Institutional work as response to institutional complexities in hybrid elite sport and sport for all organizations

References

• Agyemang, K. J., Berg, B. K., & Fuller, R. D. (2018). Disrupting the disruptor: Perceptions as institutional maintenance work at the 1968 Olympic games. Journal of Sport Management, 32(6), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 128–162). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertels, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2016). Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics: The role of individuals. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 336–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016641726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, M., & Smith, W. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 53(6), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
   Google Scholar
• Bettis, R., & Prahalad, C. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2014). Quality in qualitative research. In M. Birks, & J. Mills (Eds.), Qualitative methodology: A practical guide (pp. 221–236). Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, C., Hallmann, K., & Wicker, P. (2011). Determinants of sport participation in different sports. Managing Leisure, 16(4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.613625
   Google Scholar
• Comeau, S. (2013). The evolution of Canadian sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.694368
   Google Scholar
• Côté, J., & Hancock, D. J. (2014). Evidence-based policies for youth sport programmes. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.919338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock, T., Scheerder, J., Theeboom, M., Constandt, B., Marlier, M., De Clerck, T., & Willem, A. (2022). Stuck between medals and participation: An institutional theory perspective on why sport federations struggle to reach sport-for-all goals. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1891. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14230-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock, T., Scheerder, J., Theeboom, M., De Clerck, T., Constandt, B., & Willem, A. (2023). Sport-for all-policies in sport federations: An institutional theory perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(5), 1328–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V. (2018). A mixed methods approach to compare elite sport policies of nations. A critical reflection on the use of composite indicators in the SPLISS study. In J. Skinner, & T. Engelberg (Eds.), Research methodologies for sport scholarship (pp. 173–197). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J. (1999). A fish called peer learning: Searching for common themes. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, 9(1), 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M. A., & Svensson, P. G. (2019). A nascent sport for development and peace organization’s response to institutional complexity: The emergence of a hybrid agency in Kenya. Journal of Sport Management, 33(5), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, A., Misener, K., & Cuskelly, G. (2014). Toward a multidimensional framework of capacity in community sport clubs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2_suppl), 124S–142S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013509892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, M., & Smith, J. (2016). The institutional work of own the podium in developing high-performance sport in Canada. Journal of Sport Management, 30(4), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2014-0290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Washington, M. (2015). Establishing a “Safety net”: Exploring the emergence and maintenance of College Hockey Inc. and NCAA Division I hockey. Journal of Sport Management, 29(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2012-0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelstad, F. (2010). Rom med utsikt. Om å studere samfunnets toppsjikt [Room with a view. Studying society’s elites]. In D. Album, M. Nordli Hansen, & K. Winderberg (Eds.), Metodene våre [Our methods] (pp. 173–189). Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B., & Waldahl, R. H. (2010). Democratic governance and oligarchy in voluntary sport organizations: The case of the Norwegian Olympic Committee and Confederation of Sports. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740903559909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., & Stenling, C. (2016). Sport policy in Sweden. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(3), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2015.1063530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., Parent, M., & Mason, D. (2004). Building a framework for issues management in sport through stakeholder theory. European Sport Management Quarterly, 4(3), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740408737475
   Google Scholar
• Gammelsæter, H. (2010). Institutional pluralism and governance in “Commercialized” sport clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(5), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2010.524241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammelsæter, H., & Solenes, O. (2013). Money in – Brains out? Institutional logics affecting athletes’ preparation for alternative careers. European Journal for Sport and Society, 10(3), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2013.11687922
   Google Scholar
• Goksøyr, M. (2008). Historien om norsk idrett [The history of Norwegian sports]. Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2006). From “Sport for all” to not about “Sport” at all? Interrogating sport policy interventions in the United Kingdom. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(3), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740601094936
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, C. E., Lawrence, T. B., & Tracey, P. (2017). Institutional work: Taking stock and making it matter. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 558–590). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanstad, D. V., & Skille, EÅ. (2010). Does elite sport develop mass sport? A Norwegian case study. Scandinavian Sport Studies Forum, 1, 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Haut, J., & Gaum, C. (2018). Does elite success trigger mass participation in table tennis? An analysis of trickle-down effects in Germany, France and Austria. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(23), 2760–2767. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1361895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodeih, F., & Greenwood, R. (2014). Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organization Studies, 35(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (Eds.). (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (Vol. 2). Rowman Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, I., Strittmatter, A. M., Hayton, J., & O’Gorman, J. (2023). Two decades of youth sport policy research: An augmented scoping review and synthesis. European Sport Management Quarterly, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2023.2233553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma-aho, V., & Oikkonen, L. (2016). Expectation management. In C. Carroll (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of corporate reputation (pp. 303–306). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, C., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (2022). Challenge. Retrieved November 10, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/challenge
   Google Scholar
• Micelotta, E. R., & Washington, M. (2013). Institutions and maintenance: The repair work of Italian professions. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1137–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Culture. (2012). Den norske idrettsmodellen [The Norwegian model of sport]. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld-st-26-20112012/id684356/?ch=1
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Culture. (2019). Fordeling av spillemidler til idrettsformål [Distribution of gambling money for sporting purposes]. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dep/kud/tilskudd/Fordeling-av-spillemidler-til-idrettsformal-Hovedfordelingen/id764857/
   Google Scholar
• Misener, K., & Doherty, A. (2009). A case study of organizational capacity in nonprofit community sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23(4), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.23.4.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as a qualitative method. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, R., & Wagner, U. (2020). The inherent risk of being fired: The institutional logics enabling sport directors to replace coaches in professional football. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(6), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1727356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nite, C., & Bopp, T. (2017). Conflicting prescriptions for ‘ethical’leadership in complex institutions: Perspectives from US collegiate athletic administrators. Leadership, 13(3), 368–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nite, C., & Edwards, J. (2021). From isomorphism to institutional work: Advancing institutional theory in sport management research. Sport Management Review, 24(5), 815–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1896845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nite, C., Hutchinson, M., & Bouchet, A. (2019). Toward an institutional theory of escalation of commitment within sport management: A review and future directions. Sport Management Review, 22(5), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nite, C., & Melton, E. N. (2022). Positively prosocial: Conceptualizing prosocial behaviors as institutional work within sport organizations. Quest, 74(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.2005642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nite, C., & Nauright, J. (2020). Examining institutional work that perpetuates abuse in sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 23(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nite, C., Singer, J. N., & Cunningham, G. B. (2013). Addressing competing logics between the mission of a religious university and the demands of intercollegiate athletics. Sport Management Review, 16(4), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Football Federation. (2020a). Hospitering [Hosting]. Norwegian Football Federation. Retrieved June 22, 2022, from https://www.fotball.no/globalassets/klubb-og-leder/kvalitetsklubb/niva1/hospitering.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Football Federation. (2020b). Strategiplan 2020-2023 [Strategy plan 2022–2023]. Norwegian Football Federation. Retrieved June 22, 2022, from https://www.fotball.no/tema/strategiplan-2020-2023/
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Olymic and Paralympic Committee and Confederations of Sports. (2019). Idretten vil! Og Idretten skal! [Sport wants!]. Retrieved June 22, 2022, from https://www.idrettsforbundet.no/om-nif/idretten-vil-2019-2023/
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Olypmic and Paralympic Committee and Confederations of Sports. (1971). Protokoll Norges Idrettsforbunds 11.ordinære ting 26.-28. november [Minutes of the NIF General Assembly), NIF.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Swimming Federation. (2020). Klubbtrappa - utvikling av klubben trinn for trinn [Club stairs – club development step by step]. Retrieved June 22, 2022, from https://svomming.no/forbundet/klubbutvikling/utvikleklubb/klubbtrappa/#1467360059659-5e7f3d22-3f81
   Google Scholar
• Pedras, L., Taylor, T., & Frawley, S. (2020). Responses to multi-level institutional complexity in a national sport federation. Sport Management Review, 23(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, M., Espedalen, L. E., Stefansen, K., & Strandbu, Å. (2020). Opting out of youth sports: How can we understand the social processes involved? Sport, Education and Society, 25(7), 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1663811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo, A. D., Jones, G. J., & Funk, D. C. (2019). Navigating the iron cage: An institutional creation perspective of collegiate esports. International Journal of Sport Management, 20(2), 171–197.
   Google Scholar
• Raw, K., Sherry, E., & Rowe, K. (2019). Sport-for-development organizational hybridity: From differentiated to dysfunctional. Journal of Sport Management, 33(5), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raw, K., Sherry, E., & Schulenkorf, N. (2022). Managing sport for development: An investigation of tensions and paradox. Sport Management Review, 25(1), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 18(8), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., Dowling, M., Washington, M., Leopkey, B., Ellis, D. L., & Smith, L. (2021). Institutional theory in sport: A scoping review. Journal of Sport Management, 1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ronglan, L. T. (2015). Elite sport in Scandinavian welfare states: Legitimacy under pressure? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.987309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam, M. P., & Ronglan, L. T. (2016). Building sport policy’s legitimacy in Norway and New Zealand. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(5), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216671515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seguí-Urbaneja, J., Inglés, E., Alcaraz, S., & De Bosscher, V. (2020). Sport pyramid metaphor: Trickle down and up effect in Spain. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de La Actividad Fisica y Del Deporte, 20(77), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seippel, Ø. (2019). Professionalization of voluntary sport organizations—A study of the quality club programme of the Norwegian football association. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(5), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1579240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skille, E. (2011a). Change and isomorphism—A case study of translation processes in a Norwegian sport club. Sport Management Review, 14(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skille, E. (2011b). Sport for all in Scandinavia: Sport policy and participation in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.596153
   Google Scholar
• Skirstad, B., & Chelladurai, P. (2011). For “Love” and money: A sports club’s innovative response to multiple logics. Journal of Sport Management, 25(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.25.4.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skirstad, B., Waddington, I., & Säfvenbom, R. (2012). Issues and problems in the organization of children’s sport: A case study of Norway. European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12450790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), 1279–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712471407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen-Johnsen, K., & Amis, J. (2010). Pluralist logics and organizational dynamics in CSOs: Challenges for governance. International society for Third Sector research. Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C. (2015). The drive for change: Putting the means and ends of sport at stake in the organizing of Swedish voluntary sport. Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2009). The order of logics in Swedish sport—Feeding the hungry beast of result orientation and commercialization. European Journal for Sport and Society, 6(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2009.11687833
   Google Scholar
• Storm, R. K., Nielsen, C. G., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2018). Can international elite sport success trickle down to mass sport participation? Evidence from Danish team handball. European Journal of Sport Science, 18(8), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1489000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sætre, H. S. (2023). How hybrid organizations respond to institutional complexity: The case of Norway. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(5), 990–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strittmatter, A. M., Kilvinger, B., Bodemar, A., Skille, EÅ, & Kurscheidt, M. (2018). Dual governance structures in action sports: Institutionalization processes of professional snowboarding revisited. Sport in Society, 22(10), 1655–1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2018.1440696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strittmatter, A. M., Stenling, C., Fahlén, J., & Skille, E. (2018). Sport policy analysis revisited: the sport policy process as an interlinked chain of legitimating acts. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 621–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. G. (2017). Organizational hybridity: A conceptualization of how sport for development and peace organizations respond to divergent institutional demands. Sport Management Review, 20(5), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. G., & Seifried, C. S. (2017). Navigating plurality in hybrid organizing: The case of sport for development and peace entrepreneurs. Journal of Sport Management, 31(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2016-0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønnesson, S. (1986). Norsk idretts historie . Folkehelse, trim, stjerner 1939-1986 [Norwegian sport history, public health, sport for all, and sport stars 1939-1986]. Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, M., & Patterson, K. D. (2011). Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research. Sport Management Review, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicker, P., Breuer, C., & Pawlowski, T. (2009). Promoting sport for all to age-specific target groups: The impact of sport infrastructure. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740802571377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research – interpretive and critical approaches. Sage Pulications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, J., Berg, B. K., Newland, B. L., & Green, B. C. (2016). So you want to be a fighter? Institutional work and sport development processes at an elite mixed martial arts gym. Journal of Sport Management, 30(4), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2014-0301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar