Sexual Communication & Technology Use in Understudied Relationships: A Qualitative Communicative Interdependence Perspective Study

References

• Anastassiou, A. (2017). Sexting and young people: A review of the qualitative literature. The Qualitative Report, 22(8), 2231–2239. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., Kunkel, A., & Dennis, M. R. (2011). “Let's (not) talk about that”: Bridging the past sexual experiences taboo to build healthy romantic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(4), 381–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R. (2020). Play me: Interactive sonification of sexual arousal in long-distance relationships. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 11(1), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0014
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. (2017). Romantic jealousy in face-to-face and technologically-mediated interactions: A communicative interdependence perspective. Western Journal of Communication, 81(4), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1283048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N., LeFebvre, L. E., & Blackburn, K. G. (2016). Social networking site behaviors across the relational lifespan: Measurement and association with relationship escalation and de-escalation. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 205630511668000. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116680004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N., & Pena, J. (2013). Face threatening messages and attraction in social networking sites: Reconciling strategic self-presentation with negative online perceptions. In C. Cunningham (Ed.), Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age (pp. 205–226). Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett, M. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtice, E. L., & Shaughnessy, K. (2018). The partner context of sexual minority women’s and men’s cybersex experiences: Implications for the traditional sexual script. Sex Roles, 78(3–4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0792-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Damm, C., Dentato, M. P., & Busch, N. (2018). Unravelling intersecting identities: Understanding the lives of people who practice BDSM. Psychology and Sexuality, 9(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1410854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHaan, S., Kuper, L. E., Magee, J. C., Bigelow, L., & Mustanski, B. S. (2013). The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: A mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & Tobin, E. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmers‐Sommer, T. M. (2005). Non‐normative relationships: Is there a norm of (non) normativity? Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500033909
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, E., Casini, C., & Cipolletta, S. (2014). Forbidden games: The construction of sexuality and sexual pleasure by BDSM ‘players’. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(7), 752–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faustino, M. J. (2018). Rebooting an old script by new means: Teledildonics—the technological return to the ‘coital imperative. Sexuality & Culture, 22(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9463-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Osborn, J. L., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, K., & Byers, E. S. (2020). Factors associated with sexual satisfaction in mixed-sex long-distance and geographically close relationships. Sexual & Relationship Therapy, 38(2), 171–193. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2020.1813884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Messer, D., Bauermeister, J. A., Grodzinski, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2013). Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, L., Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. L. (2012). The Internet as a safety net: Findings from a series of online focus groups with LGB and non-LGB young people in the United States. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2012.684642
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. (2015). Polymedia distinctions: The sociocultural stratification of interpersonal media practices in couple relationships. Nordicom Review, 36(2), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0015
   Google Scholar
• Kattari, S. (2015). ‘Getting it’: Identity and sexual communication for sexual and gender minorities with physical disabilities. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 882–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9298-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, I., & Wescott, A. B. (2020). Cyberintimacy: A scoping review of technology-mediated romance in the digital age. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(10), 657–666. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. (2013). Sexting: A terrifying health risk … or the new normal for young adults? The Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 257–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macapagal, K., Greene, G. J., Rivera, Z., & Mustanski, B. (2015). “The best is always yet to come”: Relationship stages and processes among young LGBT couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(3), 309. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2013). Interpretive theorizing in the seductive world of sexuality and interpersonal communication: Getting guerilla with studies of sexting and purity rings. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2507–2520. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2250/1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N., Rash, C., & Madigan, S. (2020). The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1103–1119. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesi, J., Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. (2018). Technology-based communication and the development of interpersonal competencies within adolescent romantic relationships: A preliminary investigation. HHS Public Access, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12274
   Google Scholar
• Ouytsel, J. V., Wairave, M., Ponnet, K., & Temple, J. (2019). Sexting. the international encyclopedia of media literacy. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0219
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F.(1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paccagnella, L. (2020). Social network sites as empowerment tools in consensual non-monogamies. The case of polyamory in Italy. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i2.10126
   Google Scholar
• Pettegrew, L. S., & Day, C. (2015). Smart phones and mediated relationships: The changing face of relational communication. Review of Communication, 15(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2015.1044018
   Google Scholar
• Reed, L., Boyer, M., Meskunas, H., Tolman, R., & Ward, M. (2020). How do adolescents experience sexting in dating relationships? Motivations to sext and responses to sexting requests from dating partners. Children & Youth Services Review 109, 104696. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A. & Barker, M. (2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2018). Sometimes it’s easier to type things than to say them”: Technology in BDSM sexual partner communication. Sexuality & Culture, 1–20, 9534–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2020a). A communicative interdependence perspective on sex and technology in bondage, domination, and sadomasochist relationships. Communication Quarterly, 68(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2020.1804958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2020b). Sexual compliance in understudied relationships. Communication Studies, 71(5), 879–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2021a). Exploring the relational nature of identity gap management in sexual communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(4), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1893794
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2021b). Sources and strategies for managing sexual conflict in diverse relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 25(3), 904–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09800-x
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2021c). Toward a typology of identity gaps in “non-normative” sexual partner communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1551–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01870-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2022). Sex talk: The effects of sexual self-disclosure and identity gaps on sexual and relational outcomes in diverse relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 26(4), 1452–1476. Advance Online Publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09953-x
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V., & Ambrus, A. (2023). “Rather than ruin the fun:” elaborating on faking orgasms as goal-oriented deceptive communication. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2023.2254213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V., & Hosek, A. M. (2020). “We have to get over it”: Navigating sex talk through the lens of sexual communication comfort and sexual self-disclosure in LGBTQ intimate partnerships. Sexuality & Culture, 24(3), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09652-0
   Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L. & Dorrance Hall, E. (2021). Conceptualizing and measuring communication interdependence: The technology and face-to-face integration scale. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(3), 222–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., Roache, D. J., & Pusateri, K. B.(2019). Texting toward intimacy: Relational quality, length, and motivations in textual relationships. Communication Studies, 70(5), 601–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheff, E., & Hammers, C. (2011). The privilege of perversities: Race, class and education among polyamorists and kinksters. Psychology and Sexuality, 2(3), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.537674
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., & Merolla, A. J. (2007). Idealization, reunions, and stability in long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507072578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2018). Sexting scripts in adolescent relationships: Is sexting becoming the norm? New Media & Society, 20(10), 3836–3857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818761869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vital, J. (2014). Facebook makes the heart grow fonder: Relationship maintenance strategies among geographically dispersed and communication restricted connections. Proceedings of the 17th AMC RConference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531726
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Roaché, D. J., & Pusateri, K. B. (2019). Interconnection of multiple communication modes in long-distance dating relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 83(5), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1552986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar