Experimental investigations on the influence of embedment depth and frequency on the dynamic behaviour of tunnels under repeated shaking events

References

• Bao, Z., Y. Yuan, and H. Yu. 2017. “Multi-Scale Physical Model of Shield Tunnels Applied in Shaking Table Test.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 100:465–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X., L. Feng, C. Wang, Z. Chen, and L. Han. 2020. “Shaking Table Tests of the Seismic Response of a Utility Tunnel with a Joint Connection.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 133:106133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich. 1972. “Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Design Equations and Curves.” Journal of Soil Mechanics Foundations Division ASCE 98 (7): 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760.
   Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M., J. J. Hook, B. Schmidt, and I. John. 2001. “Seismic Design and Analysis of Underground Structures.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 16 (4): 247–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh, M., M. Hajialilue Bonab, and A. A. Javadi. 2018. “Experimental and Numerical Study of the Behavior of Shallow Rectangular Tunnels.” Journal of Vibro Engineering 20 (4): 1783–1796. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2018.19308. Jun 30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida, H., T. Hiroto, N. Yoshida, and M. Iwafuji. 1996. “Damage to Daikai Subway Station.Soils and Foundations.” Soils and Foundations 36 (Special): 283–300. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.Special_283.
   Google Scholar
• IS 2720 – Part VI. 2006. Methods of Test for Soils, Determination of Density Index (Relative Density) of Cohesionless Soils. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards. Accessed February 16, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• IS 2720-Part III. 1983. Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Specific Gravity. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards. Accessed February 16, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., M. H. El Naggar, and A. Elgamal. 2023. “Large-Scale Shake Table Testing of Shallow Tunnel-Ground System.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 166 (Mar 1): 107793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsky, Herbert. 1963. Stress Waves in Solids. Vol. 1098. USA: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., S. Bhattacharya, F. Scarpa, and M. Bianchi. 2015. “Dynamic Response of a Geotechnical Rigid Model Container with Absorbing Boundaries.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 69:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, S., H. Xu, L. Wang, S. Liu, D. Zhao, and W. Nie. 2022. “Effect of Flexibility Ratio on Seismic Response of Rectangular Tunnels in Sand: Experimental and Numerical Investigation.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 157:107256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam, M. R., and M. H. Baziar. 2016. “Seismic Ground Motion Amplification Pattern Induced by a Subway Tunnel: Shaking Table Testing and Numerical Simulation.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 83:81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtomo, K., T. Suehiro, T. Kawai, and K. Kanaya. 2001. ”Research on streamlining seismic safety evaluation of underground reinforced concrete duct-type structures in nuclear power stations, Part-2: Experimental aspects of laminar shear sand box excitation tests with embedded RC models.” Proceedings of SMiRT 16 Conference, International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G. N., and R. E. Scholl. 1981. “Earthquake Engineering of Large Underground Structures, Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration.” FHWAIRD-801195. Accessed August 16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B., T. Stimac, and Y. Hashash. 1998. “US Immersed Tube Retrofit.” Tunnels & Tunnelling International. Accessed August 16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analyses; Rep. No. EERC-70/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California. Accessed February 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Tunnel Market Survey. 2019. Accessed February 16, 2023. https://nff.no/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/01/Market-Survey-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., H. Yu, Y. Yuan, and J. Sun. 2021. “1 G Shaking Table Test of Segmental Tunnel in Sand Under Near-Fault Motions.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 115:104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Y. Yang, S. Zhang, H. Yu, and J. Sun. 2020. “A Benchmark 1 G Shaking Table Test of Shallow Segmental Mini-Tunnel in Sand.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (11): 5383–5412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00909-w.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Y. Yuan, G. Xu, Q. Su, X. Yan, and C. Li 2018. “Multi-Point Shaking Table Test for Long Tunnels Subjected to Non-Uniform Seismic Loadings-Part II: Application to the HZM Immersed Tunnel.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 108:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., L. Han, L. Feng, X. Ding, L. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Liu, A. Aljarmouzi, and W. Sun. 2020. “Study on Seismic Behaviors of a Double Box Utility Tunnel with Joint Connections Using Shaking Table Model Tests.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 136 (Sep 1): 106118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar