999
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Navigating uncertainty: how do PE teachers respond to competing institutional pressures?

ORCID Icon

References

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Bridwell-Mitchell, E., & Sherer, D. (2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716677567
  • Carlman, P., & Augustsson, C. (2016). “It’s like half-sport, maybe even a bit more than half-sport”: Children’s experience of a sport for all programme in school. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2016.1183943
  • Casey, A., & MacPhail, A. (2018). Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1429588
  • Chandra, Y., & Shang, L. (2019). Qualitative research using R: A systematic approach. Springer.
  • Cloutier, C., & Langley, A. (2013). The logic of institutional logics: Insights from French pragmatist sociology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(4), 360–380.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
  • Gammelsæter, H., & Solenes, O. (2013). Money in—brains out? Institutional logics affecting athletes’ preparation for alternative careers. European Journal for Sport and Society, 10(3), 267–289.
  • Gebreiter, F., & Hidayah, N. (2019). Individual responses to competing accountability pressures in hybrid organisations: The case of an English business school. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(3), 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3098
  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
  • Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2006). The changing status of school sport and physical education: Explaining policy change. Sport, Education and Society, 11(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320500453495
  • Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Sage Publications.
  • Larsson, H., & Nyberg, G. (2017). “It doesn’t matter how they move really, as long as they move”: Physical education teachers on developing their students’ movement capabilities. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1157573
  • Leow, A., Macdonald, D., Hay, P., & McCuaig, L. (2014). Health–education policy interface: The implementation of the Eat Well Be Active policies in schools. Sport, Education and Society, 19(8), 991–1013.
  • Lindkvist, L. (2022). Logics in play: what ‘rules of the game’ regulate Swedish PE teachers’ decision-making processes? Sport, Education and Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2071254
  • Lucassen, J., & Bakker, S. (2016). Variety in hybridity in sport organizations and their coping strategies. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(1), 75–94.
  • Maguire, M., Gewirtz, S., Towers, E., & Neumann, E. (2019). Policy, contextual matters and unintended outcomes: The English Baccalaureate (EBacc) and its impact on physical education in English secondary schools. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 558–569.
  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B (pp. 3–35). Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Penney, D. (2013). From policy to pedagogy: Prudence and precariousness; actors and artefacts. Asia–Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 4(2), 189–197.
  • Quennerstedt, M. (2008). Exploring the relation between physical activity and health—a salutogenic approach to physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 13(3), 267–283.
  • Quennerstedt, M. (2019). Physical education and the art of teaching: Transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 611–623.
  • Redelius, K., & Larsson, H. (2010). Physical education in Scandinavia: An overview and some educational challenges. Sport in Society, 13(4), 691–703.
  • Regeringsbeslut U2014/5377/S. (2014). Tillägg till uppdraget att ta fram förslag till en stadieindelad timplan för grundskolan [Addition to the commission to produce proposals for a staged timetable for compulsory school]. Ministry of Education.
  • Regeringskansliet. (2018). Nu får eleverna mer undervisningstid i matematik och i idrott och hälsa [Now the students get more teaching time in mathematics and physcial education and health]. Ministry of Education. https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2018/07/nu-far-eleverna-mer-undervisningstid-i-matematik-och-i-idrott-och-halsa/
  • Rönnberg, L. (2011). Exploring the intersection of marketisation and central state control through Swedish national school inspection. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 689–707.
  • Skolverket. (2018). Redovisning av uppdrag om mer rörelse i skolan, fördelning av timmar i idrott och hälsa i grundskolan [Report on more movement in school, distribution of hours in physical education and health in compulsory school] (Publication No. U2018/1430/S). Ministry of Education.
  • Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization Studies, 15(6), 803–827.
  • Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2009). The order of logics in Swedish sport—feeding the hungry beast of result orientation and commercialization. European Journal for Sport and Society, 6(2), 121–134.
  • Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2021). Sport club consultants as street-level bureaucrats in sport policy processes: Conceptualising micro-level interaction styles and their macro-level consequences. European Journal for Sport and Society, 18(2), 168–186.
  • Strittmatter, A. M., & Skille, E. Å. (2017). Boosting youth sport? Implementation of Norwegian youth sport policy through the 2016 Lillehammer Winter Youth Olympic Games. Sport in Society, 20(1), 144–160.
  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage Publications.
  • Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
  • Wilkinson, S. D., Penney, D., Allin, L., & Potrac, P. (2021). The enactment of setting policy in secondary school physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 26(6), 619–633.