peters, and S. Nggada. 2018. “Promoting an Open and Accessible Digital Preservation of Namibian Indigenous Languages.” In Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives, edited by D. S. Jat and J. Sieck, 119–134. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7697-8_8.
   Google Scholar
• Amery, R. 2001. “Language Planning and Language Revival.” Current Issues in Language Planning 2 (2–3): 141–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200108668023.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. 2021. Countering Misrecognition of Indigenous Contact Languages and Their Ecologies in Australia. Canberra, Australia: The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. 2018. “Designing Mobile Applications for Endangered Languages.” In Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages, edited by Kenneth L. Rehg and Lyle Campbell, Chapter 38, 842–861. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, L., and J. Donovan. 2012. “Provotypes for Participatory Innovation.” In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 388–397. DIS ’12. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014.
   Google Scholar
• Bow, C. 2020. “Entanglements of Digital Technologies and Indigenous Language Work in the Northern Territory.” PhD Thesis, Charles Darwin University (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Burston, J. 2014. “MALL: The Pedagogical Challenges.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 27 (4): 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., ed. 2001. “Computer-Assisted Language Learning.” In Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition, 44–94. Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681.004.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, K. A. 2012. “Mukurtu: An Indigenous Archive and Publishing Tool.” February. https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:12001/ .
   Google Scholar
• Christie, M. J. 2004. “Computer Databases and Aboriginal Knowledge.” Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts (1):4–12. https://digitalcollections.cdu.edu.au/nodes/view/4724.
   Google Scholar
• “Did You Know Ktunaxa is Critically Endangered?” 2021. Endangered Languages. Accessed December 6. http://www.endangeredlanguages.com/lang/1937.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A., and F. Raby. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds/Arturo Escobar. New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallman, D. 2003. “Design-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction.” In Proceedings of CHI2003, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 225–232. Fort Lauderdale: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galla, C. K. 2016. “Indigenous Language Revitalization, Promotion, and Education: Function of Digital Technology.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (7): 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1166137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galla, C. K. 2018. “Digital Realities of Indigenous Language Revitalization: A Look at Hawaiian Language Technology in the Modern World.” Language and Literacy 20 (3): 100–120. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. 1995. “Deweyan Pragmatism and the Epistemology of Contemporary Social Constructivism.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (4): 716–740. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032004716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W., A. Boucher, S. Pennington, and B. Walker. 2004. “Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty.” Interactions 11 (5): 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015555.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., T. Dunne, and E. Pacenti. 1999. “Design: Cultural Probes.” Interactions 6 (1): 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235.
   Google Scholar
• Genee, I., and M.-O. Junker. 2018. The Blackfoot Language Resources and Digital Dictionary Project: Creating Integrated Web Resources for Language Documentation and Revitalization. Mānoa: University of Hawaii Press, 359–392.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, L. A. 2016. “Encouraging the Use and Activation of Heritage Languages in the Broader Educational System.” In Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, edited by Peter Pericles Trifonas and Themistoklis Aravossitas, 1–21. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38893-9_16-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gulwanyang, M. 2023a. “Discussion Paper: Technology and Language Learning Assessment.” Yaale | Tools for Language Work. Accessed May 26. https://yaale.com.au/resource/Discussion%20paper:%20Technology%20and%20Language%20Learning%20Assessment .
   Google Scholar
• Gulwanyang, M. 2023b. Research Report: Gamification of Language Learning for Acquisition and Retention of a Sleeping Language. Yaale | Tools for Language Work. Accessed May 30. https://yaale.com.au/resource/Research%20Report:%20Gamification%20of%20language%20learning%20for%20acquisition%20and%20retention%20of%20a%20sleeping%20language.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Experimental Futures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harbord, C., P. Hung, and R. Falconer. 2021. “‘Nothing about us, without us’: An Investigation into the Justification for Indigenous Peoples to be Involved in Every Step of Indigenous Digital Product Design.” In The 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, 310–314. SIGDOC ’21. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472714.3473657.
   Google Scholar
• https://plus.google.com/+UNESCO. 2018. “Indigenous Knowledge and Knowledge Transmission.” UNESCO. February 10. https://en.unesco.org/links/transmission.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L., J. Vertesi, P. Dourish, K. Philip, and R. E. Grinter. 2010. “Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1311–1320. CHI ’10. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, O. S., and T. W. Leong. 2012. “Values-Led Participatory Design: Mediating the Emergence of Values.” In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, 468–477. NordiCHI ’12. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399087.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., and A. Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1): 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Ktunaxa Home | Explore | FirstVoices.” 2021. Accessed December 6. https://www.firstvoices.com/explore/FV/sections/Data/Ktunaxa/Ktunaxa/Ktunaxa.
   Google Scholar
• “Ktunaxa Language | Aq’am.” 2022. Accessed December 13. https://www.aqam.net/services/ktunaxa-language.
   Google Scholar
• “Ktunaxa Language Course for Educators – CBEEN Online.” 2022. Accessed December 13. https://cbeen.ca/ktunaxa-language-course/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Hammond, L., and E. Jackson-Barrett. 2019. “Indigenous Children’s Linguistic Rights in the 21st Century: Intentions and Tensions in Practice.” International Journal of Early Childhood 51 (3): 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-019-00251-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lissarrague, A. 2010. A Grammar and Dictionary of Gathang: The Language of the Birrbay, Guringay and Warrimay. Australia: Muurrbay Aboriginal Language & Culture Co-operative. https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:13372.
   Google Scholar
• Littell, P., A. Kazantseva, R. Kuhn, A. Pine, A. Arppe, C. Cox, and M.-O. Junker. 2018. “Indigenous Language Technologies in Canada: Assessment, Challenges, and Successes.” In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2620–2632. Santa Fe, NM: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/C18-1222.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K. - B. Mirraboopa. 2003. “Ways of Knowing, Being and Doing: A Theoretical Framework and Methods for Indigenous and Indigenist Re‐Search.” Journal of Australian Studies 27 (76): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., S. Doherty, P. Worthy, and J. Reid. 2023. “Design Thinking, Wicked Problems and Institutioning Change: A Case Study.” CoDesign 19 (3): 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2034885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, S., and B. Matthews. 2021. “Reconceptualising Feedback: Designing Educational Tangible Technologies to Be a Creative Material.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 29 (September): 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100278.
   Google Scholar
• Meighan, P. J. 2021. “Decolonizing the Digital Landscape: The Role of Technology in Indigenous Language Revitalization.” AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 17 (3): 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211037672.
   Google Scholar
• Nic Fhlannchadha, S., and T. M. Hickey. 2018. “Minority Language Ownership and Authority: Perspectives of Native Speakers and New Speakers.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (1): 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1127888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for the Arts, Department of Infrastructure. 2020. “National Indigenous Languages Report Document.” Text. Office for the Arts, Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. Accessed August 16. https://www.arts.gov.au/documents/national-indigenous-languages-report-document .
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L. 2017. “Exploring Provocation as a Research Method in the Social Sciences.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2): 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1161346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, A., and M. Turin. 2017. “Language Revitalization.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, edited by A. Pine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.8.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, S. Holland, and T. Carey. 1994. Human-Computer Interaction. GBR: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Radley, A., T. Ryan, and K. Dowse. 2021. “Ganggali Garral Djuyalgu (Weaving Story): Indigenous Language Research, the Insider–Outsider Experience and Weaving Aboriginal Ways of Knowing, Being, and Doing into Academia.” WINHEC: International Journal of Indigenous Education Scholarship (1): 411–448. https://doi.org/10.18357/wj161202120293.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M., C. Jones, F. Merlan, and J. MacRitchie. 2019. “Revitalisation of Mangarrayi: Supporting Community Use of Archival Audio Exemplars for Creation of Language Learning Resources.” Language Documentation 13 (May): 253–280.
   Google Scholar
• Riestenberg, K. J. 2020. “Meaningful Interaction and Affordances for Language Learning at a Zapotec Revitalisation Programme.” The Language Learning Journal 48 (3): 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1722205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, D., and A. Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Servaes, J., and R. Hoyng. 2017. “The Tools of Social Change: A Critique of Techno-Centric Development and Activism.” New Media & Society 19 (2): 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. 2018. “Reviving Indigenous Languages – Not as Easy as it Seems.” The Conversation. Accessed July 31. http://theconversation.com/reviving-indigenous-languages-not-as-easy-as-it-seems-68977.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. A., J. Giacon, and B. McLean. 2018. “A Community Development Approach Using Free Online Tools for Language Revival in Australia.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39 (6): 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1393429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soro, A., M. Brereton, J. Lawrence Taylor, A. Lee Hong, and P. Roe. 2016. “Cross-Cultural Dialogical Probes.” In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 114–125. Nairobi, Kenya: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998581.2998591.
   Google Scholar
• Soro, A., M. Brereton, J. L. Taylor, A. L. Hong, and P. Roe. 2017. “A Cross-Cultural Noticeboard for a Remote Community: Design, Deployment, and Evaluation.” In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017, edited by R. Bernhaupt, G. Dalvi, A. Joshi, D. K. Balkrishan, J. O’Neill, and M. Winckler, 399–419. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67744-6_26.
   Google Scholar
• Soro, A., A. Lee Hong, G. Shaw, P. Roe, and M. Brereton. 2015. “A Noticeboard in ‘Both Worlds’ Unsurprising Interfaces Supporting Easy Bi-Cultural Content Publication.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2181–2186. CHI EA ’15. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732713.
   Google Scholar
• St John, N., and Y. Akama. 2022. “Reimagining Co-Design on Country as a Relational and Transformational Practice.” CoDesign 18 (1): 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.2001536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, C. O. C. 2019. “Kaurna Country.” Document. City of Charles Sturt. Accessed August 26. https://www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au/community/arts,-culture-and-history/kaurna-culture/kaurna-country.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1993. “Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered.” In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13–17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW ’93, edited by G. de Michelis, C. Simone, and K. Schmidt, 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. L., A. Soro, P. Roe, A. Lee Hong, and M. Brereton. 2018. “From Preserving to Performing Culture in the Digital Era.” In Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives, edited by D. S. Jat, J. Sieck, H.-N.-N. Muyingi, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, A. Peters, and S. Nggada, 7–28. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7697-8_2 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. L., A. Soro, P. Roe, M. Brereton, and Wujal Wujal Aboriginal Shire Council. 2019. “A Relational Approach to Designing Social Technologies That Foster Use of the Kuku Yalanji Language.” In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction, 161–172. OZCHI’19. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369471.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, C. 1997. “Performing Culture in the Global Village.” Critique of Anthropology 17 (1): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9701700105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, B. 2022. “Language App Hopes to Educate and Entertain Youth.” Accessed December 13. http://www.charkoosta.com/news/language-app-hopes-to-educate-and-entertain-youth/article_45cddabc-42a9-11ea-b69c-bbc1ffcf4901.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tubby, S. 2021. “Preserving Native American Language Through Mobile Learning.” In Proceedings of SITE Interactive Conference, edited by E. Langran and D. Rutledge, 59–64. USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/220167/.
   Google Scholar
• Vaarzon-Morel, P., L. Barwick, and J. Green. 2021. “Sharing and Storing Digital Cultural Records in Central Australian Indigenous Communities.” New Media & Society 23 (4): 657–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820954201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verran, H., and M. Christie. 2007. “Using/Designing Digital Technologies of Representation in Aboriginal Australian Knowledge Practices.” In Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, edited by Pertti Saariluoma. Poland: Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä, Centre of Sociological Research. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.2007281 .
   Google Scholar
• Verran, H., M. Christie, B. Anbins-King, T. Van Weeren, and W. Yunupingu. 2007. “Designing Digital Knowledge Management Tools with Aboriginal Australians.” Digital Creativity 18 (3): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626260701531944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verran, H., and M. Christie. 2014. “Postcolonial Databasing? Subverting Old Appropriations, Developing New Associations.” In Subversion, Conversion, Development: Cross-Cultural Knowledge Exchange and the Politics of Design, edited by J. Leach and L. Wilson, 57–78. USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• “The Visual Collaboration Platform for Every Team | Miro.” 2022. Accessed August 30. https://miro.com/ .
   Google Scholar
• Warner, N., Q. Luna, and L. Butler. 2007. “Ethics and Revitalization of Dormant Languages: The Mutsun Language.” Language Documentation & Conservation 1 (1): 58–76.
   Google Scholar
• “What is Data Governance?” 2020. Accessed June 17. https://data.uq.edu.au/data-and-information-essentials/what-data-governance.
   Google Scholar
• “Winter 2021 Class List - Salish Kootenai College.” 2022. Accessed December 13. https://www.skc.edu/winter-class-list/.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, T., and H. Falak. 2018. “Insights and Challenges in Digitalization of a Secret Sign Language of the Penan on Borneo Island.” In Digitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives, edited by D. S. Jat, J. Sieck, H.-N.-N. Muyingi, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, A. Peters, and S. Nggada, 65–72. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7697-8_5.
   Google Scholar
• “ʔaq̓amnik’ School | Aq’am.” 2022. Accessed December 13. https://www.aqam.net/services/education-services/%CA%94aq%CC%93amnik%E2%80%99-school.
   Google Scholar