Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model

References

• Al-Emran, M., V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin. 2018. “Technology Acceptance Model in M-Learning Context: A Systematic Review.” Computers & Education 125: 389–412. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfadda, H. A., and H. S. Mahdi. 2021. “Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50 (4): 883–900. doi:10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. R., N. Almusharraf, and A. Almusharraf. 2022. “Video Conferencing in the e-Learning Context: Explaining Learning Outcome with the Technology Acceptance Model.” Education and Information Technologies 27 (6): 7679–7698. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belda-Medina, J., and J. R. Calvo-Ferrer. 2022. “Using Chatbots as AI Conversational Partners in Language Learning.” Applied Sciences 12 (17): 8427. doi:10.3390/app12178427.
   Google Scholar
• Bibauw, S., W. Van den Noortgate, T. François, and P. Desmet. 2022. “Dialogue Systems for Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis.” Language Learning & Technology 26 (1): 1–24. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, W. 2023, March 10. ChatGPT Can be Powerful Tool for Language Learning. University Affairs. https://www.universityaffairs.ca/career-advice/career-advice-article/chatgpt-can-be-powerful-tool-for-language-learning/.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 2023, March 11. The False Promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, D. M. 2016. “The Role of Technology in SLA Research.” Language Learning & Technology 20 (2): 98–115. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/chun.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1986. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing new end-User Information Systems: Theory and Results [Doctoral Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management]. MIT Theses and Dissertations Archive. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” Management Information System Quarterly 13 (3): 983–1003. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., and A. Amini. 2022. “Examining the Roles of Social Presence and Human-Likeness on Iranian EFL Learners’ Motivation Using Artificial Intelligence Technology: A Case of CSIEC Chatbot.” Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2096638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haristiani, N., and M. M. Rifa’i. 2020. “Combining Chatbot and Social Media: Enhancing Personal Learning Environment (PLE) in Language Learning.” Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology 5 (3): 487–506. doi:10.17509/ijost.v5i3.28687.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., K. F. Hew, and L. K. Fryer. 2022. “Chatbots for Language Learning—Are They Really Useful? A Systematic Review of Chatbot-Supported Language Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38 (1): 237–257. doi:10.1111/jcal.12610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiaer, J., and J. Lee, eds. 2023. Call for papers for a special Issue on using ChatGPT in language learning [Special issue]. Languages. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/languages/special_issues/K1Z08ODH6V.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N. Y. 2019. “A Study on the use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Improving English Grammar Skills.” Journal of Digital Convergence 17 (8): 37–46. doi:10.14400/JDC.2019.17.8.037.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N. Y., Y. Cha, and H. S. Kim. 2019. “Future English Learning: Chatbots and Artificial Intelligence.” Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning 22 (3): 32–53. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002505056
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., and N. A. Drajati. 2019. “Affective Variables and Informal Digital Learning of English: Keys to Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 35 (5): 168–182. doi:10.14742/ajet.5177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., and Q. Xie. 2022. “Profiling the Affective Characteristics of EFL Learners’ Digital Informal Learning: A Person-Centered Approach.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication, doi:10.1080/17501229.2022.2085713.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G. 2023. “To Transform or Not to Transform? Understanding the Digital Literacies of Rural Lower-Class EFL Learners.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15348458.2023.2236217.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G., and R. Darvin. 2023. “From Rural China to the Digital Wilds: Negotiating Digital Repertoires to Claim the Right to Speak.” TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/tesq.3233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., C. Ma, J. Bao, and Z. Liu. 2023. “Toward a Model of Informal Digital Learning of English and Intercultural Competence: a Large-scale Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09588221.2023.2191652.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Y. Zhang, and R. Zhang. 2023. “Bridging Imagination and Informal Digital Learning of English: a Mixed-Method Investigation.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01434632.2023.2173214.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., and A. Phakiti, eds. 2015. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., and P. Benson. 2017. “Research Agenda: Language Learning Beyond the Classroom.” Language Teaching 50 (4): 561–578. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H., C. Lai, and P. Sundqvist, eds. 2022. The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Teaching Beyond the Classroom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J., S. Tan, and S. Tan. 2023. “ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6 (1): 1–22. doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Sharadgah, T. A., and R. A. Sa’di. 2022. “A Systematic Review of Research on the use of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching and Learning (2015-2021): What are the Current Effects?” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 21: 337–377. doi:10.28945/4999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Y. 2023, March 10. What ChatGPT Means for Linguistic Diversity and Language Learning. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230223132734294.
   Google Scholar
• Shemesh, H. 2023, March 10. The Ultimate Guide for Using ChatGPT English Learning. The Accent's Way Magazine. https://hadarshemesh.com/magazine/chatgpt-for-learning-english/.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. 2009. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, P. P., and B. Mei. 2022. “Modeling Preservice Chinese-as-a-Second/Foreign-Language Teachers’ Adoption of Educational Technology: A Technology Acceptance Perspective.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 35 (4): 816–839. doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, A. 2023, June 22. What are Large Language Models. Machine Learning Mastery. https://machinelearningmastery.com/what-are-large-language-models/#:~:text=There%20are%20multiple%20large%20language,language%20and%20can%20generate%20text.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. L., and R. W. Black. 2007. “Language and Literacy Development in Computer-Mediated Contexts and Communities.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27: 133–160. doi:10.1017/S0267190508070074.
   Google Scholar
• Tlili, A., B. Shehata, M. A. Adarkwah, A. Bozkurt, D. T. Hickey, R. Huang, and B. Agyemang. 2023. “What if the Devil is my Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education.” Smart Learning Environments 10 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. 2000. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion Into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11: 342–365. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., and Y. Xu. 2022. “Call for Papers for a Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence for Language Learning.” Language Learning & Technology 26 (2): 149–150.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and X. Wang. 2019. “Modeling the Intention to use Machine Translation for Student Translators: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model.” Computers & Education 133: 116–126. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and G. Liu. 2022. “Revisiting Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE): a Structural Equation Modeling Approach in a University EFL Context.” Computer Assisted Language Learning: Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2134424.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., P. Ke, X. Qiu, M. Huang, and J. Zhang. 2023. ChatGPT: Potential, Prospects, and Limitations. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering. Advance online publication. doi:10.1631/FITEE.2300089
   Google Scholar