FutureCoast: A Playful Way to Assess Public Perceptions for Better Climate Change Communication

References

• Abram, N., Gattuso, J. P., Prakash, A., Cheng, L., Chidichimo, M. P., Crate, S., Enomoto, H., Garschagen, M., Gruber, N., Harper, S., & Holland, E. (2019). Framing and context of the report (pp. 73–129). IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. B., & Crowley, K. (2017). Moving beyond scientific knowledge: Leveraging participation, relevance, and interconnectedness for climate education. International Journal of Global Warming, 12(3–4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2017.10005878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. Allyn & Bacon. ISBN-10: 080131903X.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Woo, C.-W., Wilcox, R., Eisenbarth, H., Kim, B., Han, J., Losin, E. A. R., & Wager, T. D. (2022). The conceptual building blocks of everyday thought: Tracking the emergence and dynamics of ruminative and non-ruminative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(3), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlati, A., Rödl, A., Kanjaria-Christian, S., & Knieling, J. (2021). Stakeholder participation in the planning and design of nature-based solutions. Insights from CLEVER cities project in Hamburg. Sustainability, 13(5), 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden, C., Pipal, C., Schoonvelde, M., & van der Velden, M. A. C. G. (2022). Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, S. N., Sweetland, J., & Volmert, A. (2015). How to talk about oceans and climate change: A FrameWorks MessageMemo. FrameWorks Institute. http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF_oceansclimate/climatechangeandtheocean_mm_final_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2006). What can we learn from 25-years of PUS research? Liberating and widening the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). Associative thinking at the core of creativity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(7), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogert, J. M., Buczny, J., Harvey, J. A., & Ellers, J. (2023). The effect of trust in science and media use on public belief in anthropogenic climate change: A meta-analysis. Environmental Communication, 1–26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17524032.2023.2280749
   Google Scholar
• Bohdanowicz, Z. (2021). Different countries, common support for climate change mitigation: The case of Germany and Poland. Climate, 9(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9020027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cataldi, S., & Iorio, G. (Eds.). (2022). When reality challenges sociological imagination: What social love is in a critical perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Research on Environmental Decisions and ecoAmerica. (2014). Connecting on climate: A guide to effective climate change communication. http://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ecoAmerica-CRED-2014-Connecting-on-Climate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Climate Change Science Program (US). (2014). Climate change impacts in the United States, highlights: US national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, A., Lewandowsky, S., Phillips, M., & Roberts, O. (2015). The uncertainty handbook. University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R. (2000). Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conservation Ecology, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00171-040105. http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art5/
   Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., & Kapmeier, F. (2020). Engage, don't preach: Active learning triggers climate action. Energy Research and Social Science, 70, Article 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dézma, L., Bigazzi, S., Sarrica, M., Siegler, A., Serdült, S., & Rizzoli, V. (2024). Social representation of global climate change: An exploratory study focusing on emotions. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2024.2310828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. A., & Lampert, M. D. (1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding of spoken discourse. Psychology Press. ISBN: 9780805803495.
   Google Scholar
• Eiben, C. B., Siegel, J. B., Bale, J. B., Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Shen, B. W., Stoddard, B. L., Popovic, Z., & Baker, D. (2012). Increased Diels-Alderase activity through backbone remodeling guided by Foldit players. Nature Biotechnology, 30(2), 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenack, K., & Reckien, D. (2013). Symposium: Climate change and simulation/gaming: Special issue of: Simulation & gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 44(2–3), 185–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113493060
   Google Scholar
• Emiliani, F., Contarello, A., Brondi, S., Palareti, L., Passini, S., & Romaioli, D. (2020). Social representations of “normality”: Everyday life in old and new normalities with COVID-19. Papers on Social Representations, 29(2), 9.1–9.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, S., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Blackett, P., & Edwards, P. (2018). Adaptive and interactive climate futures: Systematic review of “serious games” for engagement and decision-making. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 063005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac1c6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FutureCoast. (2014). About FutureCoast. Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20141006135550/http://futurecoast.org/about/. See also: Wayback Machine (archive.org) captured the site in 2016: https://web.archive.org/web/20161111190732/http://futurecoast.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Groh, F. (2012). Gamification: State of the art definition and utilization. Institute of Media Informatics Ulm University, 39, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., & Lemcke-Stampone, M. (2014). Arctic warming and your weather: Public belief in the connection. International Journal of Climatology, 34(5), 1723–1728. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, C. D., Jones, R., Burgin, L., & Daron, J. (2020). Climate risk narratives: An iterative reflective process for co-producing and integrating climate knowledge. Climate Risk Management, 29, Article 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsaliaki, K., & Mustafee, N. (2015). Edutainment for sustainable development: A survey of games in the field. Simulation & Gaming, 46(6), 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114552166
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2020). 20 incredible environmental games from the last decade. Retrieved August 3, 2023, from https://www.chaostheorygames.com/blog/20-environmental-sustainability-video-games-from-the-last-decade-2021
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpu, V. (2022). What is public engagement and how does it help to address climate change? A review of climate communication research. Environmental Communication, 16(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2055601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Lee, S., Verner, M., Ballew, M., Carman, J., Myers, T., Goldberg, M., Badullovich, N., & Marlon, J. (2023). Climate change in the American mind: Beliefs & attitudes, spring 2023. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M., & Gustafson, A. (2019). Climate change in the American mind: April 2019. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CJ2NS .
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., & Smith, N. (2010). Knowledge of climate change across global warming’s six Americas. Yale University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. https://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication-OFF/files/Knowledge_Across_Six_Americas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, T. (2016). Exploring social representations of adapting to climate change using topic modeling and Bayesian networks. Ecology and Society, 21(4), 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08778-210416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., Roser-Renouf, C., & Cutler, M. (2016). Is there a climate “spiral of silence” in America. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Marceau, M., Ledoux, I., Lavoie, S., Douma, N. B., Mailhot-Bisson, D., & Gosselin, E. (2022). Exploration of the occupational and personal dimensions impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic for nurses: A qualitative analysis of survey response. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(7), 2150–2164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, A. B., & Rein, J. R. (2013). The nature of mental concepts. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 320–329). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Phillips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, N., Schoenebeck, S., & Forte, A. (2019). Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin. ISBN-10: 9780143120612.
   Google Scholar
• Moerkerken, A., Blasch, J., Van Beukering, P., & Van Well, E. (2020). A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures. Climatic Change, 159(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moezzi, M., Janda, K. B., & Rotmann, S. (2017). Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munshi, D., Kurian, P., Cretney, R., Morrison, S. L., & Kathlene, L. (2020). Centering culture in public engagement on climate change. Environmental Communication, 14(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1746680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Informing an effective response to climate change. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12784
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfirman, S., O’Garra, T., Bachrach Simon, E., Brunacini, J., Reckien, D., Lee, J. J., & Lukasiewicz, E. (2021). “Stickier” learning through gameplay: An effective approach to climate change education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1858266
   Google Scholar
• Piguet, E. (2022). Linking climate change, environmental degradation, and migration: An update after 10 years. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13(1), e746. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radchuk, O., Kerbe, W., & Schmidt, M. (2017). Homo Politicus meets Homo Ludens: Public participation in serious life science games. Public Understanding of Science, 26(5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516653030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckien, D., & Eisenack, K. (2013). Climate change gaming on board and screen: A review. Simulation & Gaming, 44(2–3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113480867
   Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN-10: 1107600758.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2022). Conducting thematic analysis on brief texts: The structured tabular approach. Qualitative Psychology, 9(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000189
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, S. (2012). Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01812.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheliga, K., Friesike, S., Puschmann, C., & Fecher, B. (2018). Setting up crowd science projects. Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516678514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, T., & Susskind, L. (2014). Using role-play simulations to encourage adaptation. In A. van Buuren, J. Eshuis, & M. van Vliet (Eds.), Action research for climate change adaptation: Developing and applying knowledge for governance (pp. 148–163). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Show, H. (2015). Rise of the citizen scientist. Nature, 524(7565), 265–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillmann, J., Shepherd, T. G., van den Hurk, B., Hazeleger, W., Martius, O., Slingo, J., & Zscheischler, J. (2021). Event-based storylines to address climate risk. Earth's Future, 9(2), e2020EF001783. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerlund, K., Forsblad, M., Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2020). The affect heuristic and risk perception–stability across elicitation methods and individual cognitive abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 970. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skains, R. L., Rudd, J. A., Horry, R., & Ross, H. (2022). Playing for change: Teens’ attitudes towards climate change action as expressed through interactive digital narrative play. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 789824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.789824
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, W. (2014). Shaping the public dialogue on climate change. In D. Dalbotten, G. Roehrig, & P. Hamilton (Eds.), Future earth-advancing civic understanding of the anthropocene. Geophysical monograph series (pp. 89–97). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118854280.ch9
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeny, K., Carroll, P. J., & Shepperd, J. A. (2006). Is optimism always best? Future outlooks and preparedness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrin, M., Pfirman, S., & Hamilton, L. (2020). Polar fun and games. Current: The Journal of Marine Education, 34(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5334/cjme.43
   Google Scholar
• USGCRP. (2018). Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth national climate assessment, volume II (D. R. Reidmiller, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, & B. C. Stewart, Eds.). U.S. Global Change Research Program. 1515 pp. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018
   Google Scholar
• USGCRP. (2023). Fifth national climate assessment (A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, & T.K. Maycock, Eds). U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023
   Google Scholar
• van Beek, L., Milkoreit, M., Prokopy, L., Reed, J. B., Vervoort, J., Waardekker, A., & Weiner, R. (2022). The effects of serious gaming on risk perceptions of climate tipping points. Climatic Change, 170(3–4), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03318-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019). The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS One, 10(2), e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, D. I., & Fennewald, T. (2018). Grim FATE: Learning about systems thinking in an in-depth climate change simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 49(2), 168–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117753498
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, N., Govani, M. S., & Farooque, M. (2021). Need public policy for human gene editing, heatwaves, or asteroids? Try thinking like a citizen. Issues in Science and Technology, 37(3), 12–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V., & Neset, T.-S. (2020). Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research – a methodological review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(5), e664. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. S., & Lee, J. J. (2015). Climate change games as tools for education and engagement. Nature Climate Change, 5(5), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, H. R., Shepherd, T. G., Acidri, J., Cornforth, R. J., Petty, C., Seaman, J., & Todman, L. C. (2020). Storylines for decision-making: Climate and food security in Namibia. Climate and Development, 13(6), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1808438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar