Publication Cover
RMLE Online
Research in Middle Level Education
Volume 46, 2023 - Issue 10
20
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Middle Level Mathematics Teachers’ Problems on Linear Relationships in a Semi-Structured Problem Posing Situation

ORCID Icon

References

  • Berg, C. A., & Philips, D. G. (1994). An investigation of the relationship between logical thinking and the ability to construct and interpret line graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310404
  • Billings, E. M., & Klanderman, D. (2000). Graphical representations of speed: Obstacles preservice K‐8 teachers experience. School Science and Mathematics, 100(8), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17332.x
  • Bonotto, C. (2013). Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9441-7
  • Bonotto, C., & Santo, D. L. (2015). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research into effective practice (pp. 103–123). Springer.
  • Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2017). Leaping from discrete to continuous independent variables: Sixth graders’ science line graph interpretations. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 455–484. https://doi.org/10.1086/690204
  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing. Franklin Institute Press.
  • Cai, J., Chen, T., Li, X., Xu, R., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., & Song, N. (2019). Exploring the impact of a problem-posing workshop on elementary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions on problem posing and lesson design. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.004
  • Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00142-6
  • Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research into effective practice (pp. 3–34). Springer.
  • Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
  • Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
  • Chen, T., & Cai, J. (2020). An elementary mathematics teacher learning to teach using problem posing: A case of the distributive property of multiplication over addition. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.004
  • Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Sriraman, B. (2005). An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes. ZDM, 37(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-005-0004-6
  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
  • Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024364304664
  • Crespo, S. (2015). A collection of problem-posing experiences for prospective mathematics teachers that make a difference. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research into effective practice (pp. 493–511). Springer.
  • Crespo, S., & Harper, F. K. (2019). Learning to pose collaborative mathematics problems with secondary prospective teachers. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.003
  • Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9081-0
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  • Grundmeier, T. A. (2015). Developing the problem-posing abilities of prospective elementary and middle school teachers. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research into effective practice (pp. 411–431). Springer.
  • Hadjidemetriou, C., & Williams, J. S. (2002). Children’s graphical conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520103
  • Hattikudur, S., Prather, R. W., Asquith, P., Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J., & Nathan, M. (2012). Constructing graphical representations: Middle schoolers’ intuitions and developing knowledge about slope and y‐intercept. School Science and Mathematics, 112(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00138.x
  • Horn, I. (2012). Strength in numbers: Collaborative learning in secondary mathematics. NCTM.
  • Huang, R., & Kulm, G. (2012). Prospective middle grade mathematics teachers’ knowledge of algebra for teaching. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.06.001
  • Işık, C., Kar, T., İ̇pek, A. S., & Işık, A. (2012). Difficulties encountered by pre-service classroom teachers in constructing stories about line graphs. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 644–658.
  • Kar, T. (2016). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of linear graphs in context of problem-posing. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 643–657.
  • Kilic, C. (2015). Analyzing pre-service primary teachers’ fraction knowledge structures through problem posing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1603–1619. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1425a
  • Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 123–147). Erlbaum.
  • Kwon, O. N. (2002). The effect of calculator based ranger activities on students’ graphing ability. School Science and Mathematics, 102(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17895.x
  • Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2019). Posing mathematically worthwhile problems: Developing the problem-posing skills of prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-09425-w
  • Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001
  • Leung, S. S. (1993). The relation of mathematical knowledge and creative thinking to the mathematical problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers on tasks differing in numerical information content [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh.
  • Leung, S. S. (2013). Teachers implementing mathematical problem posing in the classroom: Challenges and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9436-4
  • Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217299
  • Lobato, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2002). Developing understanding of ratio-as-measure as a foundation for slope. In B. Litwiller (Ed.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions: 2002 yearbook (pp. 162–175). NCTM.
  • Lotan, R. A. (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, 60, 72–75.
  • Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarsky, B. (1997). From verbal descriptions to graphic representations: Stability and change in students’ alternative conceptions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002965907987
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (MoNE). (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7, ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı [Middle school mathematics curriculum grades 5 to 8]. Author.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991) . Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Author.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000) . Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
  • Paolucci, C., & Wessels, H. (2017). An examination of preservice teachers’ capacity to create mathematical modeling problems for children. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117697636
  • Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Bardini, C. (2010). Linear functions: Teaching strategies and students’ conceptions associated with y= mx+ c. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2010.486151
  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
  • Sadak, M., Incikabi, L., Ulusoy, F., & Pektas, M. (2022). Investigating mathematical creativity through the connection between creative abilities in problem posing and problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101108
  • Silber, S., & Cai, J. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ free and structured mathematical problem posing. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1232843
  • Silber, S., & Cai, J. (2021). Exploring underprepared undergraduate students’ mathematical problem posing. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(4), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01272-z
  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
  • Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/749846
  • Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., & Kenney, P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/749366
  • Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9478-2
  • Stickles, P. (2011). An analysis of secondary and middle school teachers’ mathematical problem posing. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301
  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basis of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
  • Ulusoy, F., & Kepceoğlu, İ. (2018). The contextual and cognitive structure of prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ problems in semi-structured problem-posing context. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 19(3), 1937–1963.
  • Van Dyke, F. (1994). Relating to graphs in introductory algebra. The Mathematics Teacher, 87(6), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.87.6.0427
  • Van Harpen, X. Y., & Presmeg, N. C. (2013). An investigation of relationships between students’ mathematical problem-posing abilities and their mathematical content knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9456-0
  • Van Harpen, X. Y., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5
  • Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. (2015). Students authoring personalized “algebra stories”: Problem-posing in the context of out-of-school interests. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.001
  • Xu, B., Cai, J., Liu, Q., & Hwang, S. (2020). Teachers’ predictions of students’ mathematical thinking related to problem posing. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.005
  • Yemen-Karpuzcu, S., Ulusoy, F., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2017). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ covariational reasoning for interpreting dynamic events during peer interactions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9668-8
  • Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2011). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem-posing abilities. In B. Sriraman & K. H. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics: Advances in creativity and giftedness (pp. 5–28). Sense.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.