268
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reaction value: affective reflex in the digital public sphere

References

  • Adkins, L., M. Cooper, and M. Konings. 2020. The asset economy. London: Wiley.
  • Amoore, L. 2013. The politics of possibility: Risk and security beyond probability. London: Duke University Press.
  • Andrejevic, M. 2013. Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. London: Routledge.
  • Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition.
  • Arvidsson, A. 2011. General sentiment: How value and affect converge in the information economy. The Sociological Review 59, no. s2: 39–59.
  • Basaure, M. 2011. An interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the expansion of knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory 14: 361–81.
  • Beckert, J., and P. Aspers. 2011. The worth of goods: Valuation and pricing in the economy. Oxford University Press.
  • Beniger, J.R. 1986. The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Blokker, P. 2011. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory 14: 251–261.
  • Boland, T. 2018. The spectacle of critique: From philosophy to cacophony. London: Routledge.
  • Boltanski, L. 2011. On critique: A sociology of emancipation. London: Polity.
  • Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton, NJ: University Press.
  • Borch, C. 2012. The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Braun, B. 2015. Governing the future: The European central bank’s expectation management during the great moderation. Economy and Society 44: 367.
  • Brighenti, A., and L. Sabetta. 2024, February 14. Activated. Towards a sociology of reaction. European Journal of Social Theory. Online First Edition.
  • Cacioppo, J.T., and W. Patrick. 2009. Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Capelos, T., S. Chrona, M. Salmela, and C. Bee. 2021. Reactionary politics and resentful affect in populist times. Politics and Governance 9, no. 3: 186.
  • Clissold, B. (2004). Candid camera and the origins of reality television. In S. Holmes & D. Jermyn (Eds.), Understanding reality television. London: Routledge.
  • Colander, D. 2007. Edgeworth’s hedonimeter and the quest to measure utility. Middlebury College Economics Discussion Paper no. 07-23. Middlebury College, Department of Economics. http://ideas.repec.org/p/mdl/mdlpap/0723.html.
  • Cossarini, P., and F. Vallespín. 2019. Populism and passions: Democratic legitimacy after austerity. London: Routledge.
  • Crary, J. 2001. Suspensions of perception: Attention, spectacle, and modern culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2010. Objectivity. New York, NY: Zone Books.
  • Davies, W. 2017. How are we now? Real-time mood-monitoring as valuation. Journal of Cultural Economy 10, no. 1: 34–48.
  • Davies, W. 2021a. Anti-equivalence: Pragmatics of post-liberal dispute. European Journal of Social Theory 24, no. 1: 44–64.
  • Davies, W. 2021b. The politics of recognition in the age of social media. New Left Review 128: 83–99.
  • Dean, J. 2009. Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Dean, M. 2017. Political acclamation, social media and the public mood. European Journal of Social Theory 20, no. 3: 417–34.
  • Deleuze, G. 1992. Postscript on societies of control. October 59: 3–7.
  • Esposito, E. 2011. The future of futures: The time of money in financing and society. London: Edward Elgar.
  • Feher, M. 2018. Rated agency: Investee politics in a speculative Age. New York, NY: Zone Books.
  • Forst, R. 2012. The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2005. The order of things. London: Routledge.
  • Fraser, N., and A. Honneth. 2003. Redistribution Or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
  • Friedman, M. 1953. Essays in positive economics. Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Friedman, S. 2014. Comedy and distinction: The cultural currency of a ‘good’ Sense of Humour. London: Routledge.
  • Fromm, E. 1995. The fear of freedom. London: Routledge.
  • Galison, P. 1994. The ontology of the enemy: Norbert wiener and the cybernetic vision. Critical Inquiry 21, no. 1: 228–66.
  • Gerlitz, C., and A. Helmond. 2013. The Like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society 15, no. 8: 1348–65.
  • Gillespie, T. 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society 12, no. 3: 347–64.
  • Goffman, E. 1999. The presentation of self in everyday life. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
  • Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell.
  • Habermas, J. 2015. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Volume 1. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Haidt, J. 2024. The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. London: Penguin.
  • Halpern, O. 2014. Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 15, no. 2: 223–38.
  • Hands, D.W. 2009. Economics, psychology and the history of consumer choice theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 633–48.
  • Hansen, M.B.N. 2003. Affect as medium, or the `digital-facial-image’. Journal of Visual Culture 2, no. 2: 205–28.
  • Hansen, M.B.N. 2015. Feed-forward: On The future of twenty-first-century media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hayek, F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review 35, no. 4: 519–30.
  • Hayles, N.K. 2008. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Heidelberger, M. 2004. Nature from within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and his psychophysical worldview. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Pre.
  • Honneth, A. 2018. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hunt, E. 2023, January 31. ‘They filmed me without my consent’: The ugly side of #kindness videos. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jan/31/they-filmed-me-without-my-consent-the-ugly-side-of-kindness-videos.
  • Igo, S. 2009. Perception of pranks on social media: Clout-lighting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jarrar, Y., A. Awobamise, S. Nnabuife, and G. E. Nwek. 2020. Perception of pranks on social media: Clout-lighting. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 10, no. 1.
  • Kaerlein, T. 2012, Autumn. Aporias of the touchscreen: On the promises and perils of a ubiquitous technology. European Journal of Media Studies. 1, no. 2: 177–98.
  • Kant, I. 2007. Critique of judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Karpik, L. 2010. Valuing the Unique: The economics of singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kelly, A.H., and L. McGoey. 2018. Facts, power and global evidence: A new empire of truth. Economy and Society 47, no. 1: 1–26.
  • Kline, R.R. 2015. The cybernetics moment: Or why we call our age the information age. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
  • Krippner, G. 2012. Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lamont, M. 2012. Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 38, no. 1: 201–21.
  • Lazzarato, M. 2014. Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Cambride, MA: Semiotext(e).
  • Leys, R. 2017. The ascent of affect: Genealogy and critique. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lezaun, J., F. Muniesa, and S. Vikkelsø. 2013. Provocative containment and the drift of social-scientific realism. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6, no. 3: 1–16.
  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Luhmann, N. 2000. The reality of the mass media. London: Wiley.
  • McDaniel, B. 2021. Popular music reaction videos: Reactivity, creator labor, and the performance of listening online. New Media & Society 23, no. 6: 1624–1641.
  • McLeod, K. 2011. On pranks. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 8, no. 1: 97–102.
  • McStay, A. 2018. Emotional AI: The rise of empathic media. London: SAGE.
  • Medina, E. 2011. Cybernetic revolutionaries: Technology and politics in Allende’s Chile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Millo, Y., and J. Lezaun. 2006. Regulatory experiments: Genetically modified crops and financial derivatives on trial. Science and Public Policy 33, no. 3: 179–90.
  • Mills, J. 1998. Control: A history of behaviorism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Müller, J.-W. 2017. What is populism? London: Penguin UK.
  • Muniesa, F., and C.-F. Helgesson. 2013. Valuation studies and the spectacle of valuation. Valuation Studies 1, no. 2: 119.
  • Muniesa, F., and M. Callon. 2007. Economic experiments and the construction of markets. In Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, ed. D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 161–87. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Nicolas, S., and L. Ferrand. 1999. Wundt’s laboratory at Leipzig in 1891. History of Psychology 2, no. 3: 194.
  • Nietzsche, F. 1994. Human, all too human. London: Penguin UK.
  • Nietzsche, F. 2013. On the genealogy of morals. London: Penguin UK.
  • Nussbaum, M.C. 2016. Anger and forgiveness: Resentment, generosity, justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Osborne, T., and N. Rose. 2024. Against posthumanism: Notes towards an ethopolitics of personhood. Theory, Culture & Society 41, no. 1: 3–21.
  • Phillips, W. 2015. This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pickering, A. 2010. The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rieber, R.W. 1980. Wilhelm Wundt and the making of a scientific psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Company Limited.
  • Robin, C. 2018. The reactionary mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Robinson, D.K. 2001. Reaction-Time experiments in Wundt’s institute and beyond. In Wilhelm Wundt in history: The making of a scientific psychology, eds. R. W. Rieber and D. K. Robinson, 161–204. Robinson: Springer US.
  • Rosamond, E. 2019. From reputation capital to reputation warfare: Online ratings, trolling, and the logic of volatility. Theory, Culture & Society 37, no. 2: 105–29.
  • Rose, N. 2013. The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society 30, no. 1: 3–34.
  • Rose, N., and J.M. Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schwarzkopf, S. 2010. The consumer as ‘Voter,’ ‘Judge,’ and ‘Jury’: Historical origins and political consequences of a marketing myth. Journal of Macromarketing 31, no. 1: 8–18.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2012. Rage and time: A psychopolitical investigation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Stark, D. 2009. The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Stark, D., Ed. 2020. The performance complex: Competition and competitions in social life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Taylor, T. 2018. Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Vogl, J. 2022. Capital and ressentiment: A short theory of the present. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wahl-Jorgensen, K. 2018. Media coverage of shifting emotional regimes: Donald Trump’s angry populism. Media Culture & Society 40, no. 5, 766–78.
  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • White, H. 2002. Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Woodcock, J., and M.R. Johnson. 2019. The affective labor and performance of live streaming on twitch.tv. Television & New Media 20, no. 8: 813–23.
  • Wulf, T., F. M. Schneider, and S. Beckert. 2020. Watching players: An exploration of media enjoyment on twitch. Games and Culture 15, no. 3: 328–46.