Whose Expertise and Whose Knowledge Matter? Influencing Wind Power Decisions in Norway

Bibliography

• Beckham Hooff, S., Botetzagias, I., & Kizos, A. (2017). Seeing the wind (farm): Applying Q-methodology to understand the public’s reception of the visuals around a wind farm development. Environmental Communication, 11(5), 700–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1292937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekalu, M. A., Bigman, C. A., McCloud, R. F., Lin, L. K., & Viswanath, K. (2018). The relative persuasiveness of narrative versus non-narrative health messages in public health emergency communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Preventive Medicine, 111, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen, T. A., & Svarstad, H. (2008). Understanding traditionalist opposition to modernization: Narrative production in a Norwegian mountain conflict. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blindheim, B. (2015). Gone with the wind? The Norwegian licencing process for wind power: Does it support investments and the realisation of political goals? International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 5, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bolstad, E. (2024). Retrieved April 16, 2024, from: https://snl.no/kommuner_i_Norge
   Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. A. (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1102–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. L. (2002). Det norske landskapet: om landskap og landskapsforståelse i kulturhistorisk perspektiv. Pax forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. L. (2015). Ut i det fri: livet på setra, hytta og landstedet. Pax forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. M., Kemp, L., Talberg, A., De Castella, C., Downie, C., Friel, S., Grant, W. J., Howden, M., Jotzo, F., Markham, F., & Platow, M. J. (2020). Learning from the climate change debate to avoid polarisation on negative emissions. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1630463
   Google Scholar
• Cope, D. G. (2014). Methods and meanings: Credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(1), 89–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as tools for influencing policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230061022899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010). The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication. Communication Research, 37(6), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2021). The narrative truth about scientific misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1914085117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914085117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F., & Rosenthal, S. (2018). Third-person perception of science narratives: The case of climate change denial. Science Communication, 40(3), 340–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018766556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darpö, J. (2020). Should locals have a say when it's blowing? The influence of municipalities in permit procedures for windpower installations in Sweden and Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, 8(2), 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (pp. XIV-LXI). In: S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio, H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, … C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• DNT. (2020, October 26). DNT i motvind og medvind – 20 år med vindkraftarbeid [Video]. Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/472233475
   Google Scholar
• DNT. (n.d.). About DNT. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://english.dnt.no/about/
   Google Scholar
• Dugstad, A., Grimsrud, K., Kipperberg, G., Lindhjem, H., & Navrud, S. (2020). Acceptance of wind power development and exposure – Not-in-anybody's-backyard. Energy Policy, 147, 111780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S. (2007). The challenge of trying to make a difference using media messages. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 89–105). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701402075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. (2015). Using qualitative methods to assess impact. Charities Evaluation Services Associate, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, T. H. (1993). Being Norwegian in a shrinking world: Reflections on Norwegian identity. Continuity and Change: Aspects of Contemporary Norway, 11, 37.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1989). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Univ of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, K., & Green, M. C. (2017). Narrative persuasion. Narrative Absorption, 27, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.04fit
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, M. K., Galway, L., Buse, C., Parkes, M., & Rees, E. (2021). Place-based climate change communication and engagement in Canada’s provincial north: Lessons learned from climate champions. Environmental Communication, 15(4), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1869576
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind's eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, A. V. (2022). Collaborative management in Norwegian municipalities: Do middle managers make a difference? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v26i2.7024
   Google Scholar
• Hoiberg, C. (n.d.). Guide to Larvik. Norway Travel Guide. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://norwaytravelguide.no/city-guides/guide-to-larvik
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., Rognstad, H., Saglie, I. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2019). Who influences windpower licensing decisions in Norway? Formal requirements and informal practices. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., Theisen, O. M., & Flåm, K. H. (2020). What influences windpower decisions? A statistical analysis of licensing in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & Song, G. (2014). Making sense of climate change: How story frames shape cognition. Political Psychology, 35(4), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, A. (2021). Narrative persuasion within competitive belief environments: An interpretivist take on persuasion.
   Google Scholar
• Larvik Kommune. (2022). Fakta om Larvik. Retrieved April 16, 2024, from https://www.larvik.kommune.no/om-kommunen/fakta-om-larvik/
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C. (1998). Bridging positivist and interpretivist approaches to qualitative methods. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01931.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. (2019). Weaving an interpretivist stance throughout mixed methods research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2020). Not born yesterday. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelis, L. (2007). Consumption behavior and narratives about the good life. In Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 251–265).
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., & Dale, K. (2017). Narrative persuasion theories. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–11). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Moran, M. B., & Patnoe-Woodley, P. (2011). Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in entertainment-education. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01554.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy-Gregory, H. (2018). Governance via persuasion: Environmental NGOs and the social licence to operate. Environmental Politics, 27(2), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1373429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Ellithorpe, M. (2015). Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 24(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514545909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygaard, L. P. (2017). Writing your master's thesis: From A to Zen. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing your research project (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Olje- og Enegidepartement (OED). (2016). Kraft til endring: Energipolitikken mot 2030. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/31249efa2ca6425cab08130b35ebb997/no/pdfs/stm201520160025000dddpdfs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oschatz, C., & Marker, C. (2020). Long-term persuasive effects in narrative communication research: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti, M. J. (2011). Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search for common cause. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(4), 907–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgórecki, A., Alexander, J., & Shields, R. (Eds.). (1996). Social engineering. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
   Google Scholar
• Regjeringen. (2014). Norwegian ministry of local government and modernisation. Local Government in Norway. Retrieved November 10, 2023, from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kmd/komm/veiledninger_og_brosjyrer/local_government_in_norway_h-2313e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., & Mendelson, A. L. (2012). A qualitative experiment. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812444789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saglie, I. L., Inderberg, T. H., & Rognstad, H. (2020). What shapes municipalities’ perceptions of fairness in windpower developments? Local Environment, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1712342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Mayerson, M., Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., & Ballew, M. (2023). Environmental literature as persuasion: An experimental test of the effects of Reading climate fiction. Environmental Communication, 17(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377
   Google Scholar
• Shriver-Rice, M., Fernandes, J., Johns, L. N., Riopelle, C., & Vaughan, H. (2022). Young adults’ reactions and engagement with short-form videos on sea level rise. Environmental Communication, 16(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1963800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagstad, R. (2018). Da fjellet ble dannet. Dreyers forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Toke, D., Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4), 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. (2019). Act Prosjektet: Klimaundersøkelsen 2019. Clim. Surv, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Waaler, R. (2022). Friluftsliv. Store Norske Leksikon. Retrieved May 14, 2022, from https://snl.no/friluftsliv
   Google Scholar
• Ween, G., & Abram, S. (2012). The Norwegian trekking association: Trekking as constituting the nation. Landscape Research, 37(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.651112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westskog, H., Aase, T. H., & Leikanger, I. (2021). The Norwegian trekking association: Conditions for its continued existence with new tourism patterns. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 21(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2021.1913219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894421
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2007). Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2692–2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarun, L., & Hall, A. (2012). Narrative persuasion, transportation, and the role of need for cognition in online viewing of fantastical films. Media Psychology, 15(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.700592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2020). Making quantitative research work: From positivist dogma to actual social scientific inquiry. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(1), 49–62. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar