65
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

“Never mind”: social class differences in children’s developing emotion attributions to procedural justice outcomes

, &
Pages 447-465 | Received 19 Jan 2023, Accepted 18 Mar 2024, Published online: 08 Apr 2024

References

  • Acar, M., & Sivis, O. (2023). “But the poor needed it more”: Children’s judgments on procedural justice to allocate resources between two candidates equal in merit, different in need. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 232, 105679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105679
  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Arsenio, W. F. (1988). Children’s conceptions of the situational affective consequences of socio-moral events. Child Development, 59(6), 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130675
  • Arsenio, W. F. (2014). Moral emotion attribution and aggression. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 235–255). Psychology Press.
  • Arsenio, W. F., & Kramer, R. (1992). Victimizers and their victims: Children’s conceptions of the mixed emotional consequences of moral transgressions. Child Development, 63(4), 915–927. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131243
  • Dunham, Y., Durkin, A., & Tyler, T. R. (2018). The development of a preference for procedural justice for self and others. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36072-1
  • Elenbaas, L. (2019a). Against unfairness: Young children’s judgments about merit, equity, and equality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.009
  • Elenbaas, L. (2019b). Perceptions of economic inequality are related to children’s judgments about access to opportunities. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 471. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000550
  • Elenbaas, L. (2019c). Young children’s reasoning about equality and ownership in resource conflicts. Cognitive Development, 52, 100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100808
  • Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2019). Children’s perceptions of economic groups in a context of limited access to opportunities. Child Development, 90(5), 1632–1649. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13024
  • Elenbaas, L., & Mistry, R. S. (2021). Distributive justice in society and among peers: 8-to 14-year-olds’ views on economic stratification inform their decisions about access to opportunities. Developmental Psychology, 57(6), 951. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001188
  • Essler, S., Lepach, A. C., Petermann, F., & Paulus, M. (2020). Equality, equity, or inequality duplication? How preschoolers distribute necessary and luxury resources between rich and poor others. Social Development, 29(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12390
  • Essler, S., & Paulus, M. (2021). Robin Hood or Matthew? Children’s reasoning about redistributive justice in the context of economic inequalities. Child Development, 92(4), 1254–1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13482
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  • Flanagan, C. A., Kim, T., Pykett, A., Finlay, A., Gallay, E. E., & Pancer, M. (2014). Adolescents’ theories about economic inequality: Why are some people poor while others are rich? Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2512. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037934
  • Gerdemann, S. C., McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Haun, D. B., & Hepach, R. (2022). The ontogeny of children’s social emotions in response to (un) fairness. Royal Society Open Science, 9(8), 191456. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191456
  • Grocke, P., Rossano, F., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Procedural justice in children: Preschoolers accept unequal resource distributions if the procedure provides equal opportunities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 140, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.008
  • Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E., Gasser, L., & Malti, T. (2010). Moral emotions and moral judgments in children’s narratives: Comparing real-life and hypothetical transgressions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2010(129), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.273
  • Huppert, E., Cowell, J. M., Cheng, Y., Contreras‐ Ibáñez, C., Gomez‐ Sicard, N., Gonzalez‐ Gadea, M. L., Huepe, D., Ibanez, A., Lee, K., Mahasneh, R., Malcolm-Smith, S., Salas, N., Selcuk, B., Tungodden, B., Wong, A., Zhou, X., & Decety, J. (2019). The development of children’s preferences for equality and equity across 13 individualistic and collectivist cultures. Developmental Science, 22(2), e12729. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12729
  • Jost, J. T. (2017). Working class conservatism: A system justification perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.020
  • Kestenbaum, R., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). Preschool children’s identification and understanding of mixed emotions. Cognitive Development, 10(3), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90006-3
  • Killen, M., & Dahl, A. (2021). Moral reasoning enables developmental and societal change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620964076
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, 5(6), 3–19.
  • Malti, T., & Krettenauer, T. (2013). The relation of moral emotion attributions to prosocial and antisocial behavior: A meta‐analysis. Child Development, 84(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01851.x
  • Malti, T., & Ongley, S. F. (2013). The development of moral emotions and moral reasoning. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 163–183). Psychology Press.
  • Malti, T., Zuffianò, A., Cui, L., Colasante, T., Peplak, J., & Bae, N. Y. (2017). Children’s social– emotional development in contexts of peer exclusion. In N. Wiium & R. Dimitrova (Eds.), Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 295–306). Springer.
  • Mistry, R. S., Brown, C. S., White, E. S., Chow, K. A., & Gillen‐O’Neel, C. (2015). Elementary school children’s reasoning about social class: A mixed‐methods study. Child Development, 86(5), 1653–1671. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12407
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
  • Olson, K. R., Dweck, C. S., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2011). Children’s responses to group-based inequalities: Perpetuation and rectification. Social Cognition, 29(3), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.270
  • Ongley, S. F., & Malti, T. (2014). The role of moral emotions in the development of children’s sharing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035191
  • Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2015). Preschool children’s anticipation of recipients’ emotions affects their resource allocation. Social Development, 24(4), 852–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12126
  • Peretz‐Lange, R., Harvey, T., & Blake, P. R. (2022). Socioeconomic status predicts children’s moral judgments of novel resource distributions. Developmental Science, 25(4), e13230. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13230
  • Rizzo, M. T., Elenbaas, L., Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2016). Children’s recognition of fairness and others’ welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000134
  • Rizzo, M. T., Elenbaas, L., & Vanderbilt, K. E. (2020). Do children distinguish between resource inequalities with individual versus structural origins? Child Development, 91(2), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13181
  • Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2016). Children’s understanding of equity in the context of inequality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12150
  • Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2020). Children’s evaluations of individually and structurally based inequalities: The role of status. Developmental Psychology, 56(12), 2223. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001118
  • Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2014). Fairness as partiality aversion: The development of procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.007
  • Smetana, J. G., & Yoo, H. N. (2022). Development and variations in moral and social-conventional judgments: A social domain theory approach. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
  • Stowe, L. M., Blake, P. R., & Blake, P. R. (2022). Children consider procedures, outcomes, and emotions when judging the fairness of inequality. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815901
  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
  • Turiel, E., & Banas, K. A. (2020). The development of moral and social judgments: Social contexts and processes of coordination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.85.2
  • Turiel, E., & Killen, M. (2010). Taking emotions seriously: The role of emotions in moral development. In W. F. Arsenio & E. A. Lemerise (Eds.), Emotions, aggression, and morality in children: Bridging development and psychopathology (pp. 33–52). American Psychological Association.
  • Wainryb, C., & Brehl, B. A. (2006). I thought she knew that would hurt my feelings: Developing psychological knowledge and moral thinking. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 34, 131–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(06)80006-6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.