Liquefaction potential of reinforced soil by stone columns

References

• Adalier, K. and Elgamal, A., 2004. Mitigation of liquefaction and associated ground deformations by stone columns. Engineering Geology, 72 (3–4), 275–291. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adalier, K., et al., 2003. Stone columns as liquefaction counter-measure in non-plastic silty soils. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23 (7), 571–584. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00070-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D.C.A., 1997. Liquefaction of silty soils: susceptibility, deformation, and remediation. PHD Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Andrus, R.D. and Stokoe, K.H., 2000. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,american Society of Civil Engineers, 126 (11), 1015–1025. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgari, A., Oliaei, M., and Bagheri, M., 2013. Numerical simulation of improvement of a liquefiable soil layer using stone column and pile-pinning techniques. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51, 77–96. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S.A., et al. 2000. Liquefaction mitigation using stone columns around deep foundation:Full scale test results. Transportation Research Record 1736, Paper No. 00-1408, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, p. 110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Baez, J.I., 1995. A Design Model for the Reduction of Soil Liquefaction by Vibro-Stone Columns. Ph.D. Dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Baez, J.I. and Martin, G., 1992. Liquefaction observation during installation of stone columns using the vibro-replacement technique. Ground Modification, Geotechnical News, 10 (3), 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Baez, J.I. and Martin, G.R., 1993. advances in the design of vibro systems for the improvement of liquefaction resistance. In: Proceedings of the symposium of ground improvement, Vancouver, B.C.: Vancouver Geotechnical Society, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Barksdale, R.C. and Bachus, R.D., 1983. Design and construction of stone columns. Report No. FHWA/RD-83/026. Virginia, USA: National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Basarkar, S.S., Panse, V., and Wankhade, R., 2009. Ground strengthening by vibro-stone columns-a case study. In: Indian geotechnical conference IGC, Guntur, India: Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd, 446–450.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Kirkland, D., and Sinclair, A., 1986. Vibro-replacement ground improvement at general terminus quay, Glasgow. In: T. Telford, ed. Symposium on building on marginal and derelict land. London: 697–712.
   Google Scholar
• BenSalem, Z., Frikha, W., and Bouassida, M., 2014. Evaluation of liquefaction risk of reinforced soil by stone columns. In Proceedings 17th Brazilian conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering – COBRAMSEG2014, Golania/GO Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• BenSalem, Z., Frikha, W., and Bouassida, M., 2016. Effect of granular-column installation on excess pore pressure variation during soil liquefaction. International Journal of Geomechanics, 16 (2), 04015046. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenSalem, Z., Frikha, W., and Bouassida, M., 2017a. Effects of densification and stiffening on liquefaction risk of reinforced soil by stone columns. The Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143 (10), 1–6. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenSalem, Z., Frikha, W., and Bouassida, M., 2017b. “Densification effect on liquefaction potential of reinforced soil by stone columns.” In: The 19th International conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering ICSMGE, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• BenSalem, Z., Frikha, W., and Bouassida, M., 2018. Numerical Analysis of Liquefaction susceptibility of reinforced soil with stone columns. Proceedings of the 1st GeoMEast International Congress and Exhibition, Egypt 2017 on Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, T. Abdoun and S. Elfass, eds., Springer Science and Business Media B.V., Egypt, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, J.D. and Clements, K., 1993. Site improvements with stone columns in stratified silty soils. In Third international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, Missouri: Missouri University of Science and Technology, St. Louis, 1027–1033.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, R., et al., 1998. Drainage capacity of stone columns or gravel drains for mitigating liquefaction. In: P. Dakoulas, M. Yegian, and R.D. Holtz, eds. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics III. Geotechnical special publication. Reston: ASCE, 678–690.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin, K.O., et al., 2004. Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 130 (12), 1314–1340. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambosse, G., 1983. Liquefaction problems in the Fraser Delta and protection of a LNG tank. In Beiträge zu Staudammbau und Bodenmechanik – Festschrift zum 70. Darmstadt: Geburtstag von o. Prof. em. Dr.-Ing. Herbert Breth.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B.S. and Bailey, M.J., 2004. Lessons learned from a stone column test program in glacial deposits. In: J.P. Turner and P.W. Mayne, eds. GeoSupport 2004: drilled shafts, micropiling, deep mixing, remedial methods, and specialty foundation systems. Reston: ASCE, 508–519.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P., et al., 2022. Multi-factor influence analysis on the liquefaction mitigation of stone columns composite foundation. Applied Sciences, 12 (14), 7308. doi:10.3390/app12147308.
   Google Scholar
• Durgunoglu, H.T., et al. 1995. A case study on determination of soil improvement realization using CPT. In Proceedings international symposium on cone penetration testings, Linköping, Sweden, Swedish Geoechnical Society 441–446.
   Google Scholar
• Duzceer, R. (2003. Ground improvement of oil storage tanks using stone columns. In Proceedings Of The 12th panamerican conference In soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Essen: Verlag Glückauf GMBH, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1681–1686.
   Google Scholar
• Elgamal, A., Lu, J., and Forcellini, D., 2009. Mitigation of liquefaction-induced lateral deformation in a sloping stratum: three-dimensional numerical simulation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135 (11), 1672–1682. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellouze, S. et al., 2017. Numerical analysis of the installation effects on the behaviour of soft clay improved by stone columns. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 12 (2), 73–85. doi:10.1080/17486025.2016.1164903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frikha, W., Bouassida, M., and Jean, C., 2013. Observed behaviour of laterally expanded stone columnin soft soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 31 (2), 739–752. doi:10.1007/s10706-013-9624-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gambin, M.P., 1992. Reducing liquefaction potential by deep soil improvement. In: V. Davidovici, ed. Chap. II-4 in “recent advances in earthquake engineering and structural dynamic.” Editions Ouest-France.
   Google Scholar
• Goughnour, R.R. and Pestana, J.M., 1998. “Mechanical behavior of stone columns under seismic loading.” In: 2nd International conference on ground improvement techniques, Singapore: Ci-Premier Pte Limited, 157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R., Olgun, C., and Wissmann, K., 2008. Shear stress redistribution as a mechanism to mitigate the risk of liquefaction. In: D. Zeng, M.T. Manzari, and D.R. Hiltunen, eds. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV. Sacramento, California, United States: ASCE, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, M.B., et al., 2006. Liquefaction phenomena underneath marine gravity structures subjected to wave loads. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 132 (4), 325–335. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2006)132:4(325).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guetif, Z., Bouassida, M., and Debats, J.M., 2007. Improved soft clay characteristics due to stone column installation. Computers and Geotechnics, 34 (2), 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guettaya, I., El Ouni, M.R., and Moss, R.E.S., 2013. Verifying liquefaction remediation beneath an earth dam using SPT and CPT based methods. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 53, 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. and Sundaram, R., 1996. Gravel piles – construction and field testing. In: Proceedings seminar on Piles, Indian geotechnical society Delhi chapter, New Delhi, India, 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward Baker Geotechnical Construction Keller, 2009. Project Summary: Soil Mixing and vibro replacement liquefaction mitigation and Foundation Support.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, I.M., 1999. An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential. TRB Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction Analysis, Publication No. FHWA-RD-99-165. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W., 2004. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. In: 11th International conference soil dynamics and earthquake engineering and 3rd International conference earthquake geotechnical engineering, Berkeley: Stallion Press, University of California, 32–56.
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W., 2008. Soil liquefaction during Earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12, Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 261.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T.O., Castro, G., and Rogers, J.H., 1987. Steel Creek Dam foundation densification. Soil Improvement-A Ten Year Update, ASCE,Geotechnical Special Publication,No12, p.136–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kishida, T., et al., 2009. Seismic response of levees in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Earthquake Spectra, 25 (3), 557–582. doi:10.1193/1.3157259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. and Puri, V.K., 2001. Soil improvement using heavy tamping-A case history. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology,Technical Note, 38, 123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.S., Dash, U., and Anderson, R., 2005. Pipe pile stone columns at Webster Street Tube, Oakland, California. In: R.S. Vernon, A.B. Donald, and J.B. Michael, eds. Innovations in grouting and soil improvement. Austin, Texas, United States: ASCE, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Luehring, R., et al. 2001. Liquefaction mitigation of a silty dam foundation using vibro-stone columns and drainage wicks: a case history at salmon lake dam. In: Proceedings 21st USSD annual meeting and lecture.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle Simonton, W., 2012. Vibro ground improvement for design-build and other transportation projects. Kansas City Geotechnical Seminar.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, D.P. and Kupec, J., 2014. Stone column ground improvement field trial: a Christchurch case study. In New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Annual Technical Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuson, W.F., 1978. Definition of terms related to liquefaction. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 104 (9), 1197–1200.
   Google Scholar
• Massarsch, K.R. and Fellenius, B.H., 2002. Vibratory compaction of coarse-grained soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39 (3), 695–709. doi:10.1139/t02-006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.K., 1981. State of the art-Soil improvement. Proceedings 10th International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, 509–565.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.K., 2008. Mitigation of liquefaction potential of silty sands. In: J.E. Laier, D.K. Crapps, and M.H. Hussein, eds. From research to practice in geotechnical engineering, geotechnical special publication 180. New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: ASCE, 453–451.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.K. and Wentz, F.K., 1991. Performance of improved ground during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Report No. EERC91/12. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• NCEER. 1997. Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. New York Buffalo: Youd and Idriss.
   Google Scholar
• Ohbayashi, J., Harada, K., and Yamamoto, M., 1999. Resistance against liquefaction of ground improved by sand compaction pile method. In: S. Pinto, ed. Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Rotterdam: Balkama, 549–554.
   Google Scholar
• Olgun, C.G. and Martin, J.R., 2008. Numerical modeling of the seismic response of columnar reinforced ground. In: D. Zeng, M. Manzari, and D.R. Hiltunen, eds. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV. Sacramento, California, United States: ASCE, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Priebe, H.J., 1998. Vibro replacement to prevent earthquake induced liquefaction. Ground Engineering, 31 (9), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rayamajhi, D., et al., 2012. Effect of discrete columns on shear stress distribution in liquefiable soil. In: D.H. Roman, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and N. Yesiller, eds. GeoCongress 2012: state of the art and practice in geotechnical engineering. Oakland CA: ASCE, 1908–1917.
   Google Scholar
• Rayamajhi, D., et al., 2014. Numerical study of shear stress distribution for discrete columns in liquefiable soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140 (3), 1–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, K.M., et al. 2009. “Effectiveness of stone columns for liquefaction Mitigation of silty sands with and without Wick Drains. In: J. Han, G. Zheng, V.R. Schaefer, and M. Huang, eds., Proceedings US-China Workshop on ground improvement technologies, Geotechnical special Publication No. 188, Orlando, Florida, United States: ASCE, 160–169.
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, K., et al. 2006. Liquefaction Mitigation of Silty Sands in Utah using stone columns with Wick Drains. A. Porbaha, S.-L. Shen, J. Wartman, and J.-C. Chai, eds., Procseedings GeoShanghai international conference, geotechnical special publication 152, ground modification and seismic mitigation, Shanghai, China: ASCE, 343–348.
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, K., et al. 2012. CPT evaluation of liquefaction mitigation with stone columns in interbedded soils. In Proceedings ISC-4: the fourth international conference on site characterization, Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization 4, Brazil, 1469–1477.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, D.S. and Hussin, J.D., 1997. Stone column improved and piezocone tested site supports mid rise building complex - a case history. In: V.R. Schaefer, L.W. Abramson, J.C. Drumheller, and K.D. Sharp, eds. Ground improvement, ground reinforcement, ground treatment : developments 1987-1997. Logan, Utah, United States: ASCE, 476–491.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., 1979. Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 105 (2), 201–255. doi:10.1061/AJGEB6.0000768.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Booker, J.R., 1977. Stabilization of potentially liquefiable sand deposits. ASCE J Geotechnical Enigineering Division Geotechnical Engineering Division, 103 (7), 757–768. doi:10.1061/AJGEB6.0000453.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M., 1971. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Soil Mechanics and Foundations,division, ASCE, 97 (9), 1249–1273. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M., 1982. Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 134, 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., et al., 1984. The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. UCB/EERC-84/15, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., et al., 1985. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111 (12), 1425–1445. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
   Google Scholar
• Seed, R.B., et al. 2001. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering and seismic site response evaluation. In 4th International conference recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Shenthan, T., 2005. Liquefaction mitigation in silty soils using composite stone column.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Shenthan, T., et al., 2004. Liquefaction mitigation in silty soils using composite stone columns and dynamic compaction. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 3 (1), 39–50. doi:10.1007/BF02668849.
   Google Scholar
• Six, V., et al., 2012. Numerical analysis of elastoplastic behavior of stone column foundation. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30 (4), 813–825. doi:10.1007/s10706-012-9500-y.
   Google Scholar
• Skempton, A.K. 1986. Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging, and overconsolidation. Geotechnique, 36 (3), 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocombe, B.C., Bell, A.L., and Baez, J.I., 2000. The densification of granular soil using vibro methods. Geotechnique, 50 (6), 715–725. doi:10.1680/geot.2000.50.6.715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondermann, W., 1997. Soil improvement by vibro replacement for rigid pavement construction to the high speed railway system. In M.C.R. Davies and F. Schlosser, eds., Ground improvement geosystmes:densification and reinforcement. proceedings of the third international conference on ground improvement geosystems, London, 181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Thiriot, E.D., 2010. Liquefaction mitigation in silty sands at salmon Lake Dam Using stone columns and Wick Drains. Master of Science, Brigham Young University, Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, T., Ashford, S., and Rollins, K., 2004. Performance and analysis of a laterally loaded pile in stone column improved ground. In 13th World Confetence on Earthquake Engineering, Canada: Vancouver,B.C.
   Google Scholar
• Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 1997. NCEER workshop proc. On evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.
   Google Scholar
• Youd, T.L., et al., 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127 (10), 817–833. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y.-G., et al., 2021. Liquefaction mitigation mechanisms of stone column-improved ground by dynamic centrifuge model tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 150, 106946. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar