4,979
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Do parental control tools fulfil family expectations for child protection? A rapid evidence review of the contexts and outcomes of use

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 29-49 | Received 18 Apr 2023, Accepted 13 Sep 2023, Published online: 29 Oct 2023

References

  • *Alelyani, T., Ghosh, A. K., Moralez, L., Guha, S., Wisniewski, P., & Meiselwitz, G. (2019). Examining parent versus child reviews of parental control apps on google play. 11th International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media, SCSM 2019, London, 11579, 3–21
  • *Al-Naim, A. B., & Hasan, M. M. (2018). Investigating Saudi parents’ intention to adopt technical mediation tools to regulate children’s internet usage. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 9(5), 456–464.
  • Altarturi, H. H. M., Saadoon, M., & Anuar, N. B. (2020). Cyber parental control: A bibliometric study. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105134
  • *Álvarez-García, D., Nunez, J. C., Gonzalez-Castro, P., Rodriguez, C., & Cerezo, R. (2019). The effect of parental control on cyber-victimization in adolescence: The mediating role of impulsivity and high-risk behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01159
  • *Anderson, M. (2016). Parents, teens and digital monitoring. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/01/PI_2016-01-07_Parents-Teens-Digital-Monitoring_FINAL.pdf
  • *Badillo-Urquiola, K., Page, X., & Wisniewski, P. (2019). Risk vs. restriction: The tension between providing a sense of normalcy and keeping foster teens safe online. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019). Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
  • *Bate, F., MacNish, J., Males, S., Chova, L. G., Torres, I. C., & Martinez, A. L. (2012). Managing student distraction: Responding to problems of gaming and pornography in a Western Australian school for boys. The University of Notre Dame Australia School of Education. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=edu_conference
  • *Benrazavi, R., Teimouri, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Utility of parental mediation model on youth’s problematic online gaming. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(6), 712–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9561-2
  • Bertrandias, L., Bernard, Y., & Elgaaied-Gambier, L. (2023). How using parental control software can enhance parents’ well-being: The role of product features on parental efficacy and stress. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(2–3), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221144270
  • Billinge, G., Burgess, R., & Corby, I. (2021). EU methods for Audiovisual media services Directive (AVMSD) and General data protection regulation (GDPR) compliance. Age Verification Providers Association.
  • Bulger, M., Burton, P., O’Neill, B., & Staksrud, E. (2017). Where policy and practice collide: Comparing United States, South African and European Union approaches to protecting children online. New Media & Society, 19(5), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686325
  • Chambers, D. (2016). Changing media, homes and households: Cultures, technologies and meanings. Routledge.
  • *Chandrima, R. M., Kircaburun, K., Kabir, H., Riaz, B. K., Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Mamun, M. A. (2020). Adolescent problematic internet use and parental mediation: A Bangladeshi structured interview study. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 12, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100288
  • *Cino, D., Mascheroni, G., & Wartella, E. (2020). “The kids hate it, but we love it!”: Parents’ reviews of circle. Media and Communication, 8(4), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3247
  • Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899616.001.0001
  • *Cranor, L. F., Durity, A., Marsh, A., & Ur, B. (2014). Parents’ and teens’ perspectives on privacy in a technology-filled world. Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), July 9–11. Menlo Park, CA.
  • Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., McCauley Ohannessian, C., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
  • *Erickson, L. B., Wisniewski, P., Xu, H., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., & Perkins, D. F. (2016). The boundaries between: Parental involvement in a teen’s online world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67, 1384–1403. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23450
  • FOSI (Family Online Safety Institute). (2021). Managing the narrative: Young people’s use of online safety tools. 2021 research report. FOSI. https://global-uploads.webflow.com/5f47b99bcd1b0e76b7a78b88/618d32fb1c370900fcd08ab0_FOSI%20Research%20Report%202021.pdf
  • *Fuertes, W., Quimbiulco, K., Galárraga, F., García-Dorado, J. L. (2015a). On the development of advanced parental control tools. 1st International Conference on Software Security and Assurance (ICSSA), 1–6. Suwon, Korea (South). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSA.2015.011
  • *Gallego, F., Malamud, O., & Pop-Eleches, C. (2020). Parental monitoring and children’s internet use: The role of information, control, and cues. Journal of Public Economics, 188, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104208
  • Geržičáková, M., Dedkova, L., & Mýlek, V. (2023). What do parents know about children’s risky online experiences? The role of parental mediation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107626
  • *Ghosh, A. K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Guha, S., LaViola, J. J., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2018). Safety vs. surveillance: What children have to say about mobile apps for parental control. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), Paper 124, 1–14. New York, USA. http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/~jjl/pubs/pn1838-ghoshA.pdf
  • *Ghosh, A. K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Rosson, M. B., Xu, H., Carroll, J. M., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2018). A matter of control or safety? Examining parental use of technical monitoring apps on teens’ mobile devices. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), Paper 194, 1–14. New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173768
  • *Ghosh, A. K., Hughes, C. E., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2020). Circle of trust: A new approach to mobile online safety for gamilies. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 20), 1–14. New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376747
  • *Ghosh, A. K., & Wisniewski, P. (2016). Understanding user reviews of adolescent mobile safety apps: A thematic analysis. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 16), 417–420. New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2996283
  • *Hartikainen, H., Iivari, N., & Kinnula, M. (2016). Should we design for control, trust or involvement? A discourses survey about children’s online safety. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 16), 367–378. New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930680
  • Hartmann, M. (2005). The discourse of the perfect future: Young people and new technologies. In R. Silverstone (Ed.), Media, technology and everyday life in Europe (pp. 141–158). Ashgate.
  • Hartung, P. (2020). Children’s rights-by-design: A new standard for data use by tech companies. UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/reports/childrens-rights-design-new-standard-data-use-tech-companies
  • *Hashish, Y., Bunt, A., & Young, J. E. (2014). Involving children in content control: A collaborative and education-oriented content filtering approach. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 14), 1797–1806. Toronto, ON. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557128
  • *Hundlani, K., Chiasson, S., & Hamind, L. (2017). No passwords needed: The iterative design of a parent–child authentication mechanism. Mobile HCI 2017, 4–7 September. https://chorus.scs.carleton.ca/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/hundlani2017kindersurf-mobilehci.pdf
  • ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2020). Guidelines for parents and educators on child online protection 2020. International Telecommunication Union Development Sector. http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/gen/S-GEN-COP.EDUC-2020-PDF-E.pdf
  • *Ko, M., Choi, S., Yang, S., Lee, J., & Lee, U. (2015). FamiLync: Facilitating participatory parental mediation of adolescents’ smartphone use. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 15), 867–878. New York, USA.
  • *Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., & Olson, B. F. (2010). To control or not to control? Parenting behaviours and adolescent online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1651–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.013
  • Lievens, E., Livingstone, S., McLaughlin, S., O’Neill, B., & Verdoodt, V. (2018). Children’s rights and digital technologies. In T. Liefaard & U. Kilkelly (Eds.), International children’s rights law (pp. 487–513). Springer. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/84871
  • Livingstone, S. (2013). Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child internet safety policy. ZER: Journal of Communication Studies, 18(35), 13–28. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62278
  • Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives. Oxford University Press.
  • Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximising opportunities and minimising risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
  • Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2021). The 4Cs: Classifying online risk to children. Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.71817
  • Lupton, D., Pink, S., & Horst, H. (2021). Living in, with and beyond the ‘smart home’. Convergence, 27(5), 1147–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211052736
  • *Martínez, G., Casado, M. Á., & Garitaonandia, C. (2020). Online parental mediation strategies in family contexts of Spain. Comunicar, 28(65), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-06
  • Mauk, M. (2021). Think of the parents: Parental controls in digital TV and family implications. In D. Holloway, M. Willson, K. Murcia, C. Archer, & F. Stocco (Eds.), Young children’s rights in a digital world: Play, design and practice (pp. 81–92). Springer International Publishing.
  • Mauk, M. (2022). Parenting and the algorithm: A perspective on parental controls and guilt amid digital media. In M. Ito, R. Cross, K. Dinakar, & C. Odgers (Eds.), Algorithmic rights and protections for children (pp. 35–42). MIT Publishing.
  • McGinn, M. (2022, January 26). An age-based guide to parental controls and internet safety for kids. Verizon News Center. http://www.verizon.com/about/parenting/age-based-guide-parental-controls-and-internet-safety-kids
  • *McNally, B., Kumar, P., Hordatt, C., Mauriello, M. L., Naik, S., Norooz, L., Shorter, A., Golub, E., & Druin, A. (2018). Co-designing mobile online safety applications with children. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 18), 1–9. Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Milosevic, T., Livingstone, S. (2018). Protecting children online? Cyberbullying policies of social media companies. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037099.001.0001
  • *Miltuze, A., Sebre, S. B., & Martinsone, B. (2020). Consistent and appropriate parental restrictions mitigating against children’s compulsive internet use: A one-year longitudinal study. Technology, Knowledge & Learning, 26(4), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09472-4
  • Modecki, K. L., Goldberg, R. E., Wisniewski, P., & Orben, A. (2022). What is digital parenting? A systematic review of past measurement and blueprint for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1673–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211072458
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & Group, P.-P. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Nichols, S., & Selim, N. (2022). Digitally mediated parenting: A review of the literature. Societies, 12(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020060
  • *Noll, J. G., Shenk, C. E., Barnes, J. E., & Haralson, K. J. (2013). Association of maltreatment with high-risk internet behaviors and offline encounters. Pediatrics, 131(2), E510–E517. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1281
  • *Nouwen, M., JafariNaimi, N., & Zaman, B. (2017). Parental controls: Reimagining technologies for parent–child interaction. Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work – Exploratory Papers, 2017, 18–34. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). https://dl.eusset.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/87965281-4650-463f-bf51-de31eb7ea6fd/content
  • *Nouwen, M., Van Mechelen, M., & Zaman, B. (2015b). A value sensitive design approach to parental software for young children. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 15), 363–366. New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771917
  • *Ofcom, & Yonder. (2021). User experience of potential online harms within video sharing platforms. Ofcom. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/216492/yonder-report-experience-of-potential-harms-vsps.pdf
  • O’Neill, B., Dreyer, S., & Dinh, T. (2020). The Third Better Internet for Kids Policy Map: Implementing the European Strategy for a Better Internet for Children in European Member States. https://www.betterinternetforkids.eu/bikmap
  • *Pavan Kumar Attavar, S., & Rani, P. (2018). How children under 10 years access and use digital devices at home and what parents feel about it: Insights from India. Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 10(1), 1–25. .
  • Perspective Economics and DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). (2021). The UK Safety Tech Sector: 2021 Analysis. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/989753/UK_Safety_Tech_Analysis_2021_-_Final_-_190521.pdf
  • *Pons-Salvador, G., Zubieta-Mendez, X., & Frias-Navarro, D. (2018). Internet use by children aged six to nine: Parents’ beliefs and knowledge about risk prevention. Child Indicators Research, 11(6), 1983–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9529-4
  • *Przybylski, A., & Nash, V. (2018). Internet filtering and adolescent exposure to online sexual material. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0466
  • *Seo, H., & Lee, C. S. (2017). Emotion matters: What happens between young children and parents in a touchscreen world. International Journal of Communication, 11, 561–580. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/4233/1919
  • *Shapka, J. D., & Law, D. M. (2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2
  • Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge.
  • SIP-Bench, III. (2018). Benchmarking of parental control tools for the online protection of children – final report. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2759/80227
  • Šmahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/103294
  • Smirnova, S., Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2021). Understanding of user needs and problems: A rapid evidence review of age assurance and parental controls. euConsent. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112559
  • Smirnova, S., Stoilova, M., & Livingstone, S. (2021). Age assurance and parental control tools in everyday life: A rapid evidence review methodology. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://osf.io/mdgk8
  • *Soldatova, G. U., Rasskazova, E. I., & Chigarkova, S. V. (2020). Digital socialization of adolescents in the Russian Federation: Parental mediation, online risks, and digital competence. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0413
  • *Sonck, N., Nikken, P., & de Haan, J. (2013). Determinants of internet mediation: A comparison of the reports by Dutch parents and children. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739806
  • Staksrud, E. (2016). Children in the online world: Risk, regulation, rights. Routledge.
  • Third, A., Collin, P., Walsh, L., & Black, R. (2019). Control shift: Young people in digital society. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57369-8
  • *Tomczyk, L., Ryk, A., & Prokop, J. (2018). Digital piracy among adolescents – scale and conditions. In New trends and research challenges in pedagogy and andragogy (NTRCPA18). Charles University in Prague.*The 40 studies included in the evidence review.
  • UNICEF. (2021). Child protection: Digital opportunities, challenges and innovations across the region. UNICEF Europe and Central Asia Regional Office. www.unicef.org/eca/media/14386/file
  • UNICEF and ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2020). Guidelines for Industry on Child Online Protection 2020. http://www.unicef.org/media/90796/file/ITU-COP-guidelines%20for%20industry-2020.pdf
  • UN (United Nations) Committee on the rights of the child (2021). General Comment 25 on Children’s Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment (CRC/C/GC/25). www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/GCChildrensRightsRelationDigitalEnvironment.aspx
  • *Vaala, S. E., & Bleakley, A. (2015). Monitoring, mediating, and modeling: Parental influence on adolescent computer and internet use in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.997103
  • Vickery, J. R. (2017). Worried about the wrong things: Youth, risk, and opportunity in the digital world. The MIT Press.
  • Wareham, J. (2022, January 19). 92% of top parental control apps wrongly block LGBTQ and sex-ed sites. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiewareham/2022/01/19/92-of-top-parental-control-apps-wrongly-block-lgbtq-and-sex-ed-sites/?sh=67e8f1307844
  • *Wisniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. (2015). ‘Preventative’ vs. ‘reactive’: How parental mediation influences teens’ social media privacy behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW 15), 302–316. New York, USA.
  • *Wisniewski, P. J., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2014). Adolescent online safety: The ‘moral’ of the story. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW 14), 1258–1271. Baltimore, MD, USA.