Evaluating the Impact of Supplemental Computer-Assisted Math Instruction in Elementary School: A Conceptual Replication

References

• Agrawal, J., & Morin, L. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. K., Gersten, R. M., & Lee, D.-S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/499715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodovski, K., & Farkas, G. (2007). Mathematics growth in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/525550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1 (6th ed., pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold: Research and policy in educational technology—A response to “Fool’s Gold. Educational Technology Review, 11(1), 7–69. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/17793
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Building Blocks Software [Computer software]. McGraw-Hill Education. (Original work published 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2010). Technology. In V. Washington & J. Andrews (Eds.), Children of 2020: Creating a better tomorrow (pp. 119–123). Council for Professional Recognition/National Association for the Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science (New York, N.Y.), 333(6045), 968–970. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6045/968.full https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Liu, X. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The Research-Based Early Maths Assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701777272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Stephan, M. (2004). Measurement in pre-K to grade 2 mathematics. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 299–320). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12519
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, N., Jordan, N. C., Beliakoff, A., & Hassinger-Das, B. (2015). A kindergarten number-sense intervention with contrasting practice conditions for low-achieving children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 331–370. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., Rodrigues, J., Barbieri, C., & Rinne, L. (2020). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdReports. (2017, October 17). Math K-8 summary of alignment and usability. https://edreports.org/reports/overview/zearn-2016
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential ability scales (2nd ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1990). Beginning school math competence: Minority and majority comparisons. Child Development, 61(2), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. T., & Jacob, B. (2010). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing algebra (1st ed.). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, M. E., Anthony, J. A., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Williams, J. M. (2016). Improving mathematics learning of kindergarten students through computer-assisted instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.3.0206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M. E., Anthony, J. L., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. H., & Williams, J. M. (2018). Hispanic dual language learning kindergarten students’ response to a numeracy intervention: A randomized control trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 43, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Newman-Gonchar, R., Schumacher, R., Dougherty, B., Bucka, N., Karp, K. S., Woodward, J., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., Jayanthi, M., Keating, B., & Morgan, S. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in elementary grades. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://whatworks.ed.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2012). Missing data: Analysis and design. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. rb.gy/klfghu.
   Google Scholar
• Great Minds. (2015). Eureka mathematics curriculum: A story of units. https://greatminds.org/math
   Google Scholar
• Harskamp, E. (2014). The effects of computer technology on primary school students’ mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. In S. Chinn (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia (pp. 383–392). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, F. L., Moon, T. R., & Boren, R. (2014). Are the reading rich getting richer? Testing for the presence of the Matthew Effect. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.789784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2013). What Works Clearinghouse intervention report. U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_dreambox_121013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse. U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Sommerlund, B. (2007). A critical discussion of null hypothesis significance testing and statistical power analysis within psychological research. Nordic Psychology, 59(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.59.3.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Early development of quantity to number-word linkage as a precursor of mathematical school achievement and mathematical difficulties: Findings from a four-year longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin, J., van Garderen, D., & Kamuru, J. (2020). Building a strong conception of the number line. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2019.0061
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnuson, K. A., Meyers, M. K., Ruhm, C. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 115–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., & Plucker, M. J. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, J. L., & Boisjoli, J. A. (2009). The token economy for children with intellectual disability and/or autism: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methe, S. A., Hojnoski, R., Clarke, B., Owens, B. B., Lilley, P. K., Politylo, B. C., White, K. M., & Marcotte, A. M. (2011). Innovations and future directions for early numeracy curriculum-based measurement: Commentary on the special series. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(4), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508411414154
   Google Scholar
• Moradmand, N., Datta, A., & Oakley, G. (2013). My maths story: An application of a computer-assisted framework for teaching mathematics in the lower primary years [Paper presentation]. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. http://www.editlib.org/p/48603
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. R., Wolf, B., Ross, S. M., Risman, K. L., & McLemore, C. C. (2019). Efficacy study of Zearn Math in a large urban school district. John Hopkins University. http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/62395
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for pre-kindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Access and equity in mathematics education. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/Access-and-Equity-in-Mathematics-Education/
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. https://learning.ccsso.org/common-core-state-standards-initiative
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics in early childhood: Learning paths toward excellence and equity. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G., & McMaster, K. L. (2019). The effects of early numeracy interventions for students in preschool and early elementary: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. S., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusir, S., Alsmadi, I., Al-Kabi, M., & Sharadgah, F. (2013). Studying the impact of using multimedia interactive programs on children’s ability to learn basic math skills. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.3.3
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R. (2015). Connecting evidence-based practice with implementation opportunities in special education mathematics preparation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451215579269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2015). Intensive intervention in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(4), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PR Newswire. (2018a, June 19). Bossier Parish adopting top-rated Zearn Math curriculum across all elementary schools for 2018-19. PR Newswire USA.
   Google Scholar
• PR Newswire. (2018b, July 31). Rochester City School District partners with Zearn Math to improve student math achievement. PR Newswire USA.
   Google Scholar
• PR Newswire. (2019, November 25). Zearn Math becomes the only math curriculum recommended for all grades K-5 in New Mexico. PR Newswire USA.
   Google Scholar
• PR Newswire. (2020, January 29). Zearn Math K-5 receives highest level of rating—‘Recommended Primary’—from Utah State Board of Education. PR Newswire USA.
   Google Scholar
• Provasnik, S., Malley, L., Stephens, M., Landeros, K., Perkins, R., & Tang, J. H. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. students in grades 4 and 8 and in advanced courses at the end of high school in an international context (NCES 2017-002). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
   Google Scholar
• Ragosta, M. (1982). Computer-assisted instruction and compensatory education: The ETS/LAUSD study. The final report. U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED222169.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ran, H., Kasli, M., & Secada, W. G. (2021). A meta-analysis on computer technology intervention effects on mathematics achievement for low-performing students in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 119–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing. rb.gy/ti2xdk
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2018, December 17). Message from IES director: A more systematic approach to replicating research. https://ies.ed.gov/director/remarks/12-17-2018.asp
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2021, April 7). Reflecting on three years at IES. Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/director/remarks/4-7-2021.asp
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R., Carpenter, T., Fennell, F., Geary, D., Lewis, J., Okamoto, Y., Thompson, L., & Wray, J. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: A practice guide (NCEE #2010-4039). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E., Lee, S. A., & Izard, V. (2010). Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry. Cognitive Science, 34(5), 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01110.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedly, K., Dragoo, K., Arafeh, S., & Luke, S. D. (2008). Effective mathematics instruction. Evidence for Education, 3(1), 2–11. National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. https://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED572704.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sumantri, M. S., & Satriani, R. (2016). The effect of formative testing and self-directed learning on mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 507–524. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/128
   Google Scholar
• Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction—the Wiskobas Project. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, R. (1977). Teaching elementary school mathematics (2nd ed.). Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, R. G., Uprichard, A. E., & Heddens, J. W. (1980). Diagnosing mathematical difficulties. Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Woodworth, K. (2011). Evaluation of Rocketship Education’s use of DreamBox Learning’s online mathematics program. SRI International. http://www.dreambox.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/pdf/DreamBox Results from SRI Rocketship Evaluation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2015, March 13). Inside Eureka Math: Does a popular Common Core math curriculum move too fast for young students? The Hechinger Report. https://tinyurl.com/ms5a77z6
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, J., Beckmann, S., Driscoll, M., Franke, M., Herzig, P., Jitendra, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Ogbuehi, P. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch/
   Google Scholar
• Worthke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Shnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. (pp. 219–240). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D.-C., & Li, M.-N. (2013). Assessment of animated self-directed learning activities modules for children’s number sense development. Educational Technology and Society, 16(3), 44–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.3.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar